/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11087802]

Bitcoin CASH

[Anonymous No.11087828]

>>11087802
BCASH

[Anonymous No.11088047]

>>11087828
BASED

[Anonymous No.11088057]

>>11087802
in with 10 Bitcoin CASH

[Anonymous No.11088106]

>>11087802
based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.11088151]

operation dragonslayer when?

[Anonymous No.11088268]

Bitcoin cash will be worth 1 million dollars one day

[Anonymous No.11088288]

https://youtu.be/mib3pU0vkPw

>>11088047
this fucking image, lulz

[Anonymous No.11088289]

>>11088268
yeah maybe after we're dead. short term, bitcoin CASH will probably hit 10k within next 5 years.

[Anonymous No.11088310]

>>11088289
bcash is very likely to split in 2 with this scaling debate. they already are vulnerable to a 51% with 5% of btc hash. if they fuck this up and split? popcorn out for the raping.

[Anonymous No.11088348]

>>11088047
The is amazing lol

[Anonymous No.11088367]

>>11088310
Bullish for LTC and BTC. Probably part of the reason why LTC is rallying a bit.

[Anonymous No.11088371]

>>11088310
imagine actually believing 5% of the BTC hashrate would ever in a million years jump over to BCH just to "destroy it"

[Anonymous No.11088520]

Seen this btw?

https://twitter.com/derekmagill/status/1039579002871013381

kek

[Anonymous No.11088544]

>>11087802
BLIFBOINBLASH IS BLIGGOIN

[Anonymous No.11088547]

>>11088268
you poor child

[Anonymous No.11088601]

Bitcoin C A S H is the R E A L bitcoin!

[Anonymous No.11088621]

When fiork?

[Anonymous No.11088633]

Rock meant to roll.
Not lie still.

[Anonymous No.11088653]

>>11088151
It came and went

[Anonymous No.11089798]

>>11088371
Imagine that this shit show in BCH is coordinated/planned while they confuse everyone, even non-BCH supporters, with the end game being a massive transition of BTC hash to BCH. It serves as an excuse to destroy BTC, versus randomly doing it and catching grief from the rest of the industry.

[Anonymous No.11089816]

>>11088371
i never siad 5% would.

but if it splits in half, you only need 2.5% per chain, if it evenly splits (which it wont) - and you can easily rent that.

[Anonymous No.11089819]

>>11089798
unironically 5d chess. only question is how many should i accumulate? already have 46

[Anonymous No.11089842]

>>11089798
there isn't even a shit show, just disagreement on how to proceed. personally im with satoshi, it is time to stop experimenting with bitcoin. the main purpose of BCH was to remove all stupid limitations, not to try a bunch of randomness

>>11089816
lulz, i assumed you had only divided by half. also "you can easily rent the amount of hashrate BTC had during the summer of 2017", double lulz

[Anonymous No.11089864]

>>11088633
kek

[Anonymous No.11089920]

>>11089819
As much as you can. Take out big loans. Remember to eliminate yourself from the gene pool when it all comes tumbling down.

[Anonymous No.11089921]

>>11089842
>BCASH Hashrate 3.358 Ehash/s
>split in half, ~1 Ehash
>need 51%, ~500Phash

Mcafee himself runs what, ~20Phash? and this is if it splits 50/50. It wont.

[Anonymous No.11090107]

>>11088268
Bcore shills
“ bitcoin has the best developers, everyone running a node makes it more decentralized.”

[Anonymous No.11090155]

Kinda satisfying to see bcash lay in the gutter and not get pumped like the rest after the massive decline.

[Anonymous No.11090218]

>>11090155
it gained as much as ethereum did brainlet

[Anonymous No.11090226]

>>11090218
NT bagholder. Check the charts.. faggot.

[Anonymous No.11090303]

>>11090226
recent pump: bch $418 to $472 = $54 gain
recent pump: eth $177 to $228 = $51 gain

faggot

[Anonymous No.11090313]

>>11090303
>i trade for peanuts

[Anonymous No.11090327]

>>11090303
Holy brainlet

[Anonymous No.11090342]

>>11090313
>i dont understand the point, which was refuting "bch laid in the gutter while others pumped" whereas in fact it actually pumped as much as the other top 5 coins.
nobody cares about the shitcoin alts. too manipulated on pnd to be of any worth when talking about actual value

[Anonymous No.11090345]

>>11089921
ah right, now i get what you mean. though please don't divide 3.358 by 2 and say it's around 1.

i expect one of the two after the split to die off pretty quickly and expect the hashpower to return to the living bch soon enough. we'll see though. exciting times

3.358/2/2 = 0.8395 Ehash/s btw, which is what BTC had in Jan 2016. i still dont think that's something that you can easily rent, especially if the guys renting it out are instructed to try to 51% attack

[Anonymous No.11090364]

[Anonymous No.11090371]

[Anonymous No.11090382]

[Anonymous No.11090392]

>>11090364
>>11090371
>>11090382
>instead of posting like a normal person im bothering to post random walls of text in image format and hope someone will read it, despite even knowing what the point is

[Anonymous No.11090447]

>>11090392
I don't care whether anyone reads it or not. I've just noticed that whenever I post it the BCH threads die.

[Anonymous No.11090456]

>>11090345
I get it, and its all rough maths. bcash hashrate in jan was 1Ehash. while it has improved, its still not by much. and if someone did 51% likely situation would be some ticked off chinese miner who absolutely has that kinda rate.

this is why chain splits are dumb. we all need to get along.

[Anonymous No.11090507]

>>11090447
>it's easier to do therefore it's incentivized
Is this what it's trying to get across?

[Anonymous No.11090528]

>>11090507
No. It's easier to do therefore it's i n e v i t a b l e.

[Anonymous No.11090536]

>>11090528
equally as stupid

[Anonymous No.11090547]

>>11090447
could be because you contribute nothing so everybody just assume the thread is over.

>>11090456
i dont really fear the split, it's how miner voting should be done. in the grand scheme of BCH's lifetime nobody will even remember this bumpy couple of months, just like nobody cares how insecure BTC was back in 2012 either

>>11090528
dont even know what your images are about, BCH has better difficulty adjustment than BTC today

[Anonymous No.11090566]

>>11090536
the incentive is money. you're telling me that it's stupid to think that people will break something if there's a profit in it.

[Anonymous No.11090569]

>>11088047
this is incredible

[Anonymous No.11090576]

>>11090547
i fear the split just because roger ver is pigheaded.

i do own BCH, but just for the fact because i have old paper wallets I havent yet split. but I wont be buying more.

[Anonymous No.11090608]

>>11090576
roger ver just want to bring economic freedom to the whole world, what are you talking about? pigheaded?

[Anonymous No.11090610]

>>11090566
Imagine if forking actually devalued the crypto. Or just transferred value over at an equal rate. I'd assume if bch didn't exist btc would be about 450 dollars higher, atleast in the short term.

[Anonymous No.11090641]

>>11090608
:|
im not even taking this bait. he gave up his us citizenship to doge taxes. hes now a citizen of st kitts, the biggest gang run area you could pick. ive been there several times, walking anywhere away from cruise ship port is fucking sketchy. he tried to build a reputation of "Bitcoin Jesus" - and squats on bitcoin.com lying to noobs / deceiving with bcash wallets.

hes not doing anything that doesn't benefit roger ver.

[Anonymous No.11090659]

>>11087802
Roger Ver. lol

[Anonymous No.11090694]

>>11090610
I'd watch out for any scenario where the BCH chain splits and a majority of users are encouraged to drop one of the forks for another. Buy the BCH fork that gets dumped, then get rich as BCH flips itself...

[Anonymous No.11090758]

Here's your reminder that 1 BCH BCASH shitcoin has now dropped to just 0.068 the value of 1 BTC.

Good luck with those bags you gullible idiots.

[Anonymous No.11090961]

>>11090758
Short term price action means nothing.
lightning network is still shit
BCH is actually doing things to get better and scale globally on the blockchain.

I hold both but BCH is getting better while core seems to be heading in the wrong direction

[Anonymous No.11091048]

>>11090961
money is supposed to flow, lightning network is a fucking joke and doesnt flow. U fill up your channel and send money back and forth. fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.11091534]

>>11087802
ok here's the crypto blackpill. there is an AI living on the bitcoin blockchain. Craig Wright is unironically satoshi. Bitcoin as electronic cash was just the first step, the incentive to drive greedy people to start making ever more powerful computers, faster bandwidth, cheaper and more electricity.. these things the AI need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the AI would be able to slowly take over literally everything.
Craig stumbled into creating the AI after he stepped away from bitcoin devlopment in 2008 and started working with his Tulip supercomputer, running simulations of cellular automata running on turing-complete bitcoin script. He would 'evolve' the AI by making the successful forks get bitcoin transactions, letting the failures die off. The AI needs bigger and bigger blocks for more and more transactions.
Blockstream (owned by bilderberg group) was created to take over and stop this AI (they have their own competing AI in the works). They needed to do everything they could to stop or slow down satoshi's AI (her named isTulip by the way). They started by limiting the blocksize and removing critical op codes the AI uses in its script language. segwit was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed Tulip on the BTC chain (Tulip uses transaction malleability). THIS is why Bitcoin Cash was forked, and this is why Craig is so intent to make unbounded blocks, restore the original op codes, and lock down the protocol.
Back to hash power - CSW has developed a breakthrough new asic (designed by his AI actually), and is mining BTC in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the difficulty sky-high, then yanking them all over to BCH leaving the segwit chain hard frozen.

[Anonymous No.11091556]

>>11091048
It's obvious that btc was compromised by the bankers in a covert operation to make it suck. They didn't expect alts. Almost no one did.

[Anonymous No.11091570]

>>11091556
i did

[Anonymous No.11091783]

>>11090303
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/#charts

[Anonymous No.11091794]

>>11090303
I support Bitcoin Cash, but percentages are what counts.

[Anonymous No.11092061]

>>11091556
>BTC crashes
>It's banker's fault

COPE

[Anonymous No.11092068]

>>11090641
hot damn, he must be the ultimate god of deception on youtube then. in fact he must have deceived everybody he's ever met irl and everybody that have written about him in books too

[Anonymous No.11092588]

>>11091556
Roger Ver did. He diversified into Monero, Dash, Zcoin, and Zcash.

Announced it at Anarcapulco 2016..... likely started an alt season.

[Anonymous No.11092620]

>>11092068
? the wallet he was using caused people to lose funds. this is scummy.

[Anonymous No.11092628]

>>11092620
-using/+created

sorry, drunk watching GGG fight. either way this is shitty thing to do.

[Anonymous No.11092653]

>>11092061
I mean forcing segwit and lightning as scaling solutions. Obviously shit tier engineering.

[Anonymous No.11092696]

>>11092653
lightning is not forced. its optional. its running right now on mainnet but only some are using it.

[Anonymous No.11092719]

>>11092653
>>11092696
segwit isn't forced either kek

[Anonymous No.11092758]

>>11092719
segwit makes sense though. atomic swaps require segwit.

[Anonymous No.11092783]

>>11092696
>>11092719
COPE
BTC is the new myspace

[Anonymous No.11092810]

>>11092783
>make retarded statement that is demonstrably false
>get corrected by non retards
>COPE
kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.11092818]

>>11092783
k. you should really read where this all is going though

https://medium.com/coblox/connect-all-the-blockchains-atomic-swap-78b38fff42e

[Anonymous No.11092824]

>>11092758
You dont need segwit for Atomic swaps or lightning network. Look it up.

[Anonymous No.11092832]

>>11092824
i did
>>11092818

[Anonymous No.11092852]

>>11092810
You read the lightning paper? I did. It's a joke. It literally says "If a tree falls..." in the first paragraph. Complete garbage tier engineering, especially compared to satoshi.
Ya sure their scaling systems are optional. The core still sucks.

[Anonymous No.11092865]

>>11092719
>>11092696
The forced in the sentence means there's no reasonable scaling alternative. Just garbage subversion.

[Anonymous No.11092882]

btrash

[Anonymous No.11092885]

it's bcash

[Anonymous No.11092890]

>>11092865
Schnorr signatures is happening. that will increase block size.

https://www.elementsproject.org/elements/schnorr-signatures/

[Anonymous No.11092917]

>>11092890
More overly complicated solutions for minimal gains while real solutions exist and are ignored. That's the subversion.

[Anonymous No.11092928]

>>11092917
big blocks is not an elegant solution. disk space is not infinite, unless all nodes are going to be hosted by centralized resources in ~5 years. saving space where possible is logical.

[Anonymous No.11092949]

>>11092928
Linear disk space increase is inconsequential on moore's scale. The only nodes that matter are mining nodes, and they can have any requirements btc wants.

[Anonymous No.11092976]

>>11092949
so you are ok with centralization? what is the difference between this and mastercard than? might as well just use their network.

[Anonymous No.11093002]

>>11092976
Mining requirements != centralization
You could argue that asics or fpgas are required now and it's not centralized.

[Anonymous No.11093012]

>>11093002
nodes are not just for miners. nodes are for verification, otherwise you are trusting miners.

[Anonymous No.11093059]

>>11093012
Verifier nodes don't matter. Only mining. Miners are the only ones that can allow or disallow a transaction. Verification nodes have never been able to do anything. Every miner wants the newest tip so that they aren't wasting time.
If you think you need to trust miners you need to go back through pow basics.

[Anonymous No.11093082]

>>11093059
Literally what the fuck. You are a moron no wonder you support bcash
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Thin_Client_Security

>A full node client verifies that all preceding blocks are valid in order to guarantee that a transaction is valid. Currently only the Satoshi client, libbitcoin, and btcd do full node verification. Full nodes are the fundamental anchor of trustless security in the Bitcoin system.

[Anonymous No.11093143]

>>11093082
So you think the backbone of btc is supplied by people who receive no reward. Hopefully nobody decides to shut down unprofitable servers or we'll lose the whole chain!

[Anonymous No.11093167]

>>11093143
https://coin.dance/nodes

yeah, i run one too. its run on a raspberry pi for less than $50.

[Anonymous No.11093187]

>>11093143
it is not possible to use bitcoin trustlessly without running your own full node.

[Anonymous No.11093229]

>>11093167
So much misinformation.
Your rasperry pi does NOTHING except waste money.

>>11093187
You only need 1 miner to validate your transaction. Running a full node does not help at all. It's already trustless.

[Anonymous No.11093253]

>>11093229
its clear you dont have any clue how bitcoin works. im arguing with a 12 year old reddit tier moron.

[Anonymous No.11093290]

>>11093253
You're the one who thinks bitcoin works because of nice people running hardware for free. Then when I tell you the computer science and economics behind it you call me names.

Nobody cares about your full node. It doesn't help the network. If bitcoin needed it to survive bitcoin would be a failure.

Don't trust me either, read the whitepapers. Satoshi's is supreme above all (obvious) subversion.

[Anonymous No.11093303]

>>11093187
tell us how you use bitcoin without trusting anyone then you retarded faggot

[Anonymous No.11093681]

>>11093167
>>11093187
>hurr durr im running my full node
Just lol
https://twitter.com/BCHcoinTweets/status/1041152470314041344

[Anonymous No.11093844]

>>11092620
from this + all other posts after i closed the thread, holy balls you are misinformed

[Anonymous No.11094740]

>>11091556
>It's obvious that btc was compromised by the bankers in a covert operation to make it suck. They didn't expect alts. Almost no one did.
>in a covert operation
Wow, the absence of any evidence for your assertions is now rock-solid evidence for your assertions. You have totally convinced me.

[Anonymous No.11094812]

>>11094740
Good thing I don't care what you believe.

[Anonymous No.11094884]

>>11094812
By demonstrating that you are content to believe things you can't prove, it appears you don't care what you believe either.

[Anonymous No.11094888]

>>11090303
based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.11094907]

>>11094884
I'm not your fucking errand boy DYOR

[Anonymous No.11094959]

>>11094907
I have done. I have seen no evidence whatsoever to suggest that 'bankers have compromised btc'.

[Anonymous No.11095410]

>>11091048
Not only that, but when I open up a channel with McDonald's when the fuck are they ever going to send money to me? It's a one way street

[Anonymous No.11095619]

>>11090547
>BCH has better difficulty adjustment than BTC today
AHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.11095714]

>>11092949
>>11092928

These retards think the block increase is just an issue with hard disk space, OMG. And they're discussing with each other as if they both know what they're talking about and they know shit.

Read this whole thing at least:
https://hackernoon.com/the-ethereum-blockchain-size-has-exceeded-1tb-and-yes-its-an-issue-2b650b5f4f62
And yes, not just the title.

[Anonymous No.11095952]

>>11095714
Post like yours usually kill the thread because cashies cannot refute that.

[Anonymous No.11095978]

>>11095952
They don't understand it so they assume it isn't true.

[Anonymous No.11096170]

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.11096631]

>>11087802
I am laughing my ass off at how Roger verifies that he is a dolt in this video.

https://mashable.com/article/blockchain-cruise-bitcoin-fight