/biz/ - Business & Finance

It might be useful to look at the list of consensus sponsors/partners too. Some of them will be involved in other way without necessarily giving talks.

>>9388848
Thanks for the tip. I added a link to the list of sponsors - I'd honestly dig through it more if I had the time. I know there are other tradeable coins involved - ie. from what I heard Qlink is offering charging stations during the event.

which do i dump all my money into if im poor and need a x2?

>>9388831
No ark :^(

Right off the get go RCN is looking like a hell of a trade. It's near ATL and they're the first presentation directly related to a tradeable coin / token.

>>9388892

Sorry, anon. I definitely had them in mind when I made the list. Coindesk didn't list them on the schedule - if you can find a specific panel / presentation they're involved in please let me know.

AION is looking tasty

You missed Ark OP

>>9388891
>>9388968

SONM and VeChain are probably safe bet gains. I'll probably be going AION / VEN.

>>9388980

See:
>>9388892
>>9388920

If I can have a link to when they're on a panel / presenting I'll add it to the list in a hot second.

>>9388902
this
rcn is a steal at the moment
new roadmap this month
updated exchange this month
deployment of webapp that will replace the exchange will be announced soon
3rd party dapp for pooling rcn loan requests etc in the next few weeks
coinomi pilot loans announced this quarter or the next

>>9388902
>RCN

>>9388876
>Qlink
It's been getting manipulated like hell since about a week, that's for certain.

>>9389042
Well? This isn't just a list, I posted it so biz can discuss trading opportunities. Why would it be a bad decision?

Does biz think there is still a tradeable opportunity here? It's at ATH for BTC and about half in USD.

>>9388831
Charlie Lee still represents LTC? That's cute

>>9389185
Yeah, personal feelings aside I couldn't see leaving that out. He's specifically listed as a panelist for the event and under Speakers Coindesk has him as the Creator / Managing Director.

Even though he doesn't own any LTC. Whatever.

>>9389206
>Managing director

He managed to direct his coins to the exchange.

>>9388920
I do believe ARK has a booth there. I was looking at the floor plans a few days ago. Still, even if they do so don’t see that affecting price one bit.

>>9389206

Kek. I do wonder if he'll buy back in when he considers it to be a good evaluation. He did a helluva job timing his first (only?) selloff at the top.

>>9389250
well, it seems something affecting the price right now

Good idea OP

>>9389273
No kidding. +14% on CMC. Volume does seem to be relatively low, though.

I definitely don't underestimate the importance of even having a booth there. You'd be crazy not to think most sponsors have announcements up their sleeves for the week. I'm in ICX for example.

boring

>>9389343
2/10. We will need those FOMO's next week though.

Bump - I'm still curious what everyone is going to be betting on during this. SONM and VeChain are probably sure things.

AION could (should) have a huge breakout but we'll see what actually happens. It's disappointed me historically.

Does anyone know about or have investment in this? $21 mil marketcap and what looks like one of the few independent presentations on the stage. Wat.

>>9389073
he's not here to add anything, ignore it

>>9389596
fuck knows, i'm going balls deep into it tho. will be able to turn a profit on speculation alone

>>9389073
RCN finally created the protocol but that was the easy part. Getting an influx of people to apply for loans with cosigners is the hard part. They have such a weak presence in the crypto world, how are they going to get exposure in the real world to find normies to apply for loans? The "200,000 users lined up" is a meme. There is a reason why PBC Pajeet have never shilled RCN even though he is aware of it. The only chance for RCN is if everything is turned over to Afluenta who have an established P2P loaning business in Argentina and can actually get to the customers but that's not happening.

RCN is going to be like Kyber Network and Radar Relay, operational but not enough users to make a difference so it's like they don't really even matter and the token value will stay low.

>>9388831
>clicking on a google dox link

get fucked kid

>>9389683

>MON MAY 14/ 11:30 AM - 11:40 AM / 10 MINS
>AGRELLO: GET RID OF YOUR LAWYERS!
>TRIANON BALLROOOM
>At Agrello we believe that everyone can negotiate and execute legal contracts just using their smartphone.

>We use artificial intelligence and blockchain technologies to build an ecosystem of smart contracts and intelligent software agents for your everyday needs.

>Agrello ecosystem includes virtual passport, legally binding digital signature, template library driven by TOP lawyers, and community developed apps for contract execution.

That's what Condesk has on it. It's only a 10 minute presentation so keep that in mind, but yeah, it's hard to ignore that marketcap.

>>9389801
>It's only a 10 minute presentation
you think that's enough time to get the coin on leddit's radar?

Thanks for the resource OP, there's gonna be a lot of pumps to chase this week. Check this out: https://medium.com/@TraderRoode/pump-guide-to-consensus-2018-rcn-mana-aion-ven-and-more-926cb51bbc76
Personally I'm all in on iexec (RLC) they're making two announcements on the 16th. These guys are extremely anti-hype, and the last time they announced anything it was a collab with ubisoft. They're giving a joint talk with intel as well. This coin is a guaranteed x2 (at a minimum) this month, not even joking

>>9389811
It could end up being a speculation pump and dump. Or, you know, it could go completely parabolic after a convincing presentation. I'd use care as it looks like it's currently on a downtrend. I personally haven't decided if I'll put anything into it.

>>9389823
also all in on rlc with 70k of those fuckers. this is a 2year hodl

>>9389954
>>9389907
>>9389823
Went all in on RLC, bought in at .1985 though so hopefully it doesn't bite me in the ass

>>9390068
down to 196 already

>>9390077
Don't sweat it, prices are going to be super volatile up until Consensus. In my person opinion I believe there will be a bullrun that will bring up the value of everything

>>9389954
what price did you buy at? you are set dude. I only got in recently, how much did the price change with previous announcements? how do you see things going next week and this month?

>>9390068
A small retrace is probably in order, but don't stress too much, you'll be sitting pretty in a few days

>>9389823
When / where is the talk?

Bump again. If the RLC / Intel talk is at Consensus and I can see a verifiable source I'll add it to the spreadsheet. The more the merrier.

Enigma gonna be there, making an announcement, probably testnet.

>>9390284
So it looks like they'll be there Tuesday? Announcement will be on the 8th. I have them listed as Unknown presentation time because Coindesk put them as Speakers but didn't include them on the schedule.

>>9390211
>If the RLC / Intel talk is at Consensus and I can see a verifiable source I'll add it to the spreadsheet. The more the merrier.

>>9390325
Meant to say the tweet was from the 8th. 1 week would be Tuesday.

>>9390354
Added iExec to Wednesday with a note that there's an announcement on Monday. Thanks for doing the leg work.

>>9390354

>>9390356
No clue, he's on the speakers page but not shown in the agenda

Strawpoll for which coin will next be added to Coinbase

http://www.strawpoll.me/15682869

>Jed McCaleb (Stellar) - First the Rest, Then the West?
hoooooly shit Jed enough with the niglet airdops already

I know this isn't an exhaustive list of presentations, it's just what Coindesk has listed and what we've been able to find. If anyone has another addition like this:

>>9390354

Please say so and I'll add it to the spreadsheet. I'm going to be looking more and keeping it updated up and through Consensus. Feel free to bookmark the page.

>>9390563
off topic but why is there so much talk of this coinbase stuff? you will not see anything for months, US regulations require them to obtain special registration before any erc20 tokens will be added. It's a long ways off

>>9390624
I'm not sure. Maybe because everyone is sensing new ATH is coming and they're thinking Coinbase will rush to list tokens.

>>9390211
I think the origin is this
>>9390354
But I only paid attention to it yesterday.

I'm convinced on RLC. Going to wait for a pullback before I jump in.

So far my spread is 1/4 ICX, 1/4 AION, and 1/2 ETH. Should I look for one more or put 1/2 into RLC? What are the implications of the announcement?

>>9390849
Good call, glad I could raise some awareness. I don't know exactly what the announcements will entail but like I said, these guys don't hype just anything. Many people are expecting an intel/IBM collaboration. This month will be huge for RLC regardless. The 18th will see the testnet version of their v2 release, and the 29th will be the full release. Rumors also include a potential bithumb+okex listing at v2. I see this as a 2x minimum, up to 5x depending on the developments and partnerships announced. Strap in and get comfy

>>9388831
Monero

>>9389669
dispute it what I just wrote then faggot

kek. you missed Chainlink at 10:30 AM on Monday in the Hyperledger booth. Chainlink kicks off the whole week which will be all about the power of smart contracts.

>>9391068

>>9390284
An announcement about an announcement boys! Strap in!!! Skateboard logo Inc.

>>9391068
where did you find that? I thought they weren't presenting

>>9391051
I called you out because you didn't offer anything substantive. If you shit on a coin, offer something better

>>9391278

https://www.hyperledger.org/event/consensus-2018

>Come visit us in the Hyperledger booth (#315), snag a copy of the new Smart Contracts whitepaper, and grab some Hyperledger swag!

SmartContract isn't presenting, but the first implementation of Chainlink is.

>10:20 AM: IntellectEU – Enterprise Blockchain Integration with IoT devices and back office systems by Hanna Zubko, CEO and Paulo Rodrigues, Global Business Developer Manager, CEO Portuguese Offices

>This presentation covers a real customer case leveraging Blockchain technology to offer a new insurance product: a flexible pay per mile insurance based on the real car mileage and condition, calculating the insurance premium rate and quoting the offer based on the accumulated data received from the IoT device installed in the car. This Pilot project is based on Hyperledger Fabric 1.0 and IntellectEU’s Catalyst integration solution. Catalyst serves as a hub for connecting the insurance DB, emulated IoT device, end user application and the ledger itself. Catalyst listens to the changes on all data sources and based on the business rules applies the corresponding logic.

>>9391293
are you link dubs bro? and by "smart contracts whitepaper" we're certain that's about us?

>>9391471

kek. ya I'm link dubs bro. I'm not certain no, but at this point Monday will either be about Chainlink, or about what kills Chainlink so I'm going to keep assuming that enough pieces fit together that this is when shit gets real.

the biggest suspicion I have is knowing that Intellect has only recently started to get into blockchain tech so they're coming from behind and didn't have an existing knowledgebase too pull from internally, so it seems unlikely that they'd whip together an oracle network they're confident enough in that banks would integrate with it. you want to have a proper whitepaper and have your models audited before you'd launch something like that so it makes more sense that for any chain related integrations they'd be leaning on Chainlink's network.

we've all known Chainlink would support Hyperledger. next week my hunch is that we found out Hyperledger will also be supporting/pushing Chainlink. that's a huge shift and is definitely not priced in. see the XLM charts for what next week could look like if IBM/Hyperledger/IntellectEU makes any announcements.

>>9388999
this isnt reddit. you have to go back fucking deluded ven nigger

>>9391278
>>9391293

>>9391585
Interesting. I want big things for link, but at the same time I don't want accumulation to end haha. I wanted to hit 90-100k before leaving it be. Oh well, let's see where the week takes us

>>9391735
thanks but in that thread he's the OP and I'm the first poster lmao

its guaranteed every one of these will dump right before or during their talk

>>9391293
If they're not shouting Chainlink, I don't think it deserves to be added. Maybe a note about Hyperledger.
t. linkie

>>9391750
Oh I remember you, you uploaded that thread pic yesterday and I found it amazing, well done guys

>>9391760
I agree

>>9391792
what pic? I don't remember lol

Agrello - going heavy on it

Agrello presentation is only 10 minutes? Shiiiieet

>>9392865
legally binding smart contracts written by AI from some randos out of Estonia? Sounds like a disaster. This will be a thing but probably not from this team.

thanks for this.
here is my contribution, announced ~2 hrs ago and currently dumping

>>9388831
>Zcash: fireside chat (about why I love bitmain)

>>9394129
kek. I thought I heard that monero was going to be there but now I see nothing

Any thoughts on Fusion or Hydrogen?

>>9394709
https://medium.com/@fusionprotocol/fusion-at-consensus-2018-20b41102e7b6

>>9388831
Not going to open this virus link

>>9388831

>first the rest then the west

CAN SOMEONE JUST FUXCKKING FOERK THIS SJW SHITCOIN AND ACTUALLY MARKERT IT HOLY SHIT FUCKING HEAVY BEAGS