LINKTARDS ON SUICIDE WATCH

[Anonymous No.11517816]

https://www.ccn.com/logistics-firm-completes-first-truckload-shipment-using-bitcoin-smart-contracts/
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.11517830]

chainlink was never going to amount to anything. only retards put money into it

[Anonymous No.11517833]

>>11517816
>this is a joke right? you're not actually this stupid are you?

[Anonymous No.11517844]

>>11517816
>In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.11517924]

>>11517816
Lmao biz doesn't know about rsk

[Anonymous No.11517975]

Reeeeeeeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.11517984]

Lol, anon you didn't forget that chainlink is blockchain agnostic did you?

You didn't forget that even has the bitcoin blockchain in the graphic as one of the chains it will connect to??

Brainlet tier fud as usual

[Anonymous No.11517988]

>oraclize

[Anonymous No.11518048]

Story does not explain how the delivery was verified and the payment was triggered. Does anybody know, or have any ideas? I'm assuming the recipient just confirmed delivery. That's sort of a smart contract I guess. The idea of smart contract, though, is that the SOFTWARE confirms it autonomously.

BTW, for any noobies reading this, this does NOT BTFO chainlink. Kek at that.

But appreciate your sharing the story, OP, even if it is weak fud re chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11518067]

>>11517816
>>11517816
aaaaand it's fucking over
the dream is dead...

[Anonymous No.11518080]

>>11518048
Was wondering the same thing. The data was probably put in manually and the sender/recipient confirmed the delivery over the phone. i'm sure the information is now stored on the blockchain but there's no way the SC was triggered to confirm delivery unless it was told manually (which isn't a real SC)

[Anonymous No.11518088]

>>11517816
thanks OP just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.11518089]

>>11518048
Dunno but link jumped to 48c at about the same time...

And we know hyperleadger is fucking around with LINK.. anddddd i believe there was a article not too long confiming LINK was able to move currency to cyrpto and vice versa down to the minute exchange ratio..

Andddd... just about the same time the 48c pump happened pic related started to be issued out... and i belive visa has been connected with LINK thru some autism power.

So maybe. Just maybe. LINK mainnet is coming online behind the scenes

[Anonymous No.11518182]

>>11518080
I sounds like it was put into a escrow within RSK (which is a sidechain maybe PoS or merge mined I forget)
I guess since there were no disputes the transaction with through smoothly

[Anonymous No.11518229]

>>11518089
Now check out where ChainLink will be in a few weeks. Pic related.
>https://www.freightwaves.com/marketwaves18-attendees
Then you have -
>Wall Street Blockchain Alliance (WSBA) >Accord Project (who have already been working with CL for months)
>Blockchain in Transport Alliance (BiTA) which are a part of FreightWaves which are hosting pic related
All working together. And OP wants to fud and say CL will have no hand in the transport industry. BTFO

[Anonymous No.11518315]

>>11517816
shit article. didn't state how it was tracked (manual or using the SC), what the payment was or how it was verified. This means that most likely the payment and escrow was done completely using BTC, not triggering external payments, and verification was probably done manually. This is not a complex Smart Contract, its a shit SC thats not really needed. LINK is designed to bring complex smart contracts to fruition, which will eventually change how the world does business

[Anonymous No.11518751]

>>11518315
Seems right on all counts. Verification done manually is the stupidest part of the article. Not really a smart contract at all, the more I think about it.

Agree also that real smart contracts will change the way the world does business. Can’t happen fucking soon enough as far as I’m concerned.

[Anonymous No.11518755]

>>11517816
Fud be gone

[Anonymous No.11518762]

>>11518755

[Anonymous No.11518784]

>>11518762
Let’s go boys

[Anonymous No.11518787]

Another chainlink whitelabel?
Hundreds of teams ??!

[Anonymous No.11518788]

Where the fuck can you even buy LINK? I'm a filthy coinbaser and I don't trust Binance worth a shit.

[Anonymous No.11518793]

don't bring rory into this you bastard

[Anonymous No.11518799]

>>11518788
are you stupid?

[Anonymous No.11518804]

>>11518799

Incredibly so.

[Anonymous No.11518828]

>>11518762
LOL

OP btfo

Link 1k eoy

[Anonymous No.11518851]

>>11518788
>trusting goybase and not eternal chink fundus ar safu network

[Anonymous No.11518871]

>>11518788
>>11518804
Cryptopia

[Anonymous No.11519317]

>>11518804
etherdelta

[Anonymous No.11519367]

>>11518755
>>11518762
How do we know you didn't write that yourself?

[Anonymous No.11520431]

>>11519317
Good luck to any anons trying ED. Every incredible dip on there since February, I've bought. Lol.

[Anonymous No.11521448]

>>11517816

[Anonymous No.11521497]

>>11518229
ayyy we chainlink n sheit now

[Anonymous No.11521529]

>>11521497