[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 51 KB, 493x528, 11-01-18 at 01.23 AM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11595999 No.11595999 [Reply] [Original]

If this isn't the next btc or eth, crypto is dead

>> No.11596031

>>11595999
it took LINK 3 months to quadruple in sats. RVN did so in a week. Whats the fucking point in holding these coins when the real gains are in flipping whatever is hot at the moment (has most trading volume). Its like nothing else matters (fundamentals, TA or whatever). Look at that motherfucking red pulse phoenix, equaled all your months long LINK gains in just 1 hour. Nice trips tho

>> No.11596047

>>11596031
>look at all those pump and dumps. your organic growth means nothing.

>> No.11596053

>>11596031
yeah ok. go continue playing the shitcoin flipping game. i'll continue to hold LINK. we'll see who's ahead in a few months. (hint: not you)

>> No.11596095

>>11596047
>>11596053
totally missing the point. The fact is you had to wait 3 months (and thats buying the absolute bottom which is unlikely) to 4x in sats. You did non stop research, shilling and fud. Some kid just fucking around on binance saw phoenix start pumping and just bought. He made the same gains as you in a couple hours without any autism involved just by being ballsy. Crypto rewards having balls not research autism

>> No.11596116
File: 104 KB, 888x1120, 1510954911345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596116

>>11595999
TRIPS OF TRUTH

>> No.11596120

>>11596047
who's to say Chainlink isnt a pnd aswell. It might take months instead of hours to follow the same cycle as those shitcoins rvn and phoenix but it will end the same, giant red candles and crying linkies. These pnd just do it more aggresively, like straight to the point which is taking retards buying at the top money

>> No.11596129
File: 62 KB, 670x670, @#.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596129

>>11595999

some one else posting about about my app :')

glad to see you like it

if you'd like to see any other features on there let me know

>> No.11596155

>>11596095
so some kid turned $50 into $200 by gambling with a shitcoin. he'll lose that $200 by gambling and losing on another shitcoin very soon. meanwhile I will enjoy even more gains with my sound investment, which is currently 5 figures, not 3. it's time to be quiet.

>> No.11596171

>>11596129
Email alerts like google alerts?

>> No.11596181

>>11596129
Just curious, how do you aggregate the mentions? Do you count only chainlink or also link, even if it could be someone writing link in a different context? What if someone posts a picture of a coin logo to start a thread but doesn't mention the project specifically? Could you also take into account how active the threads are? For example a QNT thread could get 50 organic replies whereas someone shilling a random shit coin would get no reply but both examples would get the same number of mentions.

>> No.11596221

>>11596155
RVN peak volume: 176 million
PHX peak volume: 185 million
LINK current volume at peak mania: 7 million
>$50 to $200
i personally saw 80 btc buy walls during the phx PnD, there were big whales involved so stfu and recognize you dont have the balls to do what these people do so you play the long game, equally scared of the inevitable dump as those buying the PnDs

>> No.11596318
File: 6 KB, 236x196, ^^%.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596318

>>11596171
noted, what would you want to be alerted about?

>>11596181
I could probably write a masters thesis on the algorithms behind scanning for mentions, in addition they're updated pretty much every day to ensure reliability

the very basics work exactly how you would expect them to, taking the name and symbol into account, but there are more complex features to avoid some pitfalls

for example one of the cool more complex features is that it also has a built-in shill-buster, so shills trying to pump up a coin with fake numbers won't be registered

noted on the want for a metric on thread activity, that is definitely something that can be added soon, if you think of anything else you might want to see on there just let me know or fill in the feedback form

>> No.11596359

I dont understand why those people from the discord group don't cut their losses and moved on ages ago
It's obvious LINK is absolutely nothing special and wont make them rich ever

>> No.11596391

>>11596120
>whos to say the stock market isnt a pnd as well. just takes years instead of months
this is how retarded you sound

>> No.11596423
File: 63 KB, 750x424, IMG_20180116_183848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596423

>>11595999
>Hurr durr a team of paid shills posted our coin on an autism forum. Maybe it'll get on Coinbase".
The state of delusion among Linkies

>> No.11596431

>>11596391
but it is, you know it, everyone knows it. Same with your shitcoins. I bet you were looking at those PnD on binance, the order books going crazy with all that volume and thinking 'shit i might triple my link stack if i just buy now', but you didnt cause you are a pussy

>> No.11596497

>>11596391
>>11596431
and before you talk about risk, someone buying link right now is taking the same risk as those who bought the PHX pump. With PHX it took a couple minutes to go 50% down, with link it might take months but result is the same.
Now PHX could go for round 2 and pump to 4k sats with massive whale action, fundamentals be damned, all the while link dumps to 5k. It can happen, so who's taking the bigger risk? Fact is no one has a fucking clue what will happen but those ballsy enough to buy the beggining of PnDs
reap greater rewards than those passively holding coins with fundamentals. Balls in the heat of the action is rewarded more than holding 'legit' projects, as long as you're not buying parabolic green candles like a retard

>> No.11596498

>>11596431
>you didnt fomo into the pnds? you’re a pussy
i have a 10k link stack ive been holding since august. i wont be bothered to monitor every pnd and swing trade. the point is with all the gains so far, even if link dumps, it wont be fast enough before i realize my gains.

>> No.11596508

>>11596095
time will tell anon. hope you are holding.

>> No.11596551

>>11596095
holy fuck, you're right! Why bother actually buying and holding good investments when you can just buy coins that are about to pump x4?? Think about it, If i just put $10,000 on the next x4, and then did that a few more times instead of holding something long term, I could make millions in a couple months!. Why isn't everyone doing this???

>> No.11596586

>>11596498
its not about fomoing but knowing the signs that a PnD is on its way. With RVN it was binance listing, it was obviously gonna pump and i made a nice 3x
>>11596551
cause not everyone has the balls to do it, but there are people doing it i guarantee

>> No.11596628

>>11596586
>I bet you were looking at those PnD on binance, the order books going crazy with all that volume and thinking 'shit i might triple my link stack if i just buy now', but you didnt cause you are a pussy
thats fucking textbook fomo. no shit everyone knew rvn will pump because of binance. no one knew it would pump so hard though, and thats when the fomo starts

>> No.11596643

>>11596628
yeah but the point is that if you DID let fomo take in instead of your rational mind stopping you, you would have made gains like everyone else. Of course you can never know what the tops gonna be thats why im saying courage is rewarded way more than holding coins based on fundamentals

>> No.11596647

>>11596095

Strategy for trading shitcoins is completely different than investing in a brand new class of asset expecting longterm gains.
I don't trade crypto all day long, I have better things to do--I know LINK has long term real value

>> No.11596742

>>11596643
"Courage" is rewarded more but also punished more when you're wrong. It's a form of emotional trading and a surefire way to lose your money. But keep telling yourself that it it's a solid strategy kek

>> No.11596750

>>11596647
>I know LINK has long term real value
do you really? do you KNOW? or you BELIEVE?
do you really? do you KNOW? or you BELIEVE? someone buying phx before pump maybe knew it had no long term value but believed a pump was imminent, reaping in a day more rewards than you in months. Other dude might have bought believing it had long term value but knowing it would take months or years, only to be pleasantly surprised sooner than he thought. Crypto is a gamble, and these pumps and dumps show that when volume starts climbing on a project, all fundamentals go down the drain and everyone sells their bags to join the madness. If a coin called Dickcoin was listed on binance and started pumping it could rise to 10k btc or more volume easily. Showing it doesnt fucking matter what a coin does or the team behind it, only if there is action going on or not

>> No.11596753

>>11596221
>peak mania
:^)

>> No.11596784

>>11596742
im not saying its a strategy. Im saying, why is it punished more? Why are they taking a bigger risk than say you buying LINK now? LINK could dump to 4k sats again, you know it, only it could take months to drop half instead of a couple hours like a PnD.
Wasn't buying the link mega dip to 2000 sats courageous too? What if you were punished and it dumped to 1k sat? fundamentals? all it would have taken is a massive btc red candle which could happen any time

>> No.11596804

Anyone else find it odd how bch shills have disappeared? Even OPs site confirms this. Go all in BCH, it has hit a deep bottom

>> No.11596815

>>11596551
The point is there is nothing that suggests link is a good long term investment
Therefore you might as well buy into random shitcoin PNDs

>> No.11596816

>>11596784
High time preference is for niggers and children. Good luck fag.

>> No.11596841

>>11596815
someone gets it, but not just random, shit that you know its gonna pump hard because of listings or because its gaining momentum for whatever reason. Fortune favours the bold

>> No.11596849

monero is the next chainlink

>> No.11596852
File: 48 KB, 481x443, d1540268392118.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596852

>>11596120
>le pump n dump upwards meme

>> No.11596862

>>11596221
so what you're saying is is that those shitcoins we're trading at 25x the volume and weren't even worth 10c? lmao fuck off with your billions+ supply shitcoins

>> No.11596868

>>11596129
post your wallet and I'll donate to ya m8

>> No.11596888

>>11596841
If fortune favors the bold then it favors linkies who have recognized the potential and have invested for the long run. Fortune doesn't favor morons who lose their stack swing trading like idiots on PnD shitcoins. If you haven't lost it yet, you will, only a small amount of you fags keep your money.

>> No.11596907

>>11596095
You’re missing the point too, fuckstick. That kid got lucky, he won’t get lucky enough for that to actually make money in the long run. All he did was throw money on black. Statistically he will lose after enough time.

If you want to make sustainable money investing, you have to actually do some research.

>> No.11596920

>>11596888
careful you might end up losing it aswell on your precious link, just like those buying into pnd shitcoins, but i guess confidence is related to price and right now linkies confidence is through the roof. We know what comes next..

>> No.11596925

>>11595999
if LINK doesn't work crypto is dead in general because it'll never be anything more than just a ponzi scam
decentralized oracles are what blockchain needs to become a real tool and not just a meme

>> No.11596931

>>11596907
so those whales placing 100+ btc walls on phx and getting them filled (at like 400 sats) were just lucky kids? or ballsy big players? you think they didnt know what they were doing?
>research
true, but not on this market

>> No.11596947

>>11596815
>The point is there is nothing that suggests link is a good long term investment
is this satire

>> No.11596952

>>11596907
what if you got lucky too with your stinkies? you think 'fundamentals' made it pump? if fundamentals mattered it would be top 10 long ago now wouldnt it?

>> No.11596966

>>11596129
App name?

>> No.11596973

>>11596947
no its not, all you have is belief which grows with price. Nobody knows if it will be established and used worldwide in fact its highly unlikely. You all know in your heart that there is no way its gonna be adopted, get real. But you play the game along with everyone else, to sell when you are content with your profits and move on

>> No.11596983

>>11596931
That’s not the example you (or whomever the poster was that gave this example) were giving. Obviously whales who control the pumps are privy to some knowledge that makes them lots of money. That’s not the same as some kid just randomly buying raven on binance. Having said that, those whales won’t be able to do that forever. And in some countries they’ll be legislated against and caught. Many are probably already breaking laws.

>> No.11597012

>>11596973
>Nobody knows if it will be established and used worldwide in fact its highly unlikely
>You all know in your heart that there is no way its gonna be adopted, get real
The opposite. My opinion is held up by hours of research, experience and real talks with real people who know what they're talking about. Your opinion is pulled out of your ass because you're retarded and "just know it"

>> No.11597030

>>11596031
The difference, you silly faggot, is you can safely go all in on LINK and you're pretty much guaranteed to win over the long run vs with pnd shitcoins you may time the dump right this time, maybe next time, but eventually you WILL get rekt and lose your entire stack which is probably worth about $300 because if you put more than that into RVN you're an absolute drooling retard

>> No.11597034

>>11596983
ok so according to you, the kid just got lucky by buying into the rvn pnd and the same ballsyness is gonna fuck him up eventually. As opposed to buying say LINK? why would not he take the same risk buying LINK? only cause it takes months instead of hours to follow the same pnd cycle we see on every single coin? or because there is some supposed fundamentals that make your investment 'less risky' ?

>> No.11597085

>>11597012
>hours of research
lets see what they amount to in a couple months
>>11597030
>safely go all in on LINK and you're pretty much guaranteed to win over the long run
you could safely go all in RVN at 250 sats and 4x just as you did with LINK, only it would have taken a week instead of months. The result is the same, and its easier to hold for a week than for months.
>eventually you WILL get rekt
the absolute states of linkies. yeah just like the last link top, they were as confident as you are. Guaranteed returns lmao, they got rekt hard.
>if you put more than that into RVN you're an absolute drooling retard
tell that to the whales buying the rvn dip by the dozens of btc and reaping the rewards just a week later. To them, you are the drooling retard with your low volume shitcoin

>> No.11597096
File: 57 KB, 474x647, (((.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11597096

>>11596868
very glad to see you like it. thank you for the offer, but no donations necessary

I just want people to use and enjoy this site, and come to me with any new features they might want to see added


>>11596129
>>11596966

merv.tech

let me know what you think

>> No.11597097

>>11596750
It is all but demonstrably true that smart contracts will make up the defacto digital contracts of the future. Any digital contract, any money changing hands based on a binary event that is codeable. The use cases for them are so many that I'm not even going to try and list them, and the benefits are that they are more cheaper, more secure, more reliable, and more deterministic than what traditional can offer. So I *KNOW* that it has value like somebody back in '95 knew that the internet would grow to be what it is today.

There are no certainties, it's all a balance of probability. Those of us who really understand what chainlink is trying to do (and succeeding by the look of things this month) don't really doubt what the future of the project has in store for us holders. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be this year, but very very soon companies will begin to use smart contracts. And when that does, we will get an ETH like parabolic growth that will dwarf some shit coin pnd that is literally a coin toss.

>> No.11597154

>>11597097
thats all fine and sounds good on paper. Fact is very few people knew what to invest in exactly before the internet boom. A competitor to chainlink may appear next year, with better tech, better team, maybe even novel concepts. Hell one such project might exist right now.
So you dont KNOW for sure, you BELIEVE and there is a difference. Smart contracts might be the future yet no one buys your bags because it still primitive and new shit pops up. This is the tech world and things move fast dont forget

>> No.11597186

>>11597085
Oh so you're a whale? That's different. If you're a whale with a discord group coordinating the pnd yourself then sure, that's easy money until the feds find you. But if you think the average person can just perfectly time a pnd over and over I don't know what to tell you.

>> No.11597215

>>11597154
Yeah but the truth is that right now there aren't any decentralized oracle providers apart from link. It is the best bet, so that's where my money is. Things move fast, you are right, and I will be shocked if there aren't other competitors in the next couple of years. The market for monetized APIs is really, really big and it appears that LINK is the front runner. Sure man, it's a semantic argument, but yeah I BELIEVE. I'm not 100% sure that link will guarantee me financial freedom. I seriously am not. I feel doubt as I watch these green candles, but I feel pretty safe with my knowledge of what smart contracts are and what they can offer to companies who may want to adopt them.

>> No.11597225

>>11597186
you didnt have to be a whale nor be in a discord group to know rvn was gonna pump on binance. Every new coin there has its run regardless of fundamentals of the project

>> No.11597239

>>11597215
check out AE, not sure if as decentralized as link but it has other stuff going on on top of it

>> No.11597279

stop encouraging weak hands to buy in. There are people putting LINK on the level of scam coin like RVN. Let them buy into retarded hype trains like TRX and VeChain.

>> No.11597303

>>11597239
I'll take a look at it. The decentralization aspect is what gives LINK it's value, it is what distinguishes it from other oracles and it is what helps to guarantee it's security for clients who will use it. I don't see how an oracle can have value without these things.

>> No.11597316

>>11597279
the point is those scam coins and hype trains make you more money than based link and other 'legit' projects.
Why are they scams? No product all hype. Where is LINK product? i only see hype hmm..

>> No.11597337

>>11597316
And yet the biggest and best projects with the most substantial gains overtime have not been scammy shit coins though, unless you qualify ETH as such. BTC biggest gainer, not a scam. ETH, huge gainer not a scam. XMR? I could probably find others. You might get lucky with those coins, but long term if they can't provide service or value and are just vaporware, they will not give as much as a good project. The bet here is that LINK is one such project.

>> No.11597355

>>11597279
'Buying legit products not hype' got BTFO so hard in 2017
XVG and TRON are the biggest shitcoins ever and pumped the most in dec

>> No.11597358

>>11597303
well some of the differences are, link seems to be based on a reputation system (which could be tampered with, when there is big money at stake), while AE is as decentralized as the main chain is. Link is a solution for current or future blockchains while AE is building its own with states channels, bitcoin-NG, memory and latency bound PoW and in-built oracle system. I think in AE, it is left to the user criteria to trust the data of an oracle, but i see how it would eventually form some sort of reputation system aswell. Also since oracles are linked to addresses (1 per adress) and these address can claim names, you would know if for example you are requesting data from X trusted agent (they would provide you with their adress on their main website for example). Research it, its link main competitor and they will launch mainnet before. Im personally invested in both projects, the only two im in because of some sort of fundamentals, but i dont fool myself thinking this somehow makes it a 'safer' investment than buying into PnDs

>> No.11597387

>>11597358
fair enough. I will look into it and maybe throw some BTC at it to cover bases. I gotta crash though anon, it's late here and I have an early morning. GL and GN

>> No.11597395

>>11597337
they may not seem like scams now, but they sure did when they were low cap. many people were calling ETH a scam in the early days, and its first run was probably seen as a PnD. I agree if you're looking for long term hold obviously go with solid fundamentals, my point this entire thread is that its not as profitable as joining where the action is (whatever the coin) and exiting on time because
1) the growth is slower and it might dump just as a pnd
2) you might not have hit jackpot with your coin and it ends up in the shitter, regardless of how good fundamental sounded, so it still a risky strategy, as risky as flipping shitcoins

>> No.11597449

>>11596952
>>11596952

Yes, fundamentals made it pump--the value is in future earnings from staking, just like when ETH pumped due to future ICO fundamentals, just like NEO, etc

>> No.11597491

>>11597449
i guess this was the case because of the state of the market. During bull time this was the norm instead >>11597355

>> No.11597543
File: 92 KB, 960x960, 1538603154672.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11597543

>>11596221
>what are market maker bots

>> No.11597563

>>11597543
yeah so its all wash trading & bots, what makes your coin any different?

>> No.11597822

>>11597358
>25 posts by this ID
What did he mean by this?

>> No.11597863

>>11597822
im fucking bored isnt it obvious. Sometimes i lurk for days with 0 post sometimes i post in waves. Besides it changed the discussion from being just like the other hundred link threads with the same memes

>> No.11597899

>>11596129
top wallet movements for chainlink

>> No.11597924

>>11596095
Hahahahahaha. You really are playing with pennies. Shit like Phoenix? Lmao. My crypto stack is double the size of their market cap.

>what is liquidity

>> No.11597931

>>11596120
Let the adults talk here kid.

>> No.11597935
File: 874 KB, 1000x563, pumpqsk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11597935

>>11595999
It doesnt stop PUMPKIN!

>> No.11597944

>>11596750
Nah. We know.

>> No.11597966

>>11597316
I would bet 10k that you get JUST'd by the EOY trading these shitcoins. Getting lucky twice is easy. It only takes once to be wrong, and you will be wrong.

>> No.11597983

>>11597924
>>11597931
>>11597944
doesnt matter how big your stack is faggot, fact is during the pnd phx rocked the highest volume of all coins, even if half of it was fake you could get 1-2 btc in and exit with 8+, may seem pennies to you cause you handle millions. Honestly if you are that wealthy i dont know what the fuck you're doing here or on this market at all instead of enjoying life. You must be empty inside and cant find love or something.. most likely another faggot larper

>> No.11597997

>>11597966
im fine buying red for now thanks for your concern

>> No.11598009

>>11595999
i have no faith in chainlink. in fact it is a complete joke/meme to me.

any links that could change my opinion on this shitcoin?

>> No.11598034

>>11598009
learn to code and read the github and make up your own mind, its literally the source. Everything else is manipulation. Check the other project i mentioned and decide, i couldnt so im into both

>> No.11598039

>/biz
>reddit
Kill yourself

>> No.11598043
File: 14 KB, 1320x67, riddle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11598043

IS THIS REAL GUYS?

>> No.11598389

>>11597899
noted