/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11686121]

Just to make this clear to you:
Anyone using AWS will be using Chainlink for smart contracts.

>"For Kaleido, a ConsenSys business, the goal is simple: make blockchain radically simple for organizations to adopt"
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/launch-enterprise-ready-blockchain-networks-on-aws-in-minutes-with-kaleido-a-consensys-solution/

>"Through the Kaleido marketplace, businesses have access to (...) industry products like Chainlink (for smart contracts)"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhansen/2018/11/08/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains/#309fd7e32ad8

[Anonymous No.11686127]

>>11686121
Deluded. No one will use Chain Shit.

[Anonymous No.11686148]

>>11686127
>AWS says they're implementing Kaleido
>Kaleido says they're implementing Chainlink

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

[Anonymous No.11686185]

>>11686148
Wrong

[Anonymous No.11686189]

>>11686121
They are implying they will use networks "like" chailink, but do not imply in any way that they will use chainlink.

There are plenty of projects that utilize smartcontracts and the aws dev team and kaleido is competent enough to compile a better one without adoption of a random shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.11686191]

>>11686189
This

[Anonymous No.11686197]

>>11680954

Hey Wow that sounds really complicated and NOT user friendly my fellow 4 channer.

I can see why mainstream adoption is so far away. Its like using the internet without Microsoft edge, it's going to need to improve leaps and bounds before I even consider buying any digital cash coins.

I'm the kind of investor who can usually spot an emerging trend from miles away and have been very successful. I can safely say internet digital cash/coins are not ready to be taken seriously by businesses or any serious investors worth their salt.

[Anonymous No.11686201]

>>11686197
Based

[Anonymous No.11686269]

>>11686185
Literal proof in OP, trenchbrain.

[Anonymous No.11686337]

>>11686189
> We'll be using SmartContracts
>We won't be using Chainlink
>Let's name Chainlink

Thanks anon, your reasoning is flawless.

[Anonymous No.11686438]

>>11686189
>do not imply in any way that they will use chainlink
Except they literally name Chainlink for smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.11686450]

>>11686197
See >>11686121
>>"For Kaleido, a ConsenSys business, the goal is simple: make blockchain radically simple for organizations to adopt"
>https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/launch-enterprise-ready-blockchain-networks-on-aws-in-minutes-with-kaleido-a-consensys-solution/

In case the number of words is too large for your brain:
>make blockchain radically simple for organizations

The current level of "difficulty" is EXACTLY why we are the early adopters.

[Anonymous No.11686570]

>>11686121
AWS IS HUGE $1000 EOY