/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.12632130]

How do we know what Satoshi's vision was if we don't even know who he is?

[Anonymous No.12632146]

You know who Satoshi is.

[Anonymous No.12632151]

>>12632146
Based

[Anonymous No.12632167]

>>12632146
Less retarded than the real picture because at least the writing is facing the right way.

[Anonymous No.12632183]

SV is due for a pump.

My plan, all in on BTT when it drops a little more, dump at 20 sats, then all in on SV and dump at $120.

[Anonymous No.12632899]

>>12632183
no long term hold? $120 is just about ATH; you don't see potential for a moon?

[Anonymous No.12632932]

>>12632183
i keep thinking its overdue but it just keeps doing nothing.

[Anonymous No.12632960]

>>12632932
yeah because exchanges like binance artificially keep it down
craig announced that the may update would allow atomic swaps, making pure crypto exchanges completely obsolete

[Anonymous No.12632977]

>>12632130
Imagine being Satoshi. You disappear as such for severa years. Your invention gets to hundreds of millions in value. You do not touch it. Others modify it. Fork it. Decide to change the use case. Keep quiet.

Then one day you say you are Satoshi. Then that you are not. Never prove it. Fork a fork. Trust me guys, gigas per block. Stiff.

Sounds legit.

[Anonymous No.12633003]

>the Child Porn Storage token project
no thanks

[Anonymous No.12633007]

>>12632977
cringe

[Anonymous No.12633027]

>>12633003
Well, bitcoin was literally created to allow the sell of child pornography over the internet. And I'm sure that at all times there were naked 5 year old girls in Satoshi's vision.

[Anonymous No.12633035]

>>12632977
he wasnt staying quiet ge was patenting everything before ibm and microsoft could so he could give it to bitcoin for free

[Anonymous No.12633041]

>>12633003
serious question to the most blatant non-argument ever:
do you hate cash?

[Anonymous No.12633147]

>>12633041
SV isn't cash. It's a storage enabling token. The whitepaper stopped applying after metanet.
Enjoy your Crypto Public Spunk Bin.

>>12633027
You have a SV node => You download the entirety of it => High probability (reaching 100% in the long term) of having unobfuscated CP on your machine
It's not about buying or selling

[Anonymous No.12633226]

>>12632130
shit shit shit shit shit shit
he found out
execute order 903F

[Anonymous No.12633293]

>>12632130
You look at what we know that he wrote. The whitepaper, the early bitcoin forum posts, etc.

[Anonymous No.12633356]

>>12633147
my question was about its characteristic of anonymity.
are you for complete control? yes or no.

[Anonymous No.12633538]

>>12633035
This is excactly what people don't understand

[Anonymous No.12633684]

>>12632977
Based.I didn't really expect to see this much shilling. This is a top tier, grade-a shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.12633709]

>>12633356
You seem to be talking to yourself. The probability of finding unobfuscated CP on SV asymptotically reaches 100% as time progresses, with a possibility that's it's already there.
After that, it's completely over due to immutability. That's indisputable.

[Anonymous No.12633760]

>>12633147
never a day off for public spunk anon huh? how much is rog paying ya bud?

[Anonymous No.12633827]

>>12633709
true statement and also not a counter-argument against anything.
should we ban all printers because they can be used to print out CP? how about oil colors and brushes? you might paint a naked child with them after all.
should we ban USB sticks, all private data storage, VPNs and similar obfuscation services etc.?
answer my fucking question: do you want complete control via government or not? do you therefore also hate cash (paper money)?
your entire """"argument"""" is that a fantastic feature (completely free, abstract data available everywhere, every time) *can* be abused.
the point is though: that simply is a neutral statement about how insanely powerful this toolset is. every powerful tool can and will be abused, and so it is about weighing the pros against the cons.
you are against the next industrial revolution (metanet) because of pictures that anyone who truly wants them will get via traditional methods ANYWAY.
why am i even talking to such an obvious shill?

[Anonymous No.12633842]

>>12632130
sir, satoj is creg sanjay right

[Anonymous No.12634767]

>>12633827
silence from spunk dump anon of course

[Anonymous No.12634800]

>>12632932
whales are playing dead while scooping it all up
craig will rape the fake btc and take its ticker

[Anonymous No.12634926]

>>12632146
>"Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain."
>"Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain."
>"Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain."

>>12632899
I'm waiting the shitty BSV to moon just to dump it on you. As of now it's only an annoying stuff trapped in the real BTC private keys.
So fucking annoying to touch the cold storage just to drop my bag on brainlet jesus christ followers.

[Anonymous No.12634956]

[Anonymous No.12634989]

>>12633827
My fren, you are talking like metanet will be "the matrix".
Chill, not everything will be store in one single giant immortal and trascendental blockchain, simply because..
...
there is no fucking need and there are cheaper, better, reliable methods to broadcast contents.
All you need to get back from banks it's money ownership and emission.
Control the money, control the rest.
Keep it easy anon

[Anonymous No.12634999]

>>12634767
Been away as a matter of fact. How's your Child Porn Sharing network going?

[Anonymous No.12635006]

>>12634989
It's already a cult. As typically forms around a narcissistic personality.

[Anonymous No.12635028]

>>12634989
missing the point completely.
IoT is happening, the only question is how exactly. digital currency is happening aswell. which one(s)? anyone's guess.
these things are ofc debatable, but my main point was that *any* technology capable of transferring information WILL also be used to transfer unwanted/illegal information.
for instance you could paint something forbidden (mohammed caricature in iran etc.), print something forbidden etc. etc.
since the speed and reach of information transfer is ever-growing, there logically is no perfect concealment of all unwanted ideas - whatever those may be.

also: the people into CP are getting it already. why? because they are motivated by the strongest urge we have. someone dumping pics on the blockchain is not going to give anyone access who didn't have it already.
in general you don't simply judge a technology by its potential negative aspects, you judge it by its positive aspects aswell - and regarding metanet they are insanely huge.

[Anonymous No.12635040]

>>12633827
>should we ban all printers because they can be used to print out CP
If they have immutable storage that has CP lodged into it, yes.
SV will have CP put into it sooner or later. It's a certainty due to it's indiscriminate nature as a promiscuous public whore of the blockchain, and even database, world.

When you feel a tingly feeling in your nuts, you can just go to SV and unload into a orifice of your choice. Your seed will be incorporated into the fiber of the whore forever.

[Anonymous No.12635065]

>>12635040
op_return is miner prunable.

Plus any businesses or block explorers can filter content out. (in other words someone would have to manually go hunting for it)

To all those thinking of nefarious uploads, remember it is a permanent record, while even if not now - in the future it could be traced again.

[Anonymous No.12635076]

>>12635040
>promiscuous public whore of the blockchain
this is the term you use for simply not having someone else decide what information mustn't be part of your reality before it reaches you?
there is a more abstract aspect that you seem to be missing: you are longing for some kind of authority figure that must decide what is ok and what isn't, the reasoning being that human nature is corrupted and that we must be protected from its ugly side.
the logical flaw here is that the censors themselves are therefore by definition potentially corrupted and will use that mechanism (read any history book, thx) against their own people sooner or later.
the only grown-up solution here therefore is to have sensible, mature adults decide for themselves how to handle perfectly uncensored information.
unlike you i don't need big brother to tell me what inputs may even reach me before i interpret them, thank you very much.

[Anonymous No.12635082]

>>12635040

https://blog.moneybutton.com/2019/01/31/against-illegal-content-on-the-blockchain/

[Anonymous No.12635114]

>>12635076
>you are longing for some kind of authority figure
>projecting this badly about his boner for Craig
Instead of psychologising, face rality of the situation. Don't give a shit about SV personally, but the project is doomed.

>>12635082
Typical Craig cultist, incapable of voicing opinions on his own.

[Anonymous No.12635132]

>>12632130
Daily remainder that metanet made any connections that SV had to the bitcoin whitepaper completely null and void

[Anonymous No.12635143]

>>12635065
>op_return is miner prunable.
From the index. it MUST stay on the blockchain if the blockchain is to remain valid.
>typical knowledge level of the typical Craig-cult member.

[Anonymous No.12635144]

>>12635114
i don't even care about his person at all, what are you basing this bullshit on?
you don't have an argument for your own bootlicking and just randomly throw shit at the wall? no, i don't give a fuck about craig.

>the project is doomed
it just released tons of working tools and has a promising roadmap. if you don't dig that, then don't.
i am aware that i might lose every cent put into it, but that is none of your goddamn business.
when the only counterarguments that come forward against THE TECHNOLOGY are

1) "omg look at how powerful it is, it will enable people to broadcast ANYTHING, even NASTY stuff"
2) "lol that guy at the front is a narcissist"
3) vishnu shitposting
then i personally get the feeling that this is more promising than your run-of-the-mill shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.12635160]

>>12635144
>it just released tons of working tools and has a promising roadmap
By putting nice trinkets on your pulling donkey you won't make his broken spine heal. All those neat things don't conceal the fatal wound deep down in the architecture of the project.

You can apply make-up to make it look good until you won't be able to. A corpse WILL start to reek sooner or later.

[Anonymous No.12635165]

>>12635065
>in the future it could be traced again.

WRONG.

These are already digital records (ip, isp data, data, metadata, user behavioural pattern recognitions, that already exist today, abusing ads and cookies all over the place and all kind of collected shit), not real world one where after 20 years they discover a new DNA testing method and you can do better analysis on a sample.
If it can't be traced today, it will be never possible.
If Google, Facebook and your ISP don't know today, no one will ever know.
A lot of user data get trashed forever after few moths/years depending on algo implementation, the web is so big now you can't store everything on a few datacenters forever, NOT EVEN GOOGLE.

[Anonymous No.12635178]

>>12635065
>in the future it could be traced again.
So a single determined person with nothing to lose can wreck the whole thing. Craig loves to make mortal enemies out of former friends last I heard. Which one of them will care about being traced if he's about to get killed?

[Anonymous No.12635188]

>>12635144
>"omg look at how powerful it is, it will enable people to broadcast ANYTHING
Is the blockchain the best method to broadcast audio/video content?

BIG NO.

So...useless

[Anonymous No.12635189]

>>12635178
>pic related

[Anonymous No.12635194]

>>12632146
why doesn't he behave like satoshi used to?

[Anonymous No.12635887]

>>12635114
>doesn't give a shit about SV but is easily identified posting in every SV thread

[Anonymous No.12635913]

>>12635887
Craig and bsv live in their heads rent free

[Anonymous No.12635922]

Why would Satoshi want to reveal himself? Its clear his vision was to create the worlds largest ponzie scheme.