/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10765320]

>no swift
>no microsoft
>no banks
>only parters are literally whos start ups (lol)
>bunch of retards from 4chan thinks it will magically moon without anyone buying
>bunch of retards from 4chan therefore fuds it everywhere and anytime there is some news the team itself worked hard on
>meanwhile whales control the price while you do their job for free
Lol
LOL
LMAO

[Anonymous No.10765331]

>>10765320
Aaaaaaahhhhhhhh !!!!

[Anonymous No.10765341]

Sold 100k thank you very much

[Anonymous No.10765345]

and all the linkers cried out in horror as their precious token dumped uncontrollably.

[Anonymous No.10765349]

>>10765320
Level 8 here. No need to explain.

[Anonymous No.10765375]

>>10765320
>Accord
>literally who startup
lolmao

Also, Integra is a ledger, and Chainlink will be able to connect to it just like it will be able to connect to all ledgers/blockchains.

Cope, swing-trading scum.

[Anonymous No.10765410]

every smart contract consortium is small and somewhat unknown now since legal smart contracts aren't used for anything. give it time, anon. accord and openlaw (through consensys) could be very significant one day.

[Anonymous No.10765434]

>>10765375

[Anonymous No.10765441]

>>10765434
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2018/06/smart-legal-contracts-how-the-law-benefits-with-blockchain-2/

Good luck swing trading though.

[Anonymous No.10765453]

Oh god...
Oh no...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Status: KEKED

[Anonymous No.10765459]

Why doyou assholes care so much? Link is goong to the moon

[Anonymous No.10765499]

>>10765453
See pic. Whoopsie!
Good luck swing trading though.

>>10765459
They're swing trading.

[Anonymous No.10765519]

>cucked by open source partners (lol)
>cucked by potentional customers
LINKIES JUST CANT CATCH A BREAK

[Anonymous No.10765545]

>>10765519
>Fizzy saying they're looking at Chainlink is now fud

[Anonymous No.10765559]

>>10765545
They have looked and they keep looking because they are not interested.
You got nothing of substance

[Anonymous No.10765605]

4chan Chainlink प्रतिलिपि 3.6

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Eth hit. Happy gambling though anons

[Anonymous No.10765619]

>>10765559
>because they are not interested.
lmao, if you say so

[Anonymous No.10765630]

Let's be honest here, at what price did you swing traders sell at? 4k sats? 3k sats? Oh no no no you sold at 2.5k sats didn't you hahahaha
No wonder the FUD is so desperate these last few weeks. All these "traders" got cucked and sold low.

[Anonymous No.10765766]

>>10765630
I sold most my stack $1 and have been trading the whole way down
my average cost is literally below zero. how are those bags treating you? reddit tier hodler

[Anonymous No.10766768]

>>10765349
Delusional

[Anonymous No.10766882]

>>10765349
level 8 as well. See you in the 5

[Anonymous No.10766917]

[Anonymous No.10766929]

Solid month of gains.

[Anonymous No.10766943]

[Anonymous No.10766992]

we outchea

[Anonymous No.10767049]

We are now moving into Divine Realisation Era or DRE. If you hold 1k link you will be able to seek out APIs with your mind and subconsciously connect them to smart contracts. Your link reward payments will be beamed directly into your body and your will be able to buy lambos simply by waving your hand in front of the salesman. Each lambo will be charged at 0.1 link and automatically debited from your mind.
This is not a shill, it has been confirmed in telegram.