[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 109 KB, 298x282, Screenshot_2019-03-10 Psychological and Social Disorders of High IQ - YouTube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12979720 No.12979720[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABN-QNzxa2g
>high IQ individuals tend towards INFP and ISTJ
INTJ/INTP BTFO

>> No.12979724

>>12979720
very VERY good post

>> No.12979732

12:00 minute mark

>> No.12979742
File: 22 KB, 714x368, mbtigifted2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12979742

>>12979720
You know there is actual data on this

>> No.12979752
File: 16 KB, 385x324, mbtigifted1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12979752

>>12979742
>>12979720

>> No.12979757

>>12979742
>gifted/normal ratio
This isn't IQ. COPE

>> No.12979775
File: 57 KB, 700x566, MBTI statistics.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12979775

>>12979757
Seems like you're the one coping friendo

>> No.12979803

>>12979775
This is just embarrassing.

>> No.12980034
File: 105 KB, 1157x789, moon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12980034

This is a logician/architect room
Go back to plebbit

>> No.12980110

There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ. The N/S dimension is actually just a euphemism for intelligence. For the other 3 traits it's a bit more complex, for example I's are generally smarter than E's but a mild I is less intelligent on average than an extreme E.

>> No.12980150

>>12980110
>There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ
That's not true. Plenty of intuitives who don't have the reasoning skills to make anything of it. It's a correlation, but sure as hell not perfectly linear.

>> No.12980170

thread bookmarked, watch later

>> No.12980195
File: 623 KB, 2546x1160, 1544233037931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12980195

>>12979720
>INFP
Never gonna make it.

>> No.12980218

ISTJ here and i can confirm that i indeed do have a huge forehead.

>> No.12980248

ISTJ is the most patrician. INTJ tends to attract autistic ancaps. Ancaps are worthless human beings.

>> No.12980252

Lol what about entp

>> No.12980257

MBTI is pseudo-science you bucketheads

>> No.12980269

>>12980257
It doesn't claim to be a science at all.

>> No.12980295

I got INFJ, our results came during a large lecture with like 100 students. I was the only one with INFJ as far as I remember. I'm a total fucking retard loser at age 28 so I don't think it matters much.

>> No.12980389

>>12980269
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience

>> No.12980448

>>12980389
You don't seem to understand what MBTI is. It's nothing more than a self-help tool; a way to understand the psychology of yourself and others. What you're implying is tantamount to saying that stereotypes and categories are pseydoscience.

>> No.12980488

>>12980389
>Scientific racism – claim that scientific evidence shows the inferiority or superiority of certain races.
>pseudoscience
list discarded

>> No.12980543

>>12979803
Try thinking about it instead of just sensing the pretty letters.

>> No.12980551

>>12980488
>>12980389
They also list brainwashing as a pseudoscience. Imagine actually trusting wikipedia

>> No.12980603

>>12979720

>unable to see that MBTI is a bullshit feelgood "test"
>thinks he has a high IQ

>> No.12980648

>>12980389
>brainwashing is untrue (cults)
>neurolinguistic programming does not enhance persuasiveness (useful in the non-science field of marketing)

This is what you are implying with your weak grasp of what qualifies something as pseudoscience. Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no additional claim that the techniques espoused, demonstrable outcomes, or usefulness of observations are negated.

>> No.12980670

>>12979720
WE'RE AUTISTIC NOW BOYS

>> No.12980704

>>12980648
>Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline.
According to this definition, language is a pseudoscience. Try again apologist.

>> No.12980715

>>12979720
Everyone who is an S is retarded.

>> No.12980890

How do I know if I'm INFP or ISFP?

>> No.12980897

>>12979720
>unironically caring about averages
so many plebeians here