LOL, I love this timeline

[Anonymous No.13274685]

Calvin Ayre just become a ambassador in Antigua and along with it reaping the benefit of diplomatic immunity. How can one be so utterly based?

https://coingeek.com/the-bitcoin-ambassador/

[BSV will win No.13274865]

Here's the old version where he was just the "Cryptocurrency Diplomat".

http://web.archive.org/web/20171211112228/http://ayre.ag/diplomacy

Are there any official references/news to this other than coingeek.com and ayre's own website?

[Anonymous No.13274878]

>>13274865
Not that I know of, just saw his tweet about it.
China man still has stronk nipples. Will he make a new video when the blocks are 1gb? Imagine his ripped off bloody cherries

[BSV will win No.13274897]

>>13274878
He'll pull a truck with his nut sack.

[Anonymous No.13274917]

>>13274685

calvin ayre, previously top 10 on the Homeland Security most wanted list, creates division within the bitcoin financial revolution (with the help of a man that claims without proof that he is satoshi) by forking the most popular coin + dividing the user base and gets diplomatic immunity in a tax haven as a result? and the aforementioned man that cannot provide proof to his claims of being satoshi also recently said under oath that it is a matter of USA national security that he cannot answer certain questions in court?

THIS IS TOTALLY FINE GUYS. NOTHING WRONG HERE.

[Anonymous No.13274937]

>>13274917
>when you claim the addition of segwit didn't cause the fork

[BSV will win No.13274969]

>>13274917
no proof except his unparalleled knowledge in bitcoin and the people that have vouched for him. not that it really matters whether he is or isn't.

btw anti BSV people love bringing up that Ayre was hunted by the US government but at the same time they dislike BSV's pro-government ideology. which is it, rage-against-the-machine or pay-your-taxes?

>>13274937
imagine, if BTC had just increased the max blocksize to a measly 2 MB bitcoin cash would never have happened, all that adoption that BTC have been bleeding would have stayed and faith wouldn't have been lost in its future viability. roger ver would still be out there promoting BTC and every developer would have kept building on BTC.

[BSV will win No.13275006]

>>13274969
plus they wouldn't have felt the need to rush out a broken lightning network that just ruins the project's reputation. it clearly needs at least 5 more years of development and 2 MB blocks on BTC would have provided that.

for those that don't know, SegWIt increases tx/s by MAX 70%, could be 0% depending on the structure of the transactions, while increasing the disk usage and bandwidth requirements by 300%. and complexity by 9999% by adding the concept of "block weight".

meanwhile just increasing the max block size would increase tx/s by 100%, disk space by 100% and bandwidth by 100%. no complexity increase.

[Anonymous No.13275044]

>>13275006
>meanwhile just increasing the max block size would increase tx/s by 100%, disk space by 100% and bandwidth by 100%. no complexity increase
big if true, and sadly it is truly big.
On another note, do you have any idea whats going on with the blocks on bsv today? There is a lot of bocks that's at least 1-5mb. I haven't seen "big" blocks being pumped out this consistently before

[Anonymous No.13275125]

>>13274685
>drops another 10%

[Anonymous No.13275131]

>>13274917
Pls let this become a pasta to spam

[Anonymous No.13275266]

>>13274937
>>13274969
>>13275006
>>13275044

do the needful and buy calvins bags to fund his new private island!

[Anonymous No.13275594]

>>13274685
I like that you linked his own website reporting a news story about him
lol

[Anonymous No.13275628]

>>13275266
the lawsuits from the likes of sergays bags are going to pay for it

[Anonymous No.13275629]

>>13274685
Diplomatic immunity is handy for pedophiles.

[BSV will win No.13275694]

>>13275044
>big if true, and sadly it is truly big.
it's true.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weight_units#Misconceptions
>The maximum size of a block in bytes is nearly equal in number to the maximum amount of block weight units, so 4M weight units allows a block of almost 4M bytes (4MB). This is not a somehow "made-up" size; the maximum block size is really almost 4MB on-disk and over-the-wire. However, this maximum can only be reached if the block is full of very weirdly-formatted transactions, so it should not usually be seen.
as for the proof of "increase in complexity", well the only change a 1 MB max blocksize increase would bring is changing 1 line of code while segwit introduced the whole block weight concept

on the topic of how bad SegWit is, here's Peter Rizun's SegWit concern when no miner checks or saves the witness data: https://youtu.be/hO176mdSTG0
it is a valid concern of the risk in moving the input signatures outside the normal validation

>>13275131
the text is currently under evaluation by the 4chan copypasta committee. some final formatting might be needed before an official pasta is set.

[Anonymous No.13275720]

>>13274969
BCH fork happened before the B2X fork. Roger lost big on that

[BSV will win No.13275742]

>>13275720
the BCH fork had to happen before SegWit, since B2X was scheduled after SegWit. B2X was a trap anyway, very lucky that Amaury forked BCH when he did.

>>13275044
>On another note, do you have any idea whats going on with the blocks on bsv today? There is a lot of bocks that's at least 1-5mb. I haven't seen "big" blocks being pumped out this consistently before
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/charts/transaction-volume-bsv

the number of transactions are about the same so it's just more people embedding data on the chain

[BSV will win No.13275764]

>>13275742
wrong link, meant to link to the count:
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/charts/transaction-count

[BSV will win No.13275805]

>>13275764
er, actually when i zoom in there has been a very high transaction count the last 24 hours. don't know for sure why but unless it's a stress test i bet data embedding is the reason. will probably go down to normal levels again soon enough.

[Anonymous No.13275874]

Literally fucking who

[Anonymous No.13275911]

>>13275694
sauce?

[Anonymous No.13275949]

calvin ayre, previously top 10 on the Homeland Security most wanted list, creates division within the bitcoin financial revolution (with the help of a man that claims without proof that he is satoshi) by forking the most popular coin + dividing the user base and gets diplomatic immunity in a tax haven as a result? and the aforementioned man that cannot provide proof to his claims of being satoshi also recently said under oath that it is a matter of USA national security that he cannot answer certain questions in court?

THIS IS TOTALLY FINE GUYS. NOTHING WRONG HERE