I wonder how quickly we will go parabolic.

[Anonymous No.12671768]

Ether went from 1$ 01/16 to $10 03/16

Stayed that price for the rest of the year.

Then from Jan 2017 $10 to $100 May 2017

To $200 and beyond in one week

[Anonymous No.12671790]

once the singularity happens chainlink will explode like you have never seen anything ever before is what i think

but not before sadly

and thats still some time off i am afraid

[Anonymous No.12671797]

>comparing ethereum, a paradigm shift in blockchains, to chainlink, one out of hundreds of ethereum-based funding tokens, with 70% of all tokens owned by one person who's unable to write software

[Anonymous No.12671798]

other question do you frens think there will be "a day of the singularity" like in the history books. where they say hey it happened on x/x/x or will it be a process over one or two years

[Anonymous No.12671799]

It will go parabolicly low incredibly fast when the team releases the 650 million tokens to the markets.

[Anonymous No.12671800]

>>12671768
Ether is about to do that again. If you can be patient for eth 3.0 then you’ll be sippin pina coladas out of hard 10’s sweaty beach bootyholes by 2028

[Anonymous No.12671801]

>>12671768
>literally hundreds of teams

[Anonymous No.12671804]

>>12671768
>he thinks LINK will ever get close to even $1 again

[Anonymous No.12671813]

>>12671797
>he didnt read the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.12671822]

>>12671813
the white paper changes the fact that the token economics can never work on this iteration of decentralized oracles?

[Anonymous No.12671838]

here take this anti fud. ok back to my question plz :) i think it will be on one day. they will say "project x released" that was the day of the singularity

[Anonymous No.12671855]

>>12671822
And why's that?

[Anonymous No.12671871]

>>12671838
What is this?

[Anonymous No.12671877]

>>12671871
biz pool party 2019 you missed something fren. kek was very pleased that day

[Anonymous No.12671881]

>>12671855
see >>12671797

[Anonymous No.12671892]

>>12671877
dubs confirm

[Anonymous No.12671902]

>>12671768
You idiots should know that in ETH terms we are at least 5-10$ already

[Anonymous No.12671903]

Other than the ICO scam boom and not being able to scale is all we have seen from ether. The next boom will include chainlink.

[Anonymous No.12671920]

>>12671768
i hold link but i think the max we can go is $20
too many token in circulation anon

[Anonymous No.12671932]

>>12671822
>he doesnt understand the whitepaper
this dude is claiming hes smarter then the people who wrote it but yet here he is in the same shit infested room as me, glad to have ya bud

[Anonymous No.12671969]

>>12671920
What are your credentials to be able to predict this. Do you think there were probably people saying that about bitcoin at $200 for example. What is there to say that some news wont break out if it hasnt already that will allow the total market capital of all coins to enter the trillions

[Anonymous No.12672018]

>>12671969
there are 350,000,00 of link on the market and other 750,000,000 to enter on the market, anon

[Anonymous No.12672050]

>>12671768
>quick rise to around $10-20 in late 2019/early 2020
>stays there until 2021
>moons to high heaven over the next 1-2 years
>peaks in 2022

[Anonymous No.12672060]

>>12671797
>>comparing ethereum, a scamcoin ICO maker, to chainlink, the future of financial and contractual infrastructure

[Anonymous No.12672065]

>>12671969
I only have 200k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it. All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda.

It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. I need to make it to 500k before mainnet for fucks sake. Link is only going to $5 max. Right now I might make 1MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it.

The upper predictions for Link where about $60 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity.

All of that isn't going to happen anymore. The singularity is cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $5. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this board will hold from 20 cents, to $5 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the 1k eoy memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k, you will do the same with Link at $5. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 200k Link, nowhere near enough to make it. At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to wagecucking after that. But it will be worse because I will have tasted freedom and know what I am missing out on.

[Anonymous No.12672439]

>>12671902
>when eth first hit $10 the market cap was 786,000,000. If link hits that marketcap, each token will be about $2.25. So in eth terms, we are at $1.84. So buying link now is like buying eth at $1.84

[Anonymous No.12672618]

>>12672065
Get out of here nigger. You have no idea what smart contracts are capable of and how Chainlink will be the main infrastructure to fun them all. 4th industrial revolution will happen and you’ll be sry when you could of been a billionaire

[Anonymous No.12672638]

>>12672065
I also forgot to say that you actually think 4chan has a significant effect on the market and is keeping LINK from dumping. LOL

[Anonymous No.12672647]

tonight

[Anonymous No.12672701]

>>12672618
It’s stale pasta. Are you a newfag?

[Anonymous No.12672770]

>>12672065
You're probably right, link will be kept close to single-digit prices eventually.

However, you're wrong in thinking this will make your 200k stack only worth 1MM.

Read the Link ICO smart contract. It's common knowledge that 1 Link is divisible to 18 places behind the decimal. It's also widely reported that 1B tokens are in existence. But the number of tokens issued according to the smart contract has 27 zeroes behind the 1, which matches with the understanding that 1B Link with 18 places behind the decimals is 10^9*10^18=10^27. So every 1 Link you own is actually 10^18 link in the smart contract.

This will allow the network to "split" Link whenever it's convenient. If the price ever gets so high that average low-value contracts would net a node 10^-12 Link, all Link stacks can easily be split such that your stack increases by a factor of 10^9, and now every Link token is only divisible to 9 places behind the decimal, netting those same average low-value contracts .001 Link instead of 1x10^-12.
The actual number of non-divisible tokens remains exactly the same as the original smart contract stated (10^27), but there are many more tokens divisible far fewer times in circulation. In this way, the price of a single token can -- and probably will -- be kept reasonable.

[Anonymous No.12672809]

>>12671801
Lol my dick looks exactly (not almost) exactly like his. Size, shape, peehole literally everything. Specifically look for POV videos of him

[Anonymous No.12672810]

>>12672770
Quality post. You really know your shit! I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider this before they invest.

[Anonymous No.12672813]

>>12672770
Pic related

[Anonymous No.12672951]

>>12672770
wow!

[Anonymous No.12673092]

>>12672809
i always wondered if his foreskin isnt too tight for comfortable fucking.
what kept you from joining the business? are you ugly?

[Anonymous No.12673124]

>>12672770
Based Steve I fucking want you to cum in my throat

[Anonymous No.12673176]

>>12673124
Unfortunately, I'm not on the team in any respect. Just a rando /biz/ brainlet who tries to understand all he can about this project and who noticed there were way too many zeroes in the smart contract

[Anonymous No.12673222]

>>12672770
Actually, the reason why it's dividable to so small parts is that link token can be used when it hits 1 million dollars per token.

[Anonymous No.12673239]

>>12672018
>can't math
>can't understand that the 650m won't just be dumped onto the open market

[Anonymous No.12673242]

>>12672770
Like spliting a stock?

[Anonymous No.12673248]

>>12671768
We already went parabolic from 20c to 40c.
Mainnet hype will pump us to 2$ and stay there for the next 7 years

[Anonymous No.12673271]

>>12671768
>an erc20 with zero product will have the same run as ether
The delusion is painful to watch.

[Anonymous No.12673295]

>>12672770
Never heard about this before. Sounds like the team intends for link to reach 18 digits a stink at original supply. How much is that? Like a billion billion usd each? I'm going to be rich.

[Anonymous No.12673298]

>>12673242
Precisely. The only difference is that new tokens can never be created (unlike shares of a stock), which is why the team went with the absurdly high 10^27 number to begin with

[Anonymous No.12673306]

>>12673295
I see it as them being prepared for it to be an insanely valuable network

[Anonymous No.12673357]

>>12673306
Do you see mainet, with real working customers and working smart contracts before eoy? Yes, it's a guess.

[Anonymous No.12673361]

>>12672770
thomas reads biz? KEK

[Anonymous No.12673368]

Every now and then we get a Link thread with quality information discussed. This is one of them.

[Anonymous No.12673389]

>>12671932
you bagholders must be getting desperate if your only objection to the broken economics of their token model is to point at the whitepaper, something that has absolutely nothing to do with the issues of their token model outside of "we use staking"

[Anonymous No.12673406]

>>12673357
Mainnet yesterday, bro. Guesses are useless, just be patient.

>>12673361
You have no idea the pride i derive from being mistaken for members of the team. Makes me feel like I'll make it. Thanks, frens

[Anonymous No.12673407]

>>12673298
are you telling me when they decide to split the price by say half, they will distribute the other tokens to holders? i highly doubt it

[Anonymous No.12673422]

>>12672770
>>12672813
This is new to me.

Perhaps they do it as precautionary if a single token reaches high fiat value? There really is not a whole lot because all it would be doing is diluting the total
supply and lowering the price, but you would have more tokens anyhow

[Anonymous No.12673426]

>>12671790
good nigga i still need time

[Anonymous No.12673447]

>>12673406
wow, again! thanks, fren. when you mean the price of a single token can -- and probably will -- kept reasonable. what is your prediction?

[Anonymous No.12673475]

>>12673407
No, no more tokens are being created or destroyed. It's like thinking of the number of physical dollars in circulation as the number of pennies those dollars represent. A physical penny cannot be divided any further. In the same way, every Link token that's divisible to 18 places behind the decimal can be thought of as 10^18 indivisible Link. Thus, if the price of 1 Link divisible 10^18 times ever reaches $1000, it would be trivial to make every link in existence only divisible 10^15 times and have everyone's stack now representing 1000x the number of 10^18-divisible Link. You would still have the exact same number of indivisible Link, 10^27, as specified in the smart contract

[Anonymous No.12673478]

>>12673406

>You have no idea the pride i derive from being mistaken for members of the team.

It should make you fearful that maybe the retards who shilled it to you back then didn't knew shit at all

90% of link holders think chainlink is the only oracle solution out there

[Anonymous No.12673495]

>>12672770
Has Rory confirmed this?

[Anonymous No.12673504]

>>12673406
>Mainnet yesterday
What? Are you saying that mainnet was released yesterday without announcement?

[Anonymous No.12673507]

>>12673422
That's exactly what i mean. It would be a method of keeping the tokens a reasonable, easily imaginable value should they ever get to be literally unbelievably valuable in terms of fiat.

[Anonymous No.12673556]

>>12673507
Thanks. Never heard of this before. Good info anon I appreciate you.

[Anonymous No.12673569]

>>12671768
1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.12673594]

>>12673495
Never asked. I don't do twitter, or anything else for that matter. Someone else can bring it to him

[Anonymous No.12673604]

>>12673478
Eh, I've seen plenty of posts that betray a keen intellect behind them. This website is the perfect metaphor for humanity -- there's so much good and so much bad

[Anonymous No.12673659]

>>12673406
There is no way the CL team approaches a larger business, introduces smart contract, explains their oracle service, then tell them.... the service/product we offer is currently still under development... we'll be done, when we're done. It still amazes me no leak of any sort regarding an estimated, guesstimated time frame for a working product... ffs even going to the mars has projected time frame

[Anonymous No.12673701]

>>12673239
350 million plus 750 million = 1 billion you fucking retard. holy fuk llinks are stupid as fuck. No one is investing or making much money with that many tokens. Even bitcoin is dumping and only has 20million tokens. Fuck i hate uneducated american biz retards.

[Anonymous No.12673724]

>>12673701
Youre lack of math skills is showing ranjeet

[Anonymous No.12673738]

>>12673701
B8

[Anonymous No.12673743]

>>12673724
>doesn't know that 35+75 = 1 billion
get fucked burger

[Anonymous No.12673780]

>>12672810
>>12672813
>>12672951
>>12673124
>>12673222
>>12673242
>>12673295
>>12673361
>>12673422
>>12673495
are you literally all retarded?

[Anonymous No.12673786]

>>12673222

Nice numbers anon

[Anonymous No.12673788]

>>12671768
Smart contracts are a meme. Why?
If there was serious money in smart contracts you would see large companies (Amazon/Apple/Alphabet) starting to act as centralized oracles.
>Not trustless, reee
Maybe not for contracts worth billions, but certainly good enough for all kinds of dApps like betting and so on.
Since we don't see large centralized oracle providers the only conclusion is, that there's no money to be made with smart contracts.
Ethorse would like a better oracle than Oraclize, but the demand just isn't there.

Better not get too hyped about the Chainlink mainnet launch, instead have your sell orders ready.

[Anonymous No.12673794]

>>12673475
say i had 5k links at $1000.
what is the process if they switch to 10^15?
my stack becomes essentially 5M and the market price of link adjusts to $1?

[Anonymous No.12673817]

This has to be bait, I refuse to believe there's a human being on the planet this stupid

[Anonymous No.12673830]

>>12673659
Yeah, man, the team certainly has something in mind, but i have no idea what that is. My guess would be just that, a guess.

>>12673794
Yes, that's what I'm saying.

[Anonymous No.12673861]

>>12673556
I’m a brainlet and I didn’t understand. EliAutismo?

[Anonymous No.12673902]

>>12673794
Hell no anon

[Anonymous No.12673911]

>>12673830
You plan on running your own node...whenever that may be?

[Anonymous No.12673955]

>>12673911
I do, and I'm trying to figure out how to leverage info I'm pay for in my current job too. I have a subscription to ThomsonOne which is expensive as fuck, and it would be sweet if i could use that to provide data to smart contracts. But i still haven't figured out if that would violate all kinds of terms of service and open me up to lawsuits. And even if it does, i may be able to upgrade my current subscription to make it legit

[Anonymous No.12673972]

>>12673861
Let’s travel to a hypothetical future together and I’ll explain as simply as I can try.

In this future you own 100 Link, and link is $1000 each. Your total assets in link is worth $100,000

Sergey does not like Link being $1000 each, he thinks it’s too expensive for an individual token and doesn’t like people
Spending hundreds of dollars to receive .3245 arbitrary number of link.

Sergey “splits” the tokens. You now own 200 link tokens valued at $500 a token. He “splits” the token again. You now own 400 tokens valued at $250 each.

Your total assets are still valued at $100,000

Make sense?

[Anonymous No.12673996]

>>12673972
>Let’s travel to a hypothetical future together and I’ll explain as simply as I can try.
>In this future you own 100 Link, and link is $1000 each. Your total assets in link is worth $100,000
>Sergey does not like Link being $1000 each, he thinks it’s too expensive for an individual token and doesn’t like people
>Spending hundreds of dollars to receive .3245 arbitrary number of link.
>Sergey “splits” the tokens. You now own 200 link tokens valued at $500 a token. He “splits” the token again. You now own 400 tokens valued at $250 each.
>Your total assets are still valued at $100,000
>Make sense?

Based for a brainlet like me.

[Anonymous No.12674041]

>>12672770
What it God's name did I just read? How the fuck has this not been discussed before?

[Anonymous No.12674058]

>>12672810
>>12672813
>>12672951
>>12673124
>>12673222
>>12673242
>>12673295
>>12673361
>>12673422
>>12673495
>>12673972
>>12673996
I'd also like to purchase more LINK at a decreased price, so I'm not going to debunk this shit.
However if you fall for this retarded fud, you have never deserved to be holding LINK after the singularity.

[Anonymous No.12674112]

>>12674058
??? How is this fud. Did you read the original post? At worst it's deceptive hopium.

[Anonymous No.12674135]

>>12674058
So you're saying 1 million dollars per token is fud?

Folks, I think we're gonna make it.
t. >>12673222

[Anonymous No.12674138]

>>12674058
Are you retarded? This is not FUD this is actually bullish. Sergey created this token in mind with the possibility of it hitting a ridiculous price point.

[Anonymous No.12674147]

>>12673955
Good to have knowledgeable fintech marines like you onboard. Any suggestion for less tech inclined anon, linkpool I guess ?

[Anonymous No.12674209]

>>12671768
The problem with fudders is

1. they can't explain how else smartcontracts can connect to real world data for execution without chainlink.

2. they can't explain how an automated economy can work without decentalization.

3. they can't explain how the tokenomics of Chainlink will fail (because if they understood the tokenomics they would be a LINKmarine)

4. They can't quite comprehend where the whole crypto space if moving too. They still think its about collecting tokens and trading it for a higher price.

4. They still don't believe that an automated robot economy can exist ready to power the 4th industrial revolution.

Fudders are stuck in the past. Still believing a brick and morter store is better then running a website selling goods.

[Anonymous No.12674320]

>>12674209

Fudders simply see that the chainlink team will fail out of inadequancy for such a complex task as would be to code chainlink

ffs the guys were barely compiling Golang a few months ago doing Hello World tests and putting them in the pivotal tracker as achieved task

[Anonymous No.12674336]

>>12674209
>4
>4

[Anonymous No.12674361]

>>12672809
Nigga you gay

[Anonymous No.12674400]

>>12671768
I'd expect a quiet February, low of 80 high of 130. Then March, expect +20% per week until EOM, possibly a full on explosion. I fully expect eth to be between 14-2500 by EOY. I've watched crypto for awhile, but never invested a nickel. I got 10 eth tokens once I heard about Fidelity last week.

[Anonymous No.12674406]

literally nothing will happen. nothing ever happens

[Anonymous No.12674576]

>>12673972
That’s brilliant! Comfy af. Thanks fren

t. Linkmarine

[Anonymous No.12674588]

>>12674147
Man, I'm one of those less-tech-inclined anons. I have feelers out there with two people that i think will be able to fully grasp how to run a node (not to mention why they'd want to), and I'm going to offer to put up all the capital required for staking if they'd help me run a farm, or at least teach me how to do it

[Anonymous No.12674720]

>>12673972
>Sergey does not like Link being $1000 each, he thinks it’s too expensive for an individual token and doesn’t like people

Sergey loves people, how dare you. The reason to do this is that it’s cumbersome to pay for a service when you have to count the 0’s you’re paying for.

At $.01 per call and $1000 link, a call costs .00001 link. It’s in the customer’s interest to simply pay 1 link, which means moving 0’s so 1 link = $.01 and everyone’s stack is multiplied by 100000 link. The value is constant but micro transactions can remain human readable, regardless of token valuation

I guess $1000 EOY was always a meme after all

[Anonymous No.12674762]

>>12674720
Always was. That doesn't, however, mean that access to the network won't be worth quadrillions one day

[Anonymous No.12674844]

>>12674720
Actually pretty funny because as much as anyone was skeptical, there was always a small sliver of hope of it coming true. Now it's discovered that it's literally impossible in the near and distant future. Maybe 300 years down the road when they somehow run out of decimal points will it actually be 1k eoy.

[Anonymous No.12674888]

>>12674844
>running out of decimals
>27 of them

You're talking inter-gallactic economies at that point

[Anonymous No.12674910]

>>12674888
See you on the space yacht link marine.

[Anonymous No.12674936]

>>12674720
Thanks but I was trying to explain it as simple as possible for people struggling to grasp the concept itt

[Anonymous No.12675021]

>>12674936
You are a nice lady.

[Anonymous No.12675045]

>>12671797
if your post isnt darcastic then you will be the worst loser...because you knew about CL we told you and told you again and you didnt listen

[Anonymous No.12675068]

>>12674588
just make sure they don't run off with your linkies

[Anonymous No.12675080]

when will this shit drop back to 30 cents I need to buy my 1k stack

[Anonymous No.12675093]

>>12673389
>whitepaper
>has absolutely nothing to do with the issues of their token model

[Anonymous No.12675165]

>>12672813

for the brainlets out there:

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1000000000000000000000000000*.000000000000000001

[Anonymous No.12675213]

Listen anons I really care about your well-being. All the link speculation has already been priced in. All the partnerships meme or real have been priced in. It's over I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.12675237]

>>12675213
If that's the case then why does the price change at all? If everything's been priced in then why isn't the chart flat?

[Anonymous No.12675286]

>>12675237
Literally just the newcomers buying in and the rest getting rid of their bags.

[Anonymous No.12675296]

>>12675213
true. but i dont care about speculation. im not selling until we reach 1k through adoption.

[Anonymous No.12675313]

>>12675286
Isn't that priced in too?

[Anonymous No.12675391]

>>12672770
Wat wait isnt that bearish ? Wtf im brainlet explain.

[Anonymous No.12675419]

>>12675391
No, no it is not. At worst it's neutral, at best it's bullish because it shows the developers have planned for the possibility of the network being worth unimaginable sums

[Anonymous No.12675496]

>>12672065
this is copy past from someone who will never post proof

[Anonymous No.12675498]

>>12675296
> Muh technology
T. the late adopter speculative ideal

[Anonymous No.12675544]

>>12671877
>>12671838
> some sad online pixel thing that no one will ever see
> kek was very pleased that day
cringed and reddit pilled

[Anonymous No.12675575]

Every data request known to man will use chainlink in one form or another. Just like bitcoin took over monetary systems around the world. Chainlink #1 mc eoy.

[Anonymous No.12675583]

I'm an early adopter of BTC, AMA Reddit!
Chainlink is a bigger meme than DogeCoin. Linkmarines, that's a nice name for someone that's going down real soon. There's no stopping the keynesian machine, as much as we all want the ideal to be true.

[Anonymous No.12675621]

>>12675419
Yeah but how would they keep the price being reasonable without lowering the circulating supply ? Lets say i have 1 LINK and its worth 1000$. How would they manage to keep price of the LINK at 1$ and my staked fiat value at 1000$ without giving me another 999 LINKs ?

[Anonymous No.12675717]

>>12675621
Magnets.

[Anonymous No.12675727]

>>12675717
Going all in on magnets and link.

[Anonymous No.12675742]

>>12674138
lol no. He created the that supply to keep the price down. Holds so much link he if it hits 2.00 hes made it. Are you fucking retarded?

[Anonymous No.12675756]

>>12675727
Shit guess just magnets then.

[Anonymous No.12675781]

>>12671768
Your middleware isn't going parabolic and ETH 2.0 already has better solutions to this problem with a similar launch day. As a dev I would rather just wait for the protocol to implement then wait for some shit middleware where I have to manage another token.

[Anonymous No.12675828]

I hold link, but this thread is pathetic

[Anonymous No.12675854]

>>12675742
This is the worst bait of all time

[Anonymous No.12675882]

>>12675854
wtf are you on. Its a fact that it has a high supply. When you make a token and you want it to have value you dont make billions of the token.

[Anonymous No.12676025]

>>12672018
Wow you are a brainlet. The entire 650m + most of the current 350m will be committed to nodes. Supply will become very scare, very quickly.

[Anonymous No.12676444]

LINK is the future glue for the blockchain, incumbent financial sector, and the API economy. One individual LINK token will be worth more than Bitcoin itself. You are lucky to hear about it.

Based thread:
>>12673953

[Anonymous No.12676693]

>>12671920
Did you consider the fact that tokens locked up for reputation of nodes will technically lower the circulation

[Anonymous No.12676961]

>>12673743
You are a retard.
Probably should of attened maths class instead of shitting on the street

[Anonymous No.12677216]

>>12676444

Checked for trips of truth

[Anonymous No.12677854]

>>12672770
Thank you based flannelman

[Anonymous No.12678337]

>>12671790
Should I sell my car?

[Anonymous No.12678562]

>>12675717
How do they work?

[Anonymous No.12678657]

>>12671790
It’s going to be tremendous
Like it’s never been done before
It’s gping to have the best upward movement, never been done in history

[Anonymous No.12678666]

>>12672809
Wow
What’s the balls look like p? Give it detailed answers you fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.12678780]

>>12678666
What a waste of satanic trips on balls

[Anonymous No.12679064]

>>12675781
No one has to manage shit. You are stuck in the crypto token as currency meme.
With fiat gateways oracles, why would an American company price any cost of business in anything but USD. Why wouldn't Mexicans use pesos.
It can all be translated on the fly. Joe in accounting doesnt need to worry about the price of LINK, thats all done in the back end

The only people caring about token price is holders and stakers, for everyone else it can be priced in local currency

[Anonymous No.12679080]

>>12671790
>the singularity

[Anonymous No.12679087]

>>12679064
Joe from accounting is going to lose his job because of Link actually

[Anonymous No.12679102]

[Anonymous No.12679225]

>>12673972
Noob question. When you split the token, does it affect the supply somehow?

[Anonymous No.12679235]

>>12679087
Haha true, fingers crossed, fuckin accounts payable

[Anonymous No.12679392]

>>12679225
Yes it creates a Shadow fork each time and the value created is on a separate chain meaning link original holders miss out. Shadow fork supply mirrors link original. I'm stacking the Shadow fork just in case.

[Anonymous No.12679448]

>>12672770
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons

[Anonymous No.12679473]

>>12679448
Are you even ass masterblaster, or anything even close?

[Anonymous No.12679795]

>>12673972
>Sergey does not like Link being $1000 each, he thinks it’s too expensive for an individual token and doesn’t like people spending hundreds of dollars to receive .3245 arbitrary number of link.

Sergey would never give a fuck about this you stupid prat

[Anonymous No.12679820]

$5 end of March

[Anonymous No.12679959]

>>12679820
$4 eo May

[Anonymous No.12680197]

>>12679448
You obviously dont see the true benefit of DLT technology.
Goldman sachs estimates it would save 2 billion dollars a yr using DLT tech through automation plus taking out human error.
That is just 1 of hundreds of business use cases.
Cost cutting through automation will be what leads to adoption. Whoever doesnt will be left behind.

[Anonymous No.12680536]

>>12679820
>>12679959
$500 June

[Anonymous No.12680863]

>>12673701
Moron

[Anonymous No.12680888]

>>12676444
Checked

[Anonymous No.12680910]

>>12679448
this is one of the best pastas out there, gets me very time
>cyber-techno machinations

KEK

[Anonymous No.12680934]

https://vocaroo.com/i/s0lZdlrwtMAY
https://vocaroo.com/i/s0sqpVizxRD6

[Anonymous No.12680935]

>>12676025
Actually only some of them will be used to pay nodes out of Chainlink supply of 650mm as they initially bring on new clients at a reduced price as part of marketing. The rest of a large portion belong to Swift and the Banks that make up Swift. If you don't realize by now Link is part of and is supported by Swift you are a brainlet. Link is going to be huge and a lot of people who invested are going to be rewarded, Assblaster told you this in the beginning, he wasn't lieing. Matter of time and it will be obvious by end of 2019.

[Anonymous No.12681032]

>>12679448

Yeah only a moron could call something trustless as something good lmao, you linkies are something else

[Anonymous No.12681228]

>>12681032
Trust less means you don’t need trust. It works 100% of the time. Jackass.

[Anonymous No.12681242]

>>12681032
>doesnt even understand the most basic of terminology
>thinks he will make it
kek

[Anonymous No.12681268]

>>12681242
>>12681228

Holy fuck, why would anyone want something TRUSTLESS like something DECEITFUL holy shit linkies are totally deluded, it's obvious companies need TRUSTWORTHY not TRUSTLESS

[Anonymous No.12681364]

>>12681268

[Anonymous No.12681379]

>>12681364

Well, after all linkies support a platform that is based on aggregation that works like fucking gambling machines, chainlink more like gambling smart contracts lel

[Anonymous No.12682035]

>>12671797
just remember writing this in a few years, please

[UncleOldfag !7euW7q4KhE No.12682090]

$0.09 EOY

[Anonymous No.12682102]

>>12682090
Listen, I’m really worried about mental health astro tier larp

[Anonymous No.12682124]

>>12682102
Leave him alone, he's been conditioned to thinking you need to have a profile from npc social media. People must care who he is

[Anonymous No.12682129]

I hold 30k LINK but most I see it being is $5- 10 max.. you nerds are delusional

[Anonymous No.12682133]

>>12672770
nooo nooooooo I own so many link plz noooooooo

[Anonymous No.12682149]

>>12672813
STOP plz noooooooo

[Anonymous No.12682166]

>>12682129
I own 403k link you’re going to be poor selling at $10