/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9861517

>>9861517
The only thing "sinking in" is the price

>>9861517
Stop the fud, it will be worth that much EOY 2018, not 2020.

Its all over the Jews won

>>9861517
>2,257 investment right now will be worth $0 by the end of 2020.

fix'd

>>9861575
I’m being realistic. $100-200 EOY 2020 is very possible.

>>9861588
Please buy mobius, sir. Go up very fast. Lots of potential, sir. Buy.

>>9861565
kek

i think you mean a $226 investment anon

Stop it, I can't buy any more.

>>9861565
funny

>>9861517
No. Link team is incompetent and will not be the source of decentralized oracles.

topkek at Sergey fucking Nazarov making anybody rich

>>9861606

I'm being realistic. $0.001-0.002 EOY 2020 is very possible.

>>9861517
Downgraded from x1000 by 2020 to x440 by 2020, eh, pajeet? Or did you fail your math classes?

>>9861565

>>9861565
this is why I browse /biz/

Anyone else losing faith?

>>9862084
yeah, but that just goes along with what anons have been saying.
(they) dont want us to have link
((they)) will shake us out
but
(((they))) don't know about these iron hands

MARINES, WE ARE NEVER SELLING, WE WILL OUTLAST THE FUD.
THE NIGHT IS DARKEST BEFORE THE DAY
MAINNET WILL BE A NEW DAWN

>>9862084
not for a second
watch biz tonight

>mfw I sold most of my bitcoins before the bear market
>still keep 500 LINKs because of the meme
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>9862084
no, but I'm coming to terms with the idea that it may take a year for the market to recover.

>>9862084
No, dezendralised oragles are the future.

>>9862084
Never.

>>9862084
shitty btc sentiment and manipulation isnt stopping salesforce, m$, sap, docusign, mulesoft, swift looking at smart contracts

we neva freeze

accumulate

Good answers boys. I’m not selling.

>>9862227
It's interdesting Jewbase is listing ETC but only allowing institutional shekels to trade it. Maybe the same tactic will be used when LINK gets listed there and Poloniex or Bittrex? Maybe only USD or USDC pairs even? That would also stop a lot of people capitalizing on arbitrage. I'm curious what tokens will be reserved for accredited investors too. Obviously you can still trade on whatever DEX but being it seems like Jewbase, Poloniex, and Gemini are setting up a colored table for us in the back. Mmm.

Ready to go to 0.19$ tomorrow boys?

What the fuck, why isn't this coin shilled here? Just the best thing ever after bitcoin, private transactions with nano currency technlogy, This is easy top 20, and ico was of a top 600 price

>>9861760

>>9862316
Oh noes massah, the colored table? Lawd have mercy.

I've seen this shit few hours ago, thoughts?

If you look at the chart it looks like is actually forming another bear flag. But I'm too scared to lose my LINK selling and trying to rebuy cheaper.

>>9862463
i don't know what you think a bear flag is, but that ain't it.
there's no pattern there, it's ranging

When is the other 650MM hitting the market?

>>9861517

>>9862084

If you know what they're building and the infrastructure bring built how can you lose hope?

Why is there so many brainlets!

I don't own this shit never have but these retarded comments always makes me want to believe but this shit has done noting but drown since I got here last year

>>9862906

>>9862962
>>9862297
>>9862279
>>9862206
>>9862175
>>9862173
>>9862157
>>9862137
>>9861606
>>9861575
I have been watching you morons get suckered in on the laziest shill ever for the past 2 years and everytime I ask someone to give me 1 good reason to pick Link over another coin, Im only ever called a Jew or told "Linkmarines never sell."

I hope in my heart that this is not a meme and most of you really believe this, because nothing will make me happier than knowing you pathetic, lazy, NEET, middle aged faggots are contemplating suicide because the pyramid scheme you fell for ate the last dime your no-longer-trusting parents will ever give you. Good luck with your McDonalds careers

>>9863356
jew fag

>>9862704
That’s a couple of days ago chart, when it crashed than rebounced.
I was talking about this bear flag.
It looks like 3000 is plausible with the wick at 2900.

>>9863414
*then
Also not a very professional chart using Delta, but that’s the best I can use right now.

>>9861565
made me kek

>>9863356
Docusign CEO tweeted a link shill twitter account implying he is a LINK Marine

>>9863356

>what happened him?
>he ignored everyone offering a golden bull

Insider here. No, literally, I'm INSIDE Sergey's stomach right now. He's eating everything. I'm seeing all kinds of things around me covered in gastric juices from severed heads to big macs to link cubes. Before I get fully digested, I just want to let all my fellow marines know that I can hear Sergey saying that the link token was never meant to be priced over $1, and that he is yelling at Ari and Evan to add it to the whitepaper. Goodbye frens

>>9861606
>>9861754
sad that either one of these could be correct.

>>9863356
Yes anon, we are complete retards! Do not buy and be like us! The misery of my foolish investment will haunt me forever! You have made me see the light!

I'm a fucking brainlet but noone gets my fucking LINKS

>>9861517
>A $2,257 investment in LINK right now will be worth $1,000,000 before the end of 2020

OR (and most probably)
three dollah fifty

the bags have stopped. Pass the parcel is over OP. You loose.

There is a also a 97% chance link will be worth zero by 2020.

>>9862227
Microsoft have their own oracles and network you dumbass.

if you buy chainlink you are guillable as fuck

I can't buy it on any Aussie exchange though.

Seems like another Eth spawned shitcoin.

WE ARE THE LINK MARINES AND WE ARE NEVER FUCKING SELLING

>>9864212

>>9864327
cope

>>9864327
>he actually thinks chainlink is even relevant compared to ethereum
good thing 4chan's anonymous or that would be embarrassing for you

>>9863443
until he was on that episode of stolen valor where he got called out at walmart.

>>9864242
Have you heard about lindacoin yet? If you like link you'll fucking love lindacoin

>>9864327

Eth is trash though.

His mistake was thinking the market is in anyway rational.

>>9861517
*breaths in*
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAA

Stinkies on suicide watch

>>9864374
>He doesn't realize that a network of decentralized oracles that lets the Ethereum network and other blockchains utilize their smart contract functionality with real world data is the next logical step in the 4th industrial revolution
Stay poor anon

>>9864374

>>9864421

>>9864606
Just one tiny tiny problem with your logic: this is not ETH. I can post pics of people saying Bitconnect is going to the moon and compare it to LINK too. Stay delusional stinky. API capabilities for smart contracts are the future, stinky linky is not.

>>9861606
Not home so don't have my FUD material
But reminder, no price action for Linkies ..not now, not tomorrow , NEVER

You shit heads won't listen, I'll dump the ultimate JUST soon

>>9862137
Fucking retard why don't you ever think of the possibility they shilled you ico bags. They said anything they could to get everyone on board

All signs point to that
Kys

i have a wallet with 100 free link to the first person to fish it out of my ass. anybody willing to admit they would root around in there?

>>9862352
Faggot, sneak my balls

>>9862084
>everyone is using a rope bridge
>build a state of the art metal bridge
>nobody currently uses said bridge
>bridge technology must be useless

this is your logic

LINK's price is not an indicator for anything at the moment besides being a buy signal

>>9864988
id get it with my tongue baby

>>9862084
You are only feeling like this because of the price, and that is a good indication to buy more. When you are feeling to comfy and wanting to buy more that is a bad indicator. Buy when there is blood on the streets, even if it's your own

>>9861724
Surreal woj

>>9865532
this is a good indicator of chainlinks true value. this person would stick his arm up my ass for 100. thats .0465 eth right now

oc

>>9864327
We're going to make it boys

>>9863356
>everytime I ask someone to give me 1 good reason to pick Link over another coin, Im only ever called a Jew or told "Linkmarines never sell."
Yes, this totally happened. Absolutely.

>>9864579
there is no network of decentralized oracles

>>9866150
?

https://www.trivano.com/aandeel/ing-and-axa-announce-digital.415-68413.persbericht

>>9866092
"Linkmarines never sell" is a good reason. Each one of them is a walking, talking, shitting burn contract.

>>9866242

I'll add some more interesting things in here:

https://www.pwc.com.au/publications/pwc-blockchain.pdf

PWC are looking to docusign who are a known core supporter of chainlink. PWC is using REQ. REQ is a core supporter of chainlink.
It is logical to conclude that PWC are investigating chainlink.

Read further - AXA are using chainlink via Fizzy. PWC references AXA as another example.

PWC + Chainlink c o n f i r m e d

ING and AXA + Chainlink all but confirmed

>>9866242
>https://www.trivano.com/aandeel/ing-and-axa-announce-digital.415-68413.persbericht
Nothing about blockchain, smart contracts or link. Main press guy is named Linke though.

>>9861517
Haha, 22 cents? But the fucking ICO was 15 cents. That's terrible! Who buys this trash?

>>9863997
Retarded post, please post less.

>>9864327
>people doubted ETH
>people now doubt Link
>ETH is now moon
>therefore link will moon

>people doubted Galileo
>people doubt me
>Galileo was genius
>therefore, I am a genius

>my cat has four legs
>my dog has four legs
>therefore, my dog is a cat

>>9862906
fucking KEK, gotta admin Stinkie Linkies make the best memes

>>9863064
fucking KEK

>>9861517
kek, see you at 0.10

Can someone explain to me the difference between 0xBitcon and Chainlink?
(serious question)
As I understand it 0xbitcoin is a mineable token, while Chainlink is a token to pay for use of a separate platform. Aside from the 'inflation argument' I have no idea why one is better or worse than the other. I would be greatly enlightened by some careful explanation of why these differences are significant.

>>9861517
No it wont.

The only thing that will 'sink in' is Sergei's fat cock in ur ass

>>9867083
Fuck, you probably strained yourself so much trying to come up with those comparisons.

>>9867224
Not at all. Go look up 'politicians syllogism' to see how I really didn't.
Also, criticizing his logic isn't an implicit dig at chainlink. So calm your tits.

>>9861565
lmoa

>>9866092
....or they sarcasrically deflect like this nigger because Link has no legitimate value over another crypto. Still waiting to here that super great reason everyone fell for this pyramid scheme and as I wait more retards post some guy in 2015 who said Ethereum is trash, as if the 2 are comparable. Fuck off to /b/ you neckbeard, anime niggers

>>9867159
chainlink purprle

>>9867319
????

Soon my frens, soon.

asd

12 cents eoy screenshot this

>>9861517
I am from the future, and you are gonna make it anon.

>>9863356
Jew kike gay nigger

>>9863356
Linkmarines never sell so you wouldn't be able to buy any anyways.

I'm Not gonna make it

>>9861565
Got'im
1+ reddit upvote

>>9867740
We can only dream :')

>>9863356

They'll still dismiss your post as just FUD roflmao

These hardcore holders are actually retarded. It's a pitt they didn't actually put their money into a real coin with real adoption/potential like Bitcoin Cash

>mfw sub ico price eoy

>>9861517
a thread very similar to this one made me buy chainlink back in sept 2017.

>>9867961
DELETE THIS

>>9867288
Crypto is based on decentralization.
Smart contracts only became possible with crypto.
Mainstream smart contracts are only possible with oracles.
Chainlink is the first, one, and only decentralized oracle system.

It stands to be so much bigger than ETH, which only does crypto smart contracts, making it a glorified token dispenser.
But keep it under your hat, crypto still needs to bleed some more.

>>9863997
beautiful

>>9867961
>EOY

Nah nigga, EOM.

>>9868034
And now you have nothing to show for it

>>9867882
I lost more at one point, you’re not alone brother

>>9867159
>Can someone explain to me the difference between 0xBitcon and Chainlink?

>>9868291
Don't be embarrassed that you don't know how to explain it brainlet. I won't judge.

>>9868323
He is mocking you for asking for a comparison between two completely unrelated tokens and the fact its obvious you are contemplating buying either of the two most shilled products here with no knowledge of either. For the record I hold ChainLink and thing 0xBitcorn is a scam.

>>9868340
>and the fact its obvious you are contemplating buying either of the two most shilled products here with no knowledge of either
Well he totally misjudged my intentions by a country mile, why would I be asking 'what's the diff' if wanted to buy them, surely it suggests the opposite - that I can't understand why anyone would buy either?
>thing 0xBitcorn is a scam.
Why - how are they unrelated? Aren't they both means of facilitating smart contracts? What is the point of differentiation and to both end users and say people who are making Smart Contracts - what is the difference?
So link is a 'decentralized Oracle' which means that the 'oracles' can't be gamed or cheated, cool, but the services and info they're pulling info is off-chain, so how is that any different from 0xBitcoin? What's the point of being decentralized? If there is a point - then why do we need 0x?
Why the fuck is it no one will give me a straight answer?

>>9867083
>smart contracts are important
>smart contracts aren’t useful for 90% of use cases
>ChainLink will make them useful for almost 100% of applications
>Therefore, ChainLink will make projects like Ethereum 10x more powerful

>>9868405
kek

>>9868397
0xButcon is basically Bitcoin on the Ethereum network. Utterly pointless. ChainLink is attempting to let non blockchain data interact with the blockchain. Decentralization makes it so no central authority needs to be depended upon and is also insanely difficult to hack.

>>9868397
0xbitcoin is a worthless scam. Gimmicky shit like that is made all the time.

ChainLink is a project building a decentralized oracle network to provide smart contracts with tamperproof data feeds so they can actually be useful.

ChainLink is gold, 0xbitcoin is pyrite

>>9868059
Ok thats not a bad answer. But why would it matter if it its the first of its kind? Thats not a guarantee that someone wont come along and do it better. Crypto as a whole is not ready for mainstream and I have not seen Link on any of the 4 exchanges I signed up for. Thats foolishness

>>9868440
this tells me nothing I haven't read before - doesn't explain 'why'

>>9868465
>with tamperproof data feeds so they can actually be useful.
Yeah but, and here's what I never got about link: that data has to come from off-chain anyway, so while yes, you can't 'hack' the oracle itself to make it give a false completion (I'm not sure what the correct terminology is), and I can understand why that may give it a slight edge over 0xBitcoin, that data is still coming from a party who may either produce inaccurate data, or fudge the data, or send false information to activate the contract. My question is, if we're trusting these data providers in the first place - why do we need a decentralized Oracle? Maybe there's some specific applications I haven't thought of, but, for example - if I book tickets for a hotel room, I'm trusting that the hotel room is good and will be up to scratch, now how does a Smart Contract make that process any more trustworthy? Once I've paid, once I've clicked the button that says 'yes I'm in my room' - now what? I can't reverse the charges because otherwise that would enable fraud...
I just don't see where a decentralized oracle is useful - especially when the selling point is that it pulls data off-chain.
I don't see the oracle as being the weakest point. I realize that's not an argument against fixing the problem, but I don't see why it's a big deal.

>>9867224
He's right though. It's illogical to say link will moon because it's fudded because eth mooned and it was fudded.
DGB to the moon! Bullish through the fud!

>>9867258
/biz/ is one of the dumbest boards on this site. It's full of people who want to get rich quick. I wish I would've kept browsing in 2015 when I was briefly here.

>>9868561
>that data is still coming from a party who may either produce inaccurate data
That data is what is currently being used for literally everything. Obviously it's good enough.

Chainlink isn't about making data more secure, it's about securely translating the data to the blockchain.

>>9868506
>Thats not a guarantee that someone wont come along and do it better.
So wait until the matter is settled then.

>>9868506
First mover advantage is everything in this space. Ethereum can only process 14 transactions a second but it’s by the far the most used smart contract platform. Why is that? Because they were the first to make a solid, functional, and decentralized platform that was Turing-complete. Yeah other platforms might offer slight advantages over Ethereum, everyone isn’t going to shift over to something different unless there’s a HUGE improvement. Once it scales it’ll be basically untouchable.

>>9868561
0xbitcoin and ChainLink are extremely different things. I think you have a misunderstanding of what 0xbitcoin is- it’s essentially the same as all these useless bitcoin forks, except this is made on the Ethereum network. Almost all coins and tokens have some sort of smart contract functionality, but don’t get that confused with usefulness.

Centralized oracles currently rely on said party for accurate information. Think of it like this:
1. Think about how hard it would be to actually fudge the data: If I wanted to make btc seem like it was $10,000 right now to an oracle accessing a coinmarketcap API, I’d have to hack into the website. Centralized oracles are just as vulnerable to this, and are still used. The solution is to take data from multiple sources and find a way to aggregate it.
2. These “providers” have an incentive to provide accurate data. If they don’t, you wouldn’t use them. If I request the bitcoin price from CMC, Binance and Bittrex I have to reason to assume they’d deliberately send me a false price.
The worry of data coming from “centralized sources” is just silly. All the data we consume comes from centralized sources, and how often is it wrong?

>>9866150
>Being this retarded
You seriously will never make it

>>9867159
Want me to explain the difference between ripple and monero too?
Fucking retard

>managed to fucking flip LINK stack from 20k to 30k LINK
>still down significant amount of money

I fucking hate this shitcoin so much. Going to sell and buy other substantial shit as soon as maybe I break even in a surprise pump.

>>9868942
>I think you have a misunderstanding of what 0xbitcoin is
Probably, they advertise themselves as a 'middleware' or something which I took to mean as a way of interfacing off-chain data with the blockchain. And that what distinguished it from chainlink is that the latter has 'decentralized oracles'. But as you've said - it would be tremendously difficult to hack the CMC API and that places like them Binance, Bittrex are generally considered trustworthy, yes, not 100% but trustworthy enough that in certain applications you would use them as a source of data.
So why do we need a decentralized oracle if it's only as good as it's data providers?

To rephrase the question: what applications is a decentralized oracle of particular advantage when data sources, such as APIs are generally agreed upon or considered trustworthy enough to be the sources of data in a smart contract?

>>9869059
No because that's a false analogy. One is a fungible platform to transfer value between multiple currencies seamlessly, the other is a store of value focused on privacy. Worlds apart.
Don't get so angry just because someone asks questions - it makes you look defensive.

Do people here really believe this lackluster team could even accomplish their goals? Do people here think it's a realistic scenario instead of just some silly man's ego in action?

>>9869089
Any application, especially ones involving millions of not billions of dollars.

The benefit of decentralization is that NEET #482 who lives in his mom’s basement in Omaha, Nebraska can use his computer as a node in the network, but cannot tamper with the information that’s running through his node, thanks to Intel SGX trusted hardware. The problem with centralized oracles on the blockchain is that 1. they aren’t completely trustworthy, and 2. it goes against the decentralized nature of the blockchain itself.

The entire point of smart contracts is to be able to make and execute automated and trustless legally-binding agreements. If there is anyway any party could tamper with the contract, no one would trust it. Ethereum successfully made smart contracts trustless, and ChainLink is trying to make the data they interact with trustless as well

>>9869416
>Any isn't a number.
I'm a concrete thinker, I need examples. And before you call be a brainlet or a retard - how can you ever expect mainstream adoption if you can't explain it to brainlets or retards?

I don't care about the 'point of smart contracts' or how the technology works - tell me in plain English an example where this technology may be used that is prohibitively difficult to accomplish on another platform.

GIVE AN EXAMPLE.

>>9869461
Link will primarily for be businesses I think

>>9869461

>>9869461
What flavor applesauce do you want with your spoon feeding?
Kys

>>9869461
Examples of data that might be provided by oracles include:

Random numbers/entropy from physical sources (e.g. quantum/thermal phenomenon): to fairly select a winner in a lottery smart contract

Parametric triggers indexed to natural hazards: triggering of catastrophe bond smart contracts (e.g. wind speed for a hurricane bond)

Exchange rate data: accurate pegging of stablecoins to fiat currency

Capital markets data: pricing baskets of tokenized assets/securities

Benchmark reference data: incorporating interest rates into smart financial derivatives

Static/pseudo-static data: security identifiers, country codes, currency codes

Time and Interval data: Event triggers grounded in precise SI time measurement

Weather data: insurance premium calculation based on a weather forecast

Political events: prediction market resolution

Sporting events: prediction market resolution and fantasy sports contracts

Geo-location data: supply chain tracking

Damage verification: insurance contracts

Events occurring on other blockchains: interoperability functions

Transaction gas price: gas price oracles

Flight delays: insurance contracts

>>9869461

Request Network cross-chain payments require an oracle to function, and a single oracle requires a lot more trust than an incentivized network of them performing the off-chain transactions.

>>9869481
'business' is not a application

>>9869524
I had to google that idea, are you saying I'm rich?

>>9869525
No thank you, you're just gonna make it salty

>>9869565
So close and yet so far...

All you needed to say was something like
>fantasy football pool which scrapes data from the official NFL website - smart contract requires all players to have adequate liquidity for their bets, and automatically transfers to whomever the winner is depending on match results. Decentralized Oracle means that no matter how many players there are, no party or collusion of parties can 'fudge' the contract.

>>9869727
Give one example where that would be the case, ideally countered against a example where a centralized oracle isn't as big of a risk.

>>9869741
Get a load of this drag queen testing retards and lording over them with her superior ChainLink knowledge. She is truly without equal!

>>9869833
Look I know I come across as a little think but seriously am i asking weird questions? Why can't they give me a single application? Why do I need to pull examples of applications out of my arse?

>>9867685

More like .06 eoy

>new support at 6000 sats
>new support at 5000 sats
>new support at 4000 sats
new support at 3000 sats

>>9866150
It's true, it's a decentralized network of oracles.

>>9869882
you are so fucking stupid, count yourself lucky any anon has bothered to give you the time of day

>>9869978
And the application Chainlink is best suited to is?

>>9869882
I'm trying to answer your questions and you're coming off as a pretentious retard

brainlet here.
Its its primary use case for smart contracts that want to take data from multiple sources of the same metric.. or what happens when only a single api has the data needed?

What revolutionary about a single data feed going to multiple oracles as opposed to an api data provider who cryptographically signs the data and has an uptime of 99.99%?

>>9870002
Sorry that was no my intention but maybe I came across that way because it was so frustrating not to get a clear answer of a specific function explained in plain English.
You're answer was the only informative one and did go a long way to helping me understand a possible use for Chainlink - but it only described data sources rather than actual functions, "putting it into practice" if you will. Maybe I didn't make my question clear enough, maybe this just isn't the right forum for them - I don't know.

>>9869750

Financial transactions (like paying a Request in BTC) where the incentive for the single oracle to steal funds is greater than the incentive for processing them honestly.

If the intended use of the off-chain data is just displaying the current weather conditions, there is little risk in trusting a centralized weather service to provide it.

>>9869882
Maybe because no one likes you enough to give you examples and spoonfeed you?
You should never buy link tbqh. And as for 0xbitcoin, yep you should buy a lot of it. To the moon!

>>9869993
Decentralized oracles

>>9870060
Good answer!

>>9870131
>16 posts by this id
Drink bleach

>>9870171

>>9870048
>I hire a mexican to mow my lawn while I'm at work
>several sensors placed thoughout the yard
>when they all read that the grass level has gone down significantly enough, they execute a smart contract that pays Jose instantly

>>9870305
>implying Jose wouldn't find a lo-fi way to cause the sensors to give false readings

>>9868853
The difference is you guys are basing your dreams, and financial livelihood, on a baseless assumption. People are going to lost their ass.
>>9868942
I dont agree that its untouchable. The market is only a handful of years old. Thats not enough of a sample point to make such assumptions. Just because ETH and even BTC grew to great heights doesnt mean theyre NOT goong to completely collapse. Its too early to tell.

If you guys want to take a gamble and buy LINK at least call it what it is. But thats not what you guus do. You shill the fuck out of it with useless info and non-sequiturs tricking gullible idiots into over leveraging themselves

>>9869461
Bunker oil amout mt on ship via massive flow meter

>>9869461
>And before you call be a brainlet or a retard - how can you ever expect mainstream adoption if you can't explain it to brainlets or retards?

lolololololol

this is not verge, anon. this is an enterprise solution which requires dedicated programmers to even use it. It's never gonna be for the average consumer, unless some designs a p2p smart contract platform with chainlink on the back end.

That's a big reason why I like the project: it can work without normies ever realizing they're using chainlink or even blockchain. All they need to know is that it works.

>>9870415
>If you guys want to take a gamble and buy LINK at least call it what it is

Link is as close to a sure thing as you can get at the moment. If you did some research you'd understand that too.

why is biz obsessed with link? can I get a quick rundown??

I compare it to the goldrush. Chainlink isn't the gold. The data is the gold. Chainlink is what will allow us to access this gold. Think of all of the profits that were made selling supplies to the people 150+ years ago during the gold rush - Picks, clothes, food, water & whatever else they needed. That's what chainlink will be doing. It will make the current gold rush of information possible

>>9870802
Where have you been the past 10 months?

A $2,257 investment in link at the beginning of this thread would currently be worth $2,180.

>>9870415
>baseless assumption
k

>>9871221
kek

>>9871221

lawl'd

>>9862463
I really hope it stops at 2900, Jesus...

>>9871221
dumb linkies

>>9871221
2090 now

>>9870628
>Link is as close to a sure thing as you can get at the moment. If you did some research you'd understand that too.

so the market is wrong?

you disagree with the market? fuck you

>>9870802
>>9870872

>>9869882
They seriously just dont. They copy/paste anything that sounds intelligent and cant explain what they even posted if you ask them. I have been at this for at least 3 months trying to get 1 solid argument to why Link will "make it" ....and the hunt continues

>>9871980
You're a newfag who wasn't around half a year ago when people were constantly posting info on Chainlink, and is now upset because you're not getting spoonfed.

>>9871916
>you disagree with the market? fuck you
Funniest line itt so far.

>>9870305
I dont want to live in a wolrd this fast paced. Its already fast enough God dammit. Dont give Jose any ideas. Plus, who is ever going to willingly grant an application authority to decide when funds to leave your account
>What is auto billpay
Auto billpay is a monthly payment structure that still requires the authority of the user to process. Because I know my bills will auto pay on the 15th of the month, I have the authority to stop the auto pay early if services have not been rendered.

I woukd never ever give up that control

>>9871221

>>9870628
Clearly.....what are we at $0.20? And falling? Hard for a star to hit the moon when it's already crashed into the earth

>>9872052
You have to first agree to the contract which means putting funds in an escrow. Relax.

>>9871980
Imagine spending 3 months researching exclusively on biz

>>9871355
Great response. Exactly what I expect from linktards

>>9867856
My grandpa on the right.

>>9872088
At the moment everything is basically coupled to BTC. Not that hard to explain.

>>9872052
>I dont want to live in a wolrd this fast paced. Its already fast enough God dammit
That 30 year old boomer anno 1908 lamenting the advent of the automobile.

>>9872026
Read the thread. Ive been here since before crypto took over this board.
>>9872110
>exclusively
Reading comprehension by linktards

>>9871221
lol

>>9872132
You must be a NEET whose only connection to technology is his latest vidya console and his absurd HODL position on a dying super-fiat. With technology and communication as fast and diverse as it is right now, the pace of business is absurd. I am a general contractor and the pace and expectations of projects and clients is essentially down to minutes rather than days like it was before email or hours as it was a decade ago. I dont want to live in a world where that pace is seconds.

>>9861565
OP BTFO

>>9872100
Im fucking relaxed. But thats what i just typed. Learn to read. I WOULDNT AGREE TO THE CONTRACT. Fucking link idiots hesus christ

average linkholder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1XtMvcicvI

>>9870370
>Implying Jose knows how any of this works

>>9870370

>implying Jose can read your english.

>>9870370
>Asks someone to dumb it down
>Guy gives a simplified explanation
>Start acting like a know-it-all faggot looking for flaws in a dumbed down example
God, you are the worst. Go back to whatever forum you came from, newfag. Get the fuck off my board.

All these people patting themselves on the back for not selling must not have been here long enough to see the DigiMarines come (and go).

>>9872799
I post a statement like this every day and it always seems to kill the thread. I've never gotten a straight answer. Am I being shadow-banned?

>>9873027
Nah. Thread is a day old and we have all exhausted our emotions on the subkect. I just float between here anwatching my stocks and options make too mcmuch fucking money. If only Linkies were smart enough to play options....

>>9872799
Redpilll me on Digimarines

>>9873756
They made a lot of money if they sold the famous pump about a year ago

>>9873756
DGB was a coin that appeared in threads all the time when I first started lurking /biz/ regularly. At first they were like any other hype threads but gradually over the months the only things the threads talked about was how the price was low and stagnant but they were confident in the technology and would never sell their coins. Their motto was "we are digimarines and we are not selling!" and they posted many amusing images in their constant support threads.

However, I don't think I've seen a single DGB thread all year so they must have all sold. The blind (to me, at least) fanaticism of LINK holders reminds me a lot of the DigiMarines.

>>9872799
>>9873756
>>9873913
>>9873959
Digibyte was just another currency though. It doesn't solve anything nearly as significant as LINK does

>>9874017
That's not what the DigiMarines believed. They were just as confident as the LINK holders I see today.

>>9874118
As were eth holders, and nano, and xlm, and 0xbtc, etc... what matters is the significance of the project and how it's being solved. No one else in the space is attempting to solve the oracle problem as completely and securely as chainlink. https://fynestuff.com/chainlink-vs-decentralized-oracles-analysis/

>>9874233
But that's exactly the same types of things the DigiMarines said about payments in online games. I wish any were still alive to back me up.

And no, what matters is if there is demand for the product. That's what's going to give it value.

>>9861651
that is a nice pepe