Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 119 KB, 1178x662, chainlink.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10624657 No.10624657 [DELETED]  [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

EOY$ predictions for chainlink folks?

>> No.10624678
File: 163 KB, 486x695, 342857EOYcheckem.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10624678

>>10624657

>> No.10624691

>>10624657
This image epitomizes crypto shilling on /biz/. Literally blatant rump shaking to get a bunch of NEETs, wageslaves, and poorfags to dump their savings into ponzi schemes thinking "it'll be fine because I'll be the winner and I won't get tricked by Shekelstein and Chang" while getting swindled by shekelstein and chang.

>> No.10624818

2.00

>> No.10624854

$60 eoy

>> No.10624888

>>10624691
BE POOR STUPID
IF YOU DONT GET CHAINLINK YOU WILL BE POOR
WE ARE SECRET GROUP THAT WILL TO THE MOON

>> No.10624909
File: 86 KB, 680x748, 1510512884249.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10624909

>>10624657
$2500 EOY
CHANGE MY MIND

>> No.10624939

>>10624909
LISTEN TO THIS BOY
TO THE MOON!!!

>> No.10624964

The pajeets are out in full force today. None of you deserve to be called marines.

>> No.10624972

>>10624964
STUPID BE POOR!

>> No.10624995

$23

>> No.10625039

>>10624657
>anything less than $1M EOY

>> No.10625337

Sauce?

>> No.10625353

$2500 EOY

>> No.10625370

>>10624657
$1000


31.12.2018. 23:59:59

>> No.10625428

being realistic about 1.50 - 2

>> No.10625435

1400 eoy. check em

>> No.10625438

>>10625428
>pink ID
Never gonna make it

>> No.10625444
File: 706 KB, 1743x1959, 1530060434754.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625444

$2500 EOY

>> No.10625535
File: 222 KB, 500x500, linkpepebigmachat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625535

>>10624909
this....I upgraded to the $2500k timeline and never looked back. Thanks Chainlink!!!!

>> No.10625564

>>10625438
youre not gonna make it either.....but i will

>> No.10625569
File: 410 KB, 1920x1080, 1518828171115.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625569

>>10625444
Check'd

>> No.10625572
File: 120 KB, 645x773, 1533234177891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625572

>>10624657

>> No.10625580
File: 195 KB, 800x418, linksmaug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625580

>>10624657
OP I hold link and that has to be literally the worst link meme ever real braap posting but to lame to even sniff

>> No.10625592
File: 7 KB, 420x420, 1457044334241.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625592

>>10624657
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data APIs through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>> No.10625599
File: 3.70 MB, 488x291, CHECKEM.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625599

>>10625444
Chekt. The $2500 timeline is best

>> No.10625604
File: 180 KB, 547x432, linksergeysolo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625604

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data APIs through crypto.Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>> No.10625616

>>10624657
so little effort went into this.

>> No.10625639

>>10625604
star wars is ded anon. ded. luke got lukememea from a cancerous space tit and the galaxy died of forceaids.

>> No.10625670

>>10625599
Very chekt

>> No.10625698

Link is will for be 150 rupees yearly ending. I am very being sorry anonymous fellows. News not good for crypto. Very it is bad. It having bad sickness.

>> No.10625724
File: 149 KB, 664x341, darth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625724

>>10625639

>> No.10625757
File: 418 KB, 900x1039, 1520522608134 - Kopie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10625757

$0.5 EOY

>> No.10626016

Nicely said Anon, which coins would you consider for real world application them?

>> No.10626140

>>10624657
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but chainlink has roughly 3.5x the circulating supply as ETH. ETH reached over $1000 each.

If link were to reach the market cap that ETH had when it hit 1k - 1000/3.5 = $285.71. Obviously the entire market is tied to BTC. And circulating supply will also have a major impact, but if circ supply remains the same, btc takes off and we see link getting a lot of adoption, it doesn't seem too farfetched

>> No.10626150

$1000

>> No.10626165
File: 1.64 MB, 1257x2113, IMG_1111.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10626165

We cannot be stopped

>> No.10626182

>>10624657
Does this bitch look jaundice to anyone else? Med fags, speak up.

>> No.10626183

>>10625757
If that last one happens I may unironically jump off a bridge

>> No.10626195
File: 85 KB, 317x400, linksergscream.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10626195

>>10625639
how mortifying.....

>> No.10626249
File: 28 KB, 519x522, FB_IMG_1533504616948.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10626249

I've bought about ~$100 dollars of LINK over two months at an average price of around 37ยข, usually due to FOMO and usually running into a loss.

I think LINK hype and fud are produced by the same group of people to pump and/or dump the market. Anyways, I'll be happy if it goes above 40 cents. Not like I have any real stake in this.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action