/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9435890
>tfw first coin to power BITCOIN SMART CONTRACTS

>>9435890
Not everyone can be rich, anon.

>>9435890
Potential price in 2020?

>>9435930
1400$

>>9435939
The supply is very similar to ETH.

all in
looking to make an easy 4x

>>9435951
It's similar to LTC too
the difference is, iexec has actual use cases out the ass.

>>9435967
I own LINK but I unironically think RLC will cause me to make it first.

>>9435991
I'm all in RLC no fucks given see you in 2 years when we're all millionaires

When will it be too late to accumulate? This project is still under the radar.

>>9436039
anything under 2$ is a deal
buy this dip thank me wednesday

>>9436045
If 1400 is possible wouldn't anything under 10 be a steal? I don't trade btw, I just DCA into good projects that I think have big potential (so far RLC and LINK) and plan to hold until 2020 or so.

>>9436093
Short term anything under 2$ is an absolute steal.
Long term anything under 25 is a buy for me. I'll buy all the way to 25.

>>9436108
...you have a lot of faith in this project don't you?

>>9436120
Yes. For many reasons. Do some research. It checks every box perfectly, people are just sleeping on this.

I hope wednesday's announcement is massive. Today's was top notch from a tech perspective, but the importance is unfortunately lost on many.

>>9436128
The project is amazing, but in crypto the best projects don't always win out.

>>9436150
I have a feeling it is going to be relatively big. It might not be the intel or ibm partnership but i think it will bring eyes to RLC and the interesting things they're accomplishing.

>>9436190
For sure, sadly a lot of people are just moonbois or trading bots, but for those of us that try to see the future we fully believe in the technology and see the need for something like iexec. I'm willing to hold for a year or two to see if people start catching up.

no joke, i just sold my omg and nas to throw into this

>>9436255
congrats, you bought the dip of an undervalued coin before announcement #2 as well as V2 release EOM.

Fuck it, you made me put some of my poorfag port into this

>>9436255
I sold all my wan to go all in into RLC few days ago

>>9436276
>>9436255
If you want some reassurance as to why I believe RLC will be huge, here's a copypasta.

RLC is going to enable off-chain processing for ETH, but their endgame is edge/fog computing. It's essentially next-gen cloud infrastructure, which by the way is being developed by iExec, IBM, Microsoft, Samsung, Intel and CISCO_FUCKING_SYSTEMS. Why is this huge? Well. 80% of the world's data is handled by Cisco routers and switches. Now iExec is working with all these behemoths side-by-side @ OpenFog consortium. If these guys want to push new tech, you'd be an absolute retard betting against them.

Imagine you're a datacenter. Now what does it cost to run it all? Literally hundreds of millions to build it and then some more to keep it running. Now imagine you could provide hosting and computing (Amazon Web Services, Netflix runs on it for example), without having to build a huge fucking datacenter. You just rent any goddamn hardware that is idling anywhere in the world to provide your service.

Now, you don't pay for infrastructure. So you cut your prices down. You become appealing to customers. You grow. You become the airBnB and Uber of data networks/service providing.

What do you need the tokens for, you might ask? Well let my autistic-as-fuck ass tell you.
It's to pay the hardware owners for computational cycles. Just like mining, but actually doing work and not wasting electricity for frivolous shit.

Oh, this sort of network model is also ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL to IoT, since it kills all sorts of problems associated with latency and security. FUCK. This project makes my dick hard.

i've been accumulating since january, now have about 25% of my portfolio in rlc. when it comes to crypto, i keep asking myself "who is gonna use this". with rlc, unlike most projects there's an answer.

>>9435939
LOL

Truth be told, we can be happy if it reaches 300 $ in 4 - 5 years.

>>9436374
It'll be 500$ bare minimum in 2020. 1500 top side.

deez chumps wrote about RLC back in fukkin feb where were you dumbasses then

https://ironwood.io/report/12

hafta sub to their shit to read the whole thing kek

>>9436401
I of course hope youre right because that would mean that my meager 3000 RLC would make me a millionaire, but why the FUCK would it go so high?

Have you even looked at the marketcap?

>>9436255
>selling nas
Bro... should’ve just dumped your omg. I just took my xlm profits from 200 sats and bought RLC from 1000 sats to 1700 sats. Quite comfy now.

>>9435951
Actually litecoin

>>9436008
So there we go again.
Either Intel rebranded as RSK or you desperate pajeets where just obviously full of shit.
I'm glad no one fell for your bullshit shilling this past week

>>9438340
It will be intel on wednesday

Bought at 16k, easiest money in my life, 50k by the end of the week.

>>9438571
Realistically, it probably won't.

Will the announcement be good? Absolutely. These PhDs don't fuck around.

>>9438887
Well Julien has implied that it's intel in slack twice already, so I am pretty hopeful

>>9435930
~$1000

>>9436255
good decision desu, even if you're in for the short term expect x2 over the next few days alone

>>9438960
Even if it is intel, it’s not going to be some full blown implementation of RLC on every intel chip, it’s likely a technical collab focused on security. Big for sure considering the weight of all the partnerships already, but relying on a single announcement for a moonshot is absurd.
T. 20k RLC holder

>>9436297
anons let me tell you one simple thing that I based my fomo on this coin on, go to their website, and look at their open positions available. they are hiring. buy 20k of it. I plan to have easy 4x

I only got 1000 bucks do I throw it into ELC?

>>9439867
Absolutely agree. Nevertheless it will bring a positive exposure to normies

>>9435890
>There are people on /biz/ right now who dont own RLC
retards topkek

>>9436297

SONM is already doing this, and is much further ahead

>>9440801
yeah buy now before it goes 2.2k sats

There is 50% chance that iexec makes shit announcement tomorrow. Prepare for announcement dump if tomorrow's announcement is shit like RSK.

>>9440855
>sonm

>>9435958
You forgot a zero. Shit will be $100 soon.

I already have a 10k stack, should i sell my request and get more, iunno wut to do.

>>9441066
Sell request anyway

>>9441066
ye if u want that lambo