CHAINLINK SERIOUS DISCUSSION

[Anonymous No.13675683]

It's come to my attention that we're all severely overlooking a really big problem in relation to Chainlink. What is that problem you might ask? Is it security? Is it private networks? Absolutely not; it's NoLinkers.

What are we unironically going to do with them? We have under 2-weeks before things start to get out of hand. Any ideas?

[Anonymous No.13675698]

https://youtu.be/P_xRboVrYKU

[Anonymous No.13675703]

>>13675683
We use them as fodder in the great race war with the promise of 0.001 link per nigger and kike killed

[Anonymous No.13675707]

I personally take some pleasure in their kvetching.

[Anonymous No.13675715]

We will rule over them brutally.

[Anonymous No.13675722]

>>13675683
Mainnet will do nothing.

[Anonymous No.13676136]

>>13675683
>chainlink
>serious discussion
You must be new here

[Anonymous No.13676146]

>>13675683
Oraclize dude said Oraclize got a million oracle transactions at 0.02 per call that's 20k total yearly revenue lol

They're operating at a loss and have also admitted that 80% of their customers were just shitty betting dapps, finance and insurance don't give a shit about oracles hahaha

Even if link captures 10m calls per year that's 200k flowing through the network to pay thousands of node operators

And link transactions will likely be even cheaper, minimum 0.01

>muh passive income
Imagine spending 100 bucks building a node and subscribing to api feeds which will give you 10 dollar revenue per YEAR at BEST lmao

Kek!!

[Anonymous No.13676494]

>>13675683
>SECURTY
Link still has no mechanisms to provide onchain proof on execution inside a secure environment.

[Anonymous No.13676501]

>>13676494
fake news literally who article screenshot

[Anonymous No.13676512]

>>13675683
Burn the nolinkers!!!!

[Anonymous No.13676531]

>>13675683
>CHAINLINK SERIOUS DISCUSSION
HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.13676561]

>>13676501
>literally who
Appeal to authority fallacy. What he said is true.

[Anonymous No.13676600]

Made obsolete by RLC

[Anonymous No.13676622]

>>13675683
>chainlink
>serious
Pick one

[Anonymous No.13676628]

>>13676561
nice proof

[Anonymous No.13676691]

So i have like 200 bucks to invest and after noticing the recent hype im thinking on buying some LINK. I am honestly dirty poor and thats all of my savings..Is it worth it bros? Is there any articles or videos explaining the recent hype?

>Inb4 gtfo newfag

[Anonymous No.13676702]

So guys I stupidly sold around 10% of my link stack at 8800 sats pre pump because I forgot about the order.
Do you think I’ll be able to rebuy around that price range once again?

[Anonymous No.13676729]

>>13676628
Does LINK have a secure mechanism then? Please show it.

[Anonymous No.13676887]

I'm gay and I hold... Chainlink!!! Chainlink!!! Yes!!! I'm G. A. Y., gay!! By Allah I'm feeling the gaynergy! I love this movement that we built, fellow gay Marines! Yyyyyyyyes!! Chainlink is not just a blockchain, it's A MOVEMENT. What a marvelous community, my gay fellas! I want to chainlink and snort cocaine in a limousine with my gay friends! In In lambos we have gay sex and worship Master Sergey!

NEVER SELL OR MOVE YOUR TOKENS.

TAKE THEM TO THE GRAVE WITH YOU.

SUBMIT TO MASTER SERGEY.

CHAINLINK WITH FELLOW GAYS.

NO MORE CHAINS, JUST LINKS.

NO MORE CHAINS, JUST LINKS.

NO MORE CHAINS, JUST LINKS.

[Anonymous No.13677028]

>>13676146
You almost figured out one tiny part of chainlink's tokenomics, which is the inevitable dramatic increase of the token value overtime to keep the system sustainable. Lurk moar newfren

[Anonymous No.13677111]

>>13676146
>10m calls per year
kek; clearly doesn't have the vision

[Anonymous No.13677132]

>>13676887
shadowfork sell signal

[Anonymous No.13677433]