100% Proof CSW is SN

[Anonymous No.13470794]

In 2008 Craig Wright registered the Bitcoin.org domain on his credit card which he is going to prove in court with his credit card records, it's over.

>I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law. Welcome to law.

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/craig-wright-says-his-2008-credit-card-payment-proves-he-co-owned-bitcoin-org-aka-satoshi-nakamoto/

[Anonymous No.13470804]

who?

[Anonymous No.13470817]

>>13470794
all that proves is he is the owner of bitcoin.org and nothing more. he himself even said it was a team of people that built bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13470824]

Here's another bread crumb for my fellow bitcoin frens

[Anonymous No.13470826]

>>13470817

[Anonymous No.13470840]

>>13470817
Ding ding ding. Nick Szabo and Hal Finney are Satoshi. Craig was the tea boy
>can't code
>can't code
>can't code
The creator of the PoW concept is Satoshi, and that is not csw

[Anonymous No.13470855]

>>13470840
Nick = Hal
Craig = le God
le God = Satoshi

Do you understand now?

[Anonymous No.13470859]

>>13470794
>le cropped screenshot
May I also show you le 2008 blogspot post

>>13470824
What kind of evidence is that? An Aussie residential IP addrerss? Holy shit, craiglets are getting on my nerves.

[Anonymous No.13470862]

>>13470794

[Anonymous No.13470875]

>>13470859
>evidence
Who talked about anything other than bread crumbs? Are you not hungry? Where's your LINK spirit?

[Anonymous No.13470882]

it's true what people said when this crazy talk first started -- this guy is an extremely talented con man, as evidenced by the fact that even though he does stuff we know satoshi would never do, and refuses to do the only thing the real satoshi would know everyone must demand of him to believe he really is satoshi, somehow everyone is talking about whether this guy is satoshi. it's like he's a mental magician whose sleight of hand is somehow making people ignore the obvious truth that there is no more reason to think that he is satoshi than, say, ronald mcdonald

[Anonymous No.13470884]

>>13470817
People helped him, he built it.

[Anonymous No.13470887]

>>13470859
>residential IP addrerss
It is not

[Anonymous No.13470892]

>>13470855
now yuo see

[Anonymous No.13470904]

>>13470882
As "evidenced" by Greg Maxwell you mean?

[Anonymous No.13470937]

I don't know if you retards actually realize this but look at the "proof" provided from

>>13470794

and

>>13470824

One says hosting in Malaysia, but the IP address says it's from Australia.

But going further, anyone can buy hosting for any domain. They are separate things and you can claim this is your domain. The screenshot does not show "DOMAIN" as the product type, it just shows "hosting".

Also, IP addresses doesn't mean shit, it just means you own some IP space on the internet. Anyone can buy it.

Ironically though, the judge / court system probably doesn't know shit about how the internet works and believe him.

What a world we live in.

[Anonymous No.13470959]

>>13470937
You should report for duty as an expert witness in the ongoing court case against Peter McCormack. I'm sure you will blow away the other experts there with your "know how"

[Anonymous No.13470973]

>>13470959
>how will poor Peter ever recover

[Anonymous No.13470976]

>>13470937
>Ironically though, the judge / court system probably doesn't know shit about how the internet works and believe him.
Hehe, it would be fun if you could explain how you think the court of law works and how a court ruling is achieved. I imagine it would be some of the best comedy one can read on biz

[Anonymous No.13470979]

>>13470973
oh dare, he is not only childish, but he has completely lost it. I'll save that one for futher shit posting

[Anonymous No.13471000]

>>13470840
Satoshi didn't even invent POW.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-work_system

[Anonymous No.13471001]

>>13470979
funny fucking thing, courts. Its always the mouthiest assholes with the least cause threaten ppl with them, then, back off when its clear they are going to get their arse handed to them. Bring it on, enough ppl had enough of his shite already

[Anonymous No.13471007]

this thread stinks of greg's halitosis

[Anonymous No.13471019]

>>13471001
You saying csw backed out of the suit? That would be yet another lie from core, cause he didn't

[Anonymous No.13471026]

why doesn't he just move some btc out of the genesis wallet?

[Anonymous No.13471033]

>>13471019
>he backed out
not yet, but he will tho. Sure as shit, he will

[Anonymous No.13471045]

>>13471026
>move some btc out of the genesis wallet
>Genesis wallet
>wallet
>move
I can't for the life of me understand why I still waste my time on this place. It's literally filled to the brim with brainlets

[Anonymous No.13471055]

>>13471045
None of them have read the whitepaper and believe this is no different than their raspberry pi.

[Anonymous No.13471087]

>>13471000
What I mean was, the creator of the solution to the double spend problem using PoW is Satoshi

[Anonymous No.13471093]

>>13471026
Because Peter Gabriel won't return his calls

[Anonymous No.13471125]

>>13471045

You can sign a message and post the signed signature. You don't need to move any coins to prove you own an address.

[Anonymous No.13471137]

>>13471125
>You can sign a message and post the signed signature
I know, but that's not he said. Also, do you really think he won't sign for the judge and expert witnesses? He has already signed for Gavin and sevral other in the industry

[Anonymous No.13471140]

>>13471093
kek

[Anonymous No.13471216]

>>13471137

I'm sorry but it takes little to no effort to sign messages if you have the private key. If anyone asks, he should just sign a message. The message should simply read

I am csw

from satoshi's wallet and publish the sign message signature.

> Also, do you really think he won't sign for the judge and expert witnesses?

If he can do this, he would've already done so and submitted it as evidence. He would've done this already for anyone that thinks he isn't satoshi. When Vitalik and everyone else said he isn't satoshi, he could've signed a message that said

Vitalik is a fag

and published that message's signature.

But he hasn't. Getting someone (your friend) to say they've seen the message is not proof of anything. Show people the message signature. That's all you have to do.

---------

This thread is actually full of retards that think the "proof" provided in this thread is legit or they think Malaysia and Australia are the same country.

Doesn't even understand you can sign messages and publish the message signature to prove you own the private keys to an address.

Then again this is biz, you're all just trying to make a buck on technology you don't even understand or realize it's not possible to achieve. But hey, if someone said they could do it, put your life savings into it and get those 1000000x gains.

[Anonymous No.13471254]

>>13471216
That would created a legal precedent that the possession of a wallet means that you are the owner of that wallet

[Anonymous No.13471256]

>>13471216
R E D D I T

[Anonymous No.13471347]

>>13471254

If you can sign any message you want and post the valid message signature, it means you have the private keys to the wallet, which means you have full control of that wallet.

I'm not talking about any legal precedent here, but showing that you have the private keys to sign a message will shut a lot of people up.

By the way, it is a requirement to have the private key to have full control of the wallet. So, more people will believe you're satoshi if you can do this. If you can't, then you don't have the private keys to that wallet and people will not believe you. It's just that simple. There's actually many implementations of this in use in the real world right now. Your browser has a lock next to the URL when you visit https sites. You ever wonder why how it can tell from a real SSL certificate and a fake one? Because sites prove their identities by holding the private key and signing it to prove it's legit, that's why that little lock shows up. It didn't go phone a friend for a signature no one saw and his friend said "this site's legit, trust me".

The old bitcoin says goes "don't trust, verify" and you verify by looking at the signature of the message. That's how bitcoin transactions work in general. You have to sign the transaction (with your private key) to show that you want to pay this person. Otherwise, the bitcoin network won't even accept it. You need to prove that's your address and you want to send money to this other address.

>>13471256
What does that even mean? It's public key cryptography implemented in bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13471375]

And to add the creator of bitcoin doesn't understand that all he needs to do is sign the message and post the message signature, similar to how bitcoin transactions work to prove you own the address with this coins, makes no sense.

I mean I understand if you guys didn't know public key crypto that makes sense but the creator of bitcoin doesn't know this?

[Anonymous No.13471404]

>>13471347
>>13471375
If I open the door to your house with a key, does that mean the house is mine? Will you move out and let me have it?

[BSV will win No.13471623]

here come dat boi

[Anonymous No.13471884]

>>13470794
>>13470817
Proves what?

Proves nothing, its a fucking screenshot of a website, from a registrar that no one knows anything about. He can even own it or know the owners or pay them to change the database records or simply edit the website html with chrome dev tools or whatever. Lol... this craig faketoshi is a serial forger and scammer, fuck him

[Anonymous No.13471892]

>>13471623
o shit waddup

[Anonymous No.13471984]

Just another Wright document forgery.

Literally anyone can make this for free today. https://twitter.com/Mike__V_/status/1116725165168177152

"He forged it on purpose" in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

[Anonymous No.13472022]

Anyone who believes this conman is a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.13472026]

>>13471984
Aww, this is lamentable. I actually bothered to check it myself.

Here's the package page (current):
https://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_hosting_virtual.aspx

Here's the package page from 2009:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090410023048/http://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_hosting_virtual.aspx

Holy shit, craiglets, holy shit.

[Anonymous No.13472075]

>>13471984
you do understand that the picture wasnt made when he purchased it?
once the plan changes on the site, it also changes for the clients.

[Anonymous No.13472087]

>>13472075
>t. a person who has never ordered a hosting package
Imagine being this braindead

[Anonymous No.13472141]

>>13472087
why dont you reddit NPC's just stay at your cuckfestival reddit?

the stupidity here is going parabolic.

[Anonymous No.13472178]

>>13472075
Every word wasted on defending Craig Wright's fraud and lies just discredits BSV further and further.

If you were clever, you would short BSV before opening your goddamn retard mouth since then at least your idiocy would earn some profits.

[Anonymous No.13472187]

>>13472178
Nice, just bought 100k!

[Anonymous No.13472197]

>>13472141
>t. butthurt craiglet
I actually never leave the confines of 4chan. Once I saw the screenshot, I immediately verified it myself without going anywhere. Yep, Craig's full of shit. Oopsie doopsie. And guess what? Your payment history is never altered after you made a payment. That's why it's called so, a payment history. You'd know it if you were not a poor butthurt craiglet who has never ordered anything on the internet.

[Anonymous No.13472203]

>>13472178
who am i defending by stating facts?

why are you reddit NPC's even here? just stay at your heavily censored cuckfestival, post daily at your r/bitcoin and praise the blockstream jews.

[Anonymous No.13472209]

>>13472197
i dont even have BSV... what a NPC, not even worth being called fag.

[Anonymous No.13472228]

>>13471984
LOOOOL, you core coiners are getting baited so hard by Craig and you don't even realise it. He never claimed that screenshot was real or any evidence. He claims that the records of him paying for the bitcoin domain are with the cc company, and it's also with the australian tax office because he claimed the expence on his taxreturn. He made the screenshot only to illustrate his blog and (mostly) to bait retards like you. This shit is pure comedy for people with a brain

[Anonymous No.13472250]

>>13470794
>In 2008 Craig Wright registered the Bitcoin.org domain on his credit card which he is going to prove in court with his credit card records, it's over.
>
>>I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law. Welcome to law.
>
>https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/craig-wright-says-his-2008-credit-card-payment-proves-he-co-owned-bitcoin-org-aka-satoshi-nakamoto/
what exactly is over?
even if this fraudster actually is saroshi - which I really doubt - so what?

[Anonymous No.13472253]

>>13472228
>I was just trolling, guys
The cope is real.

[Anonymous No.13472259]

Imagine not buying the real bitcoin for under 100$

[Anonymous No.13472262]

Obviously the real Satoshi wouldn't use his own CC. He asked Creg to do it so his name wouldn't become public when the company is hacked.

[Anonymous No.13472281]

>>13472259

[Anonymous No.13472286]

>>13471404
If you don't have the key, can you claim the house is yours?

Step 1 is always to have the key, then talk about if its actually yours or not

[Anonymous No.13472288]

Remember when Craig spent several tl;dr to explain why he doesn't sign with Satoshi's key, because it would only prove that he owns the keys and not that he's Satoshi?

By that very same logic, this would only prove that he paid for the domain, not that he's Satoshi either.

What a fraud.

[Anonymous No.13472298]

You bunch of absolute fucking brainlet idiots.

Craig has said on numerous occasions that "mere posession does not prove ownership."

This is why he won't sign: he's very headstrong, he's also correct, this is the law, he's a fucking lawyer.

Fucking twelve year old retardos on this board. He's Satoshi, go suck a tailpipe.

[Anonymous No.13472299]

>>13472228

[Anonymous No.13472328]

>>13472298
>Craig has said on numerous occasions that "mere posession does not prove ownership."
We both know that's bullshit. If he possesses Satoshi's coins, he can spend them without asking anyone's permission (and seeking people's recognition, most importantly).

[Anonymous No.13472329]

>>13472298
That's exactly why this move won't prove anything either other than he paid for the domain.

[Anonymous No.13472347]

>>13472286
yes, you can lose or destroy it

[Anonymous No.13472377]

>>13471984
Come on. I need more cringe craiglet replies to this.

[Anonymous No.13472399]

>>13470904
Yes, man I really hate how Greg Maxwell went back and edited this blog post. Like, really, that's mean.

[Anonymous No.13472441]

>great team
>great success
>no shilling 100% guaranteed
>many ruppees
it's time for you to take the brownpill

[Anonymous No.13472511]

>>13472298
>he's a fucking lawyer
course he fucking is

[BSV will win No.13472526]

>>13472399
>posting screenshot of the compromised WikiLeaks twitter account where they claim to have independently verified something but show none of their own research

[Anonymous No.13472560]

>>13472526
>another confused, embarrassed, flabbergasted and butthurt craiglet
lrn2 archive.org, low-IQ poo. It's a fucking public service.

[BSV will win No.13472573]

>>13472560
why don't you just screenshot the github instead?

[Anonymous No.13472580]

>>13472573
It's Internet Archive, dummy. Have you heard of it there, in Maharashtra?

[Anonymous No.13472585]

>>13472573
because he is a reddit NPC that trusts what their leaders tell them.

said it before, stupidity here is going parabolic

[Anonymous No.13472587]

>>13470794
OP you or anyone else can get that exact screenshot. Also he has hidden the prices, if you go check the prices they're exactly the same. Didn't change from 2009 till now? If yes then OP is SN.

[Anonymous No.13472590]

>>13470794
Still not signed.

[Anonymous No.13472593]

>>13470794
I remember seeing this pic but with dates that didn't align with the WHOIS registry for bitcoin.org, it also had the full prices too.
Where's that one? Because to me it looks like he bought some unrelated domain in 2007 and then F12'd it to say bitcoin.org.

[Anonymous No.13472663]

>Retards in this thread and twitter dissecting a useless pic csw intentionally put in his medium article
Wow u debunked him, took u 5 min lol

[Anonymous No.13472669]

>>13472663
>merely pretending

[Anonymous No.13472677]

>>13472663
>>13472299

[Anonymous No.13472701]

>>13472669
>>13472677
>I solved the case!!!! Im smart!!!
Lmao

[Anonymous No.13472707]

>>13472663
>- i am the real genuine sirtoshi nakamotur. look at how I throw off disbelievers with fake cow poo proof
>- bravo sir toshi, we beleve u fully, you are truly a genius. may vishna bless u

[Anonymous No.13472727]

>pulled several scams through the years including a fake sig to pretend he is satoshi
>nothing sticks
are you brainlets fucking retarded?

PS. A lot of people know who Satoshi is, just go to Google scholar and read bunch of papers from 2007-08.

[Anonymous No.13472740]

>>13472259
fake you cant deny a bog call.

[Anonymous No.13472779]

Holy shit, Craig just got raped in court.

Not only did he fake the PGP signature on the fake email he provided during discovery, he also left very obvious indicators that he "drafted the fraudulent email mere minutes before a PDF of the forgery was created"

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.159.0.pdf

[Anonymous No.13472789]

>>13472779

[Anonymous No.13472879]

>>13472779
Ahahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.13472883]

[Anonymous No.13472899]

[Anonymous No.13472905]

>>13472779
We need a Fey clan member to channel Dave Kleiman and settle this.

[Anonymous No.13472959]

>>13470817
>Backpedaling this quickly
>>13470840
>>13470862
>>13470882
>>13470937
>>13471216
>>13471347
>>13472250
>>13472288
>Still in denial this hard.
AHAHAHAHAHA, the absolute state of "Not My Satoshi" CSW derangement syndrome faggots.
At this point is there any difference between arguing with these retards and trying to convince a creationist that evolution is real? I see very little

[Anonymous No.13472963]

>>13472779
Jesus. His forged emails from notCraigandDedA to notCraigB even have to compulsory namedrop ReallyCraigButTotallyNotTheAuthor 7 (seven) times in 4 (four) sentences. This cunts a fucking loop

[Anonymous No.13473028]

>>13472959
Because craiglets are unironically incapable of thoughtful information analysis. They're either desperate gay low-IQ moonboys or incoherent pajeets. It's purely rational, even if you had some interest in CSW in the beginning, to grow more and more wary as you discover incoherence and fraudulence in his personality. What is this? >>13471984 Come on, amuse me with your cope explanation.

[BSV will win No.13473060]

>>13472580
fucking kek, "how into english"

[Anonymous No.13473092]

HANG HIM

[Anonymous No.13473103]

>>13473028
>You have to prove or discredit a bunch of arbitrary bullshit or I won't believe you.
>No, I won't look at the balance of evidence. I demand that you specifically and only address the bullshit that I am clinging to because Bad Aussie Man cannot possibly be Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.13473120]

>>13472899
zhis

[Anonymous No.13473135]

>>13473103
Is that all? Weak. No, you don't have to "prove or discredit" anything as it's already been done. Namely, he fucking faked the fucking screenshot that this thread is about. Now I ask you to come up with more ridiculous excuses for his actions. I'm waiting.

[Anonymous No.13473178]

>>13473103
'the balance of evidence' has, to date, proved only Wright is an inveterate and congenital liar, a forger, a thief and general all-round fucking asspain. The quicker he starts 'proving things before court' the sooner he lands there where he (unarguably) belongs. In. fucking. jail. G'Bye, cunt

[Anonymous No.13473244]

Also, please realize that there are different kinds of lies. If he tried to fuck over the authorities, it's one thing. When he's trying to dupe his own supporters, people who share his ideas, it's something I can neither understand nor accept.

[Anonymous No.13473281]

>>13473135
>he fucking faked the fucking screenshot that this thread is about
Did he? Moreover, IIRC he never holds up the screenshot of proof of anything and implies the proof will be presented in court.
>Now I ask you to come up with more ridiculous excuses for his actions.
Not my job to convince you on your terms. You just take on assumptions that conveniently lead to your preferred conclusion. That's a lot different than looking at everything dispassionately, something you are clearly incapable of.

[Anonymous No.13473315]

>>13473135
this reddit cuck is still here? Show me, where did Dr. Craig Steven Wright touch you?

Crazy NPC

[Anonymous No.13473330]

>>13473281
I don't take any assumptions. I actually did a manual check to see if the claim of forgery is legit. It's simple, you know, there is Internet Archive.

[Anonymous No.13473348]

i'm satoshi too lads and i paid with bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13473360]

>>13473315
You must be the guy who believes that your payment history gets recalculated with new prices? It must be hard to have a low IQ.

[Anonymous No.13473374]

>>13473360
where did i say anything about payment history? typical cuck that cant read

[Anonymous No.13473394]

>>13473374
When you typed this nonsense
>you do understand that the picture wasnt made when he purchased it?
>once the plan changes on the site, it also changes for the clients.

[Anonymous No.13473411]

>>13473330
Kek, you don't even understand the key assumption you made (hint it's in this thread multiple times and has nothing to do with the content of the screenshot itself, but rather its significance)
I've gotta finish a project, so maybe another kind anon will fill you in if you ask nicely, brainlet-anon. Word of advice though, you are not a rigorous thinker and should dump whatever crypto you might hold into a managed fund or index fund so you don't get raped by the market. You are not sufficiently intellectually equipped to make money in this space.

[Anonymous No.13473416]

>>13473394
the plan. the same plan he was using before but changed because they changed their products, how retarded are you, reddit cuck?

[Anonymous No.13473449]

>>13473416
No, what you said is exactly that your payment history gets updated "once the plan changes on the site". Unfortunately, you're a very unintelligent craiglet.

>>13473411
Small details form a bigger picture, I can't ignore them as well as I can't ignore the fact that Craig is duping his own supporters. You're free to have whatever irrational vision you like.

[Anonymous No.13473507]

>>13473449
yes, the world works as you want. how fucking delusional are you, NPC? everyone understood it, besides you and therefore it has to be as you say.
Everyone here is blaming you for being a delusional, retarded, reddit cuck, but no, it's the others, right? Just go back to your reddit, fag. Since 5 hours continuously bumping this thread like a fucking NPC.

[Anonymous No.13473537]

>>13473507
Tell me honestly, have you donated to Nguyen's LGBT & diversity fund?

[Anonymous No.13474031]

>>13472779
>>13473092
Fake screenshots.

[Anonymous No.13474333]

>>13470817
so sweetie he has not proven he bought it

[Anonymous No.13474348]

>>13472075
retard, it wouldn't list as VPN200
LMAO

cope harder

[Anonymous No.13474358]

>>13472228
>>13472209
>whatever, it's fake, s-so what..?
COPE

[Anonymous No.13474374]

>>13473348
OMG SATOSHI IS POSTING HERE THIS SCREENSHOT IS IRREFUTABLE

[Anonymous No.13474437]

>Craig S(till no proof) Wright

[Anonymous No.13474908]

>>13471216
there could be another reason this has not happened, perhaps he lost access to the keys through carelessness.

[Anonymous No.13474918]

>>13471347
he could still be satoshi without control of the wallet.

[Anonymous No.13475873]

>>13472288

IF you have someone else's house keys, does it mean the house is yours?

[Anonymous No.13475932]

>>13475873
after this many years it actually would, yeah

[Anonymous No.13475945]

>>13475873
if the police find you at 1 a.m. with your arse hanging out of a residential window, slurred speech, and ask you wtf you are doing.. generally, explaining you didn't want to wake up the wife, that you have keys, and a demonstrating your keys open the front door, without problem - this all would (usually) assuage the Laws doubts some, and prevent you spending an unfortunately indeterminate time being treated as thief, answering awkward questions, then being carted off to a cell. And as CSW apparently has no keys, and since been spotted with his arse hanging out multiple windows.. well, GUESS WHERE HE'S FUCKING GOING.
And to think, all this unpleasantness could have been avoided, had CSW only remembered where he left his keys. So dumb, that dementia

[Anonymous No.13475956]

>>13475873
after this many years it actually would, yeah

[Anonymous No.13475992]

>>13475873
after this many years it actually would, yeah