[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1.78 MB, 631x739, new_cube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12014182 No.12014182 [Reply] [Original]

so Swift isn't going to use our nodes? is it over?

>> No.12014189

>>12014182
they aint ready to trust smart contacts

>> No.12014196

>>12014182
you newbies have no idea

>> No.12014199

Youd be retarded to think Swift wants to go "decentralized" and let basement dwellers and kids handle their contracts.

>> No.12014210

>>12014199
youd be retarded to think that was the plan in the first place

>> No.12014222
File: 118 KB, 750x938, 1525843160645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12014222

We got inverse singularity'd !
Exit while you can !

>> No.12014228

ETHEREUM CLASSIC IS BEING 51% ATTACKED!! SPREAD THE GOOD NEWS

>> No.12014444

If you haven't read this yet you need to: https://swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIWP-2016-001-Impact-Open-APIs-FINAL.pdf

No doubt moving significant operations to the blockchain will take a long time, but as you can see from that article, open APIs are going to change banking as we know it, and SWIFT is preparing for that. So no, as soon as chainlink's main net launches you won't see SWIFT using it on a public chain, but that is coming. Anyways the real promise of chainlink is recreating the things that SWIFT and insurers have done for forever trustlessly and without the need to trust banks. This fascination with big players use chainlink is as bad as the obsession over BTC ETFs. Blockchain was never about institutional approval.

>> No.12014528

>>12014444
https://www.ft.com/content/05d41660-f7c8-11e8-af46-2022a0b02a6c
Swift is going to use private blockchain, retard. No meme tokens, no nazi neet nodes

>> No.12014597

Why not I’m putting up 1 million as collateral?

>> No.12014598

>>12014196
Tell us more. Just a tiny bit

>> No.12014693

can anyone refute this fud?

>> No.12014724

>>12014444
>ctrl+f chainlink
0 results
>ctrl+f oracles
0 results
>ctrl+f blockchain
0 results

>> No.12014773
File: 208 KB, 600x600, 1530198824829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12014773

>> No.12014783

Poopscoop thinks he is smart but he just shares /pol/ videos. Also, he cant take any criticism. Weak. Many such cases.

>> No.12014823
File: 654 KB, 810x693, 1541019391551.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12014823

>>12014444
Quads of truth!

>> No.12014827
File: 1.15 MB, 772x900, rad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12014827

Industry standard for fucking everything. Even if every single private permissioned chain doesn't use LINK, even if SWIFT doesn't use LINK, even if ZERO of the current partners use the public Chainlink network...
It is still the industry standard that will underlie every single fucking communication between blockchains and external data. It will still call data for smart contracts and dApps on the EVM through ZeppelinOS. It will still run oracles as a service through Kaleido. It will still be the standard oracle for legal smart contracts through Accord and OpenLaw.
Do you get it? This fundamental smart contract tool is going to be running behind fucking EVERYTHING and if you think the fact that there will be some private versions of this industry standard technology is FUD, and not insanely fucking bullish as fuck, then it's about time you put on a blue plaid shirt, got your cock rock hard, and climbed on board the fucking rocket ship.

>> No.12014828

>>12014598
it was never there for swift to move settlement onto blockchain
it is there to allow contracts to send payments on swifts gpi network

>> No.12015040

>>12014783
Poopscoop BTFO. Mentally weak. Sad!