/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13641314]

Why is BCH triggering everyone in creepto to spam "BCASH BCASH" while other coins like LTC are accepted as legit?
LTC was a copy-paste scam which instamined the first 1000 blocks on top to enriched Charlie Lee and of which no BTC hodler ever received a share, while BCH was a normal fork out of which each BTC hodler received his fair share so he has nothing to complain about - to the contrary, he should be grateful there's a hedge for his bet on one implementation of Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13641336]

>>13641314
Because Jihan had a public sperge fit when someone on a Q&A panel used the phrase "Bcash" and it was hilarious. How new are you?

[Anonymous No.13641518]

>>13641314
BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.13641529]

Also Litecoin is the real bcash. 1500 EOY.

[Anonymous No.13641537]

>>13641314
Because BCH is an existential threat to their bags, because it's more useful, and has more claim to the Bitcoin name than BTC (Bitcoin husk)

[Anonymous No.13641547]

>>13641314
Because it claims to be the real Bitcoin having only 6% of BTC hashpower

[Anonymous No.13641580]

>>13641314
Did Charly ever say litecoin is the real Bitcoin? Did he ever try to kill btc by trying switching miners from btc to bcash? Was he ever dumb enough to sell btc to buy 1mil bcash and ruin his company's upcoming ipo?
Also:
>fork
>normal
Choose one

[Anonymous No.13641587]

>>13641537
Ayre as part of his plea deal will make sure BCH will fail even if he has to spend another half a billion.

[Anonymous No.13641602]

>>13641580
You're avoiding the OP question: why is LTC acceppted by Blockstream and the BTC hodlers despite it being a new ledger and not a fork?

[Anonymous No.13641668]

>>13641314
theres thad weird comma use again. Exactly the same with Craig

[Anonymous No.13641721]

the bcash strategy has always been to attack Litecoin as that is the only realistic competition in their eyes. Of course the scammers on top of the bcash-pyramid never actually believed there would be such a thing as a flippening with bitcoin.

Litecoin will win over bcash in the long run, just wait and see. The brand is already tainted like mad.

[Unironically Satoj No.13642625]

LTC:
>copy+paste BTC, do no development whatsoever, only change consensus algo
>Greg Maxwell writes a GPU miner for LTC, shares with nobody, gets half the circulating supply for himself
>Scammer creator gets his bro to list it on coinbase, dumps at ath
>Biggest technological advancement is that they'll start copy+pasting code from GRIN as well as BTC, lmfao
BCH:
>The entire early bitcoin community left the infiltrated BTC for BCH
>This includes billionaires such as Roger and Jihan, as well as dozens of others who prefer their privacy. But they're all investing in the ecosystem
>The best scientists Bitcoin ever had stuck to BCH, actual scaling is happening
>Even tokens are now on BCH and the first few ones were moon missions (biz missed them)
>More merchants in East Asia accept BCH than BTC now, the trend will only become more and more pronounced
>Even got Schnorr signatures before BTC, lmfao
>Solid devs, no infinite inflation bugs like BTC retards
>Every shitcoiner is afraid of it, so they have to call its biggest holders scammers, but the biggest holders are actually the greatest selfless philanthropists of our time

[Unironically Satoj No.13642655]

As for the exact question:
LTC has been known as a scam since its inception. As best it was at one point promoted to a "monetized testnet". It is no threat to the bankers behind Blockstream/BTC.
In addition, its first GPU miner was coded by Greg Maxwell, and the premine of this shitcoin is not just day 1, it is more than 50% if you consider that the majority of hashpower were late bitcoiners like people from the BTC camp today.
BTC-ers who were late to bitcoin (funny, isn't it) made their money from dumping LTC because they didn't believe in Bitcoin back when Roger and Jihan did.

[Unironically Satoj No.13642694]

>>13642655
Part 2:
However, when transaction fees started skyrocketing above $50 and the corecuck community asked their leaders what to do, they couldn't just legitimise BCH by recommending it. So they pointed towards their monetised testnet and recommended that instead.
Corecucks, like the good boys they are just followed orders, shilled LTC and trashed BCH. Didn't do them any good though, as their only achievement is being ranked next to Nano and IOTA bagholders as the dumbest and most delusional motherfuckers in crypto.

[Anonymous No.13642734]

>>13641537
you retards lost the scaling debate, and now you're just talking to yourselves in perpetuity. You try to make a lot of noise so as to not be ignored, but your fate is sealed.

[Anonymous No.13642798]

>>13642625
LTC: inoffensive BTC helper. Knows his place. Goes fast.
BCH: arrogant deluded moron. Constant technical issues caused by incompetent devs and oversized clowncar blocks.

[Unironically Satoj No.13642867]

>>13642734
>you retards lost the scaling debate
There never was a debate, just censorship and propaganda from BTC, and trying to preserve bitcoin from the big blocker side.
>and now you're just talking to yourselves in perpetuity
The irony is that the reason you think that is because you live in a BTC echo chamber. BCH is saving lives in Venezuela and other commie-struck regions right now. It's also seeing more use as an anonymity coin than Monero, lmfao
>You try to make a lot of noise so as to not be ignored
It's called marketing, and without it, us Bitcoin Cash-ers wouldn't have made Bitcoin popular. Now we lost 4 years but we're doing the same and will succeed again
>but your fate is sealed
How so? After billions of dollars invested into destroying it, first from AXA, then by Calvin, BCH is alive, kicking and being used. No other coin has managed to sustain that much pressure, if anything, the worst days are over
>>13642798
>inoffensive BTC helper
BTC-speak for "not a threat". Exactly my point.
>arrogant deluded moron. Constant technical issues caused by incompetent devs and oversized clowncar blocks
Fighting to preserve bitcoin and being liked by everyone cannot be accomplished at the same time. BCH-ers love Bitcoin so they are doing what they should despite the repercussions. No technical issues at all, unlike BTC who had an infinite inflation bug. Found and fixed by BCH developers. Maybe you were thinking of BSV's dumpster fire of a self-reorganizing blockchain?

[Anonymous No.13642879]

>>13641537
BCH will be pretty good if Jihan stops mining it.