BSV metanet

[Anonymous No.13889003]

Is all you need

Thread

[Anonymous No.13889028]

>not turing complete despite the PR slogans
>second-layer solutions for butchered loops
pass

[Anonymous No.13889053]

>>13889028
What second layer? Tokenized?

[Anonymous No.13889083]

>>13889028
still immensely better than shitcore
vitaliks garbage can suck dick
stellar waves shitcoins
komodo is a btc dependant piece of waste

[Anonymous No.13889090]

>>13889053
the "oracle" that runs in parallel, a slow, insecure half-assed solution to emulate loops. and even with it, still not turing complete lol

[Anonymous No.13889123]

>>13889003
stop posting pics of mark cuban on here

[Anonymous No.13889740]

>>13889083
Litecoin is winning the hashwar

[Anonymous No.13890290]

>>13889003
nobody needs that garbage

[Anonymous No.13890401]

okay guys i got some time let's discuss this bullshit in a bit of seriousness memeing aside.

here is the question: how is the "metanet" any better than a cloud storeage abstraction layer using multiple providers that retrieves files by hash. both are immutable and neither of them are censorship resistant but one actually scales infinitely only one doesn't consume an ounce of electricity more than necessary the other would consume the power equivalent of a larger country...

why is metanet better? it does the same shit only slower more cumbersome and the end result is the same your data is at a few datacenters that will serve you by http request where they can filter content. why wait 10 minutes then? why waste electrity?

[Anonymous No.13890425]

>>13890401
Bevuase blockchain, you silly anon

[Anonymous No.13890428]

shoo shoo pajeet

[Anonymous No.13890432]

>>13890425
that's a con not a pro

[Anonymous No.13890480]

>>13889028
>its not turning complete because it doesn't compute infinitely, just like every other computer

[Anonymous No.13890498]

>>13890480
actually a finite turing completeness requires it to be able to perform/emulate the instructions of any turing complete language so that's a bust too. alternatively call me back when you have a javasript eval function written in solely bitcoin script!

[Anonymous No.13890502]

>>13890401
It's immutable, decentralized and subject to economic incentives. It's the perfect archive that is impossible to censor because it stores EVERYTHING on the Bitcoin blockchain.

It is also instant due to 0-conf, and it already exists and works, try it out with this simple proof-of-concept service

https://etched.page/

With an example:
https://etched.page/00c7d5a583cca8777148e9f7000b5b0062e5e4dcba3aff6297796532cdd9b486

[Anonymous No.13890510]

>>13890401
>both are immutable
wtf are you talking about?

Anyway with blockchain you only need to do an input once and pay a small fee and its there forever. You also don't have to maintain a database or pay yearly subscriptions or deal with security.

[Anonymous No.13890513]

>>13890502
>It's immutable, decentralized and subject to economic incentives
so are cloud storage providers if you retrieve your data by hash nobody can alter it it's immutable. we don't need all this bitcoin nonsense for that.

[Anonymous No.13890549]

>>13890510
>wtf are you talking about?
i'm talking about how technically all you need for a file to be practically immutable is to hash it. every fucking body and his mother used this simple trick the past 40 years. blockchain is a timestamping (aka transaction ordering in bitcoin) mechanism proof of work is specifically a trustless permissionless timestamping mechanism. it has a purpose it's not fucking immuteable file storeage.

[Anonymous No.13890560]

>>13890510
>Anyway with blockchain you only need to do an input once and pay a small fee and its there forever. You also don't have to maintain a database or pay yearly subscriptions or deal with security.
that's why i said abstraction layer that you can pay in doge coins dollars get some for free whatever.

[Anonymous No.13890571]

>>13890549
Just because you hash something doesn't mean you can have access to it when all your cloudstorage providers get wiped. Also paying multiple providers to store some files for you for years on end is going to be far more expensive and less secure than just using the fucking blockchain.

>>13890560
>abstraction layer that you can pay in doge coins dollars get some for free whatever
Not sure what you're talking about.

Also, we mooning boys!

[Anonymous No.13890594]

>>13890571
>Just because you hash something doesn't mean you can have access to it when all your cloudstorage providers get wiped.
exactly thank you and this is why sv is shit because even it's advocates admit you gonna have to rely on services to retrieve your data nobody will be able to run a full node at home there was insane screeching about how this is a good and desired thing here for months.

>Not sure what you're talking about.
let's call it an api service even a distributed one like a shitcoin for simplicity sake that hides the subscriptions and multiple cloud providers behind that do the redundant storeage.

[Anonymous No.13890607]

>>13890549
It's a database and a time stamp and a processor and a cache. Stop thinking about the blockchain exclusively and instead all the operations miners do as a giant super computer you can piggy back on with a pay per use model. No one needs a computer then anymore.

[Anonymous No.13890617]

>>13890594
>nobody will be able to run a full node at home
Nobody runs a full node at home. I hate to current year, but its literally 2019.

[Anonymous No.13890619]

>>13889003
MINISTER YOU, SATOSHI

[Anonymous No.13890624]

>>13890571
>far more expensive and less secure than just using the fucking blockchain
not really no, and definite no on the more secure, and yeah nobody will want to wait 10-60 minutes after pushing the save button to make sure his document is all safe and secure before shutting down his computer. that's hilarious.

[Anonymous No.13890637]

>>13890619
Based

[Anonymous No.13890645]

>>13890607
i'm specifically talking about the metanet as "an immutable store of everything" being not needed not a good idea not efficient not reasonable here.

any thoughts on that? because we have bitcoin for you know the money thing, and we have cloud services for the immutable redundant insanely fast file storeage thing. and the two does not have to do anything with each other unless you force them for no reason.

[Anonymous No.13890653]

>>13890513
Nope, cloud storage is completely centralized, it's stored on actual servers of a company with an owner. It can be seized, censored, deleted or shut down.

Learn what a Blockchain is retard.

[Anonymous No.13890660]

Imagine caring about BSV when Unwriter verifiably cucked by SNTVT lead dev.

hint, SNTVT is a the next web.

[Anonymous No.13890663]

>>13890653
>Nope, cloud storage is completely centralized
so will be sv if we get to giga/terra-byte blocks no worries. even sv cucks admit this hell they say it's natural.

[Anonymous No.13890666]

>>13890624
>and yeah nobody will want to wait 10-60 minutes after pushing the save button to make sure his document is all safe and secure before shutting down his computer. that's hilarious.


Corecucks are severely damaged. How can they still not understand. After 10 fucking years.

[Anonymous No.13890671]

>>13890619

[Anonymous No.13890679]

>>13890653
>Learn what a Blockchain is retard.
right back at you mong! come back when you actually learn what blockchain is and why t is used despite all it's insane shortcomings and bottleneck.

[Anonymous No.13890689]

>>13890663
>scaling centralizes mining

Compete, join a pool or find a new fucking job, cunt.

[Anonymous No.13890692]

>>13890666
you are not sure your document is saved until it's on the blockchain you can have it in the mempool that's not the same as saved on disks on 5 continents and acknowledged back in an instant.

[Anonymous No.13890705]

>>13890689
not mining specifically full nodes the ones that could possibly make the data retrieval private and permissionless.

[Anonymous No.13890732]

>>13890692
I'd like you to explain to me how that transaction isn't going to be in the next block when the mempool never gets backed up because its cleared every transaction and Bitcoin has literally never gone offline.

>>13890705
All you need are blockheaders. Those nodes are specifically for personal use. They don't contribute to the network in any way. Satoshi explained this in the whitepaper and predicted they could be run in fucking RAM for the foreseeable future and he's right. Because you still can.

[Anonymous No.13890760]

>>13890663
False, the network is decentralized as long as shutting down specific actors or nodes does not compromise the data or security.

It's impossible to shut down the Bitcoin network this way, and the bigger the network gets, the harder it becomes. Cloud storage network but cloud storage is easy just go to his house, put him in cuffs and shut down the servers. Data GONE. Or the one with server access shuts it down himself.

CENTRAL POINT OF FAILURE - the fucking physical server the data is stored on.

On Bitcoin every single node has a fucking copy. Do you not understand how any of this works?

[Anonymous No.13890776]

>>13890732
im still talking about the metanet thing here please dont deflect!

full block validation vs block header validation is a different issue but the main problem with pruning nodes is they cant as of now partake in syncing the network especially new nodes.

[Anonymous No.13890788]

>>13890663
False, the network is decentralized as long as shutting down specific actors or nodes does not compromise the data or security.

It's impossible to shut down the Bitcoin network this way, and the bigger the network gets, the harder it becomes. Cloud storage is easy just, go to the owners house, put him in cuffs and shut down the servers. Data GONE. Or the one with server access shuts it down himself.

CENTRAL POINT OF FAILURE - the fucking physical server the data is stored on.

On Bitcoin every single node has a fucking copy. Do you not understand how any of this works?

[Anonymous No.13890793]

I'm so brownpilled that I need antibiotics.

[Anonymous No.13890802]

>>13890788
your data will soon be served by nchain alone and you know it

[Anonymous No.13890822]

>>13890788
>On Bitcoin every single node has a fucking copy.
on bitcoin yes on sv nope shit bot gonna fly if it sees any adoption in this full retard direction.

[Anonymous No.13890840]

>>13890802
>>13890822

[Anonymous No.13890856]

Will it provide gay love for all?

[Anonymous No.13890859]

>>13890776
>im still talking about the metanet thing here please dont deflect!
Yeah so was I. Metanet is still transactions, dummy.

You sync with the network via miners. I'm not going to argue about you're retarded raspberry pi node. If you haven't gotten by now you're not going to and its all so tiresome to explain this shit for the billionth time on /biz/. So here's some nChain propaganda that just came out, for (You).

[Anonymous No.13890864]

>>13890624
>>13890645
People won't have to wait that long. You send it to the blockchain, see it received, ping another couple random miners and see if they have it in the mempool and then now you're basically guaranteed it's gonna be in a block.

It is cloud storage, cloud computing, cloud hosting, the blockchain is the database, the miners run script, gpus crawl the database and deliver content through css or html. Look up what an economy of scale is. Bitcoin creates economies of scale around complete computing. Everyone having their own 12 core, 10TB SSD, 128GB RAM computer is highly inefficient when they only use it occasionally. Why not just pay per cycle to a service that you know is under ruthless competition in the small world network of the bitcoin network graph.

What you are saying is yeah I get that everything else should be done on there but not why the internet should be... Because everything else is done on there. Having them all interact seemlessly and miners able to prune the blockchain for trash while other storage services operate at scale that will host the entire blockchain.

[Anonymous No.13890872]

>>13890840
out of arguments? ok thx bye!

[Anonymous No.13890884]

>>13890859
miners are as centralized as cloud storeage there is no difference except efficiency flexibility performance is all on the cloud side.

[Anonymous No.13890895]

>>13889003

Those Bitcoin scams get worse with every fork. I though BCash was bad but this whole "I'm Satoshi, buy my shit" cringefest is the worst. This is Ripple/Tron tier.

[Anonymous No.13890896]

>>13890884
>miners are as centralized as cloud storeage
I can't do this with your retards anymore. Just enjoy poverty.

[Anonymous No.13890906]

>>13890864
>the blockchain is the database
the worst database ever concieved generally yes thats my point pow blockchaoms ar eone trock ponoes they do something no other datase can do you cant force them on other scenarios.

[Anonymous No.13890919]

>>13890906
fuck
*pow blockchains are one trick ponies

[Anonymous No.13890930]

>>13890896
truth hurts? i know... there are what like 10 major cloud providers and 10 major mining pools?

[Anonymous No.13890932]

>>13890872
You don't even understand what a Blockchain is LMAO, literally just a retarded core cuck brainlet paid to spread disinfo.

[Anonymous No.13890959]

>>13890930
What do you think is easier. Wiping data from AWS or Bitcoin?

[Anonymous No.13890979]

>>13890906
You don't force them, you pay them, they compete, services get cheaper. That's capitalism bruz. Don't like it?
S
T
I
F
F

[Anonymous No.13891003]

>>13890979
Based

[Anonymous No.13891004]

>>13890959
that's why i said with multiple cloud storage providers via an abstraction layer you have the exact same decentralization as with bitcoin. (not sv, sv is nowhere near as decentralized and it will get worse)

there is no need for a blockchain if you just want to store files in datacenters. there never was.

[Anonymous No.13891012]

>>13890979
learn to read and comprehend!

[Anonymous No.13891035]

>>13889028
weird how there are multiple mining operations competing fiercely to be the first one to win the rights to write that data permanently and immutably to the blockchain

[Anonymous No.13891053]

>>13891004
>there's no need

I don't give a fuck about what you think I need, commie faggot. If I want my desktop to be stored on the fucking blockchain so I can go anywhere and always have my PC then I will.

[Anonymous No.13891108]

>>13891053
if you insist go ahead... i'm just saying that this is probably one of the worst solutions ever conceived. and trying to sell it off as revolutionary is just plain retarded.

[Anonymous No.13891221]

>>13891012

[Anonymous No.13891240]

>>13891221
what did i tell you about idiotic memeing aside let's have a discussion? >>13890979 is basically just idiotic memeing every character of it.

[Anonymous No.13891253]

>>13891240
>I feel for the satoj meme

[Anonymous No.13891290]

>>13890802
once you see what bitcoin is capable of as the world computer you will see that nation-states will compete fiercely to be the next one to write exabyte+ sized blocks to the chain.

[Anonymous No.13891296]

10 MINUTES BLOCKTIME!!!

WORLD COMPUTER MY FUCKING ASS

[Anonymous No.13891314]

>>13891296
Transactions are instant with 0-conf, something that core coin also killed.

Deal with it, your shitcoin is being left behind.

[ANC No.13891342]

Pass

[Anonymous No.13891355]

>>13891296
payment channels are peer to peer and as fast as your network internnection link allows for. in 20 years time your network connection will outpace the data throughput capacity of your local storage by orders of magnitude. all memes aside, get STIFF'd

[Anonymous No.13891356]

>>13891314
0 conf is only for your wallet to show the transaction... you faggot

it still needs 1 confirmation for you to spend the transaction again . try it foryourself with
3 wallets

[Anonymous No.13891366]

>>13891314
core didn't kill 0-conf it never really worked securely. that is why we have this thing called confirmations. rbf just makes it a childs play to double spend but double spending is not particularly difficult without it. you could always accept transactions with no rbf flag as 0-conf if you are retarded enough.

[Anonymous No.13891370]

>>13891355
okay send me some bsv through your payment channel ill wait

1PeF67i39exfV2t1j3gkifiWvpMKMS4WR7

[Anonymous No.13891398]

[Anonymous No.13891444]

ok they had 2 blocks in the last 6 minutes what almost never happend before

[Anonymous No.13891458]

forgot pic

[Anonymous No.13891463]

>>13890432
Exactly

[Anonymous No.13891464]

>>13890666
>>13891444

[Anonymous No.13891471]

>>13891366
>high fees and 10 minute settlements is a good thing!

[Anonymous No.13891527]

>>13891471
i never said i liked high fees, but there is some rationale behind them.

basically there are two competing long term scaling solutions right now:
1 put every fucking thing on a single blockchain that gets so bloated that nobody but datacenters can deal with it directly.
2 let's keep the main net slim and focus on it's primary purpose of being a computationally secure trustless permissionless ledger and can have a wide ecosystem of tree structured other chains often with specialized features or turing complete scripting or whatever for everyday transactions and they can anchor to their parent and finally to btc blockchain against hostile reorgs and to have been rooted firmly in the shared reality.

and here is the thing. one chain can never outperform and outdo a thousand. it will be a dinosaur in every which way stiffling development competing ideas making it impossible that anyone deal with only the things he cares about the traditional permissionless and private way.

but both can scale to roughly the same tx/sec overall.

[Anonymous No.13891553]

>>13890290
And why do i need more than? Im 70% btc / 30% btc core now

[Anonymous No.13891586]

>>13891553
Anon....havent you learned your lesson from bcashies? It was .36btc at one point - look at it now...all forks are retarded

[Anonymous No.13891590]

>>13891471
You realize that WAY BACK in fucking 2010 Satoshi himself posted about how 0-conf is guaranteed to be safe within just a few seconds.

All a merchant needs to do is scan nodes for an attempted double spend within the first 5 seconds. BCH made payment apps that already do this.

Can't believe after 10 fucking years people don't even understand how Bitcoin works and what it is capable of.

[Anonymous No.13891686]

>>13891108

>Eliminating the need for trust is one of the worst solutions

Holy shit you absolute brainlets make my head hurt.

[Anonymous No.13891698]

>>13891590
satoshi specifically said 0-conf is never a good idea unless you can cancel the order/subscription to no cost to you at all.

[Anonymous No.13891735]

>>13891686
you don't get it, sv will not be a trustless permissionless file storage any more than any cloud provider is today. you either make it truly permisisonless and trustless and immutable in which case it will be chock full of illegal content, or you make it government friendly and censor it in which case it's no better than cloud storage but worse in many ways. there is no middle ground here.

as for transactions the intended use as money btc is the only one trustless permissionless publicly auditable ledger to date that is actually secure. sv and bch are not secure evident by recent 51 on bch. it's never a good idea to have 2 pow chains of the same family. it's probably not a good idea to have 2 pow chains at all. we could do with 1 and that 1 will not be sv i absolutely fucking guarantee you that.

[Anonymous No.13891770]

>>13891586
You say we can go up to 0.36??? Holy moly need my paycheck now

[Anonymous No.13891816]

>>13891356
Objectively false.

[Anonymous No.13891829]

>>13889083
if i want lower fees I can use ethereum, LTC, bcash or even doge
you have nothing

[Anonymous No.13891876]

>>13890510
the miners and the nodes are the database you incredulous fuck
BSV mines on a loss too
your immutable metanet is a delusion AND useless

satoshi himself said that bitcoin should be used to pay for hosting

[Anonymous No.13891878]

>>13891829
Nah, we just use Bitcoin (BSV), keep your shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.13891889]

>>13891878
it's funny how sv cucks just want to lock down the base protocol when btc pretty much already did with bip16.

[Anonymous No.13891892]

>>13891876
HOW MAD ARE THE CORE KEKS RIGHT NOW HAHAHAHAHA GET FUCKED

[Anonymous No.13891905]

>>13891878
But Ethereum is technically better than BSV and it is not led by a proven document forger. If BTC goes down ETH is the obvious alternative.

[Anonymous No.13891916]

>>13891889
It's funny cause it's not true
BTC = Fraud
BSV = Bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13891939]

>>13891905
Hahahahahaha, etherium can't scale and run by literal booger eaters.

It's a shitcoin for retards, fitting that you would like it.

[Anonymous No.13891951]

>>13891892
>0.017

[Anonymous No.13891967]

>>13891951
did u even read what you posted? that it literally craig wright talking about bsv

[Anonymous No.13891989]

>>13891240
It wasn't a discussion, it was ne spoonfeeding you while you went "nah sounds stupid"

I don't owe you shit to answer your basic bitch objections. Do some reading, listen to shadders, follow unwriter, read craig's medium or get rekt.

[Anonymous No.13891990]

>>13891967
Luke Dash and other core guys still bamboozle us like we’re all on 56k modems. Bigger blocks is not just the future, it’s the present.

[Anonymous No.13892002]

>>13889003
correct
craig is probably the smartest men in the space
no one can compete with him ever
the badmouthers try but they have never disproven him or proven his so called lies
it is as they say:
get in BSV
the real BTC

[Anonymous No.13892007]

>>13890401
BitCoin will be the largest computer

check em
https://youtu.be/QJ1DTeexpvA

[Anonymous No.13892017]

>>13891989
no it was bad memeing

[Anonymous No.13892026]

[Anonymous No.13892036]

>>13892007
lol this nigga btfod himself nicely.

[Anonymous No.13892044]

>>13891951
>>13891967

Have the shills begun totally blowing themselves out now? hahahaha they have completely lost the plot!

Just give them the gun and they will point it to the temple and shoot LMFAO

[Anonymous No.13892095]

>>13891967
faketoshi will never be satoshi no matter how many times you meme about it.

[Anonymous No.13892108]

>>13891967
did you read it?
Craig has never moved an INCH to do what Szabo proposed for the scaling
What has Craig done? He removed the block limit and said 'fahck ohhf'. That does not solve anything, that only creates a humongous blockchain that nobody can run a node

>If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then, sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal.
it still is a big deal

Craig WILL NEVER implement any solution proposed by Szabo

[Anonymous No.13892114]

>>13892095
repeated the desperate core shill for the millionth time

[Anonymous No.13892125]

>>13892044
LMAO WHERE IS IT FAGGOT
WHERE IS THE 0CONF IDEA PROPOSED BY SATOSHI IN HIS VENDING MACHINE THEORY
YOU TALK THIS FUCKING SHIT BUT WHERE THE FUCK IS YOUR 0CONF IN BSV????????????????

[Anonymous No.13892138]

>>13892108
The only people who choose to run nodes are neckbeard geeks to begin with. And who is likely to have 100mbs or higher connections at home but neckbeard geeks?

[Anonymous No.13892141]

>>13889003
> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

[Anonymous No.13892158]

>>13892125
LOL Schizos are going mad now, the kike schizo gene has been activated.

0-conf works natively on BSV, try to use any service or any wallet with BitcoinSV and you will see.

Now go take your meds and get off the board

[Anonymous No.13892165]

>>13889740
Unironically this. Litecoin has legs, long af chain, solid history. I’m long LTC for the first time in a long time.

[Anonymous No.13892188]

>>13892114
he is not simply a fraud he actually committed well documented perjury. for which he will receive some prison time hopefully.

[Anonymous No.13892191]

>>13892141
Nice list.

[Anonymous No.13892198]

>>13892138
it can be a AIDS ridden trannyrunning it, irrelevant point

>>13892158
not how Szabo proposed it

[Anonymous No.13892201]

>>13892158
are there any irl retails that accept sv? grab and go? cause any online service can accept 0-conf pretty much not counting money services and exchanges.

[Anonymous No.13892216]

>>13892188
>hopefully

lol the cope is real. Im laughing so fucking hard right now with BSV literally mooning while the minimum wage core shill NPCs whose only job is to attack Craig, is seething and losing their minds.

Fucking best day in a long time.

Stay mad and stay poor fags. Nobody is coming to save you.

[Anonymous No.13892217]

>>13892165
Charlie Chink is a fraud, never coded anything original in his life. Litecoin is actually a fork of Tenebrix so not even Bitcoin scrypt was his idea. The silver to Bitcoin gold is a meme concocted by him and his exchange owning brother just to get rich, it is literally one of the first “shitcoin” as we know it designed to take your Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13892236]

>>13892216
the fraud is real we will see about the consequences.

[Anonymous No.13892251]

>>13892216
well let's see in a few days how this little p&d pans out for you. so far if you sold in march for btc you are still better off.

[Anonymous No.13892253]

[Anonymous No.13892263]

>>13892216
this is your moon (0.016)
keep up the delusion nigger, did you report to Calvin that your shilling here is generating short positions for your garbage?

call me when your Indian curry diarrhea coin reaches 2% we can throw a party thread by posting Indian brapers

[Anonymous No.13892265]

>>13892251
>38 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.13892277]

>>13892236
Yes the fraud is real, the BTC fraud coin will collapse as the real Bitcoin SV takes its place.

No matter what you do, no matter what you say, you can't stop BitcoinSV from scaling, only throw useless and pathetic temper tantrums as reality works against you. I hope it kills you inside. Enjoy!

[Anonymous No.13892281]

>>13892265
bet you didn't read them

[Anonymous No.13892291]

>>13892251
Time to go to bed O1G. We know it's you

[Anonymous No.13892294]

>>13892277
you know which fraud i'm talking about stop being coy

[Anonymous No.13892334]

>>13892294
Strange how the original is different from your scanned version. Hmm makes me wonder

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892344]

>>13892334
yeah it's strange why would the court archives have my version submitted by craig in 2013 nov 4... real strange indeed.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892356]

>>13892344
i guess we should ask Nicholas McDonald JP | 0412 473 696 | [e-mail]
it's his signature on there too.

[Anonymous No.13892361]

>>13892344
Haha I knew it was you :D

>why would the court archives have my version submitted by craig in 2013 nov 4
Yes, why would Craig submit this as evidence? hmmm...could it be to provide proof of someone trying to defraud him? No can't be. That would not fit with your narrative

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892371]

>>13892361
>Yes, why would Craig submit this as evidence?
it was the ato case you know his famous tax fraud.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892388]

>>13892371
>The Weekend Australian revealed that Mr Wright was threatened with bankruptcy between 2006 and 2013 over a debt of $425,000, following a legal dispute with another business partner that saw Mr Wright have a restraining order issued against him and being convicted of contempt of court.

>Despite that conviction, Mr Wright was called upon by the AFP to give a “technical report” as part of an investigation a spokesman said had “assisted in the successful prosecution of a person in relation to online offences”. He also alleged he made a deal with a controversial business figure in 2013 to buy gold and software worth tens of millions of Bitcoin.

>After the alleged deal went sour, Mr Wright tried to sue business figures for $84.25m in the Federal Court in Sydney. He subsequently withdrew the claim. At that time, May 2013, Mr Wright said he could draw on one “Bitcoin wallet” worth at least $100m.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/atos-fraud-squad-probes-bitcoin-creator-craig-wright/news-story/9bfe1841079da0cb1e4481061ad77677?nk=52e3891a0bd53078da3891ab5d1a3182-1559129430

[Anonymous No.13892391]

While you are arguing about Craig (who is Satoshi) I'm just getting rich watching the pump.

[Anonymous No.13892421]

>>13892344
>court archives
>scribd
Pick one, Greg.

[Anonymous No.13892466]

>>13892371
>it was the ato case you know his famous tax fraud.
HAHAHA, you mean the one he won and the ATO had to pay HIM money because he payed to much tax. HAHA. Just give it a brake O1G. Everything you say expose you as a brainlet

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892518]

>>13892421
no i actually found the pic in an australian court archive i just lost the fucking link and have been digging on warosu but can't find it. basically we have the original not submitted by kleiman, but it's possible it will be easier to make >>13892356

>>13892466
if he won by fraud it's double jail time.
confirm it.

[Anonymous No.13892556]

>>13892518
>if he won by fraud it's double jail time.
>confirm it
That kind of pilpul tactic won't work here. Try again

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892557]

>>13892421
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.4.pdf
here is an other link if you don't like scribd but alas it was also submitted by kleiman, i'm looking for the original submission no worries. it was an australian site.

[Anonymous No.13892561]

Literally how can this fucking gay poofta bat aside each challenge toove 1 BTC from the Satoshi wallet to another nominated wallet?
Fucking how does he keep getting away with it

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892570]

>>13892556
we will see. you can meme pump this shitcoin to $300 it won't change a fucking thing for the outcome.

[Anonymous No.13892573]

>>13892158
SHOW ME
SHOW ME FAHCUKING PAPER OR FAHCK OFF
SHOW ME OR I WAHLK

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13892583]

>>13892561
there are easier ways that don't even violate the terms of his imaginary fund (which expired a long ass time ago even in imaginary years).

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

[Anonymous No.13892600]

>>13892391
the pump for the CG conference?

[Anonymous No.13892616]

>>13892518
Kek, the ato cunt ended up in jail. Forensics experts proved ato's security is broke.

[Anonymous No.13892624]

>>13892570
the meme pump goes to 50k anon
screencap this

[Anonymous No.13892668]

In actual fact what kind of price are we looking at in the next month of June

[Anonymous No.13892691]

>>13892191
That makes my soul hurt my god

[Anonymous No.13892714]

>>13892583
What is this

[Anonymous No.13892900]

>>13892616
there is a bit of a problem with that at the time nobody had a vested interest in faking any of craigs documents except for craig who was in the middle of a bankruptcy. we need the lawyers involved testifying in court in the keliman case which version is the original, and the ato or nsw court can chime in if they have hard copy of the files craig submitted.
>>13892714
satoshis pgp pubkey confirmed by people that worked with him in the early day. (no cryptographic evidence i'm afraid)

[Anonymous No.13892974]

>>13892900
Creg has had bitcoin related enterprises since bitcoin was released. His own employees were using backdoors to try steal his IP. They didn't fake their craigs documents they faked timestamping on their emails so they could say they corresponded when they didn't.

[Anonymous No.13893009]

>>13892974
this is not an email time-stamping issue at all.
not that i believe for a moment craigs employees did the scamming. it's all lies and bullshit with craig always an impossible to untangle web of fucking lies.

[Anonymous No.13893046]

>>13892217
I agree with you

[Anonymous No.13893295]

>>13892974
up until 2011 Craig didn't know about bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13893306]

>>13892158
>>13892216
>>13892277
show the paper
show the paper or fuck off
show the 0conf or I walk

[Anonymous No.13893446]

>>13893295
Not proof, loser. Have a nice life.

[Anonymous No.13893487]

>>13893306
Take your meds

[Anonymous No.13893516]

>>13893446
nobody said proof
it's evidence

[Anonymous No.13893535]

>>13893487
https://youtu.be/7YUTq7_vO3A?list=LL_R8aBBjm_8rMCIqN3dKqkA&t=42

again
show me the paper or fuck off

[Anonymous No.13893672]

>>13889003
Please buy sirs

[Anonymous No.13894004]

>>13889028
There exists no Turing complete computer in the universe as there is no infinite tape available...
Until now; Bitcoin (SV) the World's first infinite tape and Turing complete computer.

Better dump your bags cos this thing is ACTUALLY going to flip BTC and it will NOT be slow.

[Anonymous No.13894058]

>>13894004
No endless loops = no Turing completeness, sorry kiddo. BSV only offers butchered, castrated scripting.

[Anonymous No.13894166]

>>13894058
you only need a single instruction to be turing complete: subleq which is technically a looping instruction. writing turing complete script is the easiest thing in the world. probably little kids can do it. so if btc was meant to be turing complete it would be bet on that.

[Anonymous No.13894488]

>>13892263
Use USD to compare, nobody cares about your altcoin

[Anonymous No.13894519]

>>13894488
cope harder