LP

[Anonymous No.14217429]

You do own a share, right?

[Anonymous No.14217443]

>>14217429
yup

[Anonymous No.14217475]

>>14217429
it actually really hard to believe that people are selling so low. 1LP share could generate an annual income of $30-90K and people are selling for 13.5K. one just wonders why

[Anonymous No.14217503]

>>14217429

No, anyone can spin up this shit with brainlet knowledge of cloudformation or terraform. Linkpool holders are going to get wrecked so bad it'll be hilarious, your money is better off in LINK

[Anonymous No.14217508]

I own 22 anon :)

[Anonymous No.14217588]

4.56 LP here. Ready to make it

[Anonymous No.14217605]

if link becomes so valuable over time cant anyone run a node and basically do the same thing?

[Anonymous No.14217610]

THE FUCKING US GOVERNMENT WON'T LET ME BUY IT

[Anonymous No.14217626]

>>14217475
>people are selling for 13.5K.
>one just wonders why

[Anonymous No.14217635]

>>14217610
>WON'T LET ME BUY IT
the absolute state of amerikkka
being told what you're allowed to do with your hard earned cash

[Anonymous No.14217640]

It's amazing how generous you guys are to shill something so lucrative. Such lovely anons to just hand out tickets to making it, I'm definitely going to sell thousands of LINK to buy something that you all bought for a couple of hundred bucks. Definitely no scam here at all. Just super generous anons handing out free money.

[Anonymous No.14217654]

>>14217640
Kek
Stay poor

>>14217635
Its for your own safety citizen

[Anonymous No.14217671]

How much is 0.5 worth now? i own that but too lazy to check.

[Anonymous No.14217680]

>>14217640
>I'm definitely going to sell thousands of LINK to buy something that you all bought for a couple of hundred bucks.
>he's too poor to have any kind of cash holdings
>he assumes you have to sell your link to buy LP shares
anon...i...

[Anonymous No.14217713]

>>14217680
I'm just saying it's so incredibly kind for you guys to see a money printing machine like LP and, instead of hoarding it for yourself, to so generously sell it to other anons even though you know it will make the other anons way more money. What kind people, what generous people. The LP crowd are real altruists it makes me so happy.

[Anonymous No.14217728]

>>14217713
>so generously sell it to other anons
implying we're the ones doing the selling
I ain't selling anything, why would I?
bi-weekly dividend payouts
>t. one of the original 186

[Anonymous No.14217794]

>>14217728
It will be fun when the network gets going with real volume

[Anonymous No.14217825]

>>14217728
i remember this fucking "infographic"
Yeah a 15 ETH deposit will earn you a million dollars lmao. holy fucking kek

[Anonymous No.14217850]

>>14217825
>Yeah a 15 ETH deposit will earn you a million dollars lmao. holy fucking kek
>he doesn't get it
>should we tell him?
nah...

[Anonymous No.14217868]

>>14217605
I tried DYOR but its a little over my head, why buy LP shares if I can start running a node/staking my link/whatever it is you do once it becomes more valuable?

[Anonymous No.14217889]

I only have 0.04, but they did deposit me like 0.001 link or something the other day for free so def planing on getting some more lp

[Anonymous No.14217890]

>>14217868
You have some archives to dig through fren
This was talked out in detail for months

[Anonymous No.14217897]

>>14217868
You get slice of everything lp earns. From every node

[Anonymous No.14217902]

>>14217850
Imagine knowing something generates a million dollars for every 15 ETH you put in and still shilling it to other anons. How fucking altruistic could you be. I mean that's literally giving away millions, how unbelievably kind.

[Anonymous No.14217907]

>>14217429
5.6 shares here
20k link

[Anonymous No.14217914]

>>14217429
reminder that these threads are made by people with open orders on the dex tryingto get you to fomo in

don't do it. the price is high now because there aren't any competitiors yet, even tho LP won't be live for a year. Just wait and buy the next crowdsale

[Anonymous No.14217924]

>>14217902
>How fucking altruistic could you be
my ducks are in a row
are yours?
>if you know, you know
https://youtu.be/UH0mzTPxKHc

[Anonymous No.14217931]

>>14217680
you do realize you just said the same thing right? or is your IQ below 90?

in case you are just retarded try to answer this, if i ever had cash holdings available for investment, why the everloving fuck would i buy your bags instead of a link stack?
i presume you can't answer, that task must be beyond the IQ scope of LP holders

[Anonymous No.14217933]

>>14217914
Are you seriously suggesting that the product that gives you priority staking of 800 LINK at launch while there is no network volume is NOT worth 20 ETH per share? HOW DARE YOU!

[Anonymous No.14217950]

>>14217914
>don't do it. the price is high now
anon...i...i have some really bad news for you

>>14217931
>why the everloving fuck would i buy your bags instead of a link stack?
you're right, you shouldn't buy any LP shares

[Anonymous No.14217970]

>>14217890
>>14217897
isn't there a first come first serve system for payouts or something?

[Anonymous No.14217983]

>>14217914
Yes, go buy CLCG , lol

Imagine not listening to months or even years of LP shilling

[Anonymous No.14217998]

>>14217970
Not for payouts, just for early staking

[Anonymous No.14218026]

>>14217429
lp holders are easily the worst marines we could be cursed with
im usually kind to my fellow bros but im really looking forward to their collective suicide

[Anonymous No.14218088]

>>14217868
Run it then :*

[Anonymous No.14218097]

>>14218026
Falling off my yacht wont be ruled a suicide, anon
Boating accident at best

[Anonymous No.14218109]

5% INTEREST PER MONTH
MY WIFE STILL DOESN'T BELIEVE ME

[Anonymous No.14218184]

>>14218109
Ive already begun being paid in cryptographic tokens distributed by smart contracts, for my investment in a technology company offering nodes as a sevice to the industry standard decentralized oracle project

How are you doing in the new digital economy, anon? Dipped the toes yet? Or still manually trading shitcoins on exchanges like a neanderthal

[Anonymous No.14218204]

>>14218088
im from america so ill probably get dicked on if i go for it

[Anonymous No.14218230]

>>14217983
actaully i bought the crowdsale faggot

but what i said is true. I'm not making threads about this shit because I'm not fucking selling. the anon saying 'make sure you're buying' obviously has open orders. Personally I wouldn't sell for less than 1000

[Anonymous No.14218260]

>>14218184
*sniff sniff*
yep that's curry

[Anonymous No.14218277]

What was the eth/lp ratio on crowdsale?

[Anonymous No.14218278]

>>14218260
Stay salty, faggot

[Anonymous No.14218292]

>>14218277
1:1
1000 shares for sale
Only 700 sold
So the remainder was split between contributors

[Anonymous No.14218309]

>>14218184
>Ive already begun being paid in cryptographic tokens distributed by smart contracts, for my investment in a technology company offering nodes as a sevice to the industry standard decentralized oracle project
>How are you doing in the new digital economy, anon? Dipped the toes yet? Or still manually trading shitcoins on exchanges like a neanderthal
^this guy fucks

[Anonymous No.14218340]

>>14218292
Ok. I bought 0,44 from dex around year ago.
eth was cheap back then and one lp cost around 7-8 eth. Pretty good i guess
Should have bought more though.

[Anonymous No.14218342]

>>14217654
>Its for your own safety citizen
you are free to do as you are told

[Anonymous No.14218380]

>>14217429
No, should I?

[Anonymous No.14218385]

>>14217429
what an absolute scam, it's like those shitcoin comparisons that claim 1M tps for an unreleased network.
Providing data costs ~zero, which means revenues are going to be ~zero too.

[Anonymous No.14218425]

>>14218385
>Mowing lawns costs zero so no one will pay to have someone mow their lawn
Doesnt cost zero btw
Also, an anon made the graphic, not the LP team

[Anonymous No.14218455]

>>14218425
>so no one will pay to have someone mow their lawn
I didn't claim nobody is going to use oracles, just that total revenues are going to be minuscule. If you have to manipulate the argument in that way it only shows how weak your position is.
>Doesnt cost zero btw
you only need a <10W arm and an internet connection.

[Anonymous No.14218501]

WHAT THE HELL IS LINKPOOL?

[Anonymous No.14218603]

>>14218455
>you only need a <10W arm and an internet connection.
well there you go, you cracked the code, LP are wrong
guess Jonny and co just lost their way somewhere

[Anonymous No.14218607]

>>14217429
How do I, as a burger obtain LP shares? And how much is it to make it? I have 9K Linkies

[Anonymous No.14218749]

>>14218501
>WHAT THE HELL IS LINKPOOL?
bruh...do you even g00gle or what?
https://www.linkpool.io/

[Anonymous No.14218766]

>>14218455
>just that total revenues are going to be minuscule
anon...i...i have some bad news for you
https://medium.com/linkpool/linkpool-the-first-network-of-chainlink-nodes-backed-by-a-smart-contract-9dc34593c4d

[Anonymous No.14218878]

>>14218766
You can't resell data from paid sources, _exactly_ because of this. If you could, one entity would undercut the original provider and sell their data to everyone cheaply and the provider would only get one customer. That's why it's forbidden in terms and conditions.
The fact they use this as an argument only proves that it was designed from the start as a scam. The use case literally doesn't exist.

[Anonymous No.14218956]

>>14218878
>staking
>NaaS
>marketplace
>eth will be going to staking on linkpool node
by all means, look into this project with a very critical eye and try to poke holes in their business model
if you do your due diligence you will realize that even though the prices may seem high now, they are still low if you /zoom out/

[Anonymous No.14218968]

>>14218878
Wow. You really don't know what is coming, do you

[Anonymous No.14219046]

>>14218878
absolutely based brainlet and these niggas don't even get the irony

[Anonymous No.14219069]

Where can I buy this LP

[Anonymous No.14219118]

>>14217429
>stinktards actually believe they bought into a 40% roi magic money box


FUCKING lol

[Anonymous No.14219144]

>>14218956
>by all means, look into this project with a very critical eye and try to poke holes in their business model
I did, you didn't actually answer anything, just asserted it's good. Show me a paid data provider that's okay with reselling. I looked into sport results data providers and didn't find a single one.

As for infrastructure, nodes in people's homes are much safer than EC2. EC2 regions rarely go down but they do, if everyone uses them it means the whole network goes offline at once.
You're actually hurting the network if you use the cloud, not to mention it's much more expensive for small bandwidth use cases, even up to 100x. Get a battery that lasts several hours, two internet connections (lte+wired) and you easily have ~100% up time unless there's a region wide catastrophe or someone physically steals your node

[Anonymous No.14219391]

>>14219144
> I looked into sport results data providers and didn't find a single one.
I'm actually curious. Can you provide some examples of such ToS and the exact wording they use to prohibit data resell.

[Anonymous No.14219407]

>>14217429
This graphic assumes each LINK is worth $1000 doesn't it? So that "$5400" revenue per month actually means 5 LINK per month, which is about $9.15 per month at today's price

[Anonymous No.14219434]

>>14219407
No, no and no

[Anonymous No.14219458]

>>14219434
Explain the $ figures in the graphic then. How do they arrive at those numbers? Not FUDing, I hold LINK

[Anonymous No.14219512]

>>14219144
>You're actually hurting the network if you use the cloud
>>14219144
>if everyone uses them it means the whole network goes offline at once.

it won't be a problem, if you looked into LP you would know that they will not be taking a big enough of portion of the LINK network to justify your concern
you're acting as if it is a mutually exclusive decision and that you can only have LP staking OR your own staking
I will be doing both

[Anonymous No.14219639]

bump. Explain the money figures in the graphic

[Anonymous No.14219742]

Its a percentage of profits given to share holders, are you a fucking retard? Can you not read a graph?

[Anonymous No.14219782]

>>14219639
spoonfeed me i'm too dumb to read a graph

[Anonymous No.14219913]

>>14217429
Yeah dude. So now I pay you fags 25ETH and then I will be making 2 million monthly. I'm like all in dude.

[Anonymous No.14219914]

Do you retards seriously believe you can input 10 ETH now and get $10,800/month in return? Jesus christ the state of this board

[Anonymous No.14220207]

>>14219914
If they get those figures on the left side of their graph, then yes brainlet

[Anonymous No.14220245]

>>14219914
this. even bitconnect got balls to pull this off

hey hey heyyyyy

[Anonymous No.14220389]

>>14217640
I will admit I would have a much harder time buying now than at 15 ETH, but I also must admit I'm a literal genius and couldn't sleep on it at that price.

[Anonymous No.14220431]

>>14217429
went offgrid hunting in wyoming came back with gains such a comfy life

[Anonymous No.14220702]

>>14220431
So what'd you personally get? Like 4 or 5 LINK per day?

[Anonymous No.14220920]

>>14219391
>Reselling of the data without approval of sportmonks.com is in no way allowed.
https://www.sportmonks.com/terms#terms_of_use

[Anonymous No.14220991]

>>14220702
No.

[Anonymous No.14221266]

>>14217475
Yeah, hard to understand. The people selling right now fail to understand that Linkpool will become so much more than "just" the largest Chainlink staking pool:

- Node as a Service, fix fee paid in $
- Chainlink marketplace for node operators and data requesters, also generates revenue for LP
- Improved DEX with more pairs, even more revenue for LP
- ETH staking in the future when 2.0 goes live

Based on total marketcap Linkpool would rank at ~150 on CMC, but it easily deserves a top 100 or even top 50 place.
Not buying a piece of the Linkpool ecosystem is brainlet tier.

[Anonymous No.14221284]

>>14219914
>Do you retards seriously believe you can input 10 ETH now and get $10,800/month in return? Jesus christ the state of this board
anon...i...i have some bad news for you

[Anonymous No.14221354]

>>14220702
0.002

[Anonymous No.14221355]

>>14221266
>Not buying a piece of the Linkpool ecosystem is brainlet tier.

look at this absolute retard here
>>14219914
>Do you retards seriously believe you can input 10 ETH now and get $10,800/month in return?

poor smoothbrain can't /zoom out/ in time with his mind's eye and so keeps his brain on the

[Anonymous No.14221376]

>>14217475
>>14221266
I think you do just fine by owning only link.

[Anonymous No.14221378]

>>14221355
so keeps his brain in the mud**

[Anonymous No.14221433]

>>14219118
Cope

[Anonymous No.14221551]

Can i move to Canada & do it?
t.burger

[Anonymous No.14221618]

Imagine thinking this revenue table was even close to accurate. This is how I know link is a scam. Going fucking kek

[Anonymous No.14221634]

>>14221618
The SEC should crack down on this obvious ponzi they can’t deliver on the promise of these revenues and scamming people into thinking they will be rich

[Anonymous No.14221727]

>>14221634
>sec
shoo shoo burgerboi muhland of d free

[Anonymous No.14221784]

>>14221634
Americans are specifically banned from buying. How would the SEC crack down on a british company with European and Canadian buyers? Dumbass.

[Anonymous No.14221865]

It's overvalued atm. LP revenue will NOT be worth more than 10% of the total future marketcap of chainlink. It is better to hold LINK at these prices. I might buy if it drops by 4 times or so.

The only reason to buy any LP at these prices is if you want to priority stake with LP, and buy the minimum amount of LP for that.

[Anonymous No.14221921]

>>14221634
>The SEC should crack down on this obvious ponzi
>t. bootlicker

>>14221727
>shoo shoo burgerboi muhland of d free
>>14221784
>Americans are specifically banned from buying
AmeriKKKans are ZOGed to fuck, they don't know up from down
>LAND OF THE FREE TO DO AS YOU'RE TOLD!
>>14217635
>their faces when

[Anonymous No.14221938]

>>14221921
>AmeriKKKans are ZOGed to fuck

>AmeriKKKa (aka the GAY DISCO)

[Anonymous No.14221955]

>>14221938
>AmeriKKKans are ZOGed to fuck
>AmeriKKKa (aka the GAY DISCO)
>mfw

[Anonymous No.14222041]

< this is how you retards look right now. Imagine believing you'll get ROI anywhere near OPs pic. And I say this as a link holder

[Anonymous No.14222156]

pic related is how you retards look right now. You'll be getting 0.1-1% ROI by LP team's own "optimistic" estimates

[Anonymous No.14222215]

>>14222041
Obviously, anyone w1th a brain kn0ws that a milli0n in revenue per month is still ridiculously far 0ff.

Eventually tho, you do agree that decentralised
Oracles do have the potential to become huge,
Yes?

[Anonymous No.14222519]

>>14222215
Well yeah, as I said I'm a LINK hodler. I'm not staking 10000 stinkies to get 7 in return though after LP takes their 30% of my reward. Even if LINK hits $100 you'd be staking $1,000,000 worth of link to get back $700/month lmao.

[Anonymous No.14222839]

>>14222519
You dont know how linkpool works.

[Anonymous No.14222866]

Can anyone with LP tell me how much they made from the last distribution compared to how much LP they have?? Want to get an idea before I dump my cash into this ponzi.

[Anonymous No.14222998]

>>14222839
pic is from linkpool's own medium post. 0.1%-1% is "optimistic". Sounds like you're the one who doesn't know how linkpool works

[Anonymous No.14223044]

>>14222998
yeah whats 0.01 of one million dumbass. Ill do the math for you brainlet, its 10k a month not 700 like your example

[Anonymous No.14223052]

>>14222998
Thats initial, will increase over time when network usage increases

[Anonymous No.14223193]

>>14222866
bump for knowledge.

[Anonymous No.14223204]

>>14218309
>>14218184
Topkek

[Anonymous No.14223238]

>>14222866
i think it came out to 1.5-2 Link. just memory cant see rewards where i am now

[Anonymous No.14223252]

>>14223238
per LP I assume?

[Anonymous No.14223258]

>>14222866
1.12 LP

[Anonymous No.14223298]

>>14223252
yea i remebr the first distribution was for about .65Link and then there was another one on sunday that was supposed to be for more i just havent chacked the exact figure. There really isnt much for them to pay out right now. Im more excited about the returns when they start staking since the price is still relatively low.

[Anonymous No.14223309]

>>14223044
Actually dumbass, it would be 0.01 - 0.003 because LP takes 30% which would only be $7000 but that's extremely fucking optimistic even by their own words. You're a brainlet and used the highest "optimistic" ROI they listed to get to that 10k figure and forgot to even deduct their fee. The lower end of the "0.01%-1%" they hope for would be 0.001 - 0.0003 = 0.0007 or $700 fucking dollars for $1M staked, which is exactly what I said, and even THAT measly sum hinges on the hopium of LINK still doing a x100 from here

[Anonymous No.14223324]

>>14223258
>>14223298
so around 12k for 2-4 dollars bi weekly

[Anonymous No.14223362]

>>14223324
yup making them mad gains son. were just getting started

[Anonymous No.14223370]

>>14222866
>>14223193
You can calculate it pretty easily.

Amount of links in a payout/4000LPShares (3000 for LP, 1000 public) = amount of link per LPShare

E.g. the most recent payout was around 1600 links /4000LPS= 0.40Link per share

[Anonymous No.14223397]

>>14223370
Keep in mind this is only valid for LPS payouts, NOT staking as that function isn't even live yet.

[Anonymous No.14223422]

here is the math brainlets, assuming an 83M monthly revenue and a 1 ETH buyin. LP takes 25% from the stakers to distribute to the investors and owners. 83M divided by 4 is the LP cut. The owners take 75% of the above 25% (leaving 6.25% to the ICO buyers. This 6.25% of revenue is divided by 700 (the total amount raised and assuming bought in with 1 ETH). This number is multiplied by 12 to get an annual return on one share.

(83M/(4*4*700)) * 12

[Anonymous No.14223445]

>>14223309
Obviously I did not count in their fees. but outside of that I was correct using YOUR example of 100 dollar per link and an optimistic view point brainlet. You are not wrong though, just a negative faggot.

[Anonymous No.14223456]

>>14222866
C-checked

[Anonymous No.14223459]

>>14217914
People like to shill LP because it generates Dex volume fees in LINK that later get distributed among shareholders. Only a few lp flippers are selling

[Anonymous No.14223479]

>>14223397
So do you think it would be worth it to just wait for staking in terms of ROI?

[Anonymous No.14223574]

(83M/(4*4*700)) * 12 is only valid for the ICO. the monthly amount per 1 LP = monthy revenue / (4*4*1000)

[Anonymous No.14223603]

>>14218878
Did you notice how Kaleido became a node operator AND a data provider? That's the entire point of managed nodes. Also, as CLC, Linkpool has a team of people reaching out and making private deals with data providers to create the market place. Linkpool is going to be enormous

[Anonymous No.14223690]

>>14217924

that video is AIDs

[Anonymous No.14223694]

>>14223479
Tbh there's quite a few benefits to owning LPS. One of the biggest in my opinion is that people seem to forget about reputation. As linkpool is already on mainnet, they'll instantly be skyrocketed to the top of every list whenever reputation finally kicks in. This means their nodes will attract new high value jobs much easier in contrast to newer nodes with less of a track record. This head start combined with the fact that Linkpool has had the time to network with businesses probably since before the ico basically guarantees their succes. As long as chainlink itself succeeds, linkpool will too.

I know I sound like a shill right now but linkpool shares will only rise in value as the chainlink network expands.

In terms of roi right now its obviously not worth it to spend thousands for 0.4 link every 2 weeks.

[Anonymous No.14223699]

>>14219458
Eth on that graphic mean LP shares (it was shared before they announced they were going to distribute the unsold part). The top row is monthly USD revenue of LP, the numbers inside the graphic is yearly revenue according to your LP shares, so
Revenue * 12 * lp shares

[Anonymous No.14223722]

>>14219914
>>14219914
Are you really this fucking stupid? The contribution amount in the chart was when 1 ETH = 1 LP share during the ICO. So the contribution amounts at the top of the chart are equal to LP shares, not how much ETH you could put in now. The Dex has buy orders of over 20 ETH per LP share so in your example it would be 200 ETH contribution for 10 LP shares. Fucking moron

[Anonymous No.14224049]

>>14223722
the contribution amount in the chart is about 1 ETH = 1.4 LP since only about 700 ETH was raised for the 1000 shares

[Anonymous No.14224173]

>>14224049
This is correct.
t.creator

[Anonymous No.14224280]

>>14217429
This is the Bitconnect ROI

[Anonymous No.14224351]

>>14223309
Based

[Anonymous No.14224394]

Niggers If you want sweet roi just get yourself a Stakenet node before they launch the dex

[Anonymous No.14224470]

>>14223309
>$700 fucking dollars for $1M staked, which is exactly what I said, and even THAT measly sum hinges on the hopium of LINK still doing a x100 from here
absolutely based but who the fuck knows what is the truth. everyone is giving different numbers.

but $700 for $1M kek, you'd get more interest from a bank account

[Anonymous No.14224522]

>>14224280
This.

[Anonymous No.14224588]

>>14223445
Well of course I'm fucking negative about a shit-tier investment that will "optimistically" return 1.2% annually being shilled here as "hURr dUrR sTicK uR LinKiEs iN thIS mAgIc bOx sIr rEcieVe $2.2M pEr mOnTh sIr". You'd be better off sticking it in a low risk ETF, that's how shitty your returns are.

[Anonymous No.14224778]

>>14224588
no shit. I never said it was a good investment. My original comment was me attempting to figure that part out and as it progress I realized that the ROI atm is not good but thats where the risk is.

I can tell you are a complete retard, likely underage and high estrogen individual for getting so bent out of shape over others decisions on what they invest in.

[Anonymous No.14224931]

>>14224778
Come on, you started it calling that based anon a dumb ass and you can't even math. And you do not even understand risk if 100x hopium prices will get you ~1% p.a. returns.

Grow a pair and admit that you were wrong like a man.

[Anonymous No.14224999]

>>14217503
/thread

[Anonymous No.14225009]

>>14224931
How can I admit I was wrong truthfully If i wasnt? I already said I missed the fees they take. He was not wrong either though, just taking the opposite side (negative viewpoint). and despite being right, he could still be a dumbass so therefore I conclude I did nothing wrong. However if anon provides me a MENSA certified IQ test and scores above 120 I will admit I was wrong.

[Anonymous No.14225018]

>>14224931
thanks anon, you'll make it someday.

[Anonymous No.14225023]

>>14225018
dumbass

[Anonymous No.14225061]

>>14225009
> won't man up
> missed the fees
> calls factual information "negative" because it disagrees with his hopium-fueled moonboi keyboard diarrhea
> believes MENSA means shit
> admits I'm right but still concludes he did nothing wrong

retard you did literally everything wrong

[Anonymous No.14225128]

>>14225061
kek look at your original comment and picture. You exaggerated the original comment which was we are optimistic of .1-1%. You assumed the negative side of that. I assumed the positive. Neither of us was wrong but only one of us was looking at the investment in an objective view point (me.) You are just butt hurt I called you dumb. After my 10 minute OBJECTIVE observations I can conclude that the ROI is not great and involves a lot of variables that may not come to fruition.

I also wouldnt believe in IQ tests if I scored below 100 dumbass.

[Anonymous No.14225150]

>>14217429
Help me understand this. Isn't revenue shared between 4000 LP? So 1 million bucks in Linkpool revenue would be $250 per LP, not $1000. What am I missing?

[Anonymous No.14225318]

>>14222866
I made 0.06 LINK with 0.24 LP Shares on the distribution before Sunday.

[Anonymous No.14225567]

>>14217671
20 eth.

[Anonymous No.14225595]

>>14217907
mfw all my ducks are in a row
>if you know, you know

[Anonymous No.14225882]

>>14225595

[Anonymous No.14226456]

>>14225150
Anyone?

[Anonymous No.14226573]

>>14226456
1000 in circulation
3000 held by the team members
do you not know how to use etherscan?
https://etherscan.io/token/0x182d4990bb0ff595b308b3efcb93313abad575e7
do you need me to chew the food I'm spoonfeeding you too?

[Anonymous No.14226619]

>>14226573
Just blow it straight up my ass please

[Anonymous No.14226651]

>>14225150
This should read "earnings" as Linkpool generates 25% profit from their revenue. So yes, you are right.
However, as a shareholder you also receive earnings from:
Node as a Service
DEX fees
Marketplace fees
any further revenue streams they come up with. Maybe even a ETH staking pool.

[Anonymous No.14226882]

>>14221634
>>The SEC should
No. I don't own LP, wish I did but it's out of my reach now. I'm gonna hope to get in on whatever the 2nd biggest staking op is. Anybody know yet?

[Anonymous No.14227006]

fucking christ you retards, for every $1000 linkpool takes in (NOT JUST NODES), every share holder gets $0.0625

[Anonymous No.14227044]

>>14227006
So for 1000 staked in the future that is 6 cents for each full share holder?

[Anonymous No.14227113]

>>14227044
LP makes $1000 in revenue from the Link people gave them
LP takes 25% cut, which is $250
Those $250 get distributed among the 4000 Linkpool shares, so each share gets $250/4000 = $0.0625

[Anonymous No.14227198]

>>14227044
no, for each $1000 the company takes in, each LP token earns $0.0625. this is a certainty. no one knows yet how much staking link gets
for each $1000 a node earns, the LP pool takes $250 and the stakers in the node split $750