Serious question

[Anonymous No.13124686]

Why is it that on r/cryptocurrency almost everybody hates BTC, holds 0 BTC, and says it is outdated tech compared to alts? Isn't this completely backwards?

[Anonymous No.13124695]

>>13124686
nice try faggot

[Anonymous No.13124702]

(((They))) are doing a banging job of making people think Bitcoin will be worthless. Every person they get to sell Bitcoin is a big win for them. Remember, you’re dealing with literally the future world reserve currency. Imagine the value of just a single BTC in the near future. Exactly.

[Anonymous No.13124704]

>>13124686
Leddit is actually right about something for once?

[Anonymous No.13124712]

>>13124702
>m-muh digital gold

[Anonymous No.13124735]

You have the opportunity to get into an emerging tech market that has the potential to explode in both value and actual use, to levels which have not been seen in decades (microprocessors, the internet, etc)

Why the FUCK would you be the biggest pussy out there and hedge your money on the absolute slowest part of this fledgling market
If crypto dies, so be it, but if it succeeds you will feel like a real fucking faggot for owning the absolute least profit crypto of this revolution

[Anonymous No.13124742]

>>13124686
They are salty, because they want their shitcoins to moon.

[Anonymous No.13124751]

>>13124735
to elaborate, imagine yourself living at the start of the 1900s and being exposed to the Model T

Would you, a gigantic faggot, blow all of your money on Model T's and Model T factories to invest in

Or would you look for the guys who are doing it better, with a faster car and more safety features.

[Anonymous No.13124777]

>>13124686
NANO is the best coin for them.
You can't help stupidity.

[Anonymous No.13124812]

>>13124704
>>13124712
>>13124735
>>13124751
Wait you mean to tell me that r/cryptocurrency is actually right and alts are going to destroy BTC? I find that hard to believe.

>>13124777
They do love NANO and it's their favorite coin.

[Anonymous No.13124841]

>>13124812
I dont think that alts are going to "destroy" BTC, it will always remain top 5 I think

But considering things like Monero can go 30x and still have less market cap than BTC, I think it an entirely safe bet that there will be MANY alts that outperform Bitcoin , while still having less market cap at the end of it

that being said, i dont think its shit like NANO or FANTOM, its actual adult coins with real purpose like Monero (privacy) Ethereum (DApps) or even BNB because binance is a leading exchange

[Anonymous No.13125009]

>>13124712
Hey you’re starting to get the picture, good job faggot!

[Anonymous No.13125019]

Only rvn. You've been warned.

[Anonymous No.13125118]

>>13124686
I've been in Bitcoin for a long time. Newfags probably dont realize how quickly these shitcoin maximalists popped out of the woodworks. For 8 years Bitcoin was the center of attention, and altcoins were just cute little experiments that we traded to make more bitcoin. The Bitcoin community had a few scares like the Ghash and then BTC Guild hash wars, Mike Hearn's infamous "Bitcoin is dead" article, and the scaling drama. But it was seemingly business as usual.

Then all of a sudden it was like a cruise ship packed with retards landed on our island and started raping and pillaging our land. They took any speck of drama that was currently happening in the Bitcoin community and amplified it 100x, for the only purpose of advertising their new pump and dump shitcoin. We witnessed this on a small scale with the 2013/2014 shitcoins but this time was way different, the echochambers were amazingly effective at convincing people that these scams were actually serious projects. Vitalik coining the term "Bitcoin Maximalist" really added fuel to the fire too.

What you're seeing on places like r/cryptocurrency are remnants of this collective brainwashing that happened over the course of just a few months. This is why most oldfags push back on shitcoins so violently. We all saw how quickly the smear campaign unfolded. Any time a shitcoin is mentioned we can see past your elevator pitch bullet points. All we see is your raggedy, late adopter ass stumbling off a dilapidated cruise ship named "2017"

[Anonymous No.13125140]

>>13125118
Holy shit you seem smart and based. What is your price prediction for BTC by 2023?

[Anonymous No.13125158]

>>13125118
Your opinion on ch******k?

[Anonymous No.13125181]

>>13125118
>All we see is your raggedy, late adopter ass stumbling off a dilapidated cruise ship named "2017"
That is fucking perfect

[Anonymous No.13125183]

>>13125158
As far as heavy lift helicopters go the Chinook is a beast

[Anonymous No.13125192]

>>13125118
this

[Anonymous No.13125219]

>>13125183

[Anonymous No.13125275]

>>13125118
Absolutery this. BTC didn't fail to scale and hold back crypto adoption purposefully.
BTC's community didn't fracture into a bunch of separate coins destroying their 'store of value' illusion.
BTC didn't stop innovating to enrich the boomers who took control of the centralized aspects of the coin.
It's all an illusion. Close your eyes, go back to sleep and use your credit cards. Good boy.

[Anonymous No.13125287]

>>13125275
Found one

[Anonymous No.13125303]

>>13125287
First used BTC in 2011 and have a decent amount 'invested' since 2014.
BTC's direction has saddened me. More than you know.

[Anonymous No.13125309]

>>13124751
I'd invest in the Model T, because it won faggot...

[Anonymous No.13125321]

>>13125118
So you missed a shitload of pumps and were a btc maximimalist. No reason to be salty

[Anonymous No.13125322]

>>13125275
What is the point of this picture

[Anonymous No.13125323]

>>13125118
>1 post by this ID
Must still be waiting on his bitcoin transaction to clear kek

[Anonymous No.13125327]

>>13124686
BTC Doesn’t employ paid shills.

[Anonymous No.13125334]

>>13125322
A group of people caught up in their own bullshittery find it easy to lie to themselves and then invest in that lie as if it were truth.

[Anonymous No.13125345]

>>13125303
>First used BTC in 2011
then you would know that a blocksize increase is on core's roadmap. you don't go against the cone, you saw that with jihan. there is absolutely nothing to be sad about with bitcoin. you're just retarded, but that's ok. you don't need to make it.

[Anonymous No.13125410]

>>13125345
> LN on the way, privacy on the way, scaling on the way.
Guys trust us, don't look at the code or progress. Also don't read the whitepapers. ok thx go to sleep

[Anonymous No.13125444]

>>13124686

[Anonymous No.13125463]

>>13125444
reddit tier

[Anonymous No.13125480]

>>13125463

Deep down you know it's true bro. Your heavy bitcoin bag is just clouding your judgement.

[Anonymous No.13125498]

>>13124735
This. Based and fagpilled

[Anonymous No.13125501]

>>13125480
> bitcoin maximalist
reddit discarded

[Anonymous No.13125509]

>>13125334
Yeah, nah
It was actually “bitcoin is SJW” or some shit

[Anonymous No.13125534]

>>13125509
> centralize a decentralized movement around shitty tech and contentious development

[Anonymous No.13125545]

>>13125480
So you pay your everyday grocerry with gold nugget?

[Anonymous No.13125556]

>>13125534
> a bunch of roasties wearing “bitcoin is female” shirts is centralization

[Anonymous No.13125558]

>>13124751
Ford isn't making Model Ts, but they're still around. Henry Ford was J-woke as fuck, too.

[Anonymous No.13125614]

>>13125556
Their lie is that any female is involved in cryptography in the 2000s.
Your lie is that the world will wait for your shitcoin BTC to resolve it's issues before moving onwards.

[Anonymous No.13125622]

bitcoin haters are getting more rabid every week, especially when it's obvious that they are wrong (see bcash and sanjay vision's failures)

>muh merchant adoption
>muh coffee
>muh payment processor use case
>muh buyng groceries with crypto!
>muh on chain scaling (who gives a fuck about security and immutablity!)
>muhbitcoin whitepaper (PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111AAAAARGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH)


>>13125303
store of value motherucker, do you speak it?
making everyday purchases with bitcoin (or any other crypto) doesn't make any fucking sense you retard.
Buying something with btc = selling btc
why would you sell something you think will go up?
hold enough fiat for monthly expenses and put the rest into btc, that's what this is all about
bitcoin only needs to scale for store of value purposes it's a hedge against central banking (money printing greedy kikes), it's not a fucking visa or mastercard competitor

Bitcoin is fucking money, not technology, take you blockchain, shove it up your ass and fuck off
bunch of retards think they will get rich off of open source technology lmao
the only way to capitalize on anything in crypto is through monetary properties

[Anonymous No.13125652]

>>13124735
simple as this desu

[Anonymous No.13125673]

>>13125622
What is your BTC price prediction by 2023?

[Anonymous No.13125675]

>>13124751
So how exactly are pajeet shitcoins better than BTC

[Anonymous No.13125680]

>>13125622
> Bitcoin is fucking money
> making everyday purchases with bitcoin (or any other crypto) doesn't make any fucking sense

[Anonymous No.13125682]

>>13125323
lel

[Anonymous No.13125687]

>>13124686
r/cyrptocurrency is garbage, even for Reddit

[Anonymous No.13125706]

>>13125680
yes retard, it's a new form of money that has a tiny market cap compared to even gold alone, I guess gold also isn't or never was money by your keynesian standards.

>>13125673
Higher than 20k

[Anonymous No.13125725]

>>13125622

>shitcoin #1039 1000x
while
>your bitcoin bag 2x

If you want something that goes up why the fuck would you hold bitcoin after 2015?

[Anonymous No.13125739]

>>13125725
>t. I'm gonna pretend like I can identify a unique scam each week, buy the exact bottom sell the top and move onto the next one
we are all warren buffets behind the screens, I know

[Anonymous No.13125745]

>>13125706
I've loosely followed btc for awhile, early on spending it for day-to-day transactions was the goal. Was this just a transitional period until it could get big enough to be a store of value?
Is it still in a discovery phase where 5-20 years from now we don't think of it as a store of value, but instead something... more?

[Anonymous No.13125752]

>>13125118
ethereum will soon have a higher market cap than bitcoin. does that burn your ass? tell us about it.

[Anonymous No.13125763]

>>13125706
You would advocate spend and replace if you thought this was a new form of money.
Instead you advocate pump to later dump.
Sad. We could actually change things if only we had the backbone

[Anonymous No.13125764]

late adopters hate bitcoin because the formation of a new kind of money happened right under their noses, and they were too stupid to get in early.

most of them are also falling for blatantly obvious divide and conquer strategies against bitcoin, pushing worthless forks like bcash or centralized altcoins.

[Anonymous No.13125775]

>>13124751
perfect example of the late adopter's "better tech" fallacy.

bitcoin. is. not. tech.

[Anonymous No.13125776]

>>13125764
I’m a late adopter and I like bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13125788]

>>13124712
>stored in a network controlled by (((them)))

[Anonymous No.13125839]

>>13125776
not all late adopters hate bitcoin, but there's is no reason to hate it unless you are a late adopter, especially the deluded ones that bought bcash/xrp/nano

[Anonymous No.13125845]

>>13125775
>blockchain is not technology

[Anonymous No.13125858]

>>13125752
more late adopter desperation. understand that for ethereum to succeed, the social factors that cement bitcoin as money and the backbone of decentralized crypto must remain in place, and i say this as somebody with a very very large amount of ethereum.

[Anonymous No.13125862]

>>13125845
>only Bitcoin can have blockchains

[Anonymous No.13125868]

>>13125845
>blockchain
point to where i said blockchain. your pic related.

[Anonymous No.13125885]

>>13125868
if thats your argument you are a semantic retard

literally everybody on earth who refers to bitcoin as technology is obviously referring to the distributed ledger technology behind it you absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.13125891]

>>13125858
but ETH is better. BTC will be replaced with ZEC by (((them))) as currency

[Anonymous No.13125898]

>>13125183
Based and Chinook-pilled

[Anonymous No.13125903]

>>13125885
you late adopters sure are slow.

if blockchain was what makes bitcoin valuable, it would have already been replaced.

[Anonymous No.13125910]

>>13125764

>t. got lucky once getting into bitcoin early but missed all the other 1000x pumps after

Seething

[Anonymous No.13125919]

>>13125903
>if blockchain was what makes bitcoin valuable

I guess you're right, blockchain being the tech that allows BTC to exist has literally nothing to do with it being considered as an alternative payment solution to modern systems

[Anonymous No.13125920]

>>13125891
no, back in the real world, no it won't.

ethereum makes a universally worse money because of its proven mutability, 70%+ presale, and developer handouts. it makes for a universally great smart contract platform, of which there is no competition in sight, but despite the wishes of those that missed out on bitcoin, it doesn't make a better money.

[Anonymous No.13125926]

>>13125839
BTC abandoned the very first words in the whitepaper. That is why I hate it.

[Anonymous No.13125938]

>>13125910
speak for yourself, ethereum at sub 30¢ is a pretty good deal.

>>13125919
try understanding cryptocurrencies first instead of jumping right from "what's bitcoin?" to "link 1000 eoy"

[Anonymous No.13125958]

>>13125926
everything you've highlighted is exactly as bitcoin operates today. might want to understand what you're talking about instead of letting people think for you.

[Anonymous No.13125970]

>>13125920

As if bitcoin was any better lol. Bitcoin does what the bitcoin core developers decide it does. Just like Ethereum

[Anonymous No.13125971]

>>13125938
tell me that blockchain technology has no other uses than what BTC provides, a payment solution

if you accept the universal truth that it does, then you also accept the fact that other cryptocurrencies will be useful, likely resulting in an increase in value

[Anonymous No.13125981]

>>13124686
its because crypto is a big ponzi, and laggard dont wanna get in on a old ponzi which will not get them rich. they want to be on the ground zero of the ponzi. no one gives a fuck about tech

/thread

[Anonymous No.13125998]

>>13125970
you really think that? yikes

>>13125971
they can be useful, but theres a difference between money and tech, bitcoin isn't tech, whereas alts can only compete from a tech standpoint.

[Anonymous No.13126006]

>>13125920
>ethereum makes a universally worse money

its purpose is not meant to be money. ETH is meant to be a platform to power the worlds super computer smart contract system, and ether will be used to conduct transactions within the system. it was never meant for currency/cross border payments though it still can be used for that.
youre comparing apples and oranges.

ZEC would be perfect money

[Anonymous No.13126030]

>>13125998

But that's exactly what has happened bro. Sure you can fork it if you don't like what the core developers are doing but the forks will just die off eventually, just look at bitcoin cash. Yikes. No one will want to stand against core after that shit. What they say goes and that's it.

[Anonymous No.13126048]

>>13125998
Bitcoin isn't classified as money.

[Anonymous No.13126059]

Imagine thinking BTC will still be used 10 years from now.

[Anonymous No.13126072]

>>13125926
Don't worry. Bitcoin cash will take the reigns away from the jews who sabotaged it

[Anonymous No.13126079]

>>13125958
p2p electronic cash system
not
p2p digital gold for boomers to hoard

[Anonymous No.13126095]

>>13125998
its the otherway around. Bitcoin is tech, not money. At least not until you can buy shit directly with it (without fiat as intermediary)

[Anonymous No.13126096]

>>13125745
anyone with half a brain always saw bitcoin as a way to escape the money printing press. Maybe a few degens cared about it as a dark market currency, but that's about it.
No one uses gold to buy groceries for years but it's worth $8T (yes this 'outdated piece of shit metal boomer junk lmao haha')

>>13125752
SoonTM, muh flippening

>>13125763
that's not viable with such a small asset, it's gonna be very volatile regardless if it scales to only 5 or 900000000 tx/s, that's why even bitcoin maximalists don't tell anyone to go ALL IN, but to DCA over a longer period of time with their savings

>>13125845
>t. #BLOCKCHAIN_NOT_BITCOIN haha look at my virtue signaling everyone!!
blockchain is just one of the pieces that make bitcoin (decentralized money) possible, blockchain on its own is worthless, you won't monetize a fucking open source concept but keep trying, faggots like vitalik, Lubin and bunch of others have been trying to shove the blockchain meme down everyone's throat and even after 10 years the only use case for blockchain is moving and storing value, there is not a single serious use case that's been adopted in th real world outside of that
don't you sometimes stop for a second and think they maybe the #blockchain meme really is just a meme?
>h-heh Im sure this blockchain thing is a revolution! I refuse to let go of my shitcoin_mooning_one_Day_dream

>>13125885
and guess what, distributed ledger tehnology is nothing groundbraking, whatsoever, bitcoin on the other hand is.

>>13125891
yes, (((((((they)))))) will force us to buy (((((((their))))))) shitcoin and make bitcoin disappear, are you 12 btw?

>>13125919
decentralization is the opposite of efficiency, blockchain is a meme in terms of providing some groundbreaking utility outside of bitcoin, you sure won't believe me but maybe when another 10 years passes by you will realize you'e been memed into this BS by vitalik and other btc minialists.

[Anonymous No.13126147]

>>13126006
>its purpose is not meant to be money. ETH is meant to be a platform to power the worlds super computer smart contract system, and ether will be used to conduct transactions within the system. it was never meant for currency/cross border payments though it still can be used for that.
> youre comparing apples and oranges.
that's why it's near worthless

>>13125926
when will you brainlets realize that on chain scaling sacrifices security/immutability? if you think raising the blocksize is the way to go then may as well stick to FIAT.
Why don't you use nano or some other bcash to buy groceries and other shit if it's so great huh?

>>13126048
yes goy keep waiting until it finally is, I'm sure there will be a ton of upside potential still left!

>>13126059
it's used everyday to store value instead of holding fiat or other assets. Holding = using, regardless of how much you seething keynesian brainlets don't like to admit it.

>>13126079
then go and buy nano or bcash
>muh p2p electronic coffee hehe
what a retard
digital scarcity and immutability is the ground breaking thing, not a fucking payment processor

[Anonymous No.13126152]

>>13126096
>blockchain is a meme in terms of providing some groundbreaking utility outside of bitcoin

ahh so you are just really uninformed, i understand now

[Anonymous No.13126168]

>>13126152
>t. Joe Lubin
keep shilling the blockchain meme
Soon tm, #ground breaking technology
#Blockchain-not-bitcoin!
#BLOCKCHAIN!
#Blockchain revolution
>Bitcon? nahh, BLOCKCHAIN IS WHERE IT'S AT HEHE

[Anonymous No.13126180]

>>13126168
I dont own any, but you are a fool to not understand how supply chain tracking posted to a public immutable ledger is useless tech

This is one single use.

[Anonymous No.13126205]

>>13126180
>the supply chain meme
#Food_On_The_Blockchain

[Anonymous No.13126218]

>>13126205
right, and i suppose that investing in platforms that facilitate the exchange of BTC is also a stupid idea?

BNB and the like.

[Anonymous No.13126257]

>>13126147
Based

[Anonymous No.13126492]

>>13125275
Why are minorities always so insecure and trying to prove something.

[Anonymous No.13126600]

>>13124686
Because it's true.
Bitcoin UX is garbage and always will be, the whole thing did not make a single progress in 10 years, there is no reason it will change at that point.

[Anonymous No.13126635]

>>13125622
>making everyday purchases with bitcoin (or any other crypto) doesn't make any fucking sense you retard.

The first line of the whitepaper is literally "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System".

>why would you sell something you think will go up?
>Bitcoin is fucking money

Legit retard.

[Anonymous No.13126702]

>>13126635
>The first line of the whitepaper is literally "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System".
yeah, and so what? does someone prevent you from using it as such?

it's a new form of money you brainlet that's why it doesn't make sense to sell it now.
You are all so fucking retarded I don't even have the energy to explain simple concept to you.
Let me ask you again if using cryptocurrencies for mainstream/everyday purchases is so great, so important etc then why aren't people using some fast shitcoins like nano or bcash to buy shit?

You do realize that in order for prcie of an asset to increase people have to hold (hoard) it? if it's a fast shitcoin changing hands in nanoseconds bewteen purchases then its market cap doesn't have any reason to be high. Look up 'token's velocity' and stop believing some keynesian retarded memes spread by vitalik and other retards like roger who think that a shitcoin will moon because many people use it (spend/sell). Nobody uses gold for almost anything nowadays, explain to me why it's worth $8T sitting in vaults doing nothing? because people fucking hoard it like motherfuckers shrinking the circulating supply, creating scarcity, do you even understand what I'm talking about

Fuck with the amount of retards still left in crypto I'm pretty sure this bear market will be way longer than anyone thought

go buy nano or some waltonchain and track your potatoes using muh blockchain technology

[Anonymous No.13126809]

>>13125903
Doesn't mean the technology isn't valuable.
80/20 btc alts is my mix

[Anonymous No.13126844]

>>13126809
technology is valuable but not monetizaeble because it's all open source and can be copied
here are the things that CAN be monetized:
>immutability (btc)
>security/hashrate (btc)
>monetary properties/credibility (btc)
>network effect (btc)
etc

if the 'technology' and 'blockchain' are so great, why do you need a shitcoin to make money off of it huh?

[Anonymous No.13126858]

>>13126702
>>13126168
>>13126096


Holy fuck I knew bitcoin maximalists were tech illiterate but god damn.

Again, if the only use for crypto is for the price to go up why would anyone buy bitcoin now? Is there even a 10x left in it at this point? People aren't interested in pumping your bags they want the maximum gains for themselves and that is NOT bitcoin, when will you retards get it through your thick fucking skulls holy shit.

[Anonymous No.13126883]

>>13124735
This ended the thread a while ago.

[Anonymous No.13126898]

>>13126844
Cool. You speak sense and I'm not one to tell you you're right or wrong. Like I said I'm in btc for the most part. Holding some alts maybe some do monetize the tech in whatever niche way they're using it. Maybe I'll make some profit if not for the tech then at least when the normies arrive during the next bull and they make the mistake you're arguing against here. Thanks for the opinions you have. Thoughtful

[Anonymous No.13126968]

>>13125118
couldn't agree more with the majority of altcoins, theres maybe 4 or 5 coins I'd say that are actually legit things like monero and ethereum that have proven purposes to add to their network of users.

Love the elevator pitch analogy. My go to for spotting bullshit coins is when their website consists of a million different ideas, oh it's blockchain but more secure and faster, it's decentralized, it's file sharing, its cryptocurrency, it has future contracts. Like holy shit can you people make it anymore obvious this is just to sucker in newbies and boomers who don't know shit about crypto by using buzzwords and making it seem like this is going to apply to every possible industry ever

[Anonymous No.13126977]

>>13126096
>Maybe a few degens cared about it as a dark market currency, but that's about it.
You are either a fake oldfag or a brainlet

[Anonymous No.13127351]

>>13126702
>Let me ask you again if using cryptocurrencies for mainstream/everyday purchases is so great, so important etc then why aren't people using some fast shitcoins like nano or bcash to buy shit?

Because all of them are less than 3 years old and have still very little network effect today?
Bitcoin could have it by now if it wasn't so trash but instead it made barely any progresses in terms of UX in 10 years and created a vacuum that will be its demise in the coming decade.

> Nobody uses gold for almost anything nowadays, explain to me why it's worth $8T sitting in vaults doing nothing? because people fucking hoard it like motherfuckers shrinking the circulating supply, creating scarcity, do you even understand what I'm talking about

Egyptians used gold as money already 3000 years ago retard and it only stopped being really widely used less than 200 years ago, there is no way to predict the future and as such people will typically fall back on a monetary system with the most proven record in the eventuality of a problem with the current one.
Gold as a currency just works, even if we have a technological rollback to the middle-age it will still works.

>stop believing some keynesian retarded memes spread by vitalik and other retards like roger who think that a shitcoin will moon because many people use it (spend/sell).

The goal of a currency is to be used in order to BOTH store and exchange value in a PRACTICAL WAY.
Money velocity is too high related to its marketcap when the money in itself is garbage either because it can only buy one thing, like an utility token, and as such is not practical or because its value is unstable. In short when it's a hot potato that noone wants to keep.


BTC does not have the proven record to be used as a store of value, this retarded meme is just a gigantic COPE that fags like you swallowed when the network was shitting the bed and the people at the head weren't able to make it scale for just a tiny bit of use.

[Anonymous No.13127495]

>>13127351
>Because all of them are less than 3 years old and have still very little network effect today?
LMAO, so a shitcoin needs years of getting hyped up to be used as a currency?
No it doesn't matter if it scales or not, IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE to use cryptocurrencies for everyday use
how do you even imagine that? do you convert your entire salary/paycheck to your favorite shitcoin and and pay fees on that each time? what if your shitcoin tanks 20%? do you skip a few meals a week to not use it when it went down and do you buy things in bulk when your shitcoin goes up? it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, and no, your favorite utopian coin won't be stable or going up in value in a straight line no matter how much it's used or how well it scales, new assets with small market caps will always be volatile by nature
Collectible->Store of value->Medium of echange
in tha orded, not the other way around like keynesian brainlets think.

>Gold as a currency just works, even if we have a technological rollback to the middle-age it will still works.
bitcoin works way better than gold

>The goal of a currency is to be used in order to BOTH store and exchange value in a PRACTICAL WAY.
no one is gonna hold his entire savings in a volatile asset, people would rather keep putting some btc or other coin aside as savings so it appreciates over a LONGER period of time, not to fuking spend it on groceries the next day,if that was the case why even bother converting fiat to it when you were gonna spend that portion anyway?

There is absolutely nothing wrong with current payment methods/processors, is your user experience bad nowadays when you go to a store? is your visa/mc card too slow? is cash too heavy? no, that's not the problem
the only problem is that the jews print more and more money making fiat worthless, that's where DECENTRALIZED MONEY (btc) comes in. it's not about replacing visa/mc, it's about replacing central banks.

[Anonymous No.13127527]

>>13127351
>this retarded meme is just a gigantic COPE that fags like you swallowed when the network was shitting the bed
no, everyone with half a brain was always bullish on btc because it was a breakthrough in creating and mantaining digital scarcity/decentralized monetary system, not becasue it was possible to pay for your cucumbers and milk in a store for hipsters
you don't gain anything by paying for shit with btc instead of fiat
you gain a lot by not getting cucked through inflation imposed by money printing jews

>and the people at the head weren't able to make it scale for just a tiny bit of use.
no one is gonna raise the block size like a retard and create a hardfork just because of 2 weeks of hype every few years. That usage didn't even come from any merchant adoption it was just speculation
rasing the blocksize is not the solution, end of story, btc is still no1 because it's the most credible crypto, your shitforks or centralized scams like nano have 0 credibility and they will be forgotten in a year or 2, you think they are so great but no one wants to either hold or use (buy and spend) them

[Anonymous No.13127683]

>>13124812
>Wait you mean to tell me that r/cryptocurrency is actually right and alts are going to destroy BTC? I find that hard to believe.

They already did last bubble. Nothing will change from here on out. BTC is sub par gains compared to ALL major alt coins.

[Anonymous No.13127698]

>>13125118
>This is why most oldfags push back on shitcoins so violently.

Just shut the fuck up you retard. Alts capable of faster more efficient transactions and smart contracts are going to gain use for the simple fact you can use them.

[Anonymous No.13127702]

>>13124686
Kys

[Anonymous No.13127769]

>>13124686

Because r/cryptocurrency is a bunch of late adopter retards that don’t understand the philosophy behind bitcoin and just want to moon at the shitcoin casino

[Anonymous No.13127772]

>store of value
more like "bagholder cope", lel

[Anonymous No.13127805]

>>13124841
>fantom isn't 100% downwards compatible with ETH and otherwise superior in any way imaginable
found the turbobrainlet

[Anonymous No.13127856]

I only hold coins that I actually use for something. ETH STEEM EOS seem to be the main ones right now with good shit on them I am actively using. I mean you guys can fuck around with your BTC shit coin ponzi garbage and get sub par gains.

Meanwhile I am actively in development of things that actually use the technology. And I WILL be shilling on here once the ball gets rolling. You think BTC is going to hold up after people like me get a foot hold of this shit? You are a sub par IQ brainlet at that point. Not one decent project I can think of exists on any of the BTC chains outside of centralized services that would honestly be better if it was a dapp.

Fuck r/cryptocurrency though. Reddit is a hive mind cess pool of garbage that makes 4chan look almost pristine in terms of honest discussion.

[Anonymous No.13128115]

>>13127856
This is what the boomer fucks should be afraid of.
Instead they will be holding their dicks screaming 'muh digital gold' as crypto proves itself as emerging tech.