LINK is finished.

[Anonymous No.13339751]

it pains me to have to point out the obvious, but this really needed to be said. the pajeets barely even bother to shill this here anymore because they already dumped their bags at the top. this was nothing more than larps and lies to seperate biz neets from their money (which is literally the entire point of this board, LINK is no exception). for those of you that have yet to realize the obvious fact that LINK is now in a downtrend, its time to wake up and smell the roses.

there are still people here that truly believe that they will be financially freed by this no-working-product shitcoin that ICO'd 1.5 years ago during the ETH craze. even if fat fuck sergey and friends do actually launch a main net and come out with a fully functional product, the only demand will be coming from a bunch of other shitcoins making a few api calls for their useless blockchains.

THIS SHITCOIN WILL NOT MOON AS YOU EXPECT.

[Anonymous No.13339781]

yeah i was thinking about the same. maybe we could slowly bleed until 1500sats if link doesn't bring any good news about products.

[Anonymous No.13339795]

>>13339751
I actually came to this same conclusion recently. I put money into a presale pool that was going around on biz back in 2017 and I held all the way until about a month ago, but it does seem like it's a failed experiment. It's a bit disappointing but at least I made money in it so really I can't complain.

[Anonymous No.13339805]

>he spent his time making this
oof
yikes
cringe

[Anonymous No.13339822]

>>13339751
You're drunk pajeet, go home.

[Anonymous No.13339835]

>>13339751
>>13339781
>>13339795
fuck off trannies, I'm never fucking selling

[Anonymous No.13339845]

>>13339835
This
/Thread

[Anonymous No.13339857]

>>13339845
>learning coin

is this the type of shit that you guys are deluding yourselves with nowadays? jesus christ

[Anonymous No.13339861]

>>13339751
Oh man..bsv and link getting shit on hard. Today is a good day.

[Anonymous No.13339863]

I sold before and have actually started reaccumulating. Had 30k back in the day, 7k now.

I always do the opposite of what angry OPs seemingly overinvested in something they're supposedly not profiting from tell me to do and it has paid off so far.

[Anonymous No.13339867]

>>13339751
>the pajeets barely even bother to shill this here anymore because
Because they're salty that Sergey wouldn't endorse their DTG (Discord Tranny Group) token scam.

[Anonymous No.13339884]

>>13339845
Ctrl f

[Anonymous No.13339925]

>>13339884
its just another shitty scam coin's white paper that claims they are going to "DO" smart contracts "SOMEDAY." linkies cream themselves over shit like this because it looks like its important and very technical but its fucking not, and the guy that posted it is a brainlet that thinks that its some kind of MAJOR BREAD CRUMB OOOOOH AHHHHHHHHHHH

fucking retards

[Anonymous No.13339938]

>>13339857
>IMF
>World Bank
>deluded linkies

[Anonymous No.13339964]

>>13339925
It's literally imf and the world bank using kaleido baas

[Anonymous No.13339978]

>>13339751
lol. I will NEVER fucking sell and certainly this weak shit isn't going to change that.

[Anonymous No.13339982]

>>13339845
>some random infographic for a hypothetical issue

Linktards are the most tech illiterate morons on this whole board. I don't need to look at a chart to know link is a scam. There's just a few simple inescapable facts that are proof.

>31 million ICO two years ago with no product despite the fact the project shouldn't take more than 5-6 months to build from a full time team of actual developers
>the only thing from the head of a project is a bunch of repeated talks to a crowd of 8 people who are loitering for free refreshments
>blockchain currency like you know, Bitcoin is still a meme in the real world as far as usage goes
>smart contacts are a bigger meme than Cryptocurrency, smart contracts are vulnerable and shit (Ethereum DAO)
>even if ChainLink works, there's no real way for any actual profit
>Sergey has made $31m and hasn't delivered anything
>shit registered in Panama

Absolute KEK

[Anonymous No.13339985]

>>13339938
>>13339964
NO ITS NOT RETARD, ITS A SHITCOIN LITERALLY NAMED "LEARNING COIN" WITH A BUNCH OF LOGOS ON THEIR WHITE PAPER HOLY SHIT ARE YOU GUYS SERIOUSLY THIS FUCKING DUMB?

[Anonymous No.13339999]

>>13339982
32 million

[Anonymous No.13340017]

Nice blog post faggot, didn’t read a single word. LINK $1000 EOY, put my balls in your mouth and suck them.

[Anonymous No.13340056]

>>13339985
I went and found the article

>ctrl f oracle = 0
>ctrl f ChainLink = 0

It's absolutely fucking nothing. As usual as ever. They actually think that Sergey cares about them. He's ALREADY MADE HIS MONEY. Imagine what he's done with it over the past TWO YEARS. Probably invested a load in a bunch of shit. Probably a real estate mini mogul now. Did anyone seriously expect anything from a philosophy major? Zero technical credentials.

If you want to fucking jerk off to IMF and banking connections then invest in XRP you stupid fucks. You know, the most banker connection project that exists.

[Anonymous No.13340086]

>>13339985
>t. Streetshitter

[Anonymous No.13340114]

>>13339751
I got my linkies at 1500 sats. This has been one of the comfiest holds of my fuckin life m8

[Anonymous No.13340115]

>>13340056
https://kaleido.io/kaleido-selects-chainlink-to-provide-oracle-services-for-blockchain-business-cloud/

[Anonymous No.13340133]

>>13340086
>t. deluded fuck that can't admit that he is way out of his depths as he clings on to a useless shitcoin hoping it will someday save him from the woes of his shitty life

very ironic youre that calling me the streetshitter instead of the jeets that shilled you this garbage in the first place

>>13340115
>another useless blockchain that might "someday" have smart contracts

this is my entire point. the only interest in link is from garbage projects like this

[Anonymous No.13340141]

>>13340086
>t. deluded fuck that can't admit that he is way out of his depths as he clings on to a useless shitcoin hoping it will someday save him from the woes of his shitty life

very ironic that youre calling me the streetshitter instead of the jeets that shilled you this garbage in the first place

>>13340115
>another useless blockchain that might "someday" have smart contracts

this is my entire point. the only interest in link is from garbage projects like this

[Anonymous No.13340144]

>>13340133
Look at this image again >>13339845

[Anonymous No.13340157]

>>13339751
you have 12 weeks to get your shit together, fag

[Anonymous No.13340175]

>>13340144
a slide from a shitcoins whitepaper called "learning coin" that claims their blockchain cloud solution will be kaleidos who claims that their oracle solution is link? look, i understand that you feel like you are connecting the dots and figuring out some important shit but you are really missing the mark here. this is fucking NOTHING

[Anonymous No.13340198]

>>13340175

>facts are claims

and we're deluded

[Anonymous No.13340210]

>>13340175
>shitcoin
>IMF

[Anonymous No.13340212]

>>13340175
>Reeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.13340233]

In case you spoon fed retards weren't clear, the IMF and world Bank learning about blockchains is a watershed moment. Suddenly all institutions change their tune and jump aboard. Blockchains have gained a great deal of legitimacy.

[Anonymous No.13340234]

>>13340198
it doesnt matter if its all true

learning coin is a shitcoin with nothing but a whitepaper that says their cloud computing solution will be kaleidos which is also nothing but a whitepaper that says their oracle solution will be chainlink, which, low and behold is also nothing but a whitepaper

its a trifecta of non-working-product projects that are jacking each other off with their whitepapers and how great the future will be.

[Anonymous No.13340245]

>>13340233
shut the fuck up pajeet. its people like you that pretend to know what they are talking about that will be partially responsible for a bunch of people losing money.

[Anonymous No.13340253]

this thread is the opposite of fud

[Anonymous No.13340261]

>>13340234
Every reincarnation will be worse for you, pajeet.

[Anonymous No.13340288]

>>13340261
as long as im not reincarnated as someone thats holding this shitty fucking utility token ill be happy

[Anonymous No.13340293]

>>13340245
>Complains about losing money. Doesn't understand that crypto works along an exponential j-curve.
You're always losing money until it moons generally at the lowest point newfag.

[Anonymous No.13340296]

>>13340234
>>13340245
>shitcoin
>IMF

[Anonymous No.13340307]

>>13340288
hahaha oh you'll be happy alright

[Anonymous No.13340328]

>>13340296
i cant tell if you are joking, but just in case you are serious let me be clear -

THE IMF HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FUCKING LEARNING COIN YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKER

[Anonymous No.13340377]

This man holds LINK

[Anonymous No.13340402]

>>13340288
So should I sell my linkies?

[Anonymous No.13340443]

>>13339982

You're still not thinking big enough picture though.

As all the Link node setup threads are beginning to discuss, building an API market that is friendly toward the decentralized oracle model is a HUGE political undertaking. As many have noted, mainnet is probably as good as ready nor is the tech development the major hurdle. Chances are that LINK is working to develop business partnerships that will make their product usable as soon after launch is possible. Nothing would be quite as bad as launching a fully functional mainnet without people being able to afford API calls or having businesses willing to release API data to individuals rather than other companies that are calling in huge, guaranteed volume. Plus, it seems like *all* the breadcrumbs and hype here surrounding LINK is about partnerships and big companies wanting to work with the project. Hell, we already know Gonser is a huge ally--- docusign is fucking huge. Imagine the other industry connections he can make or have already happened independent of him, which we might not be able to know about or verify.

Beside, idiots like you still also just harp on fundamentals. The reality is the when the GBR comes back, people will buy on speculative hype again, just as they have the past several runs. And they will be doing the same research that anons here have been doing, if not following what already has massive hype. Chances are that heavily, consistently shilled coins here will find similar traction when the craze is back. RLC, FLO, LINK, etc. The reality is that they don't even have to have good tokenomics or fundamentals for them to skyrocket in value and make us rich. Hell, Bitcoin--- a deeply technologically flawed project--- is proof of this over and over and over.

[Anonymous No.13340514]

OP is all in on LINK, now go back to discord

[Anonymous No.13340536]

>>13339751
>LINK is finished
Implying mainnet will ever release

[Anonymous No.13340557]

>>13340443
>As all the Link node setup threads are beginning to discuss, building an API market that is friendly toward the decentralized oracle model is a HUGE political undertaking.

political? explain please

>As many have noted, mainnet is probably as good as ready nor is the tech development the major hurdle.

this has been the same narrative for over a year now. a main net launch will require an entire network of nodes already up and running. where are they? where is the GUI that one would go to request an api for their smart contract? where is the reputation system? where is the consensus algorithm? where are the is the affordable network of API's? where are the companies utilizing the test net?

>Plus, it seems like *all* the breadcrumbs and hype here surrounding LINK is about partnerships and big companies wanting to work with the project.

these idiots are playing connect the dot with irrelevant info. theyre playing chess on a fucking monopoly board

>Hell, we already know Gonser is a huge ally--- docusign is fucking huge

yeah tom gonser wants docusign to be the go to e-signature company for smart contracts if they ever take off. so what?

>Beside, idiots like you still also just harp on fundamentals. The reality is the when the GBR comes back, people will buy on speculative hype again, just as they have the past several runs. And they will be doing the same research that anons here have been doing, if not following what already has massive hype. Chances are that heavily, consistently shilled coins here will find similar traction when the craze is back. RLC, FLO, LINK, etc. The reality is that they don't even have to have good tokenomics or fundamentals for them to skyrocket in value and make us rich. Hell, Bitcoin--- a deeply technologically flawed project--- is proof of this over and over and over.

>even if my shitcoin is a complete fucking failure, maybe it will still moon

yeah keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous No.13340587]

>>13340557
Brilliant analysis that added nothing to the debate you fucking halfwit

[Anonymous No.13340608]

>>13340587
>t. brainlet moron that knows absolutely nothing about the shitcoin that he expects to make him rich

[Anonymous No.13340622]

>>13340608
In clownworld anon the less you know the better.

[Anonymous No.13340715]

>>13340557

1. I didn't think this would need explaining but "political" means forming strategic partnerships the make the product function beyond just a technical sense. Just... think about it. Most of the work that has to be done by Chainlink is to reshape the API marketplace which is currently hostile to the model that blockchain in general proposes, i.e. one where you potentially have individuals, smaller entities, or untrusted entities trying to make API calls when traditionally you provided data only to trusted partners who were guaranteeing volume. I get that you don't like LINK but try reading one of those link node threads, it clarifies this quite a bit.

2. It's clearly not a scam, if that's what you're implying. Cornell, successful businesses and intelligent business people have staked their reputations with chainlink. None of them got where they are by being amazed by some slight of hand into believing a project is good. They understand the tech, have done due diligence, and know things we don't. Tom Gonser, for one, would not stick his neck out for a project that he did not know was in the process of making waves. Again, back to the strategic part--- if Chainlink is doing their job they are trying to get nodes ready to go ahead of mainnet so that the network is functional when it launches. They have no incentive to reveal yet who or what would be running nodes before mainnet. All of this information is revealed at mainnet, and it would be a strategic blunder to do so prematurely.

3. Nice point? DUMB PEOPLE DOING RESEARCH

4. Again... docusign is a huge company. That means huge volume and payments to the Chainlink network.

5. Did you even read what I wrote? Bitcoin is a technological failure. Key players involved in its creation have called it that. If you have paid attention to the entire history of marketing, you would realize our primary relationship to truth and value is emotional. People believe bitcoin (or gold) is valuable. So it is!

[Anonymous No.13340726]

>>13340557

I'm sorry to be mean but you're really dumb. What do you do? I want to know more about you.

[Anonymous No.13340859]

>>13340715
> 1. Most of the work that has to be done by Chainlink is to reshape the API marketplace which is currently hostile to the model that blockchain in general proposes, i.e. one where you potentially have individuals, smaller entities, or untrusted entities trying to make API calls when traditionally you provided data only to trusted partners who were guaranteeing volume.

You are seriously talking out your ass here. Why the fuck would API providers be hostile toward blockchain or node operators that would pay them for data? You seem to enjoy saying things that sound smart when really you are completely fucking clueless

>2. It's clearly not a scam, if that's what you're implying.

I never said it was a flat our scam, just a failed shitcoin with outrageous expectations. Cornell and DocuSign looking into blockchain is akin to Starbucks creating a CBD infused drink. These are fucking TRENDS and companies do this shit to keep up with the times.

>3. Nice point? DUMB PEOPLE DOING RESEARCH

Ok?

>4. Again... docusign is a huge company. That means huge volume and payments to the Chainlink network.

DocuSign would do nothing more than provide the ability for parties to enable e-signatures for their smart contracts. How the fuck does this generate volume and payments you moron. Again you demonstrate that you know fucking nothing about any of this.

>5. Did you even read what I wrote? Bitcoin is a technological failure. Key players involved in its creation have called it that. If you have paid attention to the entire history of marketing, you would realize our primary relationship to truth and value is emotional. People believe bitcoin (or gold) is valuable. So it is!

The difference between BTC and your useless ERC shitcoin is that if the network is worth nothing then the token will be worth nothing. You can't believe a network into existing. There is no middle ground. People use BTC to buys drugs, transfer value, hide money, launder it, etc. which gives it value.

[Anonymous No.13340918]

lol at the guy pretending link isnt shit

[Anonymous No.13340949]

>>13339751
I thought that everybody already knew that link was meme

[Anonymous No.13340976]

I am in it for the memes
I’ll sell when the memes stop coming
My lowest stack in all of Crypto
Literally bought it for the biz memes

[Anonymous No.13341000]

>>13340245
It's either cryptocurrency or robot bank tellers, they're betting that they can manipulate crypto easier than fighting against robot taxes.

[Anonymous No.13341026]

>>13339751
You can't have my LINK. Poor bastards who weren't here the last 2 years or more at least have no idea how vetted LINK is and more importantly the engineered FUD campaigns to desparately rob us of something we were never meant to have. Truly

[Anonymous No.13341035]

>>13341026
Truly, anon? I don't know how you guys did it, my bags are heavy after two weeks.

[Anonymous No.13341042]

>>13339845
>>13339835
Look you guys. It's not about who's the first person to invent something. It's about the first who makes the PRODUCT TO SELL.

Ford didn't make the first car. If you invested every cent you had in the first car, you would have gone flat broke like a fucking retard (ie LINK)

These idiots have no idea how to market this piece of shit shitcoin. Another will come with a better idea of marketing, and actually sell something that makes money. It may not work as well as LINK. It may not be as efficient. Hell, it may not even have as much expansion potential and eventually be replaced by something else. But it will be BRANDED, MARKETED, and SOLD. Something the current chainlink team is absolutely aspie retarded in doing.

[Anonymous No.13341044]

>>13339751
If biztards would accept Cereneum as their new link we could all get rich together.

[Anonymous No.13341050]

>>13340233
That's why I'm going into NEO. Everything is being pushed to China. All the money.

[Anonymous No.13341065]

>>13340443
Look man, I'm not saying you're wrong about the tech, but the guy's a fucking retard when it comes to marketing. This project will go nowhere and eventually be replaced.

At least diversify. I only lost in Link. Not much thankfully, but I learned my lesson.

[Anonymous No.13341066]

You're right that I am far less familiar with the API market than people in the Link Node General threads who are actively setting up nodes. I'm relaying what has been discussed, although you don't seem interested either in going to read about this stuff which would answer your question, nor dwelling on the points I've been making. You seem like the sort of person who enters arguments to win it so you can feel good about the way you've chosen to live life, rather than listen or have any amount of intellectual curiosity that would make you receptive to new ideas. Honestly that's the worst kind of arguer because it really only wastes other peoples' time and no communication happens. Worst of all its not just a communication problem--- it's a de facto learning disability. Your arguments/responses make no sense and don't address my points. Also you never told me about yourself or what you do. Please do--- I want to put a face on your dumb words.

This will explain the issues with the API market very well, and why Chainlink is conceivably dedicating most of its time and uncirculated LINK to develop strategic partnerships:

>>/biz/thread/S13308478#p13308764

Enjoy and you're welcome... that is if you actually care about learning and maybe having your opinion changed. BTW, Cornell isn't "looking into" LINK. Look up their IC3, Ari Juels, and Town Crier. Extremely legit researchers, people, and project now part of the Chainlink project. Lol, it is FAR beyond a trendhopping move. Again with Docusign you're thinking pretty fucking small. Hope you're not in business. The basic idea of docusign is to digitally enter trusted information into binding contracts--- exactly what an oracle does and would be paid to do as part of the chainlink network... chainlink would be the verifying medium for information entry into smart contracts... creating volume, activity, and payment on the chainlink network.

[Anonymous No.13341085]

>>13341066
DUDE, the money is in the average common denominator. (ie complete retards). They don't give a shit about LINK.

The mark of the beast microchip will use Bitcoin and Ripple, and Ethereum. That's what all the ghetto masses will use to buy food stamps. Nobody gives a shit about stinky linky's ability to compile APIs into supernodes that will literally turn poop into gold at 32x IE XMCI BFT DEJ IMO capability. WHO GIVES A SHIT.

Invest in what the masses and governments will flood money into. Then sell.

[Anonymous No.13341087]

>>13340859

I also don't think you understand what I mean about cypto having almost entirely speculative value. None of this stuff will work as intended or be implemented for another decade. BTC barely works. Chainlink just has to work a little bit for people to keep speculating. And that's a worst case scenario.

>>13341065
How did you lose money?? Did you buy in 2017/2018 or something? I've tripled mine since the fall. And agreed, I am nonetheless always cynical and have other holdings.

[Anonymous No.13341100]

>>13341087
>How did you lose money?? Did you buy in 2017/2018 or something? I've tripled mine since the fall. And agreed, I am nonetheless always cynical and have other holdings.

Because the entire market tripled. NEO also nearly tripled from $5 to $12, and now it's back down.

You could have just gone ethereum after the crash.

[Anonymous No.13341204]

>>13341066
Dumbass

[Anonymous No.13341240]

>>13341066
>>13341087
I don't need to look into it more I know all about it. I hope you make it fren, but I just don't think LINK is the magic ticket. Good luck.

I'm retired btw

[Anonymous No.13342129]

>>13339751
>t. Timo desperately trying to push the price down

[Anonymous No.13342135]

>>13339751
Imagine being so painfully bored that you take the time to type out this entire post.

[Anonymous No.13342146]

>>13339751
I fucking hope so, I'd take out a mortgage if I could buy in the 20c range again

[Anonymous No.13342472]

>>13339867
CLC shares are the attempt from discord trannies of scamming us

[Anonymous No.13342479]

why would anyone sell theri precious linkies so close to mainnet lol?
maybe biz is the wrong board for this fud >>13339751 . try search some indian telegram channels

[Anonymous No.13342517]

>>13341066


how do i run a node and how do i buy api sources please help me i have 7433 links and I heard I can make more when mainnet out

[Anonymous No.13342535]

>>13341026
>Poor bastards who weren't here the last 2 years or more at least have no idea how vetted LINK is
>investment vetting
>from anonymous posters on an anime website

This is why you're poor and will continue to be poor you Dunning Krugtard. I've never seen such confident retardation as I have with Link zealots. I've been here since inception, from /g/, and LINK has always been a joke, no one here 'vets' anything you moron. Just a bunch of pseudo-techie babble that bigger brainlets lap up.

Ethereum's white paper was in 2013. Main net was released in mid 2015. Tell me how the fuck some 'oracle' API shit that's an order of magnitude less complex than Ethereum was takes over 2 years to do nothing. You think maybe it's because ChainLink is two guys sharing a bunk bed? I'm a good judge of character, the first time I ever heard Sergei talk, he sounded like a confident bullshitter who loved to believe his own excuses, he sounded lazy. He was boring. Philisophy major, big red flag right there. They're all insufferable cunts. The first time I heard Vitalik autistically talking into the top right hand corner of a screen way off frame, his enthusiasm hooked me and I went all in around early 2016 when 98% of this board were calling it a scam and saying Lisk was better, remember Lisk?

Anyway you're a dumb faggot.

[Anonymous No.13342546]

>>13342535
> Lisk
Things that never happened

[Anonymous No.13342618]

people falling for that shit obviously are middleschoolers, students with no life experience or very low iq tards. i can tell you just by the look of sergey's fat ass i decided to never invest in this shitcoin. he doesn't look neither seem like a business man that can't stand the tough pressure in this competitive market. not to mention the many red flags based on actual facts. you live in a fantasy world and i agree the white paper sounds good but when it comes to business it all really depends on what you actually can deliver and this shitcoin hasn't done anything so far.

if you haven't dumped your bags at $1 then god may be with you

[Anonymous No.13342651]

>>13342618
>>13342535
bwahahahahhahahaahahah

[Anonymous No.13342655]

>>13342618
>>13342535
i present: lez late adopters