Dimitri Roche, Chainlink, Uber

[Anonymous No.10164087]

DR just made lead Dev of Uber Golang change their fuckin code with his commit to fit Chainlink development more resolving issue in the code.

They are rewriting motherfucking Uber code for free in the meantime, and they pushed this change like it was nothing.

So lead Dev of motherfucking Uber

SAN

FRANCISCO

SILLICON VALLEY

BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY

DEVELOPER

IS AWARE OF CHAINLINK FOR MONTHS.

Now think for a second.

Uber - Driver - Passenger

Driver - smartcontract - Passenger

Pay with Crypto.

Pay with Link.

[Anonymous No.10164106]

>>10164087
FAT if true
A
T

[Anonymous No.10164115]

Facebook news, now this. Shit is going to be expelled soon. It will be explosive.

[Anonymous No.10164126]

[Anonymous No.10164127]

unironically so erect

[Anonymous No.10164129]

[Anonymous No.10164134]

no LINKs get rekt.

this is amazing news.

there is no chance, not even a tiny spec, of not mooning 20x minimum within the year.

[Anonymous No.10164149]

this thread is bullshit
this is old news, they just borrowed the structure from Uber.
Look at all these generic posts, wheres the pessimism? these arent real /biz/ bros

[Anonymous No.10164151]

I dug deep for hour on github, and seen our man Dimitri fooling around with this dude. Connected dots, checked commits from last months etc.

Autism will prevail. They are playing us right now with those prices.

We are not suppose to know.

[Anonymous No.10164153]

>>10164115
What Facebook news?

[Anonymous No.10164167]

this might trigger the singularity

[Anonymous No.10164183]

>>10164149
the fuck you are talking about ? This got pushed 8 days ago to golang zap master which is a motherfuckinh UBER code for LOGGING services.

[Anonymous No.10164195]

>>10164149
Someone argue with this anon or Im calling bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10164211]

>>10164183
>for LOGGING services
oh wow, it's nothing

[Anonymous No.10164216]

Gonna get rich

[Anonymous No.10164229]

>>10164151
>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2018-06-05/novogratz-says-regulators-caught-flat-footed-on-cryptocurrencies-video
in this here interview with michael novogratz, his go to explanation for selling suits on crypto/decentralization is how easy it would be to replace UBER with a daap. if he sees it, UBER definitely does.

[Anonymous No.10164253]

>>10164151
>friendgineering at uber

this is prime fud material

[Anonymous No.10164269]

>>10164183
>Work and fatherhood distracted me for the past few months
>fatherhood distracted me
What a cuck, I hope to never have kids so that I never end up this pathetic

[Anonymous No.10164270]

>>10164183
>>10164211
correction- logging in* . I'm hyped, but it would be funny for this code to log trees.
>>10164229
I think it's a matter of months for Uber to LINK crypto in the app. Instead of credit card, you will LINK your wallet. Pun intended

[Anonymous No.10164319]

>>10164253
>>10164269
https://www.linkedin.com/in/akshayjshah

His linkedin and 3,5 years in Uber, while managing whole repo of Uber Golang in the meantime.

Yeah totally some double digit IQ pajeet can turn this into FUD.

And totally nobody in SV knows about Chailink, they just changing their fucking code language for them to fit their fucking purpose and project, and linking their repo to that change out of blue.

[Anonymous No.10164357]

uber = german word = hitler = nazi frogs = 4chan = biz = link
$1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.10164374]

>>10164087
>They thought 1000 EOY was a meme

[Anonymous No.10164402]

>>10164319
you lost me. explain how you think UBER intends to use ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.10164433]

>>10164357
You mean über?

[Anonymous No.10164462]

>>10164134
Off by one. Reroll

[Anonymous No.10164468]

>>10164433
no

[Anonymous No.10164616]

>>10164402
My point there was, You can't get into repo out of blue, and say "yeah we need X and Y change,here's the code, get on it".

How and if they will use Chainlink is not my part to discuss. Many posibilities and it's 1am already.

Have fun boys.

[Anonymous No.10164663]

>>10164616
Sorry my dude, this doesnt mean anything. Its an open source project, you could contribute yourself as long as you know what you're doing.

[Anonymous No.10164668]

>>10164402
uber can use chainlink to order rides via crypto

[Anonymous No.10164683]

>>10164663
Who judges if you know what your doing?

[Anonymous No.10164717]

>>10164668
maybe uber will create an ether token?

[Anonymous No.10164752]

>>10164087
oh fug

a taxi fare was vitaliks very first example of a smart contract; where the smart contract would complete a transaction based on oracle input of GPS coordinates.

[Anonymous No.10164755]

>>10164683
You make a pull request. It's up to the admin to merge your submission.

[Anonymous No.10164775]

>>10164717
the customer would just use eth to pay, no need to buy another token

[Anonymous No.10164778]

>>10164087
F A T
A
T

[Anonymous No.10164790]

>>10164663
Yeah for sure I can create a noname github account, and make him even look at it or comment with ease. Then make him read the actual 240 input lines and 30+ deleted, check it with fuckin other devs, check builds, check if this doesn't mess with anything else and push the change to master, just because I know what I'm doing.

Like Daneesh can do it too. Just because he knows what's he's doing.

I'm out on bed and still smirking at this logic.

[Anonymous No.10164799]

>>10164668
uber HAS to do this or they are fucked.
see my post >>10164752

uber is dead if a smart contract like that was made

[Anonymous No.10164844]

>>10164087
Pay with ETH, LTC or BTC. Node operator gets paid in Link.

[Anonymous No.10164861]

>>10164790
This is how open source works yes.
People don't look at your github handle, they look at your code.

[Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.10164909]

love you faggots

[Anonymous No.10164915]

>>10164909
And the Gold Bull loves you too Anon

[Anonymous No.10164929]

>>10164844
And node operator is UberJew providing GPS data of a route completed or food delivered. They are jews, they won't give this extra money to public, and not only they will control massive amount of LINK, they will also earn more money on bringing crypto first in both Taxi and FoodDelivery markets.

ChaChing Uber makes it to front pages again as revolutionary etc while making bank in the future.

That's my bedtime conspiracy theory, goodnight guys. Out of this thread

[Anonymous No.10164954]

>>10164929
Your theory is not far from near future reality. Nighty Night Anon.

[Anonymous No.10164957]

>>10164087
Normies have no idea what is going on behind the scenes in the tech world. THE biggest tech and fintech companies are literally scrambling to blockchain, appointed lead devs and created departments strictly to reasearch blockchain. 1) because they are scared of it taking them over 2) because they scared competition will beat them to the blockchain revolution 3) because they see how it can help them and their services immensely. The craziest part of all of this is that nobody really knows the extent of what is going on in the background. A bunch of neets on 4chan dug up this info and bits n pieces are being publicized like today with Facebook. Everyone is keeping their research low key, but one day there will be a breakthrough where there is a first truly usable example of blockchain that gets released to the masses. This wl cause an avalanche of media attention and companies that have been dragging their feet will all start twitching and calling for meetings. Trying to get a grasp on where they will fit in. It will be like the internet taking over the planet but at 100x speed. Instead of several years it will be a matter of months. Every company out their will want to do press releases claiming how they are on the cutting edge of this new technology. Smart contracts will be the buzzword that is passed around all over. Companies will die swiftly if they don’t switch over to the new standards of doing business with smart contracts. You won’t be able to watch tv without the word blockchain or smart contracts being slammed down your throat. Nobody will understand it but everyone will be using it, some unknowingly. What will be the protocol being used for the majority of this smart contract revolution? CHAINLINK. Nobody will talk about it, because they don’t have to. It is the backend. The part nobody sees, but makes the network flow just like the blood flows through your body without you even thinking of it. It will be the https of the 2020s. Strap in

[Anonymous No.10164959]

>>10164929
Wtf, the OP good news turned into. Fud?

[Anonymous No.10164960]

>>10164844
That is my opinion as well.

[Anonymous No.10164970]

uber-go is the name a framework they are using as part of their project. It's not the actual ferry service Uber. You guys think CodeShip is an actual ship too?

[Anonymous No.10164971]

>>10164183
>doing the basedface in profile pic

moon mission cancelled boys, it's over

[Anonymous No.10164982]

BIZ YACHT PARTY WHERE?

I would be willing to spearhead a bizlinkian erc 20 token that votes on all donated funds to do fun shit. private yacht month in monaco, private bizlinkian events in macau etc.. whatever bizlinkian collectively decide for that period.

[Anonymous No.10164987]

>>10164957
This. And to think that all this Industry-wide FUD is not orchestrated with the finest tuning is crazy thinking. Anons will make it if they can hold on.

[Anonymous No.10164989]

>>10164929
Didn't mean to upset you anon. I just like my link to be considered purely as a utility.

[Anonymous No.10164990]

>>10164752
Holy shit if a smart contract could initiate a credit card charge at your bank automatically when gps requirements are met, that would be so dope

Does making Chainlink ISO20022 compliant mean it can communicate direct to your bank and initiate charges? What other crypto is actively trying to make a real world use case for itself? Sergey truly is our savior

[Anonymous No.10165010]

>>10164982
we've already agreed that meeting irl is asking for trouble.

[Anonymous No.10165011]

I love hodling my Linky!

[Anonymous No.10165069]

>order uber
>simple smart con created between me and driver
>payment is locked in the contract untill i arrive at my destination
>spoof my location and leave it at place of departure
>free uber ride
Damn so hype cant believe we are gonna make it free uber rides. You gott be batshit retarded to trust hamburglar here to make you a millionaire with his chainstink. Fucker couldnt figure out whether the top or bottom bun came first on the bigmac during his 4 years of phd. And to think billion dollar companies will partner LOL

[Anonymous No.10165078]

>>10164957

[Bearfag No.10165083]

>>10164134
>>10164374
O hi, street shitters still alive and well i see.
Allow me to spread reality, to your deep hidden secret code that you think will make this finally go parabolic (aside from the 50 other times)

Daily reminder
Biz said link would be $10 after SIBOS. Assblaster said $3 by April. The whale larper said $1000 EOY (all in the archives)

The only person who predicts correctly is the oldfag who always posts that black Amex saying it will keep falling until 0

Do not be fooled anons, threads exactly like these have been posted on biz for a year now. Always an indirect message, a weird deluded correlation, a possible but not probable scenario. 50 times they were wrong, stink didn't moon, the connection they made turned out to be nothing.

But this time they are right..... right? :^)

[Anonymous No.10165113]

>>10164990
Yes and no other crypto is attempting to achieve this because they would be delusional to try without the connections Sergey (Satoshi) has.

[Anonymous No.10165141]

>>10165069
How are you going to spoof your location? Using commercial VPN will put you in a random location so either you wont get picked up or you enable vpn after the fact and Uber goes off the drivers GPS. The uber smart contract will likely rely on GPS data of both the driver and passenger to prevent this scenario.

[Anonymous No.10165148]

>>10164087
Jesus christ i wish i didnt lose my linkies in that binance hack this week

[Anonymous No.10165169]

>>10165083
Like I give two fucks about the price of LINK this year. Anyone that does is an idiot, including you.

[Anonymous No.10165175]

>>10165141
Spoofed ot countless times on my old jailbroken iphone to fuck with chinks in asia on tinder moron

[Anonymous No.10165179]

>>10165069
>spoof gps
All the world's governments have been trying to do that to take down the greatest country in the world. What makes you think you are capable.

[Anonymous No.10165199]

>>10165175
Right but can you specify an exact location or will it just be via a random vpn exit node? Not doubting you I'm genuinely curious to learn

[Anonymous No.10165210]

>>10165179
can't they theoretically use both? GPS and GLONASS?

[Anonymous No.10165227]

>>10164087
Uber is essentially a middle-man, how's it in their interest to replace themselves with crypto? Also I don't really get the post in general. What are they doing? Who's DR?

[Anonymous No.10165229]

>>10165199
The app i downloaded had a maps in it which i could actually pinpoint locations with, and that was just the free version, there was also a paid one but didnt bother with it since the trial got the job done for its purpose

[Anonymous No.10165235]

>>10165179
he means since the phone is the oracle you can fake gps coords. but this wouldnt work because it would confirm coords with the drivers phone too. there is no incentive for the driver to have differing coords than the passenger. funds would be locked if the passenger tries any funny business.

[Anonymous No.10165241]

>>10165227
the middle man they replace is the office wagecucks that have to do all the paperwork in their company.

[Anonymous No.10165253]

>>10165227
because uber WILL be replaced by the examples ITT. the only thing going for them will be to use their existing infrastructure to be first to market.

[Bearfag No.10165256]

>>10165169
You missed an obvious point.
The delusion of price explosion with Link has been proven false. But you think if you just wait it'll happen?

I know you are basing this on Link shills but , i already mentioned they have been proven wrong. So why would you still believe this will do any better than other projects?

[Anonymous No.10165261]

>>10164970
you devil.

[Anonymous No.10165281]

>>10165179
Okay jason bourne its impossible to spoof your gps location on your phone with a simple app i guess i dreamt about asking lingling id be down eating her pussy to which she told me she also enjoys cat gourmet ever so often

[Anonymous No.10165287]

>>10164844
or dollars, which is a big selling point of LINK

[Anonymous No.10165290]

>>10165241
No thats not true, Uber takes a hefty fee over the drivers revenue.
>>10165253
first to market for what? How's them helping Chainlink going to save their business? Smart contracts and token/coins can replace Uber completely, any money paid for smart contracts or oracles processing the data will go to node operators or other networks of decentralization that offer services to make this possible. It sure won't be Uber.

[Anonymous No.10165307]

>>10164149
this

Also, LINK isn’t a fucking meme currency like NANO

so idk what OP is on about when he says

>pay with LINK

[Anonymous No.10165343]

>>10165290
i dont know man, maybe desperation. if they can come with the first taxi riding smart contract on the platform, they will at least retain some customers

[Anonymous No.10165391]

>>10164799
>>10164752
>>10164717
For what it’s worth, I worked for uber for 2 years in Australia and one of the major problems they have is with people taking a ride and not having the money to pay for it. The driver has to wait until the user logs back in and uses a different payment method.
A smart contract could take say $20 as a hold and upon reaching the destination, pay the driver his share and refund the rest (or whatever).
I definitely see the use case for uber..

.. and don’t forget that they’ve purchased driverless trucks and are making a push in to logistics

[Anonymous No.10165425]

>>10165343
The only thing I can imagine is that they'd want some stake in Chainlink and the revenue of nodes, maybe the company will reinvent itself but I find this very unlikely. I can imagine that if true they want secrecy and the reason why Chainlink might not give much news is because smart contracts are possibly to those who are aware of the capabilities a sensitive topic in the industry given that it can replace existing companies and disrupt an industry to its knees. Uber will likely be in this with the thought that they're struggling for the company's future survival and try to stay ahead of the curve by adapting as soon as possible before it actually happens and end up like the businesses that ignored it, which will likely go bankrupt.

I don't think they are interested in chainlink nodes however so i'm really not sure what they're doing but if their involvement is a fact than the rest of what I wrote should apply somewehat.

[Anonymous No.10165455]

>>10165391
This however, seems more plausible. Though I can't imagine Uber being able to keep this business model up, at some point any jack with a similar car to the selfdrivers of Uber could do this and eventually some decentralized platform will enable this for every jack&joe to participate, making Uber completely uncessary.

[Anonymous No.10165485]

>>10165455
Anyone can make a coffee, yet cafes exist. First mover advantage + strong brand + convenience will count for a lot.

[Anonymous No.10165520]

>>10165391
did you watch novogratz talk about replacing uber with a daap? he talks about how a token incentivizes drivers/customers to promote the service because the token's value will appreciate. everyone wants the service to do well because they all own a share of it.

[Anonymous No.10165526]

>>10165287
Yes dollars! If payment is initiated via your bank in fiat we will be rich. We need that to happen if we are going to win the adoption war. If payment is only for crypto, no one would use that shit, even biz retards wouldn’t buy into that bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10165570]

>>10165485
Sure but you're taking it out of context. If I go to a café I expect some level of service, I also expect the quality to be more significant than my kitchen made coffee. And cafés more often than not do offer that service and higher quality of beans/coffee.

But in the case of Uber I wonder if they offer anything of value that can justify their survival. There's no strong reason to say that they should facilitate the current model of taxi's when I could also log on to a decentralized market for taxi's and order one there, presumably at more competitive pricing aswell since Uber doesn't slurp up revenue from drivers.

[Anonymous No.10165599]

>>10165570
Uber is investing heavily in flying taxi drones and automated cars, so, perhaps in the future, there will be better and exclusive service by using Uber that you cant get from private drivers.

[Anonymous No.10165603]

>>10164087

Everything is right except you will pay with btc

[Anonymous No.10165721]

>>10165599
Sure, but its just a matter of time untill you can. Thats the trick with technology, as it develops and scales it becomes more cheap and eventually anyone and everyone can use it. And since its really hard to predict how fast this can happen I think its just a major gamble if they are aiming towards this.

[Anonymous No.10165737]

>>10165570
>What is branding
Contributing to an open sourced project doesn't mean much, but the fud is this thread is subhuman IQ

[Anonymous No.10165754]

>>10165737
I don't really see any FUD, seems to be the standard reaction to any discussion surrounding chainlink by individuals that are probably heavily invested, perhaps a little more than they can afford.

[Anonymous No.10165796]

>>10164087
you guys are retarded and have no technical know-how about any of this shit.

dimitri was just suggesting a code adjustment to an API application that uber has. it is not specific to actual ride hailing. this application can be used in non-uber applications.

many companies have open source components like this that any one can hop into.

"Contributing
We encourage and support an active, healthy community of contributors — including you! Details are in the contribution guide and the code of conduct. The zap maintainers keep an eye on issues and pull requests, but you can also report any negative conduct to [e-mail]. That email list is a private, safe space; even the zap maintainers don't have access, so don't hesitate to hold us to a high standard."

"Performance
For applications that log in the hot path, reflection-based serialization and string formatting are prohibitively expensive — they're CPU-intensive and make many small allocations. Put differently, using encoding/json and fmt.Fprintf to log tons of interface{}s makes your application slow.

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

As measured by its own benchmarking suite, not only is zap more performant than comparable structured logging packages — it's also faster than the standard library. Like all benchmarks, take these with a grain of salt.1"

[Anonymous No.10165822]

>>10165796
for those who are too dumb to read -

dimitri contributed to ZAP which is an API application that uber devs made. it is not related in any other way.

[Anonymous No.10166006]

how much should i offer sergey for smartcontract,com? I'm thinking 150k to start? We shall see. I'll be honest I would love to own the domain smartcontract,com and what I know for sure is that having this domain will pay off big time.

[Anonymous No.10166091]

>>10165520
I didn’t see it but the economics make sense, it becomes like a co-op. I think it makes good sense.

[Anonymous No.10166092]

>>10165425
sergey references uber all the time in his talks. something like if you wanted to build uber 13 years ago you couldnt because you would need to build gps, payments, sms, and then youd have to build uber and it would take a millions of dollars. today the infrastructure exists "middleware" and all you have to do is build uber. this is what how we see the smart contract connectivity problem evolving etc etc.

[Anonymous No.10166106]

>>10165737
100% this. Brand is key, and uber are miles in front.

[Anonymous No.10166166]

>>10165796

Someone refute this

[Anonymous No.10166206]

>>10164970
SHHH... we uber partners now

[Anonymous No.10166254]

EXPLAIN THIS: why is jimmy so smart but so fucking retarded? if he knows the oracle problem exists why would he not do some fucking research and see if this problem is being worked on? why wouldnt he come across Ari Js work on secure hardware like TC and SGX. what the fuck is going on here and why is he acting like smart contracts will never be able to mimic real world financial agreements. we all know he is not a complete retard sub room temp iq so what the fuck is happening does he have some hidden ulterior motive? wtf.

[Anonymous No.10166359]

>REQ and Link used to make a decentralized Uber
>Way cheaper than the real Uber
>Normans start flooding in to use dUber
>/biz/tards literally make money every time a Norman uses dUber

How much fucking comfier could it get? You could pull GPS data and the driver could be paid periodically throughout the ride using REQ’s continuous payments.

[Anonymous No.10166373]

>>10164970
>>10165796
>these
yeauup!!!

[Anonymous No.10166382]

>>10166166
did you not read the screencaps above?
KYS FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.10166389]

>>10164909

[Anonymous No.10166490]

I'm starting to think smart contracts are a meme. Like jimmy said if you tokenize a title for a house how are you going to keep the token and the house tied together. Someone can still steal the private seed and now what?

Is this why we all will be getting microchips implanted into our wrists?

[Anonymous No.10166495]

>>10166382

in >>10164183 the uber dev says WORK and fatherhood distracted him over the last few months, keeping him from updating the code.

this is classified OUTSIDE of work that he does for uber.

[Anonymous No.10166532]

>>10165520
Source?

[Anonymous No.10166569]

>>10166532
>>10164229
i just did 12 captchas for this

[Anonymous No.10166623]

I come here several times a day and read complete utter nonsense. Threads like this make it all worth it.

[Anonymous No.10166766]

>>10166623
We're still all just jerking each other off.... moment of truth is when mainet comes out, or when confirmed clients comes out

[Anonymous No.10166807]

>>10166766
at least it's new info instead of "WHY DIDNT YOU GO ALL IN ON SHITKOIN SHTKN?"

[Anonymous No.10166937]

>>10166490
>inb4 wrist cutting beccomes a thing

[Anonymous No.10166994]

>>10166490
Why would you tokenize the title for a house???

Smart contracts would be used to facilitate the sale and save on lawyers, but there would always be a physical title.

[Anonymous No.10167066]

>>10166490
>https://bluenotes.anz.com/content/dam/bluenotes/documents/whitepaper%20_bank_guarantees_dlt_poc.pdf
makes sense for rental agreements though.

[Anonymous No.10167261]

>>10165235
This. The spoof example is brainlet tier FUD. They don’t know how smart contracts work apparently, nor can they think critically about how this can be mitigated inside a contract.

[Anonymous No.10167279]

Gois is this true? Can LINK communicate with XLM to execute stuff?

>https://transformconference.mayo.edu
>Consider this connection. Look at the payment infrastructure within healthcare, it's terrible, google it. If i'm a biz, wouldn't I like to get a package deal when looking at digital transformation services? Who does IBM use exclusively? Also, data triggered events, or linking between different electronic health records. Think lab values, automatic ordering of test's based on symptoms, enterprise API, cloud integration, etc. Digital transformation is the buzz word all these boomers think about. Remember coinsensus and what biz_classic mentioned about all the boomers circle jerking about "blockchain"? You could argue that all this unverifiable and mental gymnastics but, gaining/maintaining competitive advantage is key to having a successful biz, regardless of industry. As always,
>>don't miss the forest for the trees...
>>enjoy

[Anonymous No.10167310]

>>10164087
Take it easy. If the erection gets to hard, lack of blood to the brain can cause lightheadedness. Best to deliver this news more gently.

[Anonymous No.10167311]

So a two man team is in deep with a hundred different fortune 500 companies... Do you faggots seriously believe this shit? Or do you discard the previous "partnerships" with every new one?

[Anonymous No.10167319]

>>10164269
Did your Dad fail you anon?

[Anonymous No.10167324]

Why dont we just hire a private investigator to stalk Sergey and find out their partnerships?

[Anonymous No.10167326]

>>10167311
LINKlets are getting desperate with their fud.

[Anonymous No.10167331]

Also Dimitri is not the lead dev of uber. Where the fuck do you get this bullshit from? He does freelance work on the side and hes getting paid for everything he does with LINK. Dumb fuck bag holders.

[Anonymous No.10167342]

>>10167326
$3 by April, r-right?
So far every bullshut rumor and larp surrounding this joke of a coin has been nothing but bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10167343]

Why is your butthole so gaped? calm down

[Anonymous No.10167355]

>>10167343
because pajeets make this shit up and delusional bag holders gobble it up without taking a fucking second to critically think about whatever they just read
please google "dimitri roche" and "uber", the only results are from 4chan.

[LeNdH3AB No.10167356]

LeNdH3AB youre fag gaped bottom boy stop consuming so much semen out of buttholes

[Anonymous No.10167381]

>>10167356
i only eat smegma as it is is very hgih in protein tyvm

[Anonymous No.10167400]

>>10167331
>https://github.com/uber-go/zap/graphs/contributors

[Anonymous No.10167518]

>>10164982
Sorry to burst your bubble but every single one of us would not tolerate being with a bunch of fellow link marines. It would be chaos. Keep your power level hidden.

[Anonymous No.10167536]

https://medium.com/@AugurProject/augur-weekly-development-update-july-4th-80775e2b07eb

REP are deploying their mainnet by the end of the week. As usual, there should be a dump, so look to enter at appropriate levels.

The team are extremely competent, especially compared to LINK (or the rest of the competition in this segment).

[Anonymous No.10168310]

>>10167518
This. I will likely never tell anyone in real life that I own LINK. On the off chance it does pan out I’ll still only tell family

[Anonymous No.10168521]

>>10165307
he means link will be recognized as valuable and freely traded just as easily as fiat/other crypto

[Anonymous No.10168677]

>>10165141
wtf are you on about? I spoofed my location for Pokemon Go, even moving 10 meters at a time to not trigger it's anti-cheat detector. You have no idea how easy it is.

[Anonymous No.10168836]

>>10164087
Its fucking open source software any can modifity it.
Dmititri obviously did something worthwhile that was accepted into uber-go but this no way indicates muh partnership etc.

Jesus people are really fucking bored here.

[Anonymous No.10168986]

So far in this thread :
>this doesn't mean nothing is open source
>Who's DR?
>this doesn't mean partnership with uber
>Dimitri is not lead dev of uber

OP here back from sleep.

Read between the fuckin lines you dumb cunts.
I stated that DR as Dimitri Roche, one of the Chailink devs with awesome credentials changed code of Uber Golang.

I didn't stated that their changed UBER app.

What did they changed? Pic related.

I also SPECULATE that Uber is in need /will to use crypto in near future. If You think they won't, just cash out all your holdings - You are a brainlet.

How Chainlink could help with that ?

This is answered already in this thread and LINK has no competition.

[Anonymous No.10169097]

Inb4 comment:
>hurr durr Uber will use Etherum or X crypto

Uber is customer first service provider, that does everything for their clients.

Why they would implement X crypto only, when they can implement universal crypto solution for smart contracts which will automate the process and can operate on any crypto and also on standard payment methods to assure everyone involved that contract between Driver and Passenger is valid, then proceed with payment.

The UBER strategy is simple.

Automation, self driven cars, making bank, cutting out people in the future.

Why they would employ/waste money on people still to check if the route and payment has been completed etc, to deal with customers etc.

Oracle will solve it for them.

Just a speculation - mind training based on what's in front of my eyes.

We won't be notified about that kind of partnership, this isn't our network/token to have.
It's a motherfuckin corporate solution for businesses.

Zero fuckin marketing for months, while they now finishing Logging In service with Golang which is Front-end part of development. For brainlets - this part is done last, and it's a thing you see on website for example, behind that there's a ton of code for system to work.

Which means that Mainnet is around the corner.

[Anonymous No.10169141]

The cracks are widening. You guys are starting to get it. Keep your eyes peeled.

[Anonymous No.10169346]

>ITT complete and utter delusion based on wide extrapolation
After SWIFT now it's Uber, tomorrow it will be Amazon what's next?
Stupid linkies.

[Anonymous No.10169494]

>>10169346
If you think SWIFT was just the result of delusional dot-connecting, then I don't know what to tell you, fucking lmao.

Knowing that there are people on /biz/ who are this clueless and retarded gives me hope that there are still oceans of morons out there just itching to throw their money at whatever moons next.

[Anonymous No.10169518]

>>10169494
Sure sure, in the meantime you will keep bleeding with your heavy bags during one or two more years, anxiously checking github and making movies in your head while everyone else is doing gains.

[Anonymous No.10169533]

>>10169346
Microsoft
IBM
A dozen other fortune 500 companies
A two man team who cant even put out quarterly updates is doing all this. Its pure delusion man.

[Anonymous No.10169542]

>>10169518
It just tickles me to no end knowing that there are so many people out there who think Link's Swift connection is made up.

[Anonymous No.10169553]

>>10169542
The connection was winning a contest but its not a partnership and theres no evidence in a year to show that they are going to use chainlink at all.
Muh 11,000 banks. Go fuck yourself.

[Anonymous No.10169567]

>>10169553
>The connection was winning a contest
And then being the only external crypto to showcase a PoC at Sibos 2017.

Anyway, this guy >>10169346
said Link's SWIFT connection was "complete and utter delusion based on wide extrapolation".

lmao, right?

[Anonymous No.10169584]

>>10169542
You are at stage 2.

[Anonymous No.10169597]

>>10169584
It's posts like yours that often make my day; my future wealth depends on dumbass cluelessness like yours.
Learn2read emotions.

[Anonymous No.10169603]

>>10169567
>And then being the only external crypto to showcase a PoC at Sibos 2017
yeah and what a success that was. it was far from a 'showcase' lmao.

[Anonymous No.10169622]

>>10169603
By what metric was it not a success?

>it was far from a 'showcase' lmao.
Here come the semantics.

[Anonymous No.10169715]

thinking a philosophy major can make it in a space where only the nerdiest of autists have ever had any meaningfull success...

You LINK holders are the most deluded of bag holders.

[Anonymous No.10169804]

>>10169346
>delusion based on wide extrapolation
>After SWIFT now it's Uber, tomorrow
>>10169533

https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17
+
Pic related

Delusion projecting.

[Anonymous No.10169851]

Also OP here, new IP.

I'm amazed how people are just coming to every link thread and typing "delusion" and "bagholders". Even if that's just to FUD or trolling, that's a very sad thing to do in the day.

Chainlink team will pull it off. Maybe not 1000$ per token, but there's no way to get another conclusion from evidence all across the internet.

There's no point to FUD/Shill this anymore.

It's a bullseye, and thanks to /biz/ I discovered it early enough.

Hold, and retire.

[Anonymous No.10169888]

>>10169715
A philosophy major who's owned the "smartcontract,com" domain since 2008.

[Anonymous No.10169933]

>>10169097
>Which means that Mainnet is around the corner.

I dont think you know how long it takes to launch a Codeship, thats even if the code stays afloat for launch. Plus the oceans are rough this time of year. I anticipate a 2030 circumnavigation.

[Anonymous No.10169980]

Riddle anon predicted this. Riddle = Steve

[Anonymous No.10170002]

Ok, I am unironically convinced LINKERs are gonna make it.

Bought an insurance stack of 10K LINK.

[Anonymous No.10170008]

>>10170002
Picked up another 5K.

[Anonymous No.10170016]

>>10170002
Ok, I'm done. Just another 2K. Total insurance stack of 17K.

[Anonymous No.10170054]

"Nazarov (Russian: Haзapoв), or Nazarova (feminine; Haзapoвa) is a Russian family name of Rurik stock."

Sergey is a Rurikid, bloodline of the original Tsars of Russia.

[Anonymous No.10170086]

>>10165010
>>10167518
>The fat anime neet yacht party is cancelled
;_;7

[Anonymous No.10170630]

>>10165570
i'm amazed there are people as dumb as thiss still alive.

the point of uber is that with one app on your phone you can basically get a cab anywhere in the world with a single tap of your screen. uber has no rivals.

[Anonymous No.10170991]

>>10169851
It could fail. Remember this.

[Anonymous No.10171016]

>>10166490
I listened to the jimmy podcast as well. I have no fucking clue. He truly believes the oracle problem can't be solved?

[Anonymous No.10171038]

>>10170991
ummm it's 2018 sweety, this fud doen'st work anymore. all the peices are in place.

[Anonymous No.10171053]

>>10170016
>I just need a 10k insurance stack
>well I'll just pick up a few more, 17k is enough for insurance
>why not just round it up to 20k
>fuck it it's cheap I'll pick up another 10k
>a few months later
>guys is 100k insurance stack enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.10171146]

>>10171053
Does it really matter though.
The guy with the 1k stack can earn as much as the guy with the 10k stack if he just holds.
Just remember to set stop limits ready if it crashes.

[Anonymous No.10171183]

>>10165256
*snap*
Posting screenshot when mainnet and major partnerships are announced.

[Anonymous No.10171326]

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823/stories/158722618
here's a reference to this on the LINK pivotal tracker.

[Anonymous No.10171375]

>>10164668
Paying for rides via crypto is laughable.

The value is in creating a trustless contract for someone to pick you up, drive you, and drop you off. Smart contracts are perfect for this type of transaction. Oh and every time data goes on-chain or off-chain, chainlink will be used.

[Anonymous No.10171476]

>>10164957
$1000 eoy muthafarkaaaaaa

[Anonymous No.10171610]

>>10165011

>not having sergey in his plaid shirt

Seriously, anon, would have saved otherwise.

[Anonymous No.10171619]

>>10164752
Underrated comment

[Anonymous No.10171675]

>>10171375
T H I S
H
I
S


What retards don't get is that smart contracts are the real appeal of crypto. It won't matter if you're paying with crypto or fiat or fucking fart juice because the smart contract will be completely currency agnostic. The contract can trigger a bank payment or an exchange of your crypto holdings into fiat on the back end. I have seen the future and it's precisely why I don't buy meme money shit like nano.

[Anonymous No.10171676]

>>10165455

You think Uber is just going to happily roll over and die? They are doing everything they can to remain the new taxi.

[Anonymous No.10171712]

>>10168677

And how are you going to spoof the Uber drivers GPS? Fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.10171737]

>>10167536
If Augur blows up it becomes the Monero of decentralized oracles. Because of the hype cycle hordes will buy into ChainLink like people did with Verge.

[Anonymous No.10171764]

>>10171737
You're comparing ChainLink to being the verge of oracles? Is a machine breathing for you?

[Anonymous No.10171765]

>>10171675
gotta remember though that some kinds of smart contracts require on-chain collateral that must be entirely out of human control.

[Anonymous No.10171773]

>>10164087
>Pay with Link
You don't even understand what chainlink is for do you

[Anonymous No.10171815]

>>10171764
No. It's an analogy. If Augur hits it big normies will obviously flock to other underpriced decentralized oracles they can still get into for 'cheap'. Augur is $32, it might pump to $400. People will see $0.30 LINK and buy in.

[Anonymous No.10171857]

>>10171765
Oh for sure. But dexes with fiat onramps connected to smart contracts will be a reality very soon. I'm guessing a stablecoin with full central bank backing will handle most of these kind of things within a few years but that's specualtion at this point, but it seems pretty obvious that crypto and USD both won't go away..

[Anonymous No.10171881]

>>10169980
Wouldn’t be surprised if ppl from the project lurk or post on here..

[Anonymous No.10171894]

>>10171881
I bet Sergey and Thomas post link memes of themselves when they're bored

[Anonymous No.10172036]

>>10171815
You mean the other way round.

[Anonymous No.10172057]

>>10171894
Sergey has definitely made some of the most potent fud there is about LINK. He literally can't stop fudding this project.

[Anonymous No.10172208]

Smart contracts are simply too easy to screw up, too difficult to secure, too hard to make trustless and have too many external dependencies to work for most things. The only real place where smart contracts actually add trustlessness is with digital bearer instruments on decentralized platforms like Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.10172238]

>>10172208
You are a retard.

[Anonymous No.10172964]

It still amazes me how people on this board really think that Silicon Valley giants like Uber are not aware how crypto will change the game.

There's no way in hell that Uber didn't hire a team that specialize in blockchain way before the run in 2017.

They are ahead of the game,connected with each other and they pay top notch salaries for engineers there.

I don't see any proper competition to LINK in space of smartcontracts. And those will be applied sooner than later by big companies around the world.

I think the proper question is- who will be first?

Amazon ? Uber ? eBay ? Verizone ? T-Mobile ?

Who will cut those massive leeches departments saving millions of dollars first ?

If You guys really think that they are not working at adopting crypto into massive coroprations, you must have IQ lower than 100. No way around it.

Anyone with any corporate experience will think about smartcontracts and connect the dots in 15 minutes.

AI and automation is being discussed for multiple years, some jobs are replaced as we speak, and you guys still don't think that crypto smartcontracts and blockchain will make hundreds of corporate positions obsolete ?

Dum dum.

[Anonymous No.10172997]

>>10164151
is "I love new haven" just a not so subtle way to say you went to Yale?

[Anonymous No.10173032]

>>10172036
Augur has mainnet launch in 24 hours. Chainlink mainnet is far away.

[Anonymous No.10173138]

>>10173032
augur is a piece of shit prediction market with some half assed oracle solution
when it comes to Link's competition it absoute joke in general

[Anonymous No.10173852]

>>10164149
This is correct. This thread is fabricated.

[Anonymous No.10174260]

Powerful

[Anonymous No.10174287]

>>10173852
your birth certificate is fabricated, you are a pig not a human being.

OP Here.

Laughing at this FUD attempts of lowest margin.

Suck a fat one.

[Anonymous No.10174290]

>>10172997
I think he's just from New Haven.
Next blockchain meet up I go to there hopefully this month I'm gonna talk to one of the guys who knows him and dig for some link info for us

[Anonymous No.10174313]

itt: link niggers seeing patterns where there are none

[Anonymous No.10174314]

>>10164970
DELETE THIS

RIDERS WILL PAY FOR UBER IN LINK

DELETE

[Anonymous No.10174350]

>>10174260
Jesus christ, Chainlink is SJW shit too?

[Anonymous No.10174362]

>>10169888
>hey dude you know contracts man? and you know about smartphones? how about we combine them into smartcontracts?

[LeNdH3AB No.10174372]

Youre a cockriding bitch

[Anonymous No.10174420]

>>10167536
augur is a decentralized betting market not a network of oracles

[Anonymous No.10175291]

>>10169888
No he actually did not. This is the biggest fucking false piece of info that keep gets circulating around its blowing my fucking mind how dumb all of you are and never do one once of fucking background research yourself. Literally a few clicks and you'd see this is inaccurate.

[Anonymous No.10175338]

>>10171038
It's people like you who lose everything when markets collapse(people with your personality set) simply because they are "so sure of themselves". You better have a backup plan because yes, it's a possibility that ChainLink doesn't work. The oracle problem is more complex than Ethereum.

The only people who invest in ChainLink are people with extremely high IQ who understand the technicals or the people dumb enough to take advice from people on this board and follow the hivemind but really have no fucking clue what they've invested in.

[Anonymous No.10175356]

>>10172964
People are just started to use the term smart contract. Even the company I work for just started looking at the possibilities , it will take years before we see some proper adoption. The use cases are ready, the underlaying architecture is not.

[Anonymous No.10175370]

It's really not difficult.

>read
>plan
>invest what you can afford to lose
>execute on time
>fail or succeed, depending on the project.

The surest thing in crypto is not sure at all. It's too early to tell. That's why link is so cheap. Otherwise everyone with half a brain would have bought in by now. All you morons who are looking for a get rich quick scheme are going to be burned so hard it's not even funny.

[Anonymous No.10175372]

>>10175338
sorry hun, but this worked back in 2017 when there was literally nothing said about this project. Now there's news happening every day. Gosner was all I needed, a sign from the heavens. Link is literally 2 legit.

t. iq 103

[Anonymous No.10175473]

>>10172964
I guess you know more than jimmy song huh?

https://medium.com/@jimmysong/the-truth-about-smart-contracts-ae825271811f?source=linkShare-16474700468f-1530906649
>>10175372
>103
You're probably joking about being borderline retarded but if not then I guess we know which camp you fall into

[Anonymous No.10175649]

>>10175473
I liked the memes and became convince because >7777777 but then I put some money into it and became convinced that if you could somehow truly eliminate the need to trust the other party in an agreement, then it would be the start of a revolution. The fact that Chainlink is middleware that can plug right in to existing systems is what makes this such a better choice than other projects in the space, and that all these connections are starting to materialize (swift, docusign, microsoft, et al) has cemented this.

Yes, Link is still a gamble. Crypto could experience tremendous shocks in the very near term. If it has what we stinkys think it has it link is something very special.

[Anonymous No.10175671]

>>10175473
>jimmy song
>Bitcoin Educator
>The only real place where smart contracts actually add trustlessness is with digital bearer instruments on decentralized platforms like Bitcoin.
Yeah I think we understand smart contracts on the same level. Bitcoin fuckin educator couldn't help himself to post some utter bullshit like this when he clearly has an agenda.

Go eat his asshole, since you already buying his shit.

Before I invested in LINK , I did my research, and I don't care about this medium post, even if it was written by Satoshi himself.

"decentralized platforms like Bitcoin"

Haha is this dude for real.

[Anonymous No.10175672]

>>10165287
>>10164929
>>10164844
>>10164960
yess dollar mafack the whole point is you customer pay in dollar or euro but LINK is used to pay for the GPS data you use to feed the smart contract and client information thus enabling payment automatically when your fat ass arrives home

[Anonymous No.10175698]

>>10175473
>companies don't control bitcoin

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

OMFG THIS DUDE IS AWESOME.

I BET HE POSTS ON /BIZ/ IN EVERY LINK THREAD.

FUCKIN TOP KEK

[Anonymous No.10175770]

>>10164087
>Pay with Link.
i cant tell you're a fucking idoit with this line here

[Anonymous No.10175784]

how long do i have to accumulate link under $1?

i am a salty no linker

[Anonymous No.10175805]

>>10175473
Jimmy Song isn't a bad guy but he's a deluded core dev who still believes the idealistic financial utopia painted by Satoshi 10 years ago is still plausible. He's just trying to hustle his BTC programming seminar by promoting the project he's spent years working on. It makes logical sense that he wouldn't want to face the reality that smart contracts are the future. He's smart but like everyone he has a fucking agenda. Open your eyes.

[Anonymous No.10175810]

>>10175698
Protip: check who contributes to code

[Anonymous No.10175841]

>>10175810
jew?

[Anonymous No.10175851]

>>10175770
I miss typed that as I was trying to deliver this ASAP. Obviously LINK wouldn't be payment method per se.
>>10175805
Based, but I think Jimmy really sits on /biz/. That would make sense.
>>10175810
I don't give a fuck about middleman coin.

[Anonymous No.10175994]

Wtf is going on /biz/ the only original FUD ITT is some brainlet implying that spoofing pokemon go gps coordinates means it's possible to do so with a smart contract. All other FUD is regurgitated dogshit from the past 10 months that a 3rd grader could debunk. Has the entire board unironically gone all in on this?

[Anonymous No.10176111]

>>10175994
I think AMB campaign on /biz/ to fud LINK stopped couple of weeks ago. They are starting to roll in 5+ threads in the same time for couple of days now, with generic responses.

AMB+ couple of other coins did this on /biz/ multiple times through 2018.

[Anonymous No.10176127]

>>10175994
at this point, probably

this board stay super stinky

[Anonymous No.10176577]

>>10174350
Just sold all my link. Not even joking.

[Anonymous No.10176617]

>>10174260
Not a English native speaker, is "than that" correct?

Also wtf is wrong with chainlink now.

[Anonymous No.10176642]

>>10175994

>Has the entire board unironically gone all in on this?

I'm all in. Many other anons seem to be all in as well, or at least it's their largest hold.

[Anonymous No.10176871]

>>10176642
All in. Waiting for some of my positions to increase, sell and to buy more cl

[Anonymous No.10176995]

>>10165520
I liked the name DUber lol I'd use it

[Anonymous No.10177049]

>>10176617
she forgot to put 'that' in the first part which is why it looks strange. Either both parts have 'that' or neither do.

[Anonymous No.10177108]

>>10177049
Hartelijk bedankt fren.

[Anonymous No.10177396]

>>10175291
Are you being retarded on purpose?
Is your whole post supposed to be some kind of satire?

https://whois.icann.org/en/lookup?name=smartcontract.com

[Anonymous No.10177751]

>>10175473
This nigga left the thread by disconnecting his ethernet cable straight from router son. Doesn't want any of these in his system:
>>10175671
>>10175698
>>10175851

Jimmy Chong Bitcoin educator FUDing smartcontracts literally trashed on /biz/ in minutes.

Where you at dude, don't leave me hanging here, i just want to laugh my ass off more.

Give me some next Bitcoin retard to laugh at

[Anonymous No.10178835]

>>10165307
chainlink network is a backend system. theyll pay with crypto but the transaction will execute because 30 node operators were paid in link to fetch the data

[Anonymous No.10178947]

>>10177751
i haven't left; with all do respect, I understand what the ChainLink Network is aiming to do, personally just do not believe they will be successful

they are trying to force 2+2=5 and that just isn't how the world works.

[Anonymous No.10178954]

>>10177396
there have been numerous threads on this. the one you missed was when everyone proved that sergey got the domain in 2014

[Anonymous No.10178976]

>>10178947

>i dont believe link can achieve what they are aiming to do, i wont invest

Yet you probably own how many shit coins that DEPEND on someone solving this issue. You do realise that if Link is worthless and doesnt solve this problem, then Ethereum is 1000x overvalue right now? as speculative asset, which is all imagination but sort of reality. even Vitalik says Eth should be worth like 6$.

[Anonymous No.10178985]

>>10178954
>t-there were threads! i swear!

Work harder on your fud, pajeet.

[Anonymous No.10179145]

should i sell all my eth and xrp for link??

[Anonymous No.10179314]

>>10178947
With all do respect I disagree

[Anonymous No.10179547]

>>10179145

you should definitely sell all your xrp for link.

eth is a good hold. only sell some if you can't get at least 10k link with the xrp.

[Anonymous No.10179621]

>>10179547
what about eos? i don't like it lately desu

[Anonymous No.10179645]

>>10178947
Interesting post here. Define, understand the project? Along with why you believe they are forcing a non-sensical solution/product?

[Anonymous No.10179756]

>>10179621

i don't really know much about eos tbqf

[Anonymous No.10179786]

>>10166359
Can you build this plz?

[Anonymous No.10179815]

>>10167324
You guys have already found more than a PI would in a year

[Anonymous No.10179826]

>>10178947
This is just sophisticated FUD. Stay woke faggots.

[Anonymous No.10179873]

>>10165796
>>10168836
>>10164970
This, I was looking through the zap repo and the PR for that suggests this exactly. Ashayjshah is only a maintainer of the zap repo and has appears to have done nothing to interact with chainlink except for accept a simple pull request for features the chainlink team need in chainlink for the logging library (zap) that they will be using.

For brainlets which the majority of link holders seem to be, this just means that chainlink uses some external code to do logging in chainlink. The external code doesn't have something they need yet, so they are improving the external code so that both chainlink and everyone else using it can benefit from it.

[Anonymous No.10179901]

>>10179826
Some yay who goat sucker saying ChainLink won't work because 2+2=5 is the height of sophistication.

[Anonymous No.10179965]

>>10179873

flush yourself down the toilet

[Anonymous No.10180162]

>>10179873
I think you're pretty much right.

I vaguely remember them having issues with the logging library they were using before months ago and the maintainers of that library weren't accepting the PR that they the team needed to fix whatever issue they were having.

I guess they decided to go over to the uber fork and get it sorted there instead.