[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 12 KB, 450x450, 600_465198722.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502625 No.10502625 [Reply] [Original]

Convince me why Oraclize won't beat Chainlink.

Go.

>> No.10502636

Nobody has to convince you of anything faggot we don’t even actually want you to buy LINK.

>> No.10502645
File: 580 KB, 2400x1727, oraclize is centralized - service interruptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502645

centralized

>> No.10502649

So lets count...
Actual reasons : 0
BS: 1
>>10502636

>> No.10502664

>>10502649
Why is my reason bs? Why do you rely on other people to do spell things out for you? It’s a fucking scam either way so just listen to me and do not buy.

>> No.10502665

>>10502625
Will swift or any important organization with millions on the line use an oracle that is centralized and suffers from service outages?

>> No.10502672

>>10502625
chainlink can be used in a centralized way or a decentralized way, plus you can make payments through swift network

oraclize is only centralized and can't make fiat payments

>> No.10502676

>>10502665
ehm yes. Swift, Visa, everyBank on this planet or whatever also uses cloud servers for literally anything else. Like every company does. 99,99% uptime is all you need

>> No.10502681

>>10502625
jesus christ they stole the fucking code. you are not smart. you are not "on to something." LINK is still cheap. Stop trying to be "that guy" that "gets it." Either invest in both or just go in on LINK considering it's been around A LOT LONGER

>> No.10502687
File: 313 KB, 2316x1198, IC3 Link partnership.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502687

>>10502625

>> No.10502704

>>10502676
Oraclize does not provide that

>> No.10502723
File: 76 KB, 1383x1072, this_kills_the_chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502723

>>10502704
I know. Oraclize is for crypto scam sites. Real players will use Thomson Reuters (TM) solution.

Or the gorillion other ones, once/if oracles lift off.

>> No.10502793

>>10502681
They didn't steal code. They used an open source utility made for link. But yes, oraclize is shit.

>> No.10502821
File: 1.69 MB, 200x200, 1519877262926.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502821

>>10502625
It's not even the right question I think. It's like convince me Oraclize will beat SQL first. Convince me LINK is a secure network. Convince me trust has been minimized. Convince me LINK is more than a smokescreen to buy time to do something they don't know how to do.

>> No.10502965

>>10502723
>content only from Thomson Reuters
>applicable to only Corda and Eth
Gee, if only there was a decentralized, blockchain-agnostic system that could use any data and apply it to any ledger or blockchain.

>> No.10503680

>>10502625
>Oraclize
it like escrow service in SYSCOIN?

>> No.10503701

>>10502625
two words

meme

magic

>> No.10503882

centralized

>> No.10504179

Good point.
Looks like shitlink is a turd ready to get flushed down the toilet

>> No.10504263

>>10504179
Why do you hate LINK but love literal scam coins like Funfair?
Are you both physically and mentally handicapped?

>> No.10504271

>>10502625
The link delusion continues. Imagine being the person who believes that a gypsy russian with a philosophy degree and no programming experience is going to instantiate a global, paradigm shifting economic system where banks and other entities are going to willfully funnel hundreds of billions of dollars into and sit around idly while said gypsy russian and his family of neet fags take profits.

Now imagine being the person who believes that the worlds banking cartels, with arguably some of the most brilliant computer scientists out there, are going to sit by and let a gypsy russian take profits they could have had by using a simple JSON parser.


Consider this snippet from the following article:
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10736960/High-frequency-trading-when-milliseconds-mean-millions.html]

"No wonder that Spread Networks, the company building the fibre-optic connection, proudly boasted: “Round-trip travel time from Chicago to New Jersey has been cut to 13 milliseconds.”

And HFTs were willing to pay through the nose to use it, with the first 200 to sign up forking out $2.8bn between them."
These fucking jews spend billions of dollars just to get a 13 millisecond improvement so their algorithms can get the data faster. So you're telling me that if there was any money in the chainlink area these guys wouldn't be all over it? Get the fuck out of here.

So explain to me why this is going to work again? Or is it just a PnD like 99% of other crypto's out there.

>> No.10504350

>>10502965

>As if Thomson Reuters aren't totally aware of other less popular blockchains and probably plan to support them in the future.
>As if the Chainlink team won't take ages to develop their agnostic software after Ethereum support as well.

>> No.10504742

>>10502645
>new service had some minor problems a year ago
the horror

>> No.10504887

>>10504350
They literally say that they want to support more in the future.

But linktards still want to believe that corps would use some neets node instead of the most reputable news avgency in the world.

>> No.10504937

>>10502625

centralized shit product

slow as fuck

>> No.10504995
File: 56 KB, 550x467, kek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10504995

>>10502665
>He believes chainlink will be better

>> No.10505013

>>10502625
Oraclize is down 1 day out of 5, that should be reason enough.