Redpill me on Bitcoin Cash

[Anonymous No.10417154]

[Anonymous No.10417169]

scam

[Anonymous No.10417178]

Should have sold after the fork

[Anonymous No.10417183]

pilled.com

[Anonymous No.10417193]

[Anonymous No.10417202]

>>10417154
Go to r/bitcoin and try to have an open conversation about block size

Research blockstream kikes

Look at who is in which coin and who you trust more ie do you trust people like tone vays, Andreas Antonopoulos or Roger Ver, Craig Wright? And who of those people do you want on your side

Literally go watch the Roger Ver vs Samson Mow debate, Roger BTFO Samson by a long shot

[Anonymous No.10417211]

>>10417154

ahh, I was beginning to miss the daily shilling

[Anonymous No.10417212]

>>10417154
Don't know I got mine for free. Still cant use it for anything I value. Maybe the developers will actually do something. People poke fun at btc but it is still number 1.

[Anonymous No.10417227]

>>10417169
>>10417178
>>10417183
>>10417193
Here’s you redpill anon look at all these kikes with no argument just ad homemim attacks

Pathetic really

[Anonymous No.10417273]

[Anonymous No.10417282]

>>10417212

on a serious note though, BCH will provide bigger gains than BTC over the next 2 years

[Anonymous No.10417307]

>>10417154
Bch is a scam by OG whales on newfags. Literally money from nothing. Bravo Ver

[Anonymous No.10417509]

BCH = Next-Gen Bitcoin
BTC = Old and busted

[Anonymous No.10417521]

its real name is BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.10417532]

>>10417273
unironically Land rovers original vision

[Anonymous No.10417550]

>>10417521
BÆSJ BÆSJ BÆSJ

[Anonymous No.10417759]

Isn't BCH undervalued right now?

[Anonymous No.10417848]

It's very important everyone knows and understands, Roger Ver was sent to prison, and then he was raped, then he renounced his US citizenship and became the pedo faggot conartist that he is today, promoting bcash as Bitcoin through /r/btc, @Bitcoin and Bitcoin.com.

This is sadly, a true story. BUT, I couldn't have asked for a better outcome, considering he has tainted the image of bcash, so as a result, it has literally ZERO chance of succeeding in the long run; the day where money from bcash to Bitcoin will flood once again soon, and it'll be one of the greatest fomo pumps that will ever occur.

[Anonymous No.10418031]

[Anonymous No.10418051]

Thread is 18 posts in and still no one has stated what BCH actually is.

[Anonymous No.10418171]

>>10418051
The first post covered it

[Anonymous No.10418267]

>>10418051
It's a hardfork of the bitcoin chain that increased blocksize so that transactions actually go through in the next block

When BTC was on its bullrun last year, you had to pay crazy transaction fees and wait weeks for your order to get processed because 1mb blocks can't handle a currency that people actually use.

The people in charge of BTC liked that their coin was shitty and expensive because, in lieu of increasing blocksize, they could come up with some jew workaround called "Lightening network"

BCH doesn't require lightening network because it will always have big enough blocks to handle its usage. BTC needs lightening (jewish scam) while BCH doesn;t

[Anonymous No.10418311]

Blockstream uses bitcoin as a way to leverage their own financial goals. They have full control of the git which allows them to stop blocksize increases. Why? because blockstream is financed through the sale of side-chains. If bitcoin functions smoothly, there is no demand for side chains

Bitcoin cash is bitcoin without the strangehold of blockstream. It is Peer-to-peer electronic cash.

[Anonymous No.10418375]

>>10418311
tl;dr actually this.

If you want Bitcoin with Blockstream being owned by several companies like the federal reserve and mastercard. Then Bitcoin core is for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BZoKH-hX_o&t=3m35s

If you want the original vision of Satoshi and a working Bitcoin without waiting hours for transactions. Bitcoin Cash is for you.

[Anonymous No.10418376]

>>10417227
Bcashbot deposited 0.00025 BCH to your account for this post.

[Anonymous No.10418387]

Back when there were video stores, you would sometimes see movies from Asylum Studios. Asylum's entire business model was to make a micro budget straight to DVD knockoff of huge budget tentpole movies and confuse the elderly and people who didn't speak English as a first language. So if Pirates of the Caribbean was in the theater, your local video store would have Pirates of Treasure Island. Aliens vs Predator, meet Alien vs Hunter. Death Race? Death Racers? I'm not actually sure which one of those was the knockoff.
Anyway, BCH is the Asylum Studios of crypto.

[Anonymous No.10418393]

>>10417848
Don't forget that he also stole the bitcoin twitter handle and is butthurt that he can't pay off the r/bitcoin moderators.

[Anonymous No.10418429]

>>10418376
Fact : you couldn't make this deposit with BTC lmao

[Anonymous No.10418462]

>>10418387
So Satoshi made a working blockchain, and someone made a shitty version that doesn't work as a scam to trick people into thinking they're using the original blockchain when in reality they're using a jewish sidechain network?

[Anonymous No.10418471]

>>10418267
Thank you for the non-shitpost answer.

[Anonymous No.10418502]

Bitcoin Cash’s block size is determined by the demand and supply of the free market, so it can scale to meet demand as miners freely compete with one another and hardware is improved. It’s a very simple and logical model based on the laws of economics.
Bitcoin Core’s block size is arbitrarily set by a central planning body. As in any central planning regime, this has resulted in shortages. The ludicrously inadequate 3-5 transaction per second throughput cap has caused several-day-long confirmation times and $40 fees. Usage is down now and so is the congestion, but should the bull market return for BTC, it will easily cripple it just like before, Segwit’s current 30% boost notwithstanding.
Bitcoin Cash is not opposed to second layer solutions when they are developed, but allows people to choose between on-chain and off-chain transactions. Bitcoin Core made on-chain transactions at scale impossible by imposing an arbitrary block size cap, while promising a theoretical future off-chain tech that’s supposed to fix the problems that were created by its devs in the first place.
BItcoin Cash is run and supported by free-market libertarians and logical thinkers. Bitcoin Core is run by totalitarian Marxists and followed by a non-thinking hateful obedient mob.

[Anonymous No.10418523]

>>10418471
no problem. Notice how when you deliver facts, the shills ignore it? That's why they need to ban any discussion of BCH in places like r/bitcoin because the truth shines a light on their jewish scam. You don't need lightening if you stop artificially limiting the transaction speed of your blockchain. And if your blockchain isn't limited, there's no way for (((them))) to make money off it.

I hold BTC and BCH because betting against jews when it comes to making money is bad business. Both will succeed

[Anonymous No.10418629]

>>10418523
I hold both because I got the scam for free. Block size increase is not a sustainable way to scale. The debate is over just look at the charts. I like bitcoin because it "does not change" no matter how much crying these trolls do.

[Anonymous No.10418656]

>>10418267
This is a typical bcashie response who thinks increasing the blocksize is a permanent scaling solution.

[Anonymous No.10418679]

>>10418429

Bitcoin isn't for sending money. It's for hodling. That's why bitcoin buyers should throw away their private keys. Remove the possibility of you giving into your temptation

[Anonymous No.10418681]

>>10417154
Bitcoin cash is the fringe authoritarian faction of bitcoin. Instead of upgrading bitcoin's software in a non-coercive optional manor, bitcoin cash likes to use coercion and force to update the protocol. Specifically, bitcoin core uses soft forks (which provide optional upgrades, such as segwit, schnorr signatures, bech32 address etc.), while bitcoin cash uses hardforks which requires the forcing of mandatory upgrades to the protocol. Roger ver, an alleged libertarian/ancap, uses his influence to force his narrative that bitcoin cash is the original chain. Any mention of the word "bcash" triggers him, and causes him to attack others for not using his coins preferred pronouns. Bitcoin cash has one main client, in which 90% of the nodes run, bitcoin-abc. Bitcoin abc, has one main developer, Amaury Séchet, who mostly just enables old BIPS (Bitcoin improvement protocols), and steals code from the bitcoin core client, because there is no way a single man can compete with the hundreds of bitcoin core developers.
In summary bcash is an altcoin who's marketing is to claim it's bitcoin because it's "satoshi's vision", when in reality it does not follow the protocol that satoshi originally wrote (satoshi originally added the blocksize limit to reduce spam transactions).

[Anonymous No.10418728]

>>10418681

>people are forced to run software on their own machines

You hit reddit tier IQ right out of the gate

[Anonymous No.10418763]

>>10418728
they're forced to upgrade their software and comply with the new rules. With bitcoin core you don't have to. Segwit is an optional upgrade.

[Anonymous No.10418773]

>increasing blocksize isn't a permanent solution
>it's coercion you guys!
>lets use high fees to coerce people into using kike network so we can collect fees from them

[Anonymous No.10418783]

>>10418763

No one is forced to upgrade
No one is forced to mine
No one is forced to run software

Unless someone has a gun to your head, nobody is forcing you

[Anonymous No.10418795]

>>10418773
Hearing that a company can pull profits from a node is literally the opposite of what you want in Cryptocurrency. That's the biggest fucking red flag ever.

[Anonymous No.10418800]

>>10417154

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB0mG7wMvM8&t=

[Anonymous No.10418801]

one coin is broken and needs lightening network sidechain jew bullshit. One coin increased the blocksize and continues working the way it was designed

[Anonymous No.10418813]

>>10418783
Being excluded from the network is forcing you brainlet

[Anonymous No.10418827]

>>10418783
If you don't upgrade and comply with the new rules you can't spend your coins. Yes hard forks are authoritarian, as the force you to upgrade if you want to be a participant.

[Anonymous No.10418843]

>>10418629
The debate ended when it was shown the bitcoin network is a complete graph. Nobody argues this shit anymore because braindead bcore shills are so uneducated it takes hours to walk them through it.

[Anonymous No.10418867]

>>10418827
>>10418813

if I fork bitcoin and make "Bitcoin Californium". Are you forced to do anything?
Are you forced to mine my coin?
Are you forced to run my software?

The answer is no. Because my coin has no value. You run my software and mine my coin because you think it has value. Miners and users are incentivized to run software because it has value.

Now please fuck off you retarded nigger

[Anonymous No.10418885]

>>10418813
>>10418827
You also don't realize you just made an argument for how useless non mining nodes are.

[Anonymous No.10418889]

>>10418801
Not really, Bitcoin Cash's verification time is about the same as BTC and the fees aren't exactly that mesmerizing in comparison aswell. Also you got Jihan with his insane mining farm centralizing BCH anyway. So whats the fucking point?

[Anonymous No.10418896]

>>10418867
>We should create an entirely new network, with an entirely different coin, for each feature added
>We should create an optional upgrade that's backwards compatible older clients to keep the community unified
Gee I guess I'm the retarded nigger

[Anonymous No.10418916]

>>10418896

Or we fork the network and let the market decide. Can't handle competition corecuck?

[Anonymous No.10418930]

>>10418916
>let the market decide

Lets talk about the BCASH ETF. Oh wait...

[Anonymous No.10418954]

>>10418930
/thread

[Anonymous No.10418992]

>>10418930
>>10418954

[Anonymous No.10419021]

>>10418523
Nah, it's because we are tired of refuting your nonsense. Eventually people just get sick of it. Thankfully, the market sees through your bs.

Lights out cashies, traitors go straight to hell.

[Anonymous No.10419022]

>>10418992
That doesn't make the point you are trying to make. Market Cap is skewed with every shit project at millions and billions when in fact it has no liquidity or trading volume exists at all.

[Anonymous No.10419048]

>>10419022
no liquidity or trading volume yet they still have a high value? That's a new thought, incredible.

[Anonymous No.10419122]

>>10419048
>high value

Its artificial for every buyers has to be a seller. Go make your own 1000000 coins and sell to yourself for $100 the market cap is now what? If you truly think bitcoin is dead you do you mate.

[Anonymous No.10419172]

>>10419122
>it's artificial
>people are buying at those prices
>here's an arbitrary example that automatically gets excluded from cmc's website
k

[Anonymous No.10419195]

>>10417202
I don't trust "Mt gox is totally solvent" ver at all
kys bcashie

[Anonymous No.10419208]

core cucks worst nightmare

[Anonymous No.10419241]

>>10419172
CMC has projects with virtually no trading volume... Why are you getting upset over fun bucks. What point are you actually trying to make?

[Anonymous No.10419246]

you can see how much the core cucks believe in their shit coin when they had to create tether to have something to constantly jump back and forth into as they are scared shitless to hold their own coin.

[Anonymous No.10419282]

>>10419241
That btc is losing market dominance to other crypto projects and your sitting here butthurt about it. The market is obviously not siding with btc.

[Anonymous No.10419306]

>>10419246
>>10419282
imagine being this retarded.

[Anonymous No.10419328]

>>10419282
Butthurt about what? I got plenty of skin in the game with plenty of projects. You sound like the type of person who talks to himself in a mirror or something. Just delusional.

[Anonymous No.10419349]

>>10419306
>>10419328
>btc down over 40% in market dominance in a year
it's just fake volume on random shitcoins guys even though the majority of the marketcap is held by the top 50. Don't worry about it :^)))

[Anonymous No.10419425]

>>10419349
Idk looks pretty bullish to me.

[Anonymous No.10419573]

>>10419282
create a bunch of ico shit tokens worth 30m in reality but have market caps of 300m+huur why is btc losing dominance

it's pretty clear who is king when btc pumps and alts take a massive dive at the same time

[Anonymous No.10419578]

>>10419349
1 year ago it was barely 1.5% higher than it is now.

[Anonymous No.10419615]

>>10419349
do you really think ripples market cap is legitimate? or bcash after millions of tokens were created out of thin air?

[Anonymous No.10419644]

BTC is just a hobby project now. Greg Maxwell likes to backup every block on floppy disks so the blocksize cannot be greater than 1mb. BCH is the next generation of bitcoin used for peer to peer micropayments.

[Anonymous No.10419648]

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.10419669]

>>10418656
This is a typical bcore response that implies that no solution is better than a temporary one (lightning network is centralized and goes against the whitepaper)

[Anonymous No.10419704]

>>10419644
Forgot to mention BCH features a maximum 32mb blocksize. Some argue this leads to centralization because many hobbiest can no longer run nodes on their gameboy advance. However, decentralization is ensured through mining pools located across the globe and datacenters.

[Anonymous No.10419716]

>>10419669
btc has over 10x the transactions of bcash and you can send millions of dollars for just cents
keep trying you desperate bag holder

[Anonymous No.10419717]

hahahahahahahaha how the fuck is sidechains real hahahaha nigga just increase blocksize like nigga use the real bitcoin haha

[Anonymous No.10419724]

>>10419669
not following the chain with the most hash power is also against the white paper, cashie

[Anonymous No.10419750]

>>10419717
name a single sidechain that directly solve scaling or wouldn't work better alongside larger blocks

[Anonymous No.10419787]

>>10419724
and patents on an open source project is just pissing on Hal finneys grave
csw is scum

[Anonymous No.10419795]

>>10419750
YOU CANT

[Anonymous No.10419833]

>>10418429
it costs 1 sat to send through LN

[Anonymous No.10419835]

All the cashies are scared deep down, because they know that once the flippening nears all BTC needs to do is increase blocksize to 2MB again and BCH is literally left with no more reason to exist.

[Anonymous No.10419856]

>>10419835
why would I be against BTC increasing its blockchain? If it fixed itself I would support it but they don't fix it because they want to necessitate lightening.

[Anonymous No.10419864]

>>10419835

Miners would tell them to fuck off

[Anonymous No.10419888]

asics couldn't do segwit but they could do bigger blocks, that is the only reason bcash exists. yeah im sure satoshi's vision was centralized mining

[Anonymous No.10420031]

>>10417154
Blockstream introduced Segwit to fuck the chain up to censor Assanges dead man's switch so that the world doesn't find out the bankers are baby torturing & raping Satanists. Bitcoin cash preserves the chain of signatures so the world is about to find out and when they do the BTC to BCH flip is gonna be the quickest 10x the world has ever seen.
True story

[Anonymous No.10420066]

>>10417154

Them fucking around is what caused the December crash.

[Anonymous No.10420507]

>>10420031
segwit address are optional you brain dead cash cuck

[Anonymous No.10420515]

>>10418800

[Anonymous No.10420601]

>>10418763

Vitalik talked about this, and how its completely opposite. A hard fork is voluntary, as you're always able to just use the old chain, while a softfork forces you to comply with new rules. Segwit txs werent available before the soft fork, but are now, regardless of if you agree with it.

[Anonymous No.10420669]

>>10419195
https://youtu.be/yOQ1iDG0HY8

14:44

[Anonymous No.10420736]

>>10420601

Corecucks BTFO

[Anonymous No.10420757]

>>10420601
based vitalik

[Anonymous No.10421279]

>>10420507
That doesn't mean it hasn't already corrupted the (block)chain of signatures you brainlet

[Anonymous No.10421318]

>>10420601
Wow, it's like the opposite of the truth is the truth!

You have your hardfork now. Enjoy it while it lasts.

[Anonymous No.10421871]

>>10421279
only changes segwit address signatures
I use my qt wallet from 2011 and all transactions still have signatures
do you not know anything about bitcoin at all? or just regurgitate conjecture you saw some bcash shill bot spam everywhere?

[Anonymous No.10421899]

>>10421871
do you just pay high tx fees and wait for days on end for it to process like a good little bitch?

[Anonymous No.10421918]

>>10421899
he will when the mempool fills up lmao

[Anonymous No.10421928]

>>10421318
>His memes are subpar

[Anonymous No.10421945]

>>10421918
These guys are so low T, they can't handle 8mb blocks

[Anonymous No.10421982]

>>10419856
>he thinks LN is a sidechain
this is your average cashie brainlet right here.
>>10421899
it costs 1sat/byte to get in next block on btc, and it costs 1 sat/byte to get in next block on bch..
>>10421918
that will take a lot more tx's now than it did before segwit adoption went way up.

[Anonymous No.10422009]

>>10421982
>he thinks LN isn't some kike bullshit

Got any chink coins you think I should buy as well?

[Anonymous No.10422047]

BCH fan here. I don’t hate BTC, I simply prefer BCH because it’s almost free to use, instant tx, and it’s growing in adoption. Last year BTC’s escalating tx fees and waiting periods utterly killed a promising and growing project I was part of. That’s when I realized BTC was never going to reach mainstream adoption. Maybe BCH isn’t won’t either, but next time the BTC mempool starts filling up we are going to have the same problem. And any project based on BTC will be killed off, again.

[Anonymous No.10422070]

>>10422009
BCH

[Anonymous No.10422081]

>>10418462
>>10418801
>>10419717
>>10422009
hahahahaha please tell everyone how LN is a sidechain.
ill wait.

[Anonymous No.10422127]

>>10417202
Andreas would destroy any BCash advocate in a debate

[Anonymous No.10422136]

>>10422081
Lightning has been a few months away since January of 2016. It still is a “few months away” in mid 2018. I’m really interested why you are against increasing block size. It works, right now.

[Anonymous No.10422151]

I don't really know what's going on people say blockstream took over btc by controlling the core the development team
I'd say it's true blockstream controls core but core has zero say in what miners want. Miners are the ones that aren't increasing the blocksize and are allowing segwit

the real conspiracy is probably miners manufactured the scaling debate so the smart money could accumulate bch. It's certainly what they're incentivised to do

[Anonymous No.10422203]

>>10422151
didnt core try to compromise with segwit2x but then after the miners signed the agreement, they backed out?

[Anonymous No.10422309]

>>10421899
it's not eth Lmao

[Anonymous No.10422321]

>>10422009
yeah, bcash

[Anonymous No.10422349]

>>10422203
core has no power to implement a change, they propose development and it's up to miners if they want to include it

[Anonymous No.10422352]

>>10422136
lightning is in beta running right now on mainnet with 2600 nodes and grows every day.
I'm not against increasing block size, I am against raising it as the only solution, especially if it will hurt decentralization, which is the entire point of all this.
by the way, why do you think we should have every tx on chain?
sending $1 is 2-300 bytes on chain
sending $1,000,000 is 2-300 bytes too
(assuming 1 input / 2 outputs for both tx's)
at 1 sat/byte that would be obviously 2-300 sats in fees.
sending that $1 on LN costs 1 sat TOTAL and it takes about half a second (assuming you already have an open channel.)
and you could send a thousand of those $1 tx's and it still only takes 2 on chain tx's total.
that saves you a fucking shitload of sats, and it takes that thousand tx's out of the mempool leaving more room in blocks for bigger tx's

[Anonymous No.10422359]

>>10422203
No lol. The core devs were vehemently against segwit2x. And predictably, it was buggy code that would have fucked up the network immediately upon release.

Segwit2x was a failed attempt at hijacking Bitcoin and it failed.

[Anonymous No.10422425]

>>10422352
Core Logic:
>Having 10 major hubs for LN is decentralized enough!
>But for mining we need 50k Raspi full nodes to be decentralized!

[Anonymous No.10422464]

>>10418681
> satoshi originally added the blocksize limit to reduce spam transactions
Zoom out and Read satoshis next sentence after he did that, Brainlet. The block size limit was supposed to be TEMPORARY to reduce spam, and was supposed to be removed once the network got big enough (which it did) so that bitcoin could scale as intended, the way BCH is scaling.

Want proof? Try spamming the BCH network. I’ll wait.

[Anonymous No.10422516]

>>10418051
It's peer to peer electronic cash.

If you don't hold BCH I strongly suggest you do. Ignore the haters, the vitriol and incessant 'bcash' spam _ it is all paid for by Blockstream.

The real Bitcoin, BCH, is going away. Be a part of it or lose your chance.

[Anonymous No.10422525]

>>10422516
BCH is not going away*

It's growing rapidly infact.

[Anonymous No.10422623]

>>10422349
not anymore, they can do whatever they want to layer 2 solutions, also segwit soft fork went around the miners backs too

[Anonymous No.10422664]

>>10422352
maybe we should all have tiny apartments, ride public transportation, and sit with our legs crossed because that takes up less space also.

Unfortunately for you I'm not a faggot. I live with my girlfriend in a 3 bedroom house, drive a truck, and want my transaction on the blockchain even if i'm just buying a black rifle coffee. You can drink your onions and have your side chain shit to yourself which is also super gay because you might as well just use a credit card at that point

[Anonymous No.10422665]

>>10422623
yeah maybe the miners let btc become a honeypot for blockstream
if segwit gets no hashpower there is no segwit, it is always up to miners

[Anonymous No.10422738]

>>10422516
you can send millions of dollars worth of btc for less than 10c
how is that not peer to peer electronic cash? desperate bag holder

[Anonymous No.10422751]

>>10422359
Fake news. Segwit2x was designed to fail, how else do you think the developer managed to fuck up a number change from 1024 to 2048? Because that's all the change was.

He was likely paid off to fuck it up and ensure it failed when some hooks tried to fork it a week after it was supposed to go live.

[Anonymous No.10422808]

>>10422425
>implying having a centralized 1st layer is somehow better than having a potentially centralized, totally avoidable 2nd layer...
>implying you and I can't open a channel between ourselves and send btc for zero fee without touching any of the rest of the network.
>implying anybody is stopping you from using an on-chain tx
>>10422623
if the miners don't like it they can mine bcash.
oh wait they can't do that because 95% of the users don't want it.

[Anonymous No.10422840]

>>10422738
Yes as we've seen, with higher usage BTC can't handle the volume and will result in people using the goy network or whatever side chain kike bullshit Blockstream throw in your face.

BCH on the other hand is being designed for unlimited onchain capacity with subcent fees. Bcore literally can't compete.

>>10422738
Gooks*

[Anonymous No.10422873]

>>10422808
why would I open a channel when I could just use BCH and not have to do that gay shit

[Anonymous No.10422881]

>>10422808
no one wants lightning network it's not a blockchain

[Anonymous No.10422890]

>>10419795
okay now this is epic

[Anonymous No.10422897]

>>10422808
You don't think $50 on-chain fees stops a lot of people from using it?

You realize without a blocksize increase the next bull market will have $50 on chain BTC fees again (or more).

LN is definitely centralized. Hell the auto pilot connection just finds the largest hubs to open a channel with. 10 nodes have 90% of the channels.

The only thing stopping all of your precious BTC miners from leaving you for BCH is the coin price.

[Anonymous No.10422898]

>>10422840
segwit adoption is a lot higher than during the 2017 bullrun
with the same use as then now the fees and average confirmation times will be much lower
keep trying bag holder

>>10422873
why use bch when you can use doge like everyone else

[Anonymous No.10422918]

>>10422897
LN has more nodes than bitcoin abc nodes exist
keep trying bag holder, no one is buying your chink shitcoin fronted by a fraud and proven a camper

[Anonymous No.10422930]

>>10422918
and a proven scammer*
auto correct is trying to say ver is camp, aka a faggot
top kek

[Anonymous No.10422966]

>>10422898
>segwit adoption is a lot higher than during the 2017 bullrun

congrats on your 2MB blocksize, youre really scaling there bud

>>10422918
>LN has more nodes than bitcoin abc nodes exist
you realize 50% of the BTC in the LN was put in there from 1 guy who wanted to shit on it in a blog for his website right?

Also fun fact, transactions above $250 have less than 1% chance to successfully route

[Anonymous No.10422989]

>>10422930
>says "top kek" in response to his own typo
>too beta for 8mb blocks

[Anonymous No.10423194]

>>10422840
that assumes nothing has changed since then.
segwit adoption gone way up, and exchanges are batching now which saves a massive amount of tx's
it would take a lot more volume now than it had in december.
>>10422873
use whatever you want anon
like the other anon said doge is actually much cheaper on average
LN takes fast and cheap to a whole other level tho
>>10422881
its just a fucking smart contract kek wtf.
it's using bitcoin's blockchain as the 1st layer
>>10422966
>transactions above $250 have less than 1% chance to successfully route
then use an on-chain tx for payments that big.
>you realize 50% of the BTC in the LN was put in there from 1 guy
ln is up to $770 million in capacity..
are you actually trying to say 1 guy has $380 million on LN in beta, just to shit on it?

[Anonymous No.10423295]

>>10422966
also pic related is kind of a big part of $250 tx's failing...

[Anonymous No.10423384]

>>10423194
>ln is up to $770 million in capacity..
uh you may want to check again, it's closer to $770,000.

[Anonymous No.10423399]

Why do corecucks circle jerk to LN when the devs themselves admit it can't work?

[Anonymous No.10423422]

>>10423194
This guy thinks it has almost 1 billion in capacity

top fucking kek

the delusion is so real

[Anonymous No.10423438]

>>10423384
oh my b 770 thousand
still, $380k by one guy my ass.

[Anonymous No.10423483]

>>10423422
yea i misread it when i glanced over at it, but the point still stands.
>>10423438
also what about this you faggot?
>>10423295

[Anonymous No.10423497]

>>10423483
you may want to keep up with news outside of your censored r/bitcoin sub

one guy put 250k in to play with the network for his news website

[Anonymous No.10423509]

>>10423483
If lightning works they won't be using Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.10423547]

>>10423399
wasn't optimized 8 months ago for 10k-1m channels
doesn't mean it can't work nigger
they're always upgrading the protocol

[Anonymous No.10423596]

bcash is sliding under the 10% mark
everyday it becomes easier and easier to destroy with such low SHA-256 miners securing the network

[Anonymous No.10423611]

those 100k+ EDA bcash coins mined outside of protocol consensus won't be enough to bribe miners forever

[Anonymous No.10423614]

>>10423497
>redit spacing
>implies im the one who goes to redit
kek
sure thing faggot.

[Anonymous No.10424434]

>>10423614

What exactly does 'reddit spacing' have to do with his argument? Also, a reddit spacing would have 2 white lines between text, not one.

Bcore is trash, lightning is vaporware, and you are getting brainwashed by a group of filthy kikes.

Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.10424450]

>>10423611

Hi, Bcore is still due to fork sooner than Bitcoin (BCH) because Bcore's algorithym is disfunctional and is rewarding miners every 9 minutes instead of every 10 like Bitcoin (BCH).

Try and do your homework before posting you dopey corecuck.

[Anonymous No.10424497]

>>10424450

I said 'fork' but I meant 'halve'

[Anonymous No.10424518]

>>10424434
Lmao who cares. Hold equal amounts of both, become rich no matter what. Ideological faggots deserve to be poor.

[Anonymous No.10424521]

Bitcoin Cash will destroy Bitcoin!

[Anonymous No.10425545]

>>10422352
if decentralization is your main concern, why are you not worried by blockstream's monopoly on devs?

[Anonymous No.10425568]

>>10422966
kek i know andreas
he is a /biz/raeli

[Anonymous No.10425584]

>>10424450
>>10424497
you're still wrong and stupid
last 2 week DA was over 10 minute blocks and the mining difficulty dropped slightly

[Anonymous No.10425630]

>>10424450
>Try and do your homework before posting you dopey corecuck.
Do your homework faggot
bcash had several 8 hour no blocks solved deliberately to halve the mining difficulty to spam mine the chain
it's corrupt stupid a childish error
over 100k bcash were practically printed for nothing
and all you stupid fucks either don't get it or are too retarded to care

[Anonymous No.10425696]

>>10417154
Scamcoin with 1m+ bagholders holding a coin they bought for 3-5K after Coinbase insider trading.

Thats why there are so many BCH shills. They all believed it would be the next Bitcoin and are stuck holding at a severe loss.

[Anonymous No.10425836]

>>10417154

[Anonymous No.10426137]

>>10425696
this unfortunately. too bad for the idiots who got scammed by that insider trading pump and dump. too bad for us that we have to absorb their inane perpetual bshit shilling as a result.

[Anonymous No.10427014]

>>10425836
there are three (physical) places that accept cryptocurrency in gothenburg, sweden (three more used to, but dont anymore)
all three take bitcoin cash, and two of them take bitcoin core
lel, corefags

[Anonymous No.10427028]

>>10425836
>>10426137
>>10425696
Cope

[Anonymous No.10427080]

BTC is completely (((compromised))). BCH is right about blocksize but with coins like Nano the argument itself is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.10427164]

>>10417154
Here is the thing op whether u choose to go all in bch or btc is fine, u still gonna make it. Both of them is one of the best and the safest to all in right now .
Remeber this no one on this board ,twitter, blockstream...etc or any other "crypto expert", self claimed Satoshi know which one will give u more profit.
So make up your mind and calculate the risk before go all in or diversity.

[Anonymous No.10427827]

>>10421871
You're an idiot.
The very first Segwit transaction corrupted it's block's chain of signatures, and that corrupted transaction and block have corrupted the ENTIRE blockchain's integrity.
No longer can every Satoshi be traced to it's origin you absolutely dumb cunt

[Anonymous No.10427877]

bitcoin cash started as a mining scam over segwit killing covert asicboost

then it was coopted by mad r edditors because they were censored in /r/bitcoin which is a place for posting boomer memes about bitcoin

also long term capital gains kick in on aug 1st so expect massive dumps in the days afterwards

[Anonymous No.10427905]

>>10427877
>when jihan has more control of btc than bch