Richard Heart DESTROYS Link

[Anonymous No.10365519]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gB4hDS-A8o&t=3800s

Start at 38:00 and watch until 47:15. He annihilates any retards that think blockchains are going to revolutionize things, ESPECIALLY retards that think pulling data from oracles will revolutionize things.

[Anonymous No.10365551]

>>10365519

The other guy is fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.10365580]

>>10365519
>op actually thinks that what he is saying makes any sense

His whole thing in Sweden was that traceable money can't help non-profits and that remittances don't work with bitcoin because it takes a teller.

Remittances just take a phone and an ATM now with crypto. It's never been easier.

[Anonymous No.10365610]

>>10365519
I've never understood why smart contract oracles wouldn't be paid in ethereum instead of some obscure shitcoin

[Anonymous No.10365621]

>>10365519
Maybe some retarded /biz/nessmen will finally drop their bags before link = 0$

[Anonymous No.10365635]

>>10365519

Also this is more about destroying EOS than LINK?

[Anonymous No.10365638]

>>10365580
He's saying in the clip I said to listen to in the OP that when you add humans into the equation to verify data, that you lose whatever advantage you gained when you used a blockchain, and might as well just do what we currently do which is just let one guy verify data and sue him if he lies (because this is far more efficient than having multiple parties verify data). You have no recourse with a random guy no a blockchain and the trustlessness you get from other chains like BTC is lost when you add humans back into the equation.

[Anonymous No.10365658]

>>10365610
Because then you couldn't run an ICO raising $32 million from gullible "investors".

[Anonymous No.10365671]

>>10365519
>Richard Heart DESTROYS Link

[Anonymous No.10365697]

>>10365635
His example about the flood destroying the house and someone having to input that into a database isn't specifically about EOS though. That's the part about that can be applied to LINK.

[Anonymous No.10365717]

>>10365519

His last name is Scheuler and he’s a fucking undercover kike retard.

[Anonymous No.10365720]

>>10365610
>I don't understand the basics of cryptocurrency
Brave thing to say here, anon

[Anonymous No.10365722]

>Cries about not having sold the top
>Goes on a nihilistic rampage on blockchain
You know this guy had like 30k or 50k BTC EOY in his twitter name right?

[Anonymous No.10365735]

>>10365519
Who? The scam artist, or some random loser no one has ever heard of?

[Anonymous No.10365738]

>>10365697
So he doesn't even mention link? Ok

[Anonymous No.10365756]

>>10365722
Yes, he's a social miscreant like most people involved and in the know of crypto. Find me five that aren't. Doesn't have anything to do with whether what he's saying is true.

>>10365738
No, why does he need to mention Link by name? If someone were to propose a way to get around the security of a blockchain would they need to mention Bitcoin by name to imply that Bitcoin would be ruined by that?

[Anonymous No.10365822]

>>10365756

I haven't looked into it too deeply but LINK was never supposed to fix that trust problem anyway or? Isn't it just about parsing data between blockchains and other databases etc? It's basically a 77 million (atm) jason parser. How could you even make sure the guy doesn't lie to the blockchain?

[Anonymous No.10365833]

>>10365519
"It sounds like I would have more legal recourse if the bank stole my money than if EOS stole my money."

based Richard. the haircut is swag and he's losing weight too

[Anonymous No.10365849]

>>10365833

Yea I really don't get EOS. Some random guys can just take your money for no reason and there's nothing you can do about it? That's like the opposite of what blockchains were supposed to be.

[Anonymous No.10365940]

>>10365756
Sure it does, you think that someone who's been praising blockchain for the past years as the next big thing, then cries about not selling the top and turning 100% on his statements can be trusted for his word or insights? I mean sure he makes some compelling cases here and there. But I absolutely think that his past perfomance has everything to do with whether you want to take his idea's serious.

In my opinion he lost all integrity and credibility on his emotional breakdown. And if the guy is so fucking smart that he can pinpoint every flaw of blockchain, sure he must have been smart enough to get in on Ethereum early, there's no way that guy could have seen at that point why or why not Ethereum should fail or succeed. Instead he was a Maximilast and missed out on the gains that coins like ETH had to offer and then goes on crying about it.

Guy just has no integrity, like I give a fuck about his idea's or opinions at this point. Nothing of what he says isn't something I haven't figured out myself already and the worst part is that he can't seem to mention anything positive, he's just overly negative from his emotional experiences and once blockchain starts gaining traction you will see him being overly positive speculating again.

Same as Ver, I take his integrity in question when I listen to him, and he does lie very often. Where's this idea coming from that if someone is being a backward bitch that I should still take his/her opinion serious?

[Anonymous No.10365962]

>>10365849
Yeah they are already changing that. Moving the governance from l1 to l2

[Anonymous No.10366027]

>>10365940

Yea, he's definitely a bitcoin maximalist(shill) through and through. He doens't even really believe in the tech he's 100% in it for the money. I mean have you seen his ridiculous bitcoin fork he is making(bitcoinhex or something)? The sole purpose of the fork is basically to make him and other bitcoin whales as rich as possible. He's even giving all the satoshi's coin to himself(and other bitcoin whales). It's fucking useless for anyone else. I don't know why anyone else would get involved with it.

[Anonymous No.10366054]

>>10365610
“We Have No Features: as a corollary to generalization, we often refuse to build in even very common high-level use cases as intrinsic parts of the protocol, with the understanding that if people really want to do it they can always create a sub-protocol (eg. ether-backed subcurrency, bitcoin/litecoin/dogecoin sidechain, etc) inside of a contract. An example of this is the lack of a Bitcoin-like "locktime" feature in Ethereum, as such a feature can be simulated via a protocol where users send "signed data packets" and those data packets can be fed into a specialized contract that processes them and performs some corresponding function if the data packet is in some contract-specific sense valid.”

https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Design-Rationale

[Anonymous No.10366078]

>>10365717
I knew heart wasnt his last name but holy shit another kike shape shifting to hide his kike name and using a goyish name blend in.

EVERY FUCKING TIME

[Anonymous No.10366172]

>>10366078
It's just a coincidence goyim.

[Anonymous No.10366630]

>>10365519
Richard I know you're reading this and I just want you to know you are BASED AND REDPILLED.

[Anonymous No.10366653]

>>10366630
hi dick

[Anonymous No.10366730]

>>10366653
I'm not him but he goes by Richard.

[Anonymous No.10366779]

>>10365519
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.10367135]

Richard Heart is a pimp and I think he may be my father

[Anonymous No.10367144]

>>10366027

Its almost like you've never listened to anything he ever posted ever.

[Anonymous No.10367154]

>>10365940

Listen to yourself. What a blowhard. You'd have trouble finding a diamond in a pile of shit

[Anonymous No.10367196]

>>10365519
this faggot fell for the hodl meme and was crying when price went to shit in February. he's your typical soiboi

[Anonymous No.10367298]

>>10367196
He's the realest nigga in all of crypto. You're an asshat.

[Anonymous No.10367305]

>>10365519
LINKCONNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECT

[Anonymous No.10367343]

>>10365610
Vitalik already said that alts would be useful so that eth and other token economics would be separated to a degree. Also, eth might not have all the functions necessary, see Chainlink’s ERC: transferAndCall Token Standard #677.

[Anonymous No.10368537]

After seeing his ivan on tech interview about iota where he also "destroys", I know how uninformed he is about the stuff he talks so I'm not worried. Just bought 100k.

[Anonymous No.10368548]

>biggest retard in cryptospace FUDs an already overfudded, oversold useless piece of shit.

Please tell me more. Or just kill yourself, thanks.

[Anonymous No.10368560]

I've been visiting /biz/ for over a year (a newfag to some standards)

One year ago half of biz was shilling ARK, now it seems same retards are shilling LINK.

Why does /biz/ never learn on their mistakes?

[Anonymous No.10368567]

>>10368560
only difference is that I and other people made the fortune of a life time from ARK, buying at 0.07$ and selling at 1.50$ (yes, it went higher).
LINK just fucking sucks ball since ICO and everybody missed out tremendous amounts by holding this garbage.

[Anonymous No.10368573]

>>10368567

Yeah sure. But there were people shilling ARK as it came down in price from IIRC 8$

[Anonymous No.10368595]

Holochain for dapps. Btc for digital gold. Use yoir godamned visa card for buying shit

[Anonymous No.10368621]

ITT people shouting from the sidelines with no skin in the game and the luxury of complete anonymity.

Weak and cowardly faggots like you are the reason the world will burn. Talk is cheap faggits.

[Anonymous No.10368633]

>>10368573
When ARK was sitting around 7-20 cents nobody ever talked about it, at beast it was some FUD how shitty it is. Then they fomod in like retards after the first x20 and then became bagholders. Pic very related.

[Anonymous No.10368671]

>>10366779
Literally the only early adopter who's dumb enough to be a corekek.
>Muh IOTA is a shitcoin because it's unfinished, aka a multi-million testnet
>Muh LTC is a great coin because it's a multi-million testnet
kek
>Muh technical analysis is the best way to make money on crypto
>Muh technical analysis lost me all the money I made by being an early adopter, it happened because people are stupid and I'll now cry on livestream with Ivan on Tech
double kek
>Muh Roger is wrong on everything, I need to debate him to embarrass him
>Muh Roger wiped the floor with me, we should stop letting him talk
triple kek
>Muh ICO-s are immoral scams
>Muh history of selling viagra and spamming is totally legit
Who the fuck even listens to this cocker spaniel?

[Anonymous No.10368679]

>>10368671
Oh, I forgot
>Muh ICO-s are all scams, stop putting money in them
>... loses all his money margin trading bitcoin like a complete retard
>Guys guys I'm making an ICO, give me your money

[Anonymous No.10368685]

>>10368671
>cocker spaniel

KEK

[Anonymous No.10368986]

>>10368567
>and everybody missed out tremendous amounts by holding this garbage
That's the big thing. Sure it can hit $1, maybe even $2, but everyone here held it and missed out on the 100x gains that other coins provided. Nobody is getting this moment back

[Anonymous No.10369426]

>>10368671
>>10368679

[Anonymous No.10369472]

>>10368671
>>10368679

>faggot who's 20,000 leagues underwater with LINK thinks his pile of fallacious arguments undoes the basic point Richard makes that if you need to trust individuals to verify off-chain data, then it obviates the utility of decentralised blockchains i.e. just use SQL

TOPKEK

[Anonymous No.10369477]

Did anyone post this thread to his telegram yet

[Anonymous No.10369544]

>>10369472
>faggot who's 20,000 leagues underwater with LINK
I'm not holding link, not sure about the other guy
>his pile of fallacious arguments
aka facts
>undoes the basic point bla bla
Didn't watch, didn't read lmfao

[Anonymous No.10369555]

Show yourself Richard Schuler. We know you're monitoring this thread

[Anonymous No.10370252]

>>10369555
Here I am. Nice trips. Bcash is deader than last time I said it was dead. Pls give money, I lost everything on margin trading.

[Anonymous No.10370271]

>>10368671

[Anonymous No.10370361]

>>10370271
Spread your lies while you can, corecuck (Got 21 BCH from the fork, bought more @ 0.061 BTC).
Lying can only slightly postpone the flippening

[Anonymous No.10370460]

>>10369472
Another person who thinks because computers can't perfectly determine truthfulness of real world events, blockchain is useless. Here's a hint, real people and contracts can't do this either.

[Anonymous No.10370491]

>>10366630
He isnt redpilled, fag links Sam (((Harris))) on his Twitter all day

[Anonymous No.10370496]

>>10365610
If you can't figure out how not having its own token for staking/payment makes it more susceptible to attacks via the staking system, idk what to say man. Think harder or something.

[Anonymous No.10370542]

>>10365519
Lol you're listening to THIS guy?

[Anonymous No.10370551]

>>10365519
>>10370542

AHOY MATTIES

[Anonymous No.10370570]

>>10365519
>>10370542
>>10370551

Imagine being such a cuck that you make $$$$ being an early adopter, then sell the LITERAL bottom, and then break down and cry on livestream

Oh and he wears metal rings from hot topic that turn his fat little sausages green

[Anonymous No.10370581]

>>10367298

I think he has been in bitcoin since 2011 and he STILL fell for the HODL meme. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.10370611]

I thought he was nearly a genius until I read part of his book. Terrible writing desu.

[Anonymous No.10370684]

>>10369544

>has a collection of black man gifs

Sѹ

[Anonymous No.10370932]

>>10367144

[Anonymous No.10371156]

>>10365519
This fat Jew missed eth, while being highly involved in crypto. Don’t listen to him.

[Anonymous No.10371380]

>>10365519

[Anonymous No.10371419]

>>10365638
Are you fucking dumb or just ignorant or maybe a little of both? Either way your lack of understanding of how oracles, trusted hardware or ChainLink for this matter is really showing. You're a low iq loser.

[Anonymous No.10371461]

>>10365822
Idk ask vitalik about proof of stake and why people wouldn't lie. It's almost as if you just stepped off the ship. I swear the average biz user has an iq of 80.

[Anonymous No.10371483]

e-celeb threads on /biz/? Yeah I'm not even surprised any more

[Anonymous No.10371604]

>>10371461

Let the grown ups talk. You don't even understand what's going on here.