/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11937830]

39:35 mentions chainlink.
https://youtu.be/Wpdi47V5Kn0
Amazon AWS official YouTube channel.

[Anonymous No.11937842]

>>11937830
HOLY SHIT

[Anonymous No.11937863]

$1000 EOY wasnt meme after all

[Anonymous No.11937866]

OMG

AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

MY WIRE DOESNT COME FOR 3 days

[Anonymous No.11937878]

>>11937830
HAHAHAHAHAH NO LINKERS DO U UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS???? YOU THINK THIS IS SOME MEME COIN? ITS FUCKING AMAZON

[Anonymous No.11937914]

I now realized i’m set for life and can soon embrace neetdom. 77k linkmarine

[Anonymous No.11937916]

You just win

[Anonymous No.11937928]

>>11937878

It's some undergrad doing a shitty presentation in some meetup sponsored by amazon

it's nothing

[Anonymous No.11937937]

>>11937928
>meetup
>reinvent conference
just shut the fuck up poorfag

[Anonymous No.11937938]

THIS IS YUGE.
WE NEVER GET TIRED OF WINNING.

[Anonymous No.11937952]

>>11936643
>>11936643
>>11936643
>>11936643
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH

[Anonymous No.11937962]

>>11937830
Retards, that's just some Kaleido fag talking about ways they've used AWS services.

[Anonymous No.11937991]

>>11937952
lol no, dumb your shitcoin and buy chainlink

[Anonymous No.11938021]

>>11937962

[Anonymous No.11938059]

>>11937916
we will win and we will win and we will win

[Anonymous No.11938085]

>>11937962
It's the co-founder of Kaleido actually

[Anonymous No.11938097]

>>11938059

[Anonymous No.11938106]

>>11937866
Quit bitching. I won't have any fiat before 11th

[Anonymous No.11938113]

>>11937830
Its fucking real
We will talk about that later. When?

[Anonymous No.11938123]

>>11938113
In the Amazon CEO private offices where the big money is.

[Anonymous No.11938125]

$1000 eoy was just FUD :^)

This is cookoo bananas!

[Anonymous No.11938130]

>>11937830
DELETE

[Anonymous No.11938140]

>>11937866
>>11938106
stop FOMOing you'll just end up buying the top

[Anonymous No.11938147]

>>11937952
I dont doubt ETH will be worth something, but as Chainlink's database.

[Anonymous No.11938148]

>>11937830
$1000
$1000
$1000
CONFIRMED CONFIRMED CONFIRMED

[Anonymous No.11938161]

>>11938113
couple of mins after

[Anonymous No.11938213]

>>11937952
Yeah no. This Amazon actually supporting both Hyperledger AND Eth, so Chainlink will probably be used for both. LINK is the better bet imo.

[Anonymous No.11938236]

>>11938140
I know, I know, but this is the second time this year I'm totally broke when LINK is down

[Anonymous No.11938246]

>>11938213
There’s no maybe about it. Eth is a has-been, destined to hover around $100 forever. Link is the future.

[Anonymous No.11938265]

>>11938236
>>11937866

You stupid fuck, if you look at the pivotal tracker of chainlink you will see they still have bugs to fix, it's literally coming next year and normies are nowhere near the project so it won't get hyped anyway, not above $1 usd by the end of the year probably (which will unironically be dumped to 0.25 cents again by whales lmfao)

[Anonymous No.11938284]

>>11937952
lol no... hoard LINK. AWS using Hyperledger and Ethereum.. both will be slaves to the ChainLink network. LINK $100k eoy 2020

[Anonymous No.11938352]

>>11938085
he's still a fag

[Anonymous No.11938456]

>>11937830
>249 views
>muh enterprise

[Anonymous No.11938484]

>>11937878

Kaleido is a service on the AWS. No one even uses it right now. Chainlink is also just one of many options in the kaliedo program.

Fucking lol

[Anonymous No.11938985]

>>11937830
Downplay this all you want, this is a BIG fucking deal Fudder.

[Anonymous No.11939298]

>>11938484
Lame lame fud

[Anonymous No.11939369]

>>11938484
Look at the other "many options in Kaleido program." Guess what? They also use Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11939390]

>Dude we got briefly mentioned in some boring video with 200 views

>OMG 100 EOY OMG OMG 1000

Ye linkies are this delusional

[Anonymous No.11939407]

sʇuɐd ƃuiɹɐǝʍ<

[Anonymous No.11939439]

Holy shit, I only have 13k but I'm seriously thinking about maxing out my credit card so I can buy 6k extra. 20k would settle me for life.

[Anonymous No.11939450]

>>11939390
218k subscribers on that channel

[Anonymous No.11939508]

>>11939450
yeah and their average views are like 100

stupid linkie

[Anonymous No.11939516]

>>11939439
Do it faggot.

[Anonymous No.11939539]

should I sell my entire net worth right now to buy Chainlink? I unironically feel like it wouldnt be a bad move.

-t. only 10k linker

[Anonymous No.11939544]

>>11939390
Swing trading brainlets strike again.

[Anonymous No.11939565]

>>11938484
If this smart contract thing ever takes off what do you think will happen brainlet?

[Anonymous No.11939568]

>>11939539
Don't fomo my friend. It's a good coin but not work risking entire portfolio over

[Anonymous No.11939575]

Should I sell my house, car, even my physical body itself (non-essential organs) to acquire more link?

[Anonymous No.11939598]

>>11939575
lmao

[Anonymous No.11939642]

>>11939575
yes, you can buy back some younger and healthier ones in a few years

[Anonymous No.11939661]

>>11939407
How did you get the b backwards?

[Anonymous No.11939918]

>>11938246
honestly retarded

[Anonymous No.11941007]

He doesn't just say chainlink is an option around 39:??.

He says it allows you get data into your smart contracts to run.

Anyone looked at the full list of partner services? If chainlink is the only one that gets data into smart contracts then holy shit, it's likely to be used for most of their clients (pic related, screenshot from video).

[Anonymous No.11941037]

>>11937830
Hundreds of teams

[Anonymous No.11941060]

delete now

[Anonymous No.11941098]

41:40ish

He says KALEIDO IS NOW OUT OF BETA!!!!?

HOW THE FUCK DOES IT WORK WITHOUT CHAINLINK

IS MAINNET OUT?

[Anonymous No.11941150]

Bump

[Anonymous No.11941165]

>>11939407
looks like the bees in my country lol

[Anonymous No.11941172]

>>11941150
bump

[Anonymous No.11941256]

>>11941098
Good point

[Anonymous No.11941408]

If mainnet is out why no moon

WHY NO MOON

MOON SOON?

[Anonymous No.11941438]

>>11941098
are you sure it needs link to work?

[Anonymous No.11941496]

>>11941438
No

But with all their clients, at least one has got to be using ChainLink, right?

Maybe not of it is ready yet, and the partners using ChainLink will just have to wait longer till they can run their systems in a non-testing environment.

[Anonymous No.11941537]

Im from the UK how do i purchase link on Binance?

[Anonymous No.11941558]

>>11941537
Make a limit order

[Anonymous No.11941562]

>>11941537
Buy btc on coinbase
Send btc to binance
Buy link with btc on Binance

[Anonymous No.11941578]

>>11941562
Could you post the web links?

[Anonymous No.11941640]

>>11941496
i signed up at kaleido.io

maybe it's because i'm using the free "starter" billing setup, but i can only connect my private blockchain nodes to the rinkeby testnet.

in any case, i got this interesting notification when accessing a chainlink service that i set up:
To be fully functional, Chainlink requires that you fund account 0x.... with ether from your private Ethereum Blockchain that you setup on Kaleido.
Use the Kaleido Ether Pool service on the Environment dashboard.
Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

they also give you a link and username and password to sign into the chainlink operator ui for the chainlink node that they run for you. looks like you can create jobs and bridges for your chainlink node.

i wonder how you would get paid for this, running essentially your own chainlink node for your own consortium that pulls data from your chosen source and sends it onto your private chain

you wouldnt charge yourself link tokens, right?

it seems from the warning that node operators have their own private, not-really-ethereum ETH on their own private blockchains, if im reading the warning correctly. as the chainlink nodes asks for some of this seemingly-worthless eth, i wonder if each consortium here will *also* be using their private, not-really-link LINK tokens?

just as chainlink can be on the testing networks, it would be trivial to copy it onto any of these hundreds of private networks.

if the future of 90% enterprise blockchains is running your own private, permissioned, consortium link nodes to service your own private, permissioned, consortium blockchain, im a little less bullish for link, but maybe public chains will be like SaaS and cloud computing, where there was initial resistance but now companies use them all the time

[Anonymous No.11941656]

>>11941640
>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

never fund your private chain addresses with public link tokens

so private chains will have private link tokens to go with their private eth

interesting

[Anonymous No.11941693]

>>11941656
also, if there are private link tokens, i wonder if there are private versions of a simplified mainnet currently in use?

this is sounding spookily like the shadowlink meme

we wont have a literal shadowlink token - but it looks like we're already seeing that some consortia will have private forks of chainlink running on their private blockchains. probably with private reputation, aggregation logic.

[Anonymous No.11941733]

is everyone here fucking asleep?

im not trying to fud on purpose but this looks like actual legitimate reason to worry

what if chainlink saves a shitload of money for these companies but none of it goes to public token holders because similar to ETH, enterprises don't want to touch a public token when they can set up a private blockchain with fake ETH / LINK and delude themselves into thinking it's anything other than an inefficient shared database?

[Anonymous No.11941742]

is kaleido's long-term view that enterprises will want public blockchains or do they expect to set up private ones forever?

[Anonymous No.11941750]

>>11941733
shut the fuck up faggot no one cares about your bullshit review

[Anonymous No.11941820]

>>11941750
they would if they understood it
let me put it in retard words you can understand:

SHADOWLINK IS NOT JUST A MEME

[Anonymous No.11941906]

Bump

[Anonymous No.11941907]

>>11941656
>>11941640
>>11941733

You're just memeing being this retarded, right?

[Anonymous No.11941908]

>>11941640
Clever FUD. 7/10

[Anonymous No.11941955]

If you disagree, why?

What makes you think a company is going to demand a higher degree of decentralization and tamper-resistance in their input/output systems than in their infrastructure that executes their smart contracts?

If a company is willing to use a consortium chain, they're probably willing to use a consortium oracle.

If you have ten companies contributing their own nodes to a private ethereum chain, what makes you think they won't also contribute their own chainlink nodes to that chain?

They trust a majority of the other members to execute contracts correctly but not to fetch data correctly?

[Anonymous No.11941997]

Sergey made the point that being able to trust your smart contract execution is worthless if you can't trust the input and output.

It also goes the other way:
The extra guarantees from your input/output being widely decentralized are wasted if you're just using private smart contract logic on a private blockchain.

A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.

Having private blockchain defeats the purpose of public oracles.

[Anonymous No.11942019]

>>11937830
Holy crap doubling down

[Anonymous No.11942066]

>>11941907
>>11941908
Not fudding, I am happy with my link stack

I am getting worried, though

I realized a bet on link is not just a bet on the tech being useful

It is a bet that enterprises will soon stop deluding themselves into thinking private blockchains are reasonable things to use.

I don't want to wait ten years or even five years for public blockchains to be accepted the same way it took forever for software as a service to be accepted.

If we really need web3 to happen before link moons then FML

I want to moon in a few months, I'm almost thirty. I want to become rich af in my twenties, not in my thirties

[Anonymous No.11942085]

Wait wtf it's real

[Anonymous No.11942088]

You
Just
Win

[Anonymous No.11942271]

except it's literally dumping right now. next target 1000 sats.

[Anonymous No.11942356]

>>11942066
holy shit dude just stop. any brainlet here knows theres a difference between mainnet eth and the eth you use for testing on rinkeby. one of them you get for free, the other you sells for about $120 which would be why kaleido says not to fund their rinkeby testing environment with
>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

[Anonymous No.11942367]

>>11942066
>>11942356
same goes for link for fucking worthless fudder

[Anonymous No.11942382]

>>11942356
>any brainlet here knows theres a difference between mainnet eth and the eth you use for testing on rinkeby. one of them you get for free, the other you sells for about $120 which would be why kaleido says not to fund their rinkeby testing environment with
>>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.
Rinkeby is not a private chain you dumb fuck

If they meant rinkbey or a testing chain, they'd say that

Instead, they said "private chain"

It's not fud you dumb fuck it's a valid concern

[Anonymous No.11942432]

>>11942382
kek if anyone falls for this they do not deserve to make it. go build something.

[Anonymous No.11942464]

>>11942382
Jesus christ retard. I don't even care if you're fudding,there's literally no need to anymore.

You can't use a private chain for ETH and LINK you fucking retard. Only for testing. The entire fucking point of using distributed blockchains is the fact that they're fucking DISTRIBUTED. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS YOU FUCKING INBRED?

[Anonymous No.11942561]

>>11942464
what makes private chains not distributed you mongoloid?

[Anonymous No.11942580]

>>11942561
same thing that makes public chains distributed

[Anonymous No.11942604]

>>11942580
Holy fuck you're retarded.
Distributed = multiple machines working as a single system.

[Anonymous No.11942610]

>>11942561
The 105 IQer, everybody. Give him a round of applause.

[Anonymous No.11942635]

>>11937830
I would normally be excited about this but holochain is going to kick AMazon web services ass.

[Anonymous No.11942672]

>>11939439
No it won’t. It’s never enough lol. You have 20k pull just want 25-30k

[Anonymous No.11942744]

>>11942604
what is decentralization

[Anonymous No.11942763]

>>11942604
Distribution is done to ensure there is a trustless network. Distributing the nodes inside a company doesn't give you that.

[Anonymous No.11942845]

>>11942763
And it looks like they'll be distributing nodes inside multiple companies.

>>11942464
>You can't use a private chain for ETH and LINK you fucking retard.
What the fuck do you think quorum is? Fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.11942857]

>>11942635
Only a brainlet neet with no understanding of how ubiquitous aws is would even suggest such a retarded thing

[Anonymous No.11942898]

Hint: quorum is built by jp Morgan for companies that fell for the "blockchain is revolutionary but crypto is a scam" meme, failing to realize that removing crypto and adding permissions to give themselves more control defeats the whole purpose by removing the incentive to contribute to the network honestly and increasing the capability for one of the permissions actors to act dishonesty.

We won't see a quorum-like fork of chainlink because chainlink is already easy to set up like quorum for deluded permissioned usecases.

[Anonymous No.11942940]

>>11942845
I know what Quorum is. I'm not arguing with you because you're either playing a retard, or you're actually a retard.

Why hold BTC when JP Morgan can just fork all of your buttcorns? checkmate

[Anonymous No.11943002]

>>11942940
>Why hold BTC when JP Morgan can just fork all of your buttcorns? checkmate

The real question is "why hold btc for the next ten years when jp Morgan is stupid enough to think they can fork your buttcorns and will try to do so, so you won't moon for ten more years?"

Because btc doesn't need jp Morgan to use it to increase in value. It remains cash and a store of value regardless.

ChainLink's token value proposition requires enterprises to use it. Nobody is going to use it as cash or a store of value unless it gets enterprise adoption first.

If it takes up Morgan and others ten years to wake up the fuck up and stop puttering around with their retard fork then the singularity won't be here for a while.

[Anonymous No.11943169]

>>11937830
Why is this news? Kaliedo already announced months ago.