Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

If you can see this message, the SSL certificate expiration has been fixed.
Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 6 KB, 400x400, analysis-of-request-network-decentralized-network-for-payment-requests.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14547645 No.14547645 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Remember when biz fudded this to death?

>> No.14547662

i remember buying 15k usd at 15 cents and selling at a dollar

>> No.14547672

>>14547645
Remember when you could've cashed this in to Link about 1:1?

>> No.14547733

>>14547672

YES. I remember when everyone on biz was like Req and Link are bros! Right beside each other on CMC. So glad I picked the non retarded sibling.

>> No.14547736

>>14547672
Yep! Also (and I'm sure this ratio was more pronounced at one time) I remember One ICX got anout 6.5 Link on the way down. Didn't do it though! Idid get two Link for each AMB though - so, some wins and some losses!

>> No.14547789

>>14547733
same... this should be some kind of code so that those of us who were around that time can identify one another

>> No.14547799

member when req was 2x link?
i member

>> No.14547828

>>14547733
Yes I remember, there was a lot of advocating for have 50/50 LINK and REQ stacks and how the two projects “needed each other”.

Luckily I stayed all in LINK for the memes.

>> No.14547841

>>14547662
Real Chad right here

>> No.14547883
File: 139 KB, 1000x750, rb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14547883

>>14547645
weird and creepy

>> No.14547934
File: 368 KB, 1121x504, Q2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14547934

>>14547883
ah the memories

>> No.14547968
File: 71 KB, 702x395, reqt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14547968

>>14547934
>BIG PLANS

>> No.14547975

They even hit all roadmap goals until mainnet then everything went downhill. everything was fucked
mozzarella bitches

>> No.14547995

>you could've put 10k in LINK or in REQ
>choices were made
>some brothers did not make it

remember that for every LINK general is a ruined REQ investor

>> No.14548022

>>14547975
what exactly happened with the mozzarella thing; i was off biz after the crash

>> No.14548066
File: 317 KB, 1342x844, 1 X33Ts1C0Xny-1jEyEAn-dw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14548066

>>14548022
Price was tanking and they stopped hitting goals. Really late on goals and kept pushing things back and not updating the community. Then they made an update about how they were eating at a fancy ass restaurant eating mozzarella
https://blog.request.network/request-network-project-update-july-24th-2018-community-manager-special-ethex-listing-e3fc9633726f

>> No.14548125
File: 2.75 MB, 1200x1600, 1_4UKs2himMgbotvXEftWj2Q.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14548125

>>14548066
bahahahahahah
the sad part is that the req team has been living like this everyday for almost 2 years now and they still have around $20m left

>> No.14548139

>>14548125
feelsbadman

>> No.14548151

bought 1eth worth of req just now in honor of the amazing partnership with pwc france. i assume that's on the verge of bearing fruit by now

>> No.14548189

>>14548151
thats over

>> No.14548195

>>14547645
I REQUEST MY MONEY BACK

>> No.14548274

>>14548151
How is wiki panning out?

>> No.14548306

>>14547645
complete and utter SCAM. get out now before the remainder of the team’s tokens are released in Sept.-Oct.

>> No.14549041

>>14547662
>Lost $14,999 off of one coin
Damn someone got Reqt

>> No.14549395

>>14549041

I traded 35,000 Links for 70,000 req tokens so I LOST BIG

>> No.14549451

>>14547645
This and XLM. Absolute garbage

>> No.14550675

>>14547828
Yeah, I fell for it but actually managed to exit REQ just before the dump. Dodged a bullet there.

>> No.14550932

I lost around $25k worth of btc on this shit
the founders dont even show up for work or reply to their emails
was a scam from day 1

>> No.14552116

>>14547645
All the fud turned out to be true.

>> No.14552153

B A G U E T T E D

>> No.14552223

I don't remember prices, but I remember LINK and REQ battling like some DBZ shit in the 120's on coinmarketcap to overtake the other.

>> No.14552409

I did a nice DCA on REQ, the amount of gains I'm going to make on this shitcoin is going to be glorious and /biz doesn't even know. The fundamentals are there, just learn to be patient you bunch of fuckwits.

t. bought 15k link at 0.20$ chad.

>> No.14552465

These REQ threads are making me super salty since it feels like pouring salt on my wound. I trusted in the team, and defended their processes and credentials. Best part is everyone used to refer to them as "professional" back in the day. I went 50/50 between it and REQ. Specifically, 100k Req vs 100k Link when they were 1:1.

But then, they literally started over from scratch to do V2. I honestly don't have a problem with that, it admits they made a mistake and clearly have intentions to fix it instead of building kaka that nobody wants or that is severely flawed. You always invest in the team, since the product will always have to adapt and change. They also still have a majority of their ICO capital from responsible spending.

But fuck the team, they have delivered disappointment after disappointment as I watch this shitcoin go to 0. They are horrible communicators, they are slow in development versus other projects, they are not showing much from a biz dev standpoint either. It's how they conducted themselves, and how they have shown very little in the past year to push the product forward. They have cute updates every now and then, but where the fuck is the adoption? Their roadmap was a joke, and the main thing everyone cared for was REQ for FIAT. They still have not completed it, nor do I believe the ever will. I will forever be REQT. Still holding onto my tokens, since fuck it at this point, Im just gonna roll the dice in the off chance they get it together. But their biggest hurdles besides all the above, will be to convince the community that they are serious and can be trusted again

>> No.14552480

>>14548022
I open the fridge. The smell of mozzarella slowly crawls up to my nostrils. I freeze up. Terrifying thoughts begin to emerge from my subconsciousness as the mozzarella engulfs me. I cannot take it anymore. The flashbacks make me have a seizure. I fall towards the floor but remain unscrached as I hit a soft cheesy texture instead. Entire room is now filled with this moist Italian culinary disaster. I begin to suffocate and in desperation utter my last words "I REQUEST MY MONEY BACK".

>> No.14552539

I bought 70k REQ when it was 22 cents(after $1) thinking it was a steal. Swung traded to 91k REQ but dumped for 832 link before the pump to $4.50, right before 2 dollars. The fucked up part is I could have had 11k link last October when REQ pumped to 1160sats. This shit genuinely depressed me hard in 2018. Now I'm throwing $500 on link per week

>> No.14552608

Backed by Y Combinator who will be shoving this down the throats of everybody in Silicon Valley.

>> No.14553527

>>14552608
Very aggressive there

>> No.14553609

>>14552608
>>14553527
This. Everyone get ready for ycombinator to fuck all our moms and sisters

>> No.14554867

AHHHHHHHHHHH MY REQUESTIESSSSSSSSSSS

>> No.14554952
File: 165 KB, 383x668, reqnew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14554952

i'm broken, boys

>> No.14555887

>>14548066
VIDT team has a photo of them drinking on the whitepaper...

>> No.14555915

>>14547662

I remember buying close to $100,000 worth in February 2018 and selling in October for $6,000.

>> No.14555991

>>14553527
Hello oldfag.

>> No.14556027
File: 227 KB, 1600x1066, 1_wP2JmLOkTgHhh1tTuO2I1w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14556027

>>14548151
>bought 1eth worth of req just now in honor of the amazing partnership with pwc france. i assume that's on the verge of bearing fruit by now


Lmao, It's PwC French Africa, and the partnership was some sort of marketing ploy, and recently PwC (the main one) published an article in how they don't see any use for Blockchain in their products.

Lmao, REQT

>> No.14556058
File: 118 KB, 1024x853, 1516906059004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14556058

>>14552409
>The fundamentals are there

>REQ

>Fundamentals

So between no working product, no clients and the devs not even showing up to work, do you see "fundamentals"?

>> No.14556093
File: 27 KB, 747x601, 1 cv0wzxykTkH9wFg6gVcMZQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14556093

How do you go from this

>> No.14556116
File: 2 KB, 225x225, índice.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14556116

>>14556093
to this

>> No.14556207

>>14552465
Cant trust the French. Their hubris makes for shitty code.

>> No.14556255

>>14556093
>>14556116

With 30 million dollars.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action