[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 89 KB, 1024x819, 1555894693867.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13398760 No.13398760 [Reply] [Original]

Why is it taking so long to solve the the scaleability problem?

>> No.13398771

>>13398760
Because its not purely a technological/mathematical problem. It exists at the intersection of technology/game theory/human behavior, and thats a bitch to solve correctly.

>> No.13399009

>>13398771
Retard! Everything can be solved with technology.

>> No.13399037

Its unsolvable. Which is why Fantom is a no brainer.

>> No.13399266

>>13399037
ah yes the erc20

>> No.13399268

You can't solve a problem that can't be solved. Blockchains are inherently unscalable.

>> No.13399273
File: 46 KB, 498x880, IMG_20190418_131634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13399273

>>13399268
>>unscalable

>> No.13399281

>>13398760
Ethereum bagholder spotted.

>> No.13399289
File: 281 KB, 798x1211, forged.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13399289

>>13399273
He means without sacrificing security with centralized solutions like that shitcoin you have bought into, even though it is promoted by a professional scammer.

>> No.13399299

>>13399273
Its easy for something to work well when its new and doesnt have 10 years of transactions on it

>> No.13399306

>>13399299
bitcoin is more than 10 years old you absolute retard. It's the BSV ticker that's new

>> No.13399367
File: 33 KB, 595x515, images (32).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13399367

>>13398760
It is solved. It's called Bitcoin(BCH)

(SV is the testnet, 32mb blocks are fine to get us to PayPal level of transactions)

>> No.13400101

>>13399367
Roger?

>> No.13400613
File: 22 KB, 460x259, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13400613

>>13399009
>being this stupid

>> No.13400618

>>13399037
This

>> No.13400624

>>13398760
For me it's the McChicken

>> No.13400632

>>13399306
You talking about Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) and not Bitcoin (BTC). Stop scamming people. Your shitcoin is based around making new people in this space think it's related to real Bitcoin so it's a fucking SCAM just like bcash which it forked from. And I'm not even BTC holder.

>> No.13400633

>>13398760
because blockchain is a billion times less efficient and worse at scaling than the worst relational databaae

>> No.13400634
File: 153 KB, 537x640, 1555668411153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13400634

>>13398771

>> No.13400639

>>13400632
sv is the streetshitter variant

>> No.13400659

>>13399266

Not an erc20 you fuuuuuuuuuckin faggot.

>> No.13400689

Is the blockchain really uncrackable?

>> No.13400701
File: 77 KB, 902x842, guxwezb3j6s11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13400701

>>13400632
>he thinks btc is bitcoin
>he doesn't know about segwit

>> No.13400703

>>13400689
bitcoin is the only one trustless permissionless publicly audited ledger that is secure. but secure in practical therms yheoretical attacks are well documented segwit just added 1 more

>> No.13400710

>>13400701
what sort of drooling imbecile you have to be to say that?

>> No.13400752

>>13400710
BTC is just a fork of Bitcoin. The only reason why it's currently considered the "real Bitcoin" is because the real Bitcoin died with the fork. If BTC died when SV was made, then it'd be considered the "real Bitcoin".

>> No.13400755

>>13400752
btc is the main fork of bitcoin yes

>> No.13400768

>>13400752
here is what i want you to do to stop embarrass yourself: go and read about bip16! it was in 2012 and every fucking body was perfectly happy with it.

>> No.13400996

Bump

>> No.13401508

>>13398771
Can someone elaborate on this

>> No.13401976

>>13401508
he is wrong tho scale is purely a technical problem. blocksize storeage and network propagation times don't scale very well. they allow for a natural growth with the underlying infrastructure (which btc blatantly missed to take advantage of) but it's not fucking enough long term for significant adoption figures.

btc could have doubled the block size with every halving and be fine. it was a fuckup of historical proportions not to do that. bch went full retard, but looking back seeing what sv does they start to look like the moderates in this clusterfuck.

>> No.13402958

>>13401976
Except that is the wrong naive approach. Each time you double the block size you increase the centralization factor of a crypto by two. You can't solve a problem with the same type of thinking used to create it

>> No.13403652

>>13399273
>1 node

>> No.13403694

idk what you are talking about NANO has already solved it