How did LINK actually end up being a biz meme coin?

[Anonymous No.13087686]

It has no main net, no price movements, no big exchange backing, has been literally stable between 40-50c for 6 months

Like, I understand the fundamentals, but why shill something that WONT FUCKING MOVE EVER and is BORING?

[Anonymous No.13087692]

>>13087686
This, the pasta is true:

Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.13087694]

>>13087686
it went from spot 120 to 30 in this bearmarket, stfu.

[Anonymous No.13087695]

>I understand the fundamentals

[Anonymous No.13087708]

>>13087686
>>13087692
This. Bunch of discord trannies tried to force it as /ourscam/, during the presale ICO phase of shadowlink there was a minimum requirement of 30 bucks worth of meth to enter the presale. Bunch of newfags pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their meth. The newfags continued to get shilled and pumped with BBC during the sibios event that shadowlink attended, the whole event turned out to be a flop. Shadowlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices, creating 1000's of bagholders. Now during this alt bull run lots of trannies took advantage of this, and shilled this coin to all the new money and new fags that joined in December and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales (which McAfee admitted to fucking), who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people/cetaceans hybrids have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to the actual project that Shadowlink is aiming to achieve, its nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum… literally making the whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than Shawdowlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all. With no proven background, in fact Sergay was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he abandoned and which floundered until it was took over by a new developer team.

[Anonymous No.13088103]

>>13087686


Opening up this March

https://youtu.be/OIamCXZ6CZI
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827989.680

[Anonymous No.13088146]

>when a 9 page white paper pseudonomously published in 2009 decimates the demand for your 12,000 year old 3rd party financial services industry which has allowed you to literally harvest human life force without consequence so to stop it you invest in a middleware project in an attempt to remain relevant whilst manufacturing a cult following marketing campaign for the weirdo thought leaders occupying an obscure Malaysian fishing internet forum who unwittingly stand to replace you in the power structure but when you pump the price singularity instead of becoming aligned with your interests they all dump their gains back into the disruptive tech you were trying to stop in the first place bringing about heaven on earth and condemning you to hell indefinitely

[Anonymous No.13088153]

Let be honest... only hype produces price increase now... there is no hype left for chainlink... please file under bat/zrx etc.

[Anonymous No.13088161]

>>13088153
> now

[Anonymous No.13088179]

>>13087694
kek... right below DGB and above ICX...

It still needs to double in mcap to enter the rub shoulders with scams like BitcoinGOLD & Crypto.comChain.

[Anonymous No.13088421]

I think post-SIBOS 2017 it really was fading out until Assblaster came in, and from there it really secured its place on /biz/, and then things coming true in terms of it becoming more obvious it was a very serious project with a lot of partnerships just kept sealing the deal.

[Anonymous No.13088606]

[Anonymous No.13089340]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW4YL-u6oag
Rahneesh reviewed it and its a solid pick for 2019. 10$ easily

[Anonymous No.13089363]

>>13087686
>no big exchange backing
It's just about to be listed on Coinmetro.

[Anonymous No.13089533]

>>13087686
Sam hyde bought some

[Anonymous No.13089556]

/biz so busy shilling LINK that they missed out on Enjin, the real next big thing

[Anonymous No.13089610]

>>13089556
They missed raiblocks, Neo, Holo and a few dozens other as well...

[Anonymous No.13089662]

>>13089610
Those were just test runs. Those who missed those gains also missed the 99% decline, LINK will go up and stay up in value.