/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9733252
>Remind me again, why are you still hodling BCore?
I'm not a retard anon, went all in BITCOIN cash last week. Up 15% whilst BCore is crumbling.

LIGHTNING WILL BE WORKING ANY DAY NOW

Bitcoin Maximalists have the same totalitarian motives and ideology as Stalinism.

>>9733252
I came here just to laugh at bizlets.

Post more pink

>>9733548
Thanks just bought 100k BTC

BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH

A one block difficulty adjustment means it does not rely on merit to survive. So it's shit.

>>9734253
>Corecucks actually believe this.

>>9734277

Stop shilling. No one is buying your bags

>>9734277
Prove me wrong without the mods blocking me

>>9733252
Bcore? BTCC is less shit than BCH but shitter than BTC

There is only one bitcoin

>>9734277
>>9734292
daily reminder roger is a massive faggot.
https://archive.fo/jDdSY

>>9734340
Not BTCC, that's Bitcoin Core, don't insult it by calling it Bcore, that's reserved for Bitcoin (BTC).

>>9733544
Newsflash: Lightning is already up and running

Weird how no one uses it.. hey.. .you dont think maybe... its shit? UH OH

>>9734313
>>9734292
Janitors but yes, prove me wrong.

>>9734389
https://fork.lol/tx/fee
:^)

Once Bitcoin (BCH) gets its market dominance back, it is inevitable commies will try to corrupt and take over it again. What do you reckon is the way to fight this? Stressing its anarcho-capitalist roots in marketing and forking off whenever they succeed again?

>>9734442
The fact that you clarify it with (BCH) means you don't even believe it's the "real" BTC.

>>9734406
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/median_transaction_fee-btc-bch.html#3m

>>9734389
there are more lightning nodes than bcash nodes and its only in testing kek.

>>9734465
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-bch-doge.html#3m

>>9734465
why the fuck does anybody use bcore? bitcoin cash is superior in every aspect

>>9734481
>name my band
One Meg Greg and the Champagne Poppers.

>>9734496
Why don't you ask your Lord and Savior why he hasn't swapped his mining cartels over?

>>9734510
just swap to BCH, no need to get emotional buddy

>>9734489
Because you actually need to run a node to use lightning.

>>9734524

What will corecucks do once LN hits its scaling limit?

>>9734510
better to mine btc and sell it to maximize profitability.

>>9734533
blame everyone else

>>9734524

>>9734541
Why? BCH is better.

>>9734521
Don't have a dog in the fight. They're both shit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HV2UYm1xe0

Check out this video guys, he is ripping bcash to shreds. Very comfy watch!

cuz I can't trade all my shitcoins against it

>>9734481
the guy with the cap isn't a core person fyi, the cap says "make bitcoin cash again"

bcash lel fight me ver

>>9734595
NO YOU LIED TO ME
AHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>9734595
>Check out this video guys, he is ripping bcash to shreds. Very comfy watch!
Wow BCore destroyed

>>9734453
I have to clarify this because Bcore has duped the majority into thinking it is bitcoin, so the real bitcoin forked off and got a new ticker.

>>9735150
Bitcoin Cash is the real bitcoin and forked off to fire the incompetent/corrupt devs that celebrate full blocks and high fees.

>>9734644
>>9734680
Got 'em!

>>9735482
I THOUGHT I WAS SAFE WITH IVAN
HE NEEDS TO BE EXCOMMUNICATED

>>9735166
>>9734680
Sounds like Ivan is a believer in peer to peer electronic CASH, won't be long and he'll be fully on the BCH train.

>>9734489
In this context, one node=one wallet, since you need an always online node to even use LN.

>>9735845
You can really hear how carefully he needs to choose his words in order to try not to trigger BTC people.
>What if people just don't want digital gold? We have to consider the possibility that mainstream might just want something to pay with online... We also need to start thinking about advertising. B-but write what you think in the comments!

>>9734306
Tons of people are, at increasingly higher prices.

>lighting is gaining tracking with retailers
>bcash shills are at ATH
>bitcoin's next rally about to start

RIP if you buying this bch pump lmao. At this point you deserve it though.

>>9733252
>calling BTC "Bcore"

Y I K E S

>>9736278
i prefer legacy Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash myself. i sure get what people are poking fun at when they use bcore though

>>9734253
This is actually a hilarious situation. Coretards carefully plan the coup, they get the exchanges under political control and ensure that no matter what is actually mined as btc, whatever the core political dev council declares to be btc is what will be listed as btc on exchanges, chain length be damned. They know the miners can't keep mining a chain they can't trade for operating costs, so they figure they've got them by the balls as permanent captive dumb pipe level infrastructure unable to add value to the product.
So miners hard fork with a different difficulty adjustment algorithm so they can build a new product fully controlled by them around the original vision, which when it gets significant market share will permanently kill the btc chain, and there's nothing corecucks can do about it.
"BUT THAT'S NOT FAIR MUM HE CHEATED MUH TENDIES REEEEEEEEEE CALL THE SEC OH GOD WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE WE'RE BEING ATTACKED AAAAAAAAARGH"
You're so fucked, it's hilarious.

https://twitter.com/BitcoinCom/status/1003234920590962688

"Bitcoin Cash is coming to tens of thousands of convenience stores in Japan soon!"

(!!!)

>>9736703
Yeah I was really surprised when I heard that and have to wonder if maybe those numbers aren't as big as he think they are. Still, even a thousand convenience stores would be huge. A couple of hundreds would be absolutely fantastic!

So since he didn't say exactly how BCH is coming to the stores I take it with a grain of salt until I hear it is actually implemented and working. I'm assuming that it's some kind of deal with a common legacy payment provider (?) and in that case it might very well be 10s of thousands of stores that get support for BCH.

If bscam is so great why do you need to make these daily threads and shill it so much hmm

>>9736877
To expand other people's minds you first need to offer to help.

>>9736791
It might just be buying BCH through some bill payment system which is not really worth caring about and was done with BTC before
The ability to use BCH actually for payments in stores would be a huge deal though, since BTC never even got that on a large scale
I don't know why Ver or that chink doesn't just buy up some legacy system

In addition, inevitably the return Bitcoin (BCH) again lost the competitive advantage to the communist country. How is this fight counted? Did the marketing success and people highlighted again the route of Anakar?

>>9734489
>there are more lightning nodes than bcash nodes and its only in testing kek.
Are there any merchants that accept bitcoin lightning?

>>9736877
Because it triggers so many people and eventually the truth will come out. Don't say you weren't warned.

the only people who support btc are those with massive bags that they hope to unload on unsuspecting noobs.
meanwhile bch is an actual p2p electronic currency.

Bitcoin Cash will destroy Bitcoin.

>>9737304
Yea sure. Even though its in beta, there are still more merchants than I would have thought.

>>9737541

>Can't scale beyond 100,000 users
>Merchants still bother

>>9737541
Lightning is intended to handle almost all of bitcoin transactions, this list is pretty much nothing. I don't understand why BTC insists on relying on lightning network to be plan A.

>>9737559
>wojack
>>>/v/

>>9737629
>in beta like 5 months
>first phone wallet came out in April
>expects the whole world to adopt in 1 or 2 months
kek
cashlets the post
its not meant to handle all transactions either, just smaller ones, even down to 1 satoshi.
how much would it cost to send 1 sat in bch?

>>9734389
literally more people use it than bcash
now kys bag holder

>>9737810
>in beta like 5 months
>first phone wallet came out in April
>expects the whole world to adopt in 1 or 2 months
Don't you see the insanity in this? We already have bitcoin and wallets that work perfectly well. Why are we waiting to build out this second network that requires new software and new adopters instead of just going with the intended method of scaling? Putting all of your faith in LN is madness.

>its not meant to handle all transactions either, just smaller ones, even down to 1 satoshi.
It's meant to handle anything that you're not willing to pay a 30$ fee for.

>>9737964
>muh $30 fee
nice lies bcashie

>>9737964
the median fee is 11 cents there big guy.
for months now 1 or 2 sats per byte works fine for getting in next block thanks to segwit and batching.
the current average is LESS than bch's fee in satoshis per byte
that means you'll pay more in USD to use bcash right now if they were the same price.
there are more segwit transactions than bcash transactions too and it was implemented after bcash.
why does bcash suck so bad?

also you didn't answer my question - how much would it cost in bch to send 1 sat of bch?

B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH B CASH

>>9738117
>>9738213
Do you remember the beginning of the year? Yea I know, segwit and batching have helped, but bitcoin adoption has stalled. That's because everyone knows what will happen if usage ever picks up. Don't you care that bitcoin is being artificially crippled?


>also you didn't answer my question - how much would it cost in bch to send 1 sat of bch?
I don't know.

>>9738305
I remember the beginning of the year when btcs mempool was being purposefully flooded so a certain narrative crucial to the adoption of another coin could be pushed, yes

Bitcoin (BCH) is fun AGAIN.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nid1Szud524

>>9734177
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

>>9738321
I wonder why the spam stopped at the exact time the market free fell and interest in bitcoin vanished overnight. I also wonder why there isn't constant spam on the BCH network to make it appear to have traction. Maybe there simply never was any malicious spam in the first place and BTC just couldn't handle Bitcoin mania.

>>9738344
>roger buys a drink with a 0 conf
>winks and says "you know I'm good for it"

Lmao, even roger doesn't believe his own shilling.

>>9738353
it stopped literally the week after coinbase announced batching and segwit.
everyone else followed, some started batching right away, and the mempool cleared out in like 9 days while btc was totally flat in price

https://youtu.be/6xIq0FdmsIA?t=1263 @ 21:03

You can actually pinpoint the moment that core supporter's hearts break. Those confused and hesitant claps are digital gold. Notice how quickly Andreas Antonopoulos moves on to mentioning Ethereum so that people won't have a chance to start booing.

>>9738117

>>9733252
Marxists are heavily involved in all coins though.

>>9739234
None of them ever use bitcoin so they wouldn't know about the fees.

>>9739249
BCH is pretty much immune to them. It's dominated by ancaps that want to starve the state of tax revenue.

>>9738353
>I wonder why the spam stopped at the exact time the market free fell and interest in bitcoin vanished overnight. I also wonder why there isn't constant spam on the BCH network to make it appear to have traction. Maybe there simply never was any malicious spam in the first place and BTC just couldn't handle Bitcoin mania.
It was probably a combination of coinbase activating segwit and segwit adoption growing to the point it became too costly to spam the network long term in an attempt to force people into using bcash.

Also there's strong reason to believe both coinbase and bitpay were involved, they are connected to Roger, both purposely didn't activate segwit for over 6 months, they both have strong motivation to do so as they want to offer centralized portals that merchants can use for 0 conf transactions.

I'm uncertain which will dominate, if BTC has to die I would rather BCH not replace it over other alts, due to the mining monopoly bitmain has BTC and BCH are no longer trustless or permissionless. Bitmain or the chinese government can easily tamper with both chains at the moment.

>>9739267
>BCH is pretty much immune to them. It's dominated by ancaps that want to starve the state of tax revenue.
Yes the chinese communist party, perhaps one of the most famous ancap group around.

>Not overrun with Marxists
the main claim to value as far as im concerned

Holy shit in the last 24 hours not a single crypto in the top 100 is green against BCH now.

>>9739328
As far as you know.

Bow to me