MORPHEUS PARTNERS WITH CHAINLINK!

[Anonymous No.11589877]

https://medium.com/morpheus-network/morpheus-network-partners-with-leading-decentralized-oracle-network-provider-chainlink-for-b6d197637ce1

[Anonymous No.11589883]

>>11589877
shitcoin a partners with shitcoin b

oy vey kys

[Anonymous No.11589891]

who

[Anonymous No.11589901]

Please for you to be joking my leg, sirs?

[Anonymous No.11589904]

>>11589877
pls buy morpheus sir

[Anonymous No.11589913]

Asked them on Telegram if they use chainlink at about ICO time. They implied they didn't know what chainlink is.

[Anonymous No.11589927]

>>11589913
Were gonna be seeing this a lot

[Anonymous No.11589928]

>>11589913
Obviously figured it out, smart to jump on the sails of a crypto rocket.

[Anonymous No.11589930]

>>11589877
Not gonna read your link (no pun intended).

But what does a partnership even mean? Is a partnership when Sergey hoovering over a buffet table, and a guy from Morpheus ask if they could "talk" about oracles and shit, and Sergey says "No now, perhaps at a later time".
Would that chain of events be considered a partnership?

[Anonymous No.11589952]

>>11589928
"We are being contacted by literally 100's of teams"...... Aka "winning"..

[Anonymous No.11589954]

>>11589930
“Chainlink is very excited to be working with Morpheus.Network. Decentralized trade is a perfect use case for blockchain technology. Partnering with Chainlink will allow their smart contracts to interact with our decentralized oracle network, providing API data access from a wide variety of sources, as well as allowing payments via the world’s most recognized payment processors. We are looking forward to our collaboration!”—Daniel Kochis—Director of Global Business Development

[Anonymous No.11589963]

>>11589927
The whitepaper did everything to imply chainlink partnership without spelling it out ought right. SWIFT, dedicated paragraph on decentralized oracles, etc

[Anonymous No.11589965]

Another one

[Anonymous No.11589986]

>>11589952
I say again .

[Anonymous No.11590026,1]

Dump dump dump dump

[Anonymous No.11590005]

>>11589883
that's why its important. every shitcoin will announce they are using link.

[Anonymous No.11590006]

Partnership is such a strong word. They're customers.

[Anonymous No.11590009]

I'm almost beginning to feel sorry for the anons still spreading FUD. Getting BTFO on the daily.

[Anonymous No.11590023]

>>11590009
Checked. It will pump again today.

[Anonymous No.11590025]

>>11589877
They are all trying to capitalize on Chainlink’s success. It’s the same as shitcoins doing an ICO on ethereum.

[Anonymous No.11590026]

>>11589877
Nobody cares. Nearly every project in blockchain will be all but forced to use chainlink. We already know this.

[Anonymous No.11590048]

>>11590026
But why

[Anonymous No.11590060]

Early access platform in November?

[Anonymous No.11590066]

Literalmente quien

[Anonymous No.11590070]

>>11590048
because shittokens don't do anything besides switching owners on eth right now.

[Anonymous No.11590083]

>>11590060
Main net launch 1qtr 2019, my Linkies stay super Stinky. Comfy.

[Anonymous No.11590159]

>>11589930
"...Fuck off I'm eating."

[Anonymous No.11590164]

>>11589877

[Anonymous No.11590189]

>>11590048
b/c chainlink is the only serious oracle provider in crypto. you might not like that that is the case, but its reality, son, and you better get used to it.

[Anonymous No.11590206]

>>11590006
This unironically.
Be prepared for a major influx of shitcoins stating they have a CL partnership just because they will be using the network. In 5 months this will be the next 'new website' meme

[Anonymous No.11590220]

>>11590206
This was always the case...getting into the logistical framework for success

[Anonymous No.11590255]

>>11589954
Fuck nice.
This will be just like ETH. “Literally hundreds” of shitcoins using LINK.

[Anonymous No.11590273]

>>11589930
>Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network that enables smart contracts to securely access off-chain data feeds, web APIs, and traditional bank payments. Chainlink is well known for providing highly secure and reliable oracles to both large enterprises and leading smart contract development teams and is consistently selected as one of the top blockchain technologies by leading independent research firms such as Gartner.

[Anonymous No.11590285]

>>11589877
This is bigger than u guys think. See https://morpheus.network/Swift/

[Anonymous No.11590311]

>>11590285
Additional confirmation of Link/Swift. We are going to make a bunch of Jack boys. If you are selling now instead of buying you are a MORON.

[Anonymous No.11590319]

So glad I sold al my Morpheus for chainlink ages ago lol

[Anonymous No.11590349]

So do I buy this shitcoin or not?

[Anonymous No.11590379]

>>11589883
>>11589891
>>11589901
>>11589913
>>11589930
>>11590006
>>11590026
>>11590066
cope

[Anonymous No.11590393]

>>11589883
>>11589877

It's no different to the web3 partnership? Did you think web3 was a big company? Kek. It's a shitty blockchain startup company as well. The web3 foundation launched it's shitty polkadot blockchain project in August this year. Yet that was hyped because it has no token, yet when tokenized projects like REQ partner with them it's a meme.

Link literally can't get partnerships with anything but other blockchain projects, it's sad.

[Anonymous No.11590395]

>>11590023
He didn't get digits. There's nothing to check you retarded zoomer.

[Anonymous No.11590405]

>>11590393
All this not cope.

[Anonymous No.11590466]

>>11590405

Mark my words at Devcon 4 tomorrow they will announce another shitty meme partnership with another shitty meme blockchain backend company that has no cashflow and is another pipedream attempt at decentralizing everything.

Linkies on this board will froth at the mouth and pump it up further, unaware that based bobo's are waiting to dump on them hard once conference season is over. There has not been one piece of news released by the team yet that doesn't make me want to market sell my entire stack one the carrot on the end of the stick that's keeping everyone holding is gone.

[Anonymous No.11590472]

>>11590060
Someone needs to go through each of the "partnerships" and check if their roadmaps converge at any time. Might be a hint to when mainnet is coming.

[Anonymous No.11590492]

>>11590466
tl;dr

Cope harder and more.

[Anonymous No.11590513]

>>11590466
Lying is a sin and you will probably burn in hell kek

[Anonymous No.11590532]

>>11590006
How long before we see Chainlink's version of the EEA? We need our own consortium to show off to the world every project that will be utilizing this network.

[Anonymous No.11590540]

Oh fuck people are actually buying it. Linkmarines are pumping shitcoins now.

[Anonymous No.11590553]

>>11590472
https://morpheus.network/Swift/.. This confirms Link/Swift. Target main net 1qtr 2019.

[Anonymous No.11590563]

>>11590532
It already exists. Dig into digital chamber of commerce docs

[Anonymous No.11590565]

>>11590492
>>11590513

Until Link can get a partnership that isn't another blockchain company, it will remain a meme.

The most bearish possible thing for Link tomorrow is a partnership with another blockchain startup with zero cashflow. If that happens Link will just become another Ethereum, an oracle for shitcoin factories.

[Anonymous No.11590586]

>>11590553

You can buy a partnership with Swift, this isn't an actual partnership.

[Anonymous No.11590596]

>>11590565
What about Swift and Accord?

> Link will just become another Ethereum
Oh I get it, you're low-key hyping Link.

>shitcoin factories
All the partners Link has are about connecting external data. So no.

[Anonymous No.11590597]

>>11590586
>You can buy a partnership with Swift, this isn't an actual partnership.
LOL! no-linky cope at its finest

[Anonymous No.11590599]

>>11590393
Dude...web3 isn't a shitty startup. It's a research foundation working to build the fucking infrastructure of blockchain itself. Ever heard of Gavin Wood? Co-founder of Ethereum, creator of solidity and whisper protocol? You have no idea what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.11590604]

Morpheus bends the knee.

[Anonymous No.11590625]

>>11589877
OY VEY

[Anonymous No.11590651]

https://morpheus.network/Swift/

LINK / SWIFT confirmed. Kek. $1000 eoy.

[Anonymous No.11590691]

>>11590651
This shit looks so scammy it's not funny

[Anonymous No.11590694]

>>11590599

Yes I have and what a shit resume. ETH is a fucking shitcoin factory with no use case, solidity is a shit language.

A partnership with a research foundation is shit. Where is the cash flow? Is this all Sergey could manage? A partnership with some blockchain nerds desperately trying to find a use case for this tech?

You aren't getting my fucking point here, web3 might be attempting legitimate research, but that doesn't make them a good partner. They are a shit partner unless they have a large customer base and a huge cashflow. Money is what drives adoption you fucking retard. No one cares about technical fucking crap if it doesn't make money. If you are buying into Link because of my technology, then why don't you sell everything and get jump on fucking Astraea then? John Adlers Astraea project is more technically advanced than Sergey's, sidesteps the problem of reputation and aggregation completely and already has interest from all the same backend blockchain tech nerd companies that Sergey is partners with?

So why are you with ChainLink over Astraea? MONEY! SWIFT. That's why. You think (THINK) Link can make more money. But this was before conference season, now we are almost done and Sergey hasn't revealed jack shit about partnerships with companies with cash flows or customer bases. It's just the same blockchain nerd shit. I am getting very bearish on Link lately.

[Anonymous No.11590701]

>>11590691
Doesn’t fucking matter. The rise of ETH was fuelled by shitcoin ICOs. This is exactly what will happen with LINK as well. More users on the network =more LINK locked up on the network and more demand for the tokens to reward node operators.

[Anonymous No.11590711]

>>11590694
>ETH is a fucking shitcoin factory with no use case, solidity is a shit language.

How can you cope so little about something that mooned so hard so long ago?

Brain damage. That's how.

[Anonymous No.11590720]

>>11590694
>Sergey hasn't revealed jack shit about partnerships with companies with cash flows
They are actually working with all the payment providers that feature on their slides. SWIFT, PayPal, it’s all real. Screencap this.

[Anonymous No.11590733]

>>11590563
What do you got anon? I remember that floating around several months ago, but don't remember anything concrete coming from it...

[Anonymous No.11590739]

>>11590694
You should sell right away.

[Anonymous No.11590746]

>>11590720

We know they are working with SWIFT, but that news is over a year old already. I jumped on the Link train because of Swift but there has been nothing substantial since then and Link is looking more and more like a one trick pony.

PayPal, would be nice but that's not confirmed. Paypal would be a good partnership though, a great partnership even. Web3, ConsenSys, OpenLaw, Accord, ZeppelinOS are all fucking joke partnerships compared to something like PayPal.

Problem is Sergey can't seem to get a PayPal partnership yet.

[Anonymous No.11590757]

>>11590733
No concrete connection to chainlink other than Blythe Masters and Perianne Boring being on the same panel as Sergey.

[Anonymous No.11590763]

>>11590746
>Web3, ConsenSys, OpenLaw, Accord, ZeppelinOS are all fucking joke partnerships
Top copelet.

Please keep bitching, crying, and moaning for my amusement, swingtrading faggot.

[Anonymous No.11590779]

>>11590023
Go ahead and fuck right off back to plebbit thank you for your compliance

[e !!0sV3h0yFhvu No.11590780]

>>11590746
I’m telling you: I know something you don’t know. Screencap this. All the payment providers on their slides are not just there for decoration. Just because it’s not announced doesn’t mean they aren’t already collaborating and buying after the confirmation is not gonna make you rich. You may not believe me but I’ll be back to rub it in your face, take note of my tripcode.

[Anonymous No.11590783]

>ETH mooned because everyone and their mother was starting an ICO on it
>LINK is a decentralized oracle network which is required for 99% of blockchain projects to even begin to function
I can see the light, boys

[Anonymous No.11590789]

>>11590763
Comedy Gold for sure. FYI, it's pumping if op wants to sell.

[Anonymous No.11590807]

>>11590701
Yes it fucking does.
Chinese & Russian scammers are going to destroy any potential blockchain technology has to offer before it can even begin to get off the ground.
In fact, they've already done it
>pic related

[Anonymous No.11590825]

>>11590048
Smart contracts are useless without external data. A centralized oracle is a single point of failure which basically negates the whole point since it is no longer decentralized or trustless.

[Anonymous No.11590839]

>>11590807
The fuck are you talking about

>>11590825
This.
Eth all over again. Almost exactly the same pattern.

[Anonymous No.11590840]

>>11590763
>>11590789

It's pumping because the devcon happy hour meetup happening now. Who fucking cares about that. After the conferences are over in a few days it will dump like it should.

>>11590780

I hope you are right but you have no way to prove it other than just trusting you. I'm already a top 1000 wallet holder, what am I gonna do, buy more right now when Link is priced in for the conference? I'll wait for the post conference dump.

Still all you do is add another breadcrumb hopeful partnership. I was hopeful and bullish these previous months but now that Sergey is actually speaking to us at conferences his mysticism has faded and I am just seeing the same blockchain scam partnerships I saw last year with every other shitcompany like OMG, Tron, Req, Icon, Fun, XLM etc.

[Anonymous No.11590853]

>>11590840
>After the conferences are over in a few days it will dump like it should.
t. desperate swingtrader

[Anonymous No.11590865]

>>11590840
What were hoping to happen? Was there a specific partner you were looking for?

[Anonymous No.11590867]

>>11589954
>Partnering with Chainlink will allow their smart contracts to interact with our decentralized oracle network
wait what? Chainlink is the decentralised oracle network though.. is this a typo?

[Anonymous No.11590870]

>>11590164
Nice !

[Anonymous No.11590881]

>>11590853
Torille!

[Anonymous No.11590885]

>>11590393
>a blockchain middleware project can't get partnerships with anything but other blockchain projects
Kek even if you were to ignore swift and all the legal and insurance partners they already have this statement would still be incredibly retarded.

[Anonymous No.11590895]

>>11590839
Let's see where this bullshit morpheus.network is in a year from now?
(((Danny Weinberger)))

[Anonymous No.11590897]

>>11590840
Jesus fucking Christ stop whining about good news

[Anonymous No.11590906]

>>11590746

Thanks for the laugh. Stay poor.

[Anonymous No.11590911]

>>11590853

Keep telling yourself that everyone even slightly bearish on Link is a swingtrader. I'm sure it will help you cope when Link tanks in the coming months due to no real partnerships being announced.

In fact you know what, fuck you, here is my Link trade history for the month. That tiny buy in was to make my stack a nice complete even number just in case it did take off, but now I am almost regretting even that. It's clearly going to dump.

>>11590865

Yeah. A partnership with a company that has customers and positive cashflow, and that promises to integrate Link into their services and use it so that we can be guaranteed that the network will actually be used by a functional company upon mainnet launch and not be yet another platform for shitcoin trading.

[Anonymous No.11590919]

>>11590911
>Keep telling yourself that everyone even slightly bearish on Link is a swingtrader.
I don't know about that, but you sure as fuck are a swingtrader, lol.

[Anonymous No.11590923]

>>11590919

Show me where I sold then retard?

[Anonymous No.11590928]

>>11590923
haha what?

[Anonymous No.11590929]

this thread has me bullish af

[Anonymous No.11590945]

>>11590895
>pic related

[Anonymous No.11590950]

retarded linkies, buy morpheus, its only 60 eth to put it to 2x and make your own shitcoin moving
if people see success after link related announcements they will flock to your trash as well

[Anonymous No.11590953]

>>11589877
>>11589883
>>11589891
>>11589901
>>11589904
>>11589913
>>11589927
>>11589928
>>11589930
>>11589952
>>11589954
>>11589963
>>11589965
>>11589986
>>11590005
>>11590006
>>11590009
>>11590023
>>11590025
>>11590026
>>11590048
>>11590060
>>11590066
>>11590070
>>11590083
>>11590159
>>11590164
>>11590189
>>11590206
>>11590220
>>11590255
>>11590273
>>11590285
>>11590311
>>11590319
>>11590349
>>11590379
>>11590393
>>11590395
>>11590405
>>11590466
>>11590472
>>11590492
>>11590513
>>11590532
>>11590540
>>11590553
>>11590563
>>11590565
>>11590586
>>11590596
>>11590597
>>11590599
>>11590604
>>11590625
>>11590651
>>11590691
>>11590694
>>11590701
>>11590711
>>11590720
>>11590733
>>11590739
>>11590746
>>11590757
>>11590763
>>11590779
>>11590783
>>11590789
>>11590807
>>11590825
>>11590839
>>11590840
>>11590853
>>11590865
>>11590867
>>11590870
>>11590881
>>11590885
>>11590895
>>11590897
>>11590906
>>11590911
>>11590919
>>11590923
>>11590928
>>11590929
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.11590954]

>>11590586

[Anonymous No.11590962]

>>11590953
Literally (you)

[Anonymous No.11590980]

>>11590746
>paypal
because its the only company your little brain recognizes

[Anonymous No.11590985]

>>11590911
so are you bullish on LINK in the long run?

[Anonymous No.11591003]

>>11590701
Look at this absolutely trash tier pathetic excuse for a "partnership" trying to ride Sergey's coat-tails.

[Anonymous No.11591023]

>>11591003
they are clients not partners lmao these stupid crypto projects are doing all they can to hype up their project

[Anonymous No.11591030]

>>11590980

More like it's the only company in this thread worth knowing about. If a company doesn't make money it's worthless as a partnership.

>>11590985

I don't know. I used to be bullish. We will see what Sergey has to offer us tomorrow at Devcon4, and at the marketwaves thing next week. If it's just more shitcoin partnerships and blockchain crap I might become bearish longterm unless Sergey can show us something substantial.

I've been holding for over a year, believing that the teams previous silence was due to them working hard and getting tons of good partnerships, and after all that it's just blockchain research groups and shittokens. I am honestly disappointed.

[Anonymous No.11591040]

>>11591030
>More like it's the only company in this thread worth knowing about. If a company doesn't make money it's worthless as a partnership.
Who are you trying to convince so desperately?

[Anonymous No.11591056]

>>11591003
>literally everyone and their dog trying to gain credibility from Chainlink
>not bullish af
Your mother will never love you.

[Anonymous No.11591080]

thanks just bought some more stinkers

[Anonymous No.11591101]

>>11591056
But your Mummy loves me real good

[Anonymous No.11591103]

>>11590923
Shut the fuck up you whining ass faggot. Link has outperformed nearly every crypto and every equity in the past few months. Wtf do you want? Who cares if it doesn’t get used, you’re making money right now and a lot of attention is being garnered.

You sound like such a bitch faggot. If you’re unsure about your investment, sell it and shut the fuck up. No one cares about your uncertainty and we don’t want to hear you talk about how smart you were for holding when this makes us rich. There’s no such thing as a no-risk investment, grow up and grow some balls you pussy.

[Anonymous No.11591114]

>>11591030
rebuttable

do research on ic3 and digital assets

[Anonymous No.11591137]

>>11590285
>>11590311
we are going to make it holy shit

[Anonymous No.11591144]

>>11591030
It’s like you want to be handed a 10,000% return on a silver platter. If everything you wanted were public info right now, you wouldn’t be holding Link, you’d be watching it hit $200 saying, “wow, I can’t believe that used to be 40 cents.” People like you are so retarded and shouldn’t be speculating with money.

[Anonymous No.11591156]

>>11590867
thats Dan speaking on behalf of chainlink dude

[Anonymous No.11591162]

>>11591103

>waah someones posting bearish posts STOP IT

Jesus christ what a little baby. So it's okay for Linkies to spam the entire fucking board non stop with bullish nonsense meme partnerships and shitposting. But a few bearish posts and you get upset. I think you should sell anon, you clearly can't emotionally handle the thought of anything bad happening to Link. Did you invest more than you could afford to lose? Does the thought of Link going down scare you that badly?

>it's outperformed

Because Sergey shut his mouth, and we all assumed he was working on real partnerships. Now it's conference season which generations natural hype in itself, but the partnerships are turning out to be just more blockchain memes.

I will continue to bearpost and make sure evey Linkie knows that Chainlins partnerships are all with meme crypto startup blockchain companies and not real actual companies with cashflow and customers. No one is gonna use the network when mainnet launches aside from shitcoin trading. It will be another failure like ETH.

[Anonymous No.11591204]

>>11591030
>More like it's the only company in this thread worth knowing about. If a company doesn't make money it's worthless as a partnership.

The “partnership” with PayPal only means that smart contracts will be able to initiate payments via PayPal (and swift, etc) through chainlink. You idiot. Ts nothing to do with the amount of revenue PayPal makes. It will simply Make payment integration to dapps and smart contracts easier.

[Anonymous No.11591213]

>>11590945
It doesn’t matter where Morpheus network is you weirdo.
The point is that every shitcoin needs chainlink. Exactly as they needed ETH last year.

[Anonymous No.11591216]

>>11591162
You’re not posting anything bearish. You’re just complaining about nonsense. The most bullish things since the project’s release are happening and you’re so myopic that it is annoying. Nothing you’re saying is “bearish,” you’re just spewing stupid insecurities that show you have absolutely no vision for what is transpiring in the tech space and various other industries. It’s embarassing.

[Anonymous No.11591226]

>>11590694
toplel

[Anonymous No.11591230]

need more insight on who chainlink is really working hand and hand with? see pic related

[Anonymous No.11591249]

>>11591216
Well put. Exactly.

[Anonymous No.11591264]

>>11591162
And for fucking sake, watch sergey’s presentations, especially at web3, do some fucking research. You sound like such an idiot right now. There’s a reason it pumped 20+% after that presentation.

[Anonymous No.11591284]

>>11591162
>waah someone partnered with Chainlink STOP IT

Cry like a bitch some more.

[Anonymous No.11591332]

https://twitter.com/Timccopeland/status/1057667369806503937

ITS HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.11591403]

>>11591162
Were you involved in this market in early 2016? Do you remember the early days of ETH back when it was 80 cents and shot up to 24 dollars? Before Ethereum had any GUI interferace like MEW and it was rather technical to get involved in any ICO? When the DAO hack happened and Ethereum forked and sparked the creation of Ethereum Classic?

I doubt you were because those time were INCREDIBLY bearish for Ethereum. Small time no name companies were partnering with Ethereum and serious doubt in the team was arising. It was very very difficult to hold during those times, yet if you did you would have seen incredible ROI when the bull run hit. If you are bearish at this moment on LINK then I'm afraid the worst is yet to come and you will have weak hands that will inevitably shake in 6 months times. This is EASY compared to holding early Ethereum that had a literal autist running a team and constant drama behind it. Remember, the Chainlink team still holds 1/3 of the total supply and will sell at the very least the majority of that supply and this market will dump. If you believe in this project then you hold, if not, sell now because the worst is yet to come. You really have seen nothing yet. We are all investors and we are all here speculating on this technology. There is no such thing as 100% guarantee in this game and I struggle to find a reason why you are so bearish at this stage, relatively speaking.

[Anonymous No.11591467]

>>11591156
ohhh kek I'm dumb
pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.11591536]

>>11591403
so do you think it will tank in a few months and that most guys here are way too bullish?

Do you think that mainnet release will be disastrous?

You seem very knowledgable and i am interested.

[Anonymous No.11591548]

>>11591403
I would invest in link if the team didn’t hold 1/3 of the total supply.

This fact totally discredits the project for me.

[Anonymous No.11591552]

>>11591403
Weird post but ok. You really think they would dump this early on right as its starting to gain traction? Pretty much everyone involved in the project is already rich af... I'm not arguing with you just genuinely curious about your thought process wise oldfag.

[Anonymous No.11591564]

>>11591230
Kate Bush poster here from that thread. Gonna make another aussie thread in a day or so when I have time

Heres a clue. Why was the consensys lead for South Africa asking Blythe Masters questions at the end of her oct 23rd presentation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKIlRzImCu4

[Anonymous No.11591604]

>>11591564
Give timestamp.

[Anonymous No.11591606]

>>11591548
They intend on using a portion to expand the node network and yes eventually they will release more. No doubt that will impact price, but not to the point other node operators get screwed. Still believe Swift has control of a large portion of what is not in circulation.

[Anonymous No.11591611]

>>11591403
>Remember, the Chainlink team still holds 1/3 of the total supply and will sell at the very least the majority of that supply and this market will dump.
The fuck are you talking about? The reserved tokens are for “incentivising the network”, not dumping on Binance for profit. Incentives will probably include giving away link to important node operators so they have no set up costs. Not dumping on Binance. Jesus.

[Anonymous No.11591664]

>>11591604
About 43:15

[Anonymous No.11591767]

>>11591403
>>11591611
this lol. imagine if you're SWIFT and some Sergey guy comes up and says he'll build you new technology that will not only put you well above all competitors but will also save you money. he also says he'll give you a huge portion of that technology for free if you give him a chance.
this is what the reserved LINK is for, to make sure nobody ever refuses Sergey

[Anonymous No.11591787]

>>11591536
>so do you think it will tank in a few months and that most guys here are way too bullish?
>Do you think that mainnet release will be disastrous?

I don't know, I cant predict the future. I am simply stating that right now is good times for Chainlink and if you have bearish thoughts at this moment in time then your hands will inevitably shake in the near future. This is seriously easy compared to the drama early Ethereum had.

>>11591552
>You really think they would dump this early on right as its starting to gain traction?

Not right now no, But once mainnet is released and IF it coincides with major price movement then the team would most likely be incentivized to sell off their supply just to keep the price of the token somewhat stable. Remember, we are still very early in this and its better for the team to sell their supply off now rather then later. It would be best for us honestly if the team started selling of their supply right now, but I already know for a fact the moment they do decide to sell will be incredibly bearish for LINK and many investors will shake. Its impossible to know when or even if the team is going to sell off their supply for profits, I dont think even Sergey has a set plan for it now.

>>11591611
the team holds 2/3 of the supply, 1/3 for nodes for "incentivising the network" and 1/3 to fund the team. the other third went to the ICO and that 1/3 is what is currently being publicly traded.

[Anonymous No.11591887]

>>11591787
Curious what your thoughts are on the possibility that Swift creates an exchange dedicated to handling Link. Would include settling penalties, distributing rewards as well as conversion to Fiat.

[Anonymous No.11591939]

>>11591403
>>11591787

Thank you for these insightful posts.

I have some questions about Staking. If we have no information to provide, will our node even get used? I've seen a lot of Linkies just assume that once mainnet is out, you just set up a node and start earning money instantly. And shit like Linkpool takes a 20% profit on top and they will be doing research to find good information to make sure their node gets work and pulls work away from the nodes of other linkies.

A lot of Linkies have also stated wishes to just live off their nodes and quit their jobs. This means that if Sergey is going to be giving out free Link to node operators to incentivize them to keep running, many will be selling off Link just to eat and new Link will dilute and enlarge the circulating supply.

So that leaves the circulating supply at possibly over 700 million Links when the team dumps and the first third is filtering through by node operators selling off.

All the market cap fags will be going into a hysteria. The marketcap will be going up without the price going up, and it will encourage fags to start selling off.

[Anonymous No.11592052]

>>11591277
GET IN HERE FAGGOTS

STREAMS OF THE HAPPY HOUR

[Anonymous No.11592084]

>>11591939
Read the fucking whitepaper. Running a chainlink node is not passive "staking" like all these masternode ponzis it is a job that requires attention, access to good data, and collateral (LINK tokens). So to answer your question, no your node will not be used nor will any of these other newfag idiots. Retail investors aren't even really supposed to be participating in this at all.

[Anonymous No.11592134]

>>11591887
Too far ahead in the future to be speculating on that. Cross that bridge when/if we arrive at it. If the team can accomplish what it is setting out to do then I wouldn't be surprised to see entire new companies/subsidiaries being sprung up taking advantage of the network, but again, one step at a time.

>>11591939
Any question involving node usage or network participation I'll always give the same answer, because its an open question that cant be fully answered because main net is not out and we have nothing to go off of yet:
With a decentralized network, the most important aspect is the amount of nodes the network has generated. Sergey and his team want as much nodes as humanly possible, the more the merrier. The value of these networks don't come necessarily from the technology, but rather the size of its network. Think metcalfes law. The team will not hinder users setting up nodes as it will be directly harming their network. As far as if your nodes will be chosen for high value contracts, I will make the assumption that it would be for the individual contract creator to decide the level of decentralization they want and if you have the capitol to provide the penalty payment. If a company wants a certain level of decentralization that 100 nodes can provide for a high value contract, you can make the assumption that those 100 nodes would have to put up a decent chunk of money to provide for penalties. But again, this is all assumption because I have nothing to go off of, mainnet is not out.

I have to go finish some work. I'm glad you guys enjoyed my posts but I don't have the time to answer everything all day. If this thread is still up in 6 hours then I might be back. We'll see.

[Anonymous No.11592169]

>>11590625
Always bank on the Jews when money is involved. This is very bullish.

[Anonymous No.11592208]

>>11590466
The Oracle of Mumbai has spoken.

[Anonymous No.11592425]

>>11590563
>>11590532
didn't dig into this, but Sergey said in the interview with that Jake B. guy that there would likely be a Chainlink Foundation. It seems pretty likely that will be what takes over development of the network after they get it off the ground.

[Anonymous No.11592457]

>>11592084
What's the basis of the statement " Retail investors aren't even really supposed to be participating in this at all."?

Why do you believe this? If that's the case how did it get out?

[Anonymous No.11592494]

>>11590911
you're literally braindead. there are plenty of good arguments against chainlink, you have failed to bring up any of them.

[Anonymous No.11592601]

>>11590349
this

[Anonymous No.11593024]

Another literally who blockchain startup lmao.

[Anonymous No.11593189]

>>11593024
confido 2.0

[Anonymous No.11593273]

>>11590651
This is huge

[Anonymous No.11593704]

>>11590691
look at the second name on their twitter banner lel
Roger what?

[Anonymous No.11593762]

>>11591939
lmao this fucking twat spending all day shitting up this thread with brainlet-tier fud didn't even read the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.11594000]

>>11590840
You notice how al the good informations is cordinated too right. Look at all this twitter accounts hyperlink the shit out of link since the pump started. I’m starting to think those accounts are all owned by one person