What is in the mind of BTC maximalist?

[Anonymous No.13138229]

What's so special about BTC except it's the first blockchain and currently has the highest market cap?

How are they going to solve these issues in a short time?
>scalability
>smart contract
>centralization of mining pool/ hardware

Once smart contract infrastructures are built around ETH, there's simply no reason to switch back to BTC. ETH already has a roadmap for sharding, PoS. And it's entirely possible that a DAO will appear and help with these issues.

The world won't wait for BTC to slowly improves itself. Once ETH becomes the fabric of every smart contract in the world, flippening will happen.

Why can BTC maximalist be so religious or have I missed something?

[Anonymous No.13138268]

Each coin serves a purpose. But BTC gives the others value. When BTC is up , then your shitcoins will also go up in value. Thus having gold is more important then receiving shit coins which may be a scam.
BTC was first. Does it need smart contracts and all of that other shit? No.
It works well on its own. Of course there are some kinks and such but we can work it out to make sure we don't get fucked.
It's in your best interest that BTC wins...because if it doesn't , then we will have lost the war...

[Anonymous No.13138269]

you've missed the simple fact that

1) bitcoin is money
2) bitcoin is not technology

the demise of bitcoin is the demise of cryptocurrencies as money, it's as simple as that. if you want a utility-only world of cryptos, fine, that would be a drop of about 99% in terms of value, but you can't remove bitcoin from the picture and expect the concept of store of value to remain.

ethereum is fine, but the dao bailout and the 70% premine shows that it is worthless as money, it's value is held entirely due to it's technology and what turing complete smart contracts have enabled. launch ethereum with the same technology as bitcoin, and it would already be dead.

when you understand why bitcoin has remained so dominant with such rudimentary technology, you'll understand why no amount of "better tech" in alts can make a single bit of difference. that and late adopter desperation throws all logic out and they cling to their favorite alt as if its going to make them rich.

[Anonymous No.13138296]

>>13138269
>that and late adopter desperation throws all logic out and they cling to their favorite alt as if its going to make them rich.
Blatant projection there

[Anonymous No.13138325]

>>13138269
BTC is also shitty money!

[Anonymous No.13138350]

>>13138296
And also another good example of why BTC is fucked long term. Normies know there is more money to be made finding the "new bitcoin" than buying more of Grandpa and making some chink whales and Tone Vays rich.

[Anonymous No.13138357]

>>13138229
>i bought this in 2013 and therefore I deserve this
>fuck those guys getting rich of other coins they don't deserve this

Something like this.

[Anonymous No.13138413]

>>13138229
>>13138296
>>13138325
Eth ultra mega penta bagholders are too blind to see that "smawt contwacks" is a fucking meme right now considering the scam token platform you guys worship hasn't even fully defined their sharting, sharding* plan or final blockchain specifications. But muh we have the most pajeet developers and basement nerds, well bitcoin has 99% of the hash rate, which by the way for proof of work coins is a big deal.. But I guess muh PoS (piece of shit) staking will make the 70% pre-miners jewish rich and all the reddit plebs decently rich so why not preach it as the next technological breakthrough.

[Anonymous No.13138535]

>>13138268
You are describing the current price correlation of BTC to altcoins (and in fiat value no less).
It is not necessarily the property of BTC but rather the status quo caused by 1. BTC is a common trading pairs to altcoins. 2. BTC has the heaviest weight to the market cap.

Point 1 will surely be weakened in the future with more fiat gateway being available. If the majority of trading volume of Monero comes from USD/EUR/KRW trading pair, it's price will be more decoupled from price of BTC.

And Point 2 will naturally become less obvious when BTC drop in dominance.

[Anonymous No.13138536]

>>13138357
This is it. It's group delusion as a lot of these people have a ton of 'money' in BTC, not realizing that crypto is being judged as technology instead of digital gold.
They will get mad at this realization before they accept it.

[Anonymous No.13138559]

>>13138269
Agree with most of this anon.
To add; BTC is the most secured network, with the greatest network effect and decentralisation, greatest lindy effect, antifragile and with a proper monetary policy.

95% of the crypto people still don't get its the most disruptive crypto in the space, and don't spend time understanding it's value proposition. Mid-term, it's an easy road to the next ATH over 100k.

[Anonymous No.13138764]

>>13138269
How is Bitcoin not technology?

Suppose Bitcoin's network is getting congested even more than what happened during the last bull run. Apparently it won't hurt Bitcoin from the store of value narrative?

[Anonymous No.13138840]

>>13138413
Hash rate is driven by economic incentive. Miners are not volunteers vowed to protect the network. It only reflect the price (acutal and anticipated) of the coin.

Having high hash rate is certainly not an inherent feature of Bitcoin and can change overtime.

[Anonymous No.13138850]

>>13138269
god damn i don't think i've read a bigger piece of delusion in my life.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13138920]

>>13138229
its the only one trustless permissionless publicly audited ledger that is secure.

[Anonymous No.13138936]

>>13138268

The only reason why btc gives value to the market currently is liquidity, proof of work gives value to BTC but not other coins, it's the same reason that if usd shits the bed every currency in the world goes to shit

Btc has liquidity it's because you must have to buy btc in order to flip shitcoins... If BTC doesn't scale and ETH does the flippening, then ETH will provide more liquidity and btc will be just a store of value and not really important in the marketcap, it's the same reason why eth got a bubble out of ICOS, you had to buy eth to get into ICO so eth got more liquidity

most current btc maximalist are trying to explain how btc came to be through current lenses, but btc has nothing to do with giving value to other shitcoins, so if other shitcoins could flip it easily if they give more value through adoption or other things

probably btc will be just like gold, long store of value, and eth will be used for the real world

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13138953]

>>13138936
you altfags still dont get it

[Anonymous No.13139075]

>>13138296
projection of what? i've been in crypto for a long time, and i'm not deluding myself against everything going on around me that some flavor of the year alt is going to somehow "flip" bitcoin.

>>13138325
yep, it's far, far from perfect, but its the only actual pure money in crypto, and the entire concept of whether crypto can even be money rests entirely on whether bitcoin can.

>>13138350
"normies" think that, but then all of them lost their money to be buying up alts at their ATHs while i and many others were selling them. low-volume alts always rise faster and fall deeper, but thats entirely down to their low volume, and nothing else.

>>13138764
because all of the tech existed long before bitcoin did, satoshi just put it all together. it could have been any kind of tech, blockchain or not, it doesn't matter, what bitcoin is is simply digital scarcity, digital money. alts on the other hand have to compete against bitcoin with tech alone, because if they're just 1:1 copies, like litecoin, they might enjoy some speculative longevity, but will always live in bitcoin's shadow.

>>13138850
i didnt say crypto was going to work out, i said that if it does as money, it has to be from bitcoin. debating that is simply your lack of understanding of the non-tech side of crypto.

[Anonymous No.13139079]

Some of you come close to the answer but miss out somehow. BTC was created to be used as money, however with time, the tech proved to be more useful in another way: as a store of value. You probably wont see people paying stuff with it, it will probably be another coin (or many others). But, as a store of value, it is perfect. It doesnt need to be fast, feeless or whatever, it just have to be trustable. Considering its hash rate, then yes, it is perfect the way it is.

The second fact that makes BTC more valuable than any other is because it was the first to see mass adoption. The whales that got in early are filthy rich and you dont even know. Do you think they didnt buy ETH, or any other coin way before you? Of course they did, and they can increase their stack in any coin they want, and there is nothing you can do, no matter how billionaire you are. Do you know why? Because no matter what, you will never have as many BTC as them. THEY CONTROL SUPPLY YOU MORONS! Did you realize BTC has 51% market dominance? Thats because if you add all other shitcoins, they still can buy them all! Even dollars dont matter that much.... just add every stablecoin out there and you will find out.

[Anonymous No.13139093]

>>13139079
This way I ask you... why the hell would they want to lose their dominance over you, or another shitcoin that has some stupid morons that are simply lucky?

[Anonymous No.13139104]

>>13139079
bitcoin has well, well over 51% market dominance. market cap is a useless statistic, especially when coins like xrp manipulate it in the billions, and the average alt is something like 50+% premined.

theres no easy way to get an actual ranking of the coins that are actually relevant, but market cap is about the worst metric you could use.

[Anonymous No.13139131]

The name of this game is to get more fiat, not BTC, fiat.

[Anonymous No.13139133]

>>13139104
I was just giving a picture as how BTC dominate the others, and you just confirmed that, thanks

[Anonymous No.13139146]

>>13139131
Nope... if you think BTC will go to zero somehow you are terribly wrong. The game is to lure everyone to crypto and make the initial adopters filthy rich

[Anonymous No.13139162]

>>13138920
and yet it would take only a few chinks agreeing to initiate huge reorgs. just like has happened before

[Anonymous No.13139172]

>>13139075
>>13139079

Bitcoin faggots confirmed retarded faggots. Just as I always suspected.

>>13139093
>some stupid morons that are simply lucky?
It's almost as if you are complete devoid of self awareness. Faggot, what do you think early BTC holders are if not what amounts to lottery winners?

Tell me you're not THIS much of a retarded faggot?

[Anonymous No.13139175]

>>13139133
well its obvious, the problem of market cap is late adopters somehow think that "bitcoin dominance" is a thing that can be explaned by market cap, and believe because of that bitcoin is losing dominance.

>>13139162
which is a known attack model, and would result in a proof of work change, as designed. there are many flaws in proof of work, but the only alternative is a proof of stake system that is spawned from a fair proof of work launch, something that quickly became impossible as speculation took over the alt market.

[Anonymous No.13139179]

>>13139172
>pure unadulterated late adopter cope

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13139190]

>>13139162
no it doesnt work like that for various reasons including long term self interest and pools hashrate not being owned and controlled by a single person but thousands.

[Anonymous No.13139218]

>>13139079

>what is printing fiat

do you realize that the banks already flipped any early btc adopter through "printing" (it's just QE) enough fiat to buy all the supply?

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13139221]

>>13139175
pos is not impossible its just permissioned and memoryless unlike pow but it makes sharding and sidechaind viable unlike pow

[Anonymous No.13139232]

>>13139162
Why would they shit in their own plate?

[Anonymous No.13139236]

>>13139179
It's almost as you dirty fags completely forgot about this "little" bug BTC devs had to keep entirely secret.

https://www.coindesk.com/the-latest-bitcoin-bug-was-so-bad-developers-kept-its-full-details-a-secret

>"According to the report, an anonymous user originally filed a report about the denial-of-service bug to top developers of Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin ABC, the main software implementation of bitcoin cash. About two hours later, Chaincode engineer and Bitcoin Core developer Matt Corallo realized the bug could have been exploited to print unlimited bitcoin."

Imagine had this anonymous source not notified devs? Your chuck-e-cheese tokens wouldn't be worth good a god damn.

[Anonymous No.13139241]

>>13138229

Dumbass the people that adopted bitcoin in the beginning did so because of the philosophy behind digital gold. Bitcoin is the only coin with immutible properties. Dump your shitcoins and study bitcoin more instead of asking shitcoiner questions.

[Anonymous No.13139286]

>>13139241

the protocol lets it be secure, security as an ideal is far more valuable than a store of value can ever be, bitcoin won't die but it won't reach the marketcap of other projects destined to more liquid prospects (like derivatives and swaps)

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13139297]

>>13139236
nah if coins were created by exploiting a bug a consensus hardfork would roll it back easily.

[Anonymous No.13139394]

>>13139241
>>13139179
>>13139241
The maximalists get angry as they start to see that other people are judging crypto as emerging tech not digital gold.
It's inevitable as the tech progresses and fulfills futuristic promises. BTC continues to stagnate.

[Anonymous No.13139440]

>>13139297
nice hand waving away of a critical bug so bad it could have ruined crypto as the world knows it.

[Anonymous No.13139441]

>>13139394

Have fun at the shitcoin casino

[Anonymous No.13139456]

>>13139441
Work through the phases of acceptance. I am not telling you what I think, I am telling you that others, IE the banks, investors, normies etc all are looking at crypto in terms of value creation and emerging tech.
They are looking for the next amazon or google, not the next rare earth metal.

[Anonymous No.13139459]

You guys don't really think SHA-256 is unbreakable right? what would happen if SHA-256 becomes breakable and all privatekeys are compromised?

>implying the NSA doesn't have the backdoor and will give it to the IRS to bumfuck everyone post 2025

[Anonymous No.13139468]

>>13139394
>>13139286

Shitcoiners that dont understand bitcoin and see 2,000 shitcoins view crypto as “blockchain tech” and yall will lose all ur money

[Anonymous No.13139481]

>>13139456

Dum dum they can think whatever they fucking want but the truth is only one coin has the properties of bitcoin. Tick tock dude. U’ll figure it out eventually

[Anonymous No.13139501]

>>13139468
>Shitcoiners
>>13139481
> Dum dum
Anger and disbelief are common responses to uncomfortable truths.
Don't take it out on the many development communities bringing progress to crypto. Instead pressure your precious bitcoin to be better. Start some LN nodes and hope to hell that they fix the numerous issues with varying fees, routing and usability.
Because BTC is about to enter a fight for it's life. And the competition is very very motivated to prove they aren't shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.13139544]

>>13139501

I’m already running a lighntning node. The delusion is strong with you. Sell ur shitcoins dude. Lol.

[Anonymous No.13139551]

>>13139544
I already sold the shitcoins I had. BTC mostly, held from 2014 first used in 2011.
It somehow got worse over time.

[Anonymous No.13139553]

>>13139544
How many Satoshi do you get a week on average if u don’t mind me asking

[Anonymous No.13139574]

>>13138229
Hashrate, userbase, excellent monetary policy, development momentum, etc.. Nothing else compares to Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13139580]

>>13139551

Retard larp or BSV shill confirmed.

>>13139553

I haven’t been paying close attention. I only have about $100 and 6 open channels on it at the moment

[Anonymous No.13139604]

>>13139580
Nope. Just someone 'in it for the tech'. Eventually tech will swallow all of us but it won't be the expensive 'digital gold' that matters.
It will be the competition of innovation that you label as 'shitcoins'.

[GayFaggyFagFag No.13139658]

>>13138229
Brainlets, no other explanation needed.

[Anonymous No.13139669]

>>13139604

Every single shitcoin you hold could use a database instead. You’ll figure it out eventually being that you’re in it for the tech

[Anonymous No.13139699]

>>13138229
>the world won't wait for btc to improve
>but it will wait for eth to implement its roadmap!
kys faggot

[Anonymous No.13139866]

>>13139669
>>13139699
Bitcoiners have anger because they don't have hope. They have angst instead of dreams.
It wasn't always this way.

[Anonymous No.13139877]

>>13138229
BTC is the only coin that matters and will ever matter. All the rest of the worthless shitcoins out there floating around exist solely for you to trade to increase your stack of bitcoin. The sooner you realize this the sooner you'll ascend from being a complete newfaggot.

[Anonymous No.13139885]

>>13139604
there is nothing in those little shitcoins that can't be implemented in btc if needed.
>muh smart contracts
those can be added on bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13139890]

all bitcoin maximalists are just late adopter cringe fiat maximalists and don't realize the irony of their views

[Anonymous No.13139900]

>>13139885
Developer mindshare cannot be reclaimed.
Smart contracts were already rejected from bitcoin. It's literally how eth got started.

[Anonymous No.13139924]

>>13139866

Confirmed bcashie and/or bsv shill. You guys are so easy to spot now

[Anonymous No.13139936]

>>13139900

Yup retard confirmed. Smart contracts ON THE BASE LAYER due to security concerns was rejected.

[Anonymous No.13139991]

>>13139936
>>13139924
I support the competition of currencies. If BCH or BSV wins then so be it. BTC doesn't get to skip the fight and stagnate.
I think it will be a blockchain 3.0 but it might be that there is room for many solutions.
>>13139936
Move the goal posts. Ignore the issues. Maximalists are getting so good at that.

[Anonymous No.13140003]

>>13139936
Bitcoin will never have smart contracts. Rootstock won't get any traction, it makes the chain weaker.

[Anonymous No.13140027]

>>13139900
BTC maximalists have no common sense anon, and they're very fond of revisionist history.

[Anonymous No.13140069]

>>13140027
They are all very angry too.
Easily offended and low effort.
Guess thats what happens without inspiration.

[Anonymous No.13140106]

>>13138229
Most decentralised, creator isn't controlling the supply/code, most resistant to centralisation due to small blocksize and anal about code change, suffered and survived the most grievous attacks.

And, yes, brand recognition and first-mover advantage.

[Anonymous No.13140117]

>>13140106
Forgot that PoW is what gives a coin value, since PoW is electricity, hardware and network, .
PoS coins or fiat, and company stocks for that matter, rely on pixie dust for their value.

[Anonymous No.13140131]

>>13139991
Fight imply psychotic frequent change, which is exactly what would stop mass adoption.
It would be like putting your wealth in land in Venezuela, not very smart as a long-term plan.
What you want is long-term stability.

[Anonymous No.13140136]

>>13140106
If you had a modicum of business education you would know first-mover advantage means nothing and its a thing plebs think they know about business.

[Anonymous No.13140169]

>>13140136
It is transparent you focus on the afterthought argument that are obviously both irrelevant to the value of the chain and very important in helping its spread, instead of the central point you worthless cattle.

Refusing to engage in dialectics and resorting directly to rhetorics is admitting your loss, shitcoiner.

[Anonymous No.13140253]

>>13138229
btc has value simply because it has way more trading pairs than any other currency. Also way more bitcoins have been taken out of circulation than any other currency because of stupid early adopters who threw out their computers and lost their private keys.

[Anonymous No.13140266]

I wonder how many btc are contained in inactive wallets that have remained inactive for 5+ years.

[Anonymous No.13140484]

>>13140117
Bitcoin is basically the coca cola of crypto. People think of coke when they think of soda and they think of Bitcoin when they think of crypto. Its going nowhere. Technical innovation is not the most important thing, bitcoin has mindshare which is the most important thing you can have when you are creating a new type of MONEY

[Anonymous No.13140614]

>>13140484
>Technical innovation is not the most important thing,
> crypto isn't emerging tech
> stop looking for tech things guys
> guys buy the cocabitcoin
> guoys oh wow why wont you believe
> cmon I put my money on this
> stop building things
> just hodl bitcoin
No. Not just from me but from all smart money looking for innovation. No.

[Anonymous No.13140616]

>>13138269
PoW is doomed
BTC and PoW can go to shit, my coin would still be up and running
Fuck centralization

[Anonymous No.13140644]

>>13139241
>>13139394


So I buy the digital gold arguments... but I need help with my faith.

- fee's got up to $30 a transaction during the boom. We can't ever go back up to those prices and volume without significant technical changes.
- What happens when we no longer have blockrewards and miners would get more value out of messing with the chain?
- lighting network is incredibly stupid and convoluted. You can't walk into a taco bell, you have to setup an account and coordinate deposits like they are some long term agreement with your lawyer.
- The block stream relationship is sketchy. Bcash people are on to something.

[Anonymous No.13140656]

>>13140484
Coca Cola tastes good. Bitcoin is tasteless and can’t scale. Better hope normies believe the muh store of value meme. Other than that it can’t be built to scale based on its structure. I feel bad for idiots that think btc will be useful in the future on the day to day. Get rekt

[Anonymous No.13140666]

>>13139924
> name calling and no argument.

So should we not have peer to peer transactions. Should we just limit crypto to a settlement coin and use other goof proprietary systems to do payments?

[Anonymous No.13140729]

>>13140614
Dude crypto is literally the process of CREATING FAKE MONEY. The tech is not the most important aspect. To be money you have to have mindshare and name recognition and trust. Bitcoin is so far ahead on the exponential curve with that that no other upstart is going to be able to catch up, it is literally synonymous with crypto for 99% of people. If bitcoin fails it is taking the whole market with it, just go look at the charts every coin is correlating with bitcoin. All the little random moon missions here and there are just playing within the margins, big daddy bitcoin is the actual market maker

[Anonymous No.13140743]

>>13138229
>ME BUY SHINY DIGITAL MONEY
>ME MAKE MANY MONEY IN FUTURE

[Anonymous No.13140768]

>>13140484
Except that Coca Cola has repeat customers while Bitcoin doesn't. People buy Coca Cola to drink. People buy Bitcoin in hopes of making money. When Bitcoin fails to make money, people will just dump/ignore it.

[Anonymous No.13140783]

IDk about btc but if PoS comes out it will change everything. Btc will have the market like gold does but ETH will be the new stock market

[Anonymous No.13140832]

I don't own any bitcoin...should I trade all of my Ada to get one bitocin?

[Anonymous No.13140853]

>>13140768
People buy all crypto in hopes of having a headstart into the inevitable future, your favorite shitcoin is no different

[Anonymous No.13141381]

>>13140853
>headstart
>buying bitcoin
Pick one.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13141943]

>>13139440
every software has bugs im a dev i knlw this very well you can fork for the roght or wrong reasons for example eth forked for the wrong reasons bevause of defective dao code but a btc inflation bug fix would only correct unintended behavior in the codebase and underlying protocol. its no big deal really.

[Anonymous No.13141963]

>>13140832

Yes.

[Anonymous No.13141976]

>>13141381
So you’re saying btc won’t pump anymore

[Anonymous No.13142038]

>>13141976

How big of a pump could there possibly be left in btc at this point? A 10x? Why the fuck would anyone buy bitcoin in fucking 2019? The tech is shit, the price literally can't pump all that much anymore, the community is full of retarded bitcoin maximalists. I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.13142044]

>>13142038
>bitcoin maximalists
oh so you’re one of THOSE...

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142069]

>>13142038
i would say an easy 100x at the very least in the coming years. after that it will get much slower.

[Anonymous No.13142095]

>>13138229
>nce smart contract infrastructures are built around ETH
>ETH
*takes deep breath*

Literally everything you said about Bitcoin applies to ETH as well. Except ETH is in a much worse position because normies don't know about it and it doesn't have first mover advantage.

>m-muh sharting and PoS
it will never happen.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142133]

>>13142095
>it will never happen
people said that about flying at first it was a dangerous inconvenient ineffective means to travel with fragile things or canvas and wood exposed to the elements sometimes crashing after a few hundred meters. that is where crypto is. the few early adopters are regarded lunatics. today commercial flight is the no1 means to travel around the world. most safe most convenient fastest and probably cheapest. that is where crypto is headed.

btc doesn't have to do everything it's enough if it acts as a backbone to the crypto ecosystem. eth and all the thousands of alts can go pos go permissioned go semi trustful to scale bitcoin can't. bitcoins path is to keep crypto at the core trustless and permissionless and secure. it doesn't have to scale as much as people imagine it to needs for adoption. buying coffee with bitcoin is secondary to having full control of your finances full ownership of your wealth.

[Anonymous No.13142149]

>>13142133
I didn't say crypto will never do it. I said ETH will never do it. It is designed poorly from the ground up. There are already a number of platforms that do everything ETH does but ten times better. Those are the coins you would invest in if you weren't a blind bag holder

[Anonymous No.13142166]

>>13138229
its just the boomer crypto, like gold is to "money".
the only thing really going for it is being first mover, much like gold.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142173]

>>13142149
>There are already a number of platforms that do everything ETH does but ten times better.
i don't think the world works like that. eth will most likely emerge a winner even if there are cryptos 10 times better. i see this all the fucking time in the industry. simply because it has pretty much the most devs the most brand recognition the most built upon already. but i have no strong feelings for eth so whatever.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142177]

>>13142166
gold was not first mover, people used grains and clamshells as money way before gold.

[Anonymous No.13142194]

>>13142173
Ethereum doesn't even function on a basic level though due to scalability issues and a horrible user experience. It's already fallen way behind in adoption despite its 2 year head start. Sorry to burst your bubble bub, but ETH is the AOL of the blockchain.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142202]

>>13142194
>ETH is the AOL of the blockchain
like i said i don't care much about eth but i don't see what you are saying at all.

[Anonymous No.13142208]

>>13142202
Then you should try using it one of these days and put yourself in the shoes of a normie.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13142217]

>>13142208
i see, i would have to be awfully drunk to pla with eth.

[Anonymous No.13142315]

>>13138229
>What's so special about BTC except it's the first blockchain and currently has the highest market cap?
I see alot of similarities between the relationship of BTC to ETH and Angular to React.
Angular was the most used framework for single page applications, then the devs fucked up and changed things so much that they alienated alot of their devs and most devs switched to React. Now React is the most used framework for single page applications and still gains more traction every day.
BTC was the most used blockchain, then the devs fucked up and changed things so much that they alienated alot of their devs (just look at the amount of forks), and most devs switched to ETH. The vibe and hype in the React and ETH communities is really comparable, which is one of the main reasons I believe that ETH has already won.
Yes, things are still bad, but they will get better with time, because the majority of devs see it as the best approach to a problem, so they will continue to improve it and build tools to build better apps with it. That's why ETH will ultimately succeed, and why other platforms will never come close to the success that ETH will have. People saying it will never scale, it's fundamentally flawed etc. are just fudding bagholders who probably bought some dpos token.

[Anonymous No.13142368]

>>13142315
You're actually delusional. Ethereum has already lost all of its users and dapp developers to competing platforms. The top EOS and Tron dapps have more users than the entire Ethereum network. Even IF Ethereum was able to solve its scaling problems, it would still be playing a serious game of catch up, and would still have a vastly inferior economic system due to transaction fees.

[Anonymous No.13142381]

>>13141943
Critical bugs like that one that allow unlimited coin creation aren't excusable for software that deals with huge amounts of money, even more so when they're not even working against any deadlines. Bitcoin's team doesn't follow industry standards for software development.

[Anonymous No.13142413]

>>13142368
>muh gambling dapps
lmao, like I said:
>fudding bagholders who probably bought some dpos token.

[Anonymous No.13142419]

[Anonymous No.13142435]

>>13142413
>implying Ethereum isn't full of gambling dapps that no one uses
>implying Ethereum's only real use to date was to as a scam ICO platform
People who live in glass houses etc.

[Anonymous No.13142464]

>>13142435
Here you go, since you seem to need visual aid.
Explain to me again how eos and tron or any other shitcoin has a bigger network of devs? You're just the usual eos shill, you're literally in every single thread that is remotely positive about eth. Get a fucking life bro.
>muh ICO scams
Yeah, and EOS and TRON don't have any ICOs right?
People who live in glass houses etc.

[Anonymous No.13142469]

>>13142368
EOS is fast and regulation friendly. Ethereum is for censor resistance and high security. Different use cases.

Also, to whoever doesn't get it: BTC is the gold standard for crypto; a way to measure crypto within crypto without fiat. It is also the most secure network on the planet. Not defending its #1, but defending its price and relevance.

[Anonymous No.13143021]

>>13142469
it's centralised dipshit.
No big company wants to rely on another company for blockchain tech, that nullifies the point.

[Anonymous No.13143067]

>>13138413
THIS / thread

Keep holding them alts while BTC maximalists flip them for more BTC

[Anonymous No.13143161]

>>13138357
i bought this in December 2017 and therefore I deserve this

[Anonymous No.13143189]

Smart contracts are fucking meme bullshit.

[Anonymous No.13143337]

>>13138229
>centralization of mining pool/ hardware

Won´t happen with pow and moore law limits being reached.

We will see massive descentralization naturally coming as moore law limits means that miners move from most hash to best kw/hash ratio.

>smart contract
Meme

>scalability
Segwit increases capacity by 80% as slowly people move their coins to the new wallet protocol.
Also LN will help with microtransactions.

[Anonymous No.13143596]

>>13142038
You probably dont get it because you are sad you are not getting quick rich with your shitcoin. The reason why you are poor can be easily revealed by your posts and it got nothing to do with which asset you are holding you just have that typical retard altcoiner mentality. I hold alts and btc if something gains the upper hand ill just switch my funds im not subscribed to any of them. Now look at you and your retarded piece of shit posts your assbrain brapped out.

[Anonymous No.13143627]

>>13143596

[Anonymous No.13143686]

>>13143627
And you?

[Anonymous No.13143701]

>>13138269
Thanks for this enlighting info.
Posts like this make me come back to this shithole on 4chan. Quality insights anon, keep it up.

[Anonymous No.13143707]

>>13138229

BTC is almost the only coin which has a legit beginning (yes there are a few others). No one cares about ICO scam coins like ETH. It can never be legit money.

[Anonymous No.13143732]

>>13138229
The new standard of Bitcoin and it has a way now to pay for transactions without needing ETH to do so. It's called Lava Token.

https://lavatoken.com/

Relayers pay your ETH fees so you don't have to. You simply reward them in 0xBitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13143824]

>>13140729
This guy gets it

[Anonymous No.13143837]

>>13142038
It will peak at around 160.000,- USD in roughly 4 years

[Anonymous No.13143873]

>>13138229
Is the crypto reserve currency! It most likely will always be.

[Anonymous No.13143885]

There are gonna be books about Bitcucks and their delusion. They might genuinely have an ultra convenient narrative for everything.

[Anonymous No.13143929]

You shitcoin dreamers will never make it