[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 145 KB, 1600x767, Untitled_6.max-1600x1600.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595446 No.14595446 [Reply] [Original]

Dev here, let's make something clear about this image. It does NOT represent an integration. Again LINK and its shills are lying to pump their bags.

Let's break it down.

#1. App Engine. What is that? It's a hosting service. It hosts your apps or websites. It's like buying a laptop, leaving it on 24/7 and running your app on it. It can run ANY app out of the box. Just like a computer can run ANY app. There's no integration. It's like if an HP employee bought an HP laptop and installed a Chainlink node on it t demo it. Is that an integration/partnership? No. That's what's going on here.

#2. BigQuery. What is that? It's database as a service. What's a database? It's an app like MS Excel that writes/reads to a file, except it's a lot faster than excel so you can use it to persist data for your apps. Does it need an integration? No, it already works out of the box with any app. It's a public service. As a general rule, like 95% of the time, all databases can work with all apps. Also, databases don't adapt to applications, applications adapt to databases.

Does Google provide any useful data publicly on BigQuery like youtube, maps, search results, etc? No. BigQuery is made so that customers import their own data. Google doesn't use Chainlink. They're just presenting it as a demo for their own customers to use, to SELL it. It's a SALES PITCH for BigQuery. BigQuery has some public datasets, but none of them are Google's data, they are just a few shitty public datasets that people can play with (Like Eth price).

>> No.14595448

>>14595446
#3. Is the tweet to their 1million followers a partnership/integration? No. First of all, they tweet 5 blog posts a day, all of them are sales pitches for their own products. So was that one. Second of all, they post about partnerships and integrations ALL THE TIME. And every single time, they use the words INTEGRATION and PARTNERSHIP in the title of the blog post, and in the tweet itself. Also remember that the words "partner" and "integrate" mean nothing. Twitch has thousands of "partners". I "integrate" google cloud with my apps daily. Those words do NOT mean that Google is using Chainlink to power anything.

Also if you're gonna say "this is fud", "swingtrader", "you had 2 years". How about you address the fucking issue? Oh wait, you're saying this shit cause you got nothing.

>> No.14595463

>>14595446
iExec RLC makes LINK obsolete anyways who cares jump ship and join the real life chads

>> No.14595468

You had 2 fucking years.

Why are you trying to trick our not-so-bright linkies into doing something they'll regret? You know Hell is real right?

>> No.14595478

>>14595446
dev here, let me be clear:
this image depicts an integration

>> No.14595493

Op is right. The price would be $15 otherwise morons

>> No.14595495

>>14595468
>>14595478
kek you linkies are pretty salty. How about you refute with real arguments? Oh wait, you got none.

>> No.14595496

>>14595478
Another Dev here; I concur

>> No.14595505

>tries to patent the word "smart contracts"
Nazarov is a low-key CSW tier scum.

>> No.14595510

Dev here
Sell all your link. Its gonna dip hard

>> No.14595513

>>14595446
im not selling sorry OP, a person hating this much on chainlink is bullish af

>> No.14595523

>>14595446
Actual fucking dev here. Your FUD is psyop tier spread it on Reddit.

>> No.14595534

>>14595446
Dev here (Wizard level unlike OP)

Clearly OP is a huge fag and this is his way of coping. Also you'll never make it.

>> No.14595543
File: 727 KB, 1331x1457, swinglinkers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595543

enough to fool tech illiterate linkies but you fucked up with
>I "integrate" google cloud with my apps daily
retarded false equivalency even brainlets will detect. go back and try again swingie

>> No.14595549

You iexecucks need to give it up already

You're embarrassing yourselves

>> No.14595557

>>14595446
You need to plaster this on reddit. They're actually retarded enough to believe it.

t. developed OP from muh loins

>> No.14595605

>>14595543
I didn't fuck up at all. Everything I said is 100% truth and verifiable.

>> No.14595607

Google is promoting integration of Chainlink and BigQuery, which will help solve the Oracle problem (shortage of oracles).

Google recognizes everyone will be using chainlink to pass data to smart contracts and they are trying to position BigQuery as the off blockchain data source.

How is that not bullish?

>> No.14595610
File: 43 KB, 608x305, 1562232697640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595610

Link was recently downgraded to an erc10 token by vitalik himself

>> No.14595621

>>14595557
There's nothing to believe, those are verifiable facts.

>> No.14595670

>>14595607
>marketcap grows to $4bil based on Google partnership/integration
>turns out it's not actually a partnership/integration
>this is bullish
kek

>> No.14595733

>>14595670
You’ve constructed a straw man as I did not argue the first point.

I said Google recognizes Chainlink may be valuable to their customer base.
That is bullish imo.

You’re saying the blog post is meaningless and not indicative of Chainlinks usefulness or value.

>> No.14595757

>>14595607
>(shortage of oracles)
already solved by iExec
PoCo doesn't required KYC nodes like link does

>> No.14595785

>>14595733
Well you're obviously too stupid to understand my point, let me explain.

Chainlink is OVERPRICED. It grew to $4 bil market cap based on pseudo partnerships.

Are their collabs with Swift/Google/Oracle worth something?
Sure.
Are they partnerships/integrations?
No.
Are they worth $4bil market cap?
No.

>> No.14595812
File: 39 KB, 421x441, 1562300746060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595812

dev here, IM NEVER FUCKING SELLING

>> No.14595827

>>14595605
>integrating GCP into my hobby projects is the same as B2B integration within the cloud platform's infrastructure
>i didn't fuck up
choose one retard

>> No.14595858

>>14595785
This $5.00 is the top for the foreseeable future.

>> No.14595875

>>14595785
>are they worth $4bil market cap?
What is market cap?

>> No.14595886

>>14595827
kek, how low IQ are you? An employee of Google "integrating" Chainlink on his one $20 App Engine instance is what retarded linkies consider an "integration".

It's not an integration, it's just one guy installing Chainlink on one server.

Is this all you got kek? The price is really about to go to 0 if that's the strongest argument you retard can come up with.

>> No.14595907

>>14595785
Uber is valued at 120 billion usd on speculation alone, your point is?

>> No.14595946

>>14595907

holy fuck, you guys are just BTFO of your own arguments because you're so dumb kek

uber has 40mil users, 16000 employees. worth $120bil
chainlink has maybe 100 users, 10 employees. worth $4bil

Do the math

>> No.14595957

>>14595886
>an employee and his $20 App Engine instance
except that's not what happened. keep up with the absolute COPE you weak handed faggot hahahaahah

>> No.14595961

>>14595957
No. It IS literally what happened. I use Google Cloud daily. You simply don't know what Google Cloud is or how it works.

Or are you lying to pump your pathetic bags?

>> No.14595974

>>14595946
Lol the business models are so different talking about these numbers is apples and regarded oranges.

>> No.14595985
File: 24 KB, 317x432, B5C2BB7E-F613-4CB5-BBDF-85249A7DD4A6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595985

>>14595946
You are just a dev, you work for dumb people, as a matter of fact I can make you work for me, you know why? Because I have money, you know how I made this money? By mining bitcoin when everyone said it was a scam. You know how I made even more money? By buying chainlink at 10 cents when everyone said it was a scam and overvalued. Now come again, what are you? You are nothing, just a shitty ass dev with no idea how the world of finance works. Your uber analogy proofs that point, fucking wagecuck

>> No.14596008

>>14595961
>trying to tell an SRE how cloud platforms work
you picked the wrong one kek. what do you do with gcp on a daily basis? i want the next chapter of your bedtime story

>> No.14596014

>>14595974
cope, show me one big client using Chainlink in production (with proof of the app, not fake eth txs)
>>14595985
wow you have no arguments except personal attacks! That's really bullish for Chainlink!

>> No.14596019

>>14595785
The collaborations are all helping to build the oracle network. It’s with this network of oracles that chainlink ushers in world domination. You can’t know future growth so can’t say that it's overvalued. Blockchain use is being explored by every industry. Chainlink might be undervalued if smartcontracts take over.

You are witnessing the brick laying and saying it’s overvalued because the house isn’t built yet.

>> No.14596037

>>14595495
I'm also a dev and I think this also means an integration. My dev knowledge also tells me that the OP has programmed a large amount of cope into his posting, and every response he writes is a function call begging for cheap bags.

No, Ranjesh. No.

>> No.14596047

>>14596014
Do I need arguments? On what basis does a financial illiterate dev thinks he is to judge the value of a company. You think computer science equals investment banking? You are just a shitty dev, there are an abundance of those, you know nothing. You are shit. Fucking wagecuck

>> No.14596064

>>14596008
if you work in tech and got fooled by that blog post as an integration, well you are a retard. Not every engineer knows enough about Ethereum and Google Cloud to actually understand it's not.

>> No.14596074
File: 152 KB, 1600x767, google cloud chainlink node.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14596074

>>14595446
>dat pic
Holy shit, Google Cloud are actually running a Chainlink node...
I had no idea the integration was this deep.

Thanks for awaring me, OP!

>> No.14596082

>>14596047
wow another great argument. So bullish for Chainlink!

You have no arguments. You're just some angry brainlet who can't defend his own investments with facts and logic, because he doesn't even understand the tech he's investing in.

>> No.14596093

>>14596082
You are too dumb to understand that your job is to check for bugs in code. Let the finance people do the valuation, you are not capable enough to sit in that room. Fucking wagecuck.

>> No.14596121

to see the full potential of link you need to get your ducks in a row.
Check honkhonkler.com to understand, basically, what is already possible with oracles, at a foundational level.
Expand your thinking into deeper Structure and Keys.

>> No.14596407

>>14595446
>>14595448
I appreciate the attempt but you can’t fud google. The fact we’re even discussing the depth of google’s involvement with chainlink is bullish af. Sorry anon but we all had two years.

>> No.14596447

Linkies are so fucking stupid it's painful. None of you guys have even remotely attempted to refute a single thing OP said.

>> No.14596596

>>14596447
I have no idea what OP is blabbering about (for instance his point about the app engine just turns into "i-it was just an employee!" and actually has nothing to do with app engine) but I am glad he made me take a deeper look at that Google Cloud schematic, making me find this: >>14596074

>> No.14596698

>>14595907
Uber has profit, nigger.

>> No.14596709

>>14595985
>mined Bitcoin before it was cool
>buys into a premine shittoken

>> No.14596714

>>14596698
uber has revenue not profit.
"[Uber's] losses before taxes, depreciation and other expenses were $1.8 billion, an improvement over the $2.2 billion loss posted in 2017."

>> No.14596798

>>14596714
How the fuck do these people stay in business?

>> No.14596821

>>14596798
venture capitalist money

they're relying on a bunch of stuff happening to become profitable in the next 5 years iirc, like self-driving cars and shit

>> No.14596834

>>14596798
national awareness and mass real world usage goes along way, people strongly believe in the project and for good reason. Its only a matter of a few years before they start to break even.

>> No.14596914

>>14596082
You seem really angry about link. You may wish to consider putting that super smart dev brain of yours to use and trying to learn how to filter link out, since this is totally just a scam coin that you aren't emotionally invested in at all.

>> No.14597918

>>14595961
>No. It IS literally what happened.
There it is. Schizo dev is back to tell us all about his delusions that he made up on the spot and now believes in as facts.

>> No.14598872

bump, I want more salty linkies to see this

>> No.14598913

>>14598872
I'm not salty about having ten times as much money as I did a year ago.

>> No.14598917

>>14595446
>Dev here
stopped reading

>> No.14598927

I don't care if chainlink works. It has enough hype that the price is going to rise regardless.

>> No.14598929
File: 82 KB, 400x350, chain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14598929

>>14595446


Attention dear (((market maker))), I have an annoucement to make:

*AHEM....*

I

AM

NEVER

FUCKING

SELLING

&

MY

LINKIES

STAY

SUPER

STINKY

IN

COLD

STORAGE

>> No.14598956

>>14595446
>Dev here
Hi, I'm a Wendys chef and I make 50K a year

>> No.14598976

>>14595446
>whats the cloud? a laptop
>whats BigQuerty? a database
>whats chainlink? a scam

0 effort

>> No.14598994

>>14598929
100% BASED & LINK PILLED

>> No.14599037

>>14595446
I'm a tcp ip developer myself, the asynchronous link modules don't even operate in the Google engine, basically link btfo

>> No.14599067
File: 86 KB, 923x713, 1561819595577.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14599067

>>14599037


Attention dear (((market maker))), I have an announcement to make:

*AHEM....*

I

AM

NEVER

FUCKING

SELLING

&

MY

LINKIES

STAY

SUPER

STINKY

IN

COLD

STORAGE

>> No.14599418

>>14595446
Test

>> No.14599441

>>14595446
>dev here..
Dumb pasta, but even then any fucking degenerate mongoloid can call themselves a dev these days...

>> No.14599634

>>14595446
"remember the words 'partner' and 'integrate' mean nothing."

Well by that logic the words used in your whole post mean nothing. You sound like a communist "SJW" parsing the definitions of Marxism vs. Leninism and what is or is not "real communism."

What's important about the Google post is that Google mentioned Chainlink at all. They add a degree of legitimacy to the project. Now go be a gag somewhere else.