/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9805273
wtf are you talking about? you should be all in on anything that didn’t have an ICO. do you really need people constantly saying this for you to believe it? kill your self

Another brainlet who think for himself.
Here, for you:
MOST ICOS ARE SECURITIES. FACT. CHAIRMAN SAID SO. BITCOIN AND CURRENCIES LIKE BITCOIN ARE NOT SECURITIES. FACT. CHAIRMAN SAID SO.
ETHER HAD AN ICO. ETHER'S ONLY PURPOSE ARE ICOS. MOST ICOS ARE SECURITIES. BAD FOR ETHER.
BITCOIN GOOD BITCOIN NO SECURITY
Hope I could help.

>>9805318
*can't think

>>9805318
>>9805292
Yes but I thought the SEC was supposed to make their move today?

>>9805318
For the projects that ended their ICO's and have a product with an actual utility for the token won't have any issues.

ETH never had an ICO. Only ETC did. It would never stand up in court.

And the SEC could never handle the bad PR of causing mass suicides across the world for destroying the most promising technology since the wheel.

SEC isn't going to do shit, fuck them

>>9805512
>>9805355
>>9805318
So what about the shill coins?

VEN, ICX, AMB etc... I can't imagine SEC FUD would kill coins that aren't even based in the US. Any idea what that means for us holding them though?

>>9805535
>VEN is a shill coin
I see like one VEN FUD thread each 3 hours that never get past 20 posts and nothing else, meanwhile shit like LINK, 0xBTC and AMB made the habit of spamming the catalog non stop

>>9805619
Ok, substitute VEN for JNT and the question remains the same

>>9805641
It's all about where the guys behind any ICO have their HQ and which exchanges have most of their volume and where are those based

>>9805752
Any idea what that means for the holders though?

Binance -> KYC/US ban; mandatory reporting etc...

>>9805318
He said these things on CNBC does that really make them facts? we don't really have all the details yet.

>>9806134
>ignoring what the SEC said on live television
>Chooses to believe conspiracy theories about whales tricking him to sell low

lmao i cant wait to trash talk you faggots the moment the SEC makes a statement confirming that having an ICO = security

Hope you realize this is the goys last effort to cause panic to create everyone to sell and cause a selloff so they can load up. Just think about it.

>>9805326
sec has already made clear their intentions good luck next year reporting that you committed securities fraud on your taxes

>>9806152
I dont plan on "selling off" I just would rather know if my low caps are about to get dicked on and whether or not I need to redistribute my folio back into the big boys

>>9806152
>Hope you realize this is the goys last effort to cause panic
Thats right, similar how to selling in January was a stupid idea.

Newsflash retards, if something dumps hard and stays there for months but recovers in the future doesnt mean holding was a good idea.

>>9806150
like i said we don't have all the details yet.

>>9806167
no, keep it in low caps haahqahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahh you fuckers deserve whats coming

>>9805273
I dunno what OP is talking about. I’m not in alts I’m in Btc 100% r/n.

>>9806161
Only the unregulated exchanges commit securities fraud, not the customers who bought from or sold to the exchanges.

It could get tricky if you trade with another person or OTC though.

Reminder faggots, Binance is not your friend

>Binance's Venture Fund Head Is Waiting for ICO Bubble to Burst
>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-04/binance-s-venture-fund-head-is-waiting-for-ico-bubble-to-burst