/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10963079]

so when 10k again? this better come soon, we will go upwards also as followers of BTC. hope you did accumulate this summer frens, as ETH is nuked our chances grow exponentially. also, mesh net soon!

[Anonymous No.10963141]

lol btc goes down 2% eth gets slaughtered by 15%. low cap alts like SKY currently hold their ground apparently

[Anonymous No.10963213]

>>10963079
Mainnet is on the way, that will be the decisive moment that will determin the success of the SkyProject

[Anonymous No.10963220]

>>10963079
when mesh net? Q4 or should we wait for 2019?

[Anonymous No.10963229]

>>10963141
well apparently everything is falling apart now but by next week we re going to see massive pumps take it from me

[Anonymous No.10963251]

>>10963213
main net will just get the nodes online and activate the blockchain, but in theory the tech is way more advanced than that of BTC for ex

[Anonymous No.10963252]

>>10963079
accumulated and now holding waiting for a sign that i am on the right side here

[Anonymous No.10963275]

the upcoming bull run will set things straight, hopefully we ll see sky going beyond 10$

[Anonymous No.10963280]

where my skyfleet bros at

[Anonymous No.10963287]

>>10963252
You are, the market will react to sky future movements as it has when testnet was launched. Patience and you will be on the winning side

[Anonymous No.10963308]

>>10963220
I get a Q4 feeling. There is a long queue for skyminer purchase and plenty of nodes are waiting to get whitelisted. Drawing a line and prepare for the 2nd phase is not a bad idea.

[Anonymous No.10963319]

>>10963275
10$ is not the milestone I’m worried of, they had more substantial market growth in the past and it will have again. My problem revolves around regulators and future governance on crypto

[Anonymous No.10963336]

>>10963308
Tell me about it, been waiting for the miner for 2 months and no reply yet. I ve been to the hamburg conference but I didn t win the giveaway

[Anonymous No.10963340]

Skycoin has the best economic model of any non PoW coin. Too bad the marketing and branding is so trash. Not even top 100 lmao

[Anonymous No.10963353]

>>10963287
from how long are u a skyfleet? i bought sky not so long ago, i don't have the full experience of a sky holder yet. to become certain about this i'll need some further movements from them and from the market

[Anonymous No.10963377]

>>10963319
yeah well until then we ll just use the coins without any problem, the web of trust will solve the governance thing also

[Anonymous No.10963379]

>>10963308
cool, so Q4 should be the one. although had some advices that Q4 is more a preparatory phase for 2019.

[Anonymous No.10963395]

>>10963340
Sorry to tell you but to this day, pow is still king and pow based coins are the most stable. I like the cheaper hardware approach but I don t see any reason to spend money until the network is running and fully operational

[Anonymous No.10963418]

next Synth AMA will announce the mainnet

[Anonymous No.10963427]

>>10963141
2% is not so bad giving it is going back on green tomorrow or the day after. You can proffit more from alts but you can loose all you have over a couple of hours, so think it through

[Anonymous No.10963443]

>>10963353
look into the past you ll find all the evidence you need, this 3rd gen coin is awesome and you re about to find out

[Anonymous No.10963487]

>>10963418
the nodes are more than enough for the blockchain to work, things should move pretty fast now

[Anonymous No.10963560]

>>10963443
i did, actually this is how i ended up buying sky. did some research about altcoins, and this one caught my interest due to the ecosystem. a lot of traders and investors don't realized that it is all about the ecosystem. no more, no less

[Anonymous No.10963576]

My node just got whitelisted today

[Anonymous No.10963659]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.10963703]

get rekt skyfags, this was your last chance to unload your shit scambags, scumbags

[Anonymous No.10963987]

>>10963703
>>10963659
vapid unjustified rage against sky is actually how I got in to this project, thanks brehs

[Anonymous No.10964006]

>>10963987
i justified it more than enough in other threads, all that is left to say is: enjoy those worthless bags skyfag

[Anonymous No.10964053]

>>10964006

[Anonymous No.10964106]

>>10963079
Hilariously, after losing all that value, the chart still looks garbage.
>>10963213
How you gona have mainnet without a consensus algorithm, son? That's crypto 101

[Anonymous No.10964432]

>>10964006
U tryin to avoid your own financial ruin by spreading fake news about this wonderful project, aren't u? no judgin, u gotta go what u gotta do for your own survival fren

[Anonymous No.10964603]

>>10963353
plenty of those, sky is permanently on the move either with updates/product releases or internationally exposure with impact on the market. at least that's what I've noticed, each appearance is influencing the market value, try to follow that

[Anonymous No.10964695]

>>10964106
Mainnet is metered traffic. Once nodes are live, consensus can use them.

[Anonymous No.10964716]

<<<---- this is how everything began

[Anonymous No.10964723]

>>10964695
>Shit that doesn't make sense
/thread

[Anonymous No.10964824]

>>10964723
Sure it does. The definition of mainnet for this is to have software completed for specific terms, not the terms you define.

The terms in this case are people getting paid for metered traffic, among other things.

Obelisk will run off of nodes ran by the community, so why would Obelisk be implemented before Skywire nodes are?

[Anonymous No.10964851]

>>10964695
>>10964723
Lol
Let me try
Keywords: mainnet, traffic, nodes, consensus

>>nodes are reaching consensus while forwarding the traffic/bandwidth during mainnet

[Anonymous No.10964883]

>>10964851
>>10964824
Yeah it doesn't make sense, there's no consensus algo.. after 6 years and even the most basic fucking thing as a consensus algo isn't finished. Why the fuck should this be worth even 1M?

[Anonymous No.10964944]

>>10964851
Almost! But my phrasing made more sense friend :) Can I ask if you're ESL?

>>10964883
Well, consensus is pretty important. Why not make sure it's right? And if it's useless to make public before it can truly be used on Skywire, why open it up to being copied?

[Anonymous No.10964978]

>>10964944
After 6 years of development, with a known history of doing things halfway and then abandoning it, I don't trust this project to deliver anything.

[Anonymous No.10964998]

>>10964978
Hmmm, I've never heard of abandoned things. What comes to mind?

[Anonymous No.10965019]

>>10964883
>Consensus is basic
You're fucking retarded. There's dozens of projects that have been in development for years trying to solve the scalability trilemma

[Anonymous No.10965030]

>>10964998
DEX, decentralized 4chan and Reddit and more. Check their old roadmap from 2017

[Anonymous No.10965084]

>>10965030
Oh! You mean reprioritized things then. Those are still talked about. Can't have those until other components are built to facilitate them. It's pretty exciting that the scope of Skycoin as an entire platform is growing.

CX is nearing completion and is in a workable enough state for some simple games. https://github.com/galah4d/pacman-cx

[Anonymous No.10965085]

>>10964944
so good they wanna steal it

[Anonymous No.10965103]

>>10964432
fake news? nope just some common sense and tech knowledge is enough to see what a scam this crap is

[Anonymous No.10965105]

>>10965084
So a project that's in development for 6 years with pretty much everything being halfbaked developed sounds like a good investment to you? Not to mention the ridiculous public image Synth has created for himself trying to make HOLO look like a scam whilst they are the ones selling raspberry pi's at a 100x markup?

[Anonymous No.10965201]

>>10965105
Well, you'd have to prove it's halfbaked development. The desktop app, Android wallet, and Skyminer builds all have worked flawlessly for me. The proxy on the testnet is better than paid proxies I've used.

Being the first to market isn't everything, friend. Ethereum did that and now they can't run a cat game without grinding the entire platform to a halt.
Apple didn't invent the mp3 player, but they came along with a product so good that now everyone thinks that they did.

I think the only thing Synth has ever mentioned about Holo is that their simple tech can be run off Skywire. They're going to need the help since their concept will be crippled by the legacy internet's lack of support for SDN. Honestly, simple copycat projects like holo aren't worth discussing.

[Anonymous No.10965242]

>>10965201
I don't care about ETH. I've used Skycoin and sure it works, but I wonder what makes it work when nothing is released yet. Who confirms these transactions?

Synth was litterly ranting in the telegram how Holo is a ponzi and he can't believe what a shitcoin and a scam it is.

[Anonymous No.10965281]

>>10965105
any solid project requires serious research and time. what's your point? hide in the basement and work on the most advanced tech away from public eye and then shazam?! give me a break
totally irrelevant to use this argument against sky when it's a sign of meticulous work
it's true that Synth has a special image but his personality is his problem not ours. he is just one of many involved and he is not even acting like a madman, u are overreacting

[Anonymous No.10965334]

>>10965201
>>Ethereum did that and now they can't run a cat game without grinding the entire platform to a halt

THAT was shittybiz

[Anonymous No.10965340]

Imagine betting on this shit show. Not a fan of any internet crypto projects but this by far the dumbest to put your money on. There will never be a new entirely decentralized internet, it's just a meme to suck you all in. And how is it other projects that have been under development for not even half of the time have produced similar if not more results? NKN has already designed an entirely new unique consensus algo. They aren't charging 1btc for raspberry pie, anyone can set up a client they dont have to wait for their name to be reached on an excel spreadsheet. The team is actually open and transparent and hasn't been kidnapped by their own marketing team. This shit is a joke. Stop falling for synths bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10965394]

>>10965334
Doesn't matter who it was. It matters that it was able to happen.

Lol, imagine a cat game costing $10k/hr to operate. Fiber is feeless since people are throttled by using coinhours.

[Anonymous No.10965478]

>>10965340
some of these shills know this shit will never work in the real world but still hype it up to unload on gullible retards, they are just as dishonest as the lead team

[Anonymous No.10965551]

>>10965340
I'm sure ISPs will be falling over themselves to spend millions to upgrade their equipment to allow nkn to work as intended, lol. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/22/sdn_controller_design_sucks_claim_network_boffins/

The official miners don't cost 1btc, it's a great way to support development by buying a miner and some sky.

Anyone can set up a client on Skywire, it's just people that want to get rewards for operating the testnet that are having to wait. It's so that the project isn't flooded by a centralized region. You should join in man, you can even turn your PC into a single node if you're handy with a cli and can run golang.

I guess we'll see with the marketing team. I wonder when their court date is coming up soon I hear, lol.

[Anonymous No.10965670]

>>10965478
>Guys, putting antennas, routers, and servers on private property and compensating the owners will never work! It will never have a marketable advantage over corporate run ISPs!

You sound so basic, lol.

[Anonymous No.10965958]

>>10965551
Idk wtf you are even talking about. ISPs having to upgrade hardware? NKN client can run on a pin just like your shitcoin. Any John or Jane can set it up on their home PC and begin relaying data. Remind why ISPs are having to upgrade? Contributors/miners to the network will be limited by their own network speeds not hardware. Related wont be limited by anything other than the nkn network acting as a second layer on top of current infrastructure. You seriously think all the current internet infrastructure will be replaced by your skyscam? The obvious next step is to work off of the current network, which yes sky is doing, but they claim to aim to replace it at some point which is absolutely insane. Not in a good way.

[Anonymous No.10966110]

>>10965958
Look at this little fella. Talking shit and you don't even understand networking hardware or networking protocols.

Yes anon, buy lots of nkn, holo, and tron, and "run it on top" of the legacy internet, lol. I'm sure everything will work just great.

[Anonymous No.10966121]

>>10965670
basic is your understanding of internet tech

[Anonymous No.10966185]

>>10966121
>said the anon, as he did nothing to highlight any flaw he could find with the vast operational savings of unzoned private ownership of backhaul nodes compared to commercial requirements and red tape in various countries

[Anonymous No.10966310]

>>10966185
oh look its the thot poster skyfag again.

Intercontinental and transatlantic communication lines worth trillions. You need them to send data between countries that arent connected by land. Contracts to use them are worth billions. You lack funds, you wont be able to get such funds without being able to send even a single data packet from the U.S to say Australia.
Laws concerning the regulation and snooping of ISPs by all alphabet agencies around the world. No way around it.
Thats just the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong with your scam project. Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.10966345]

>>10966310
>b-but we gonna launch sattelites! or lay our own cables! there is no stopping us!
the height of delusion

[Anonymous No.10966556]

>>10966110
Please enlighten us. Tell me in what way sky would be superior to a second decentralized layer working in tandem with the current network. That's a nice vpn yall got. Mine only costs me $15/yr and works perfectly fine with my gigabit connection. And I honestly trust the provider more than i would skycoin. But yeah lmk when you have that completely seperate decentralized internet going. Fucking eh.

[Anonymous No.10966955]

>>10966556
Fucking this.
How many times do Skyfags have to hear that to understand it?
Apparently unlimited number of times because that's how many times it was said already.
Ya'll remind me of XBY club, seriously.

[Anonymous No.10967318]

>>10966310
They'll provide bandwidth of their own accord, or will start losing business. Caching will go a long ways as well.

[Anonymous No.10967370]

>>10966345
Satellites are for show, not really viable.

Cables will be rented, bought or built. Even if they weren't an option, most of the world can be reached by land and over narrow passages of water.

[Anonymous No.10967479]

>>10966556
The literal hardware requirements. MPLS requires ram. Lots of ram. ISPs pretty much play a game of "who can dump traffic on the next ISP" over and over. Skywire doesn't have operators trying to fuck each other over.

[Anonymous No.10967536]

>>10966955
not an argument

[Anonymous No.10967676]

>>10967370
>Cables will be rented, bought or built
rent is your only option and therefore you are subject to many regulations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indefeasible_rights_of_use
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_tariff
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
>muh raspies and antennae can compete against this
trillions on existing network infrastructure and you pretend like you can just switch some general purpose hardware on and somehow be economically attractive for users.
You cant compete, seriously. You cant even send data across countries without some serious investment first. Where are you getting the money?

[Anonymous No.10967950]

>>10967676
A single backbone coast to coast in the US is about 20 unlicensed antennas. Probably around the cost of a used car.

Even if cables aren't an option, which is unlikely that operators hate money, the only countries that can't be reached by 250km wifi antennas are likely Iceland, Greenland, and New Zealand.

[Anonymous No.10968020]

>>10967676
Oh, also, cheap, uncensored internet where shit like China's social credit score isn't a thing is pretty economically attractive.

[Anonymous No.10968051]

>>10967950
>antennas
99% of traffic runs through cables for a reason, brainlet
>>10968020
nobody cares about your internet justice nonsense, they want reliability and SPEED