/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9154495
>Unironically holding the confirmed scamelcoin

>>9154495
WE ARE THE JIBI MARINES, AND WE ARE NEVER FUCKING SELLING

>>9154495
Not sure anymore if this will ever moon...

Look at total vapoware Like EOS which is nearly 20B worth

If anything at all is tokenised the buying pressure will cause FOMO on an unprecedented scale. It's funny, the "singularity" is much more likely to happen to Jibrel than chainlink.

>>9154495
benis :DDD

>waiting for AMA

last chance to stock up before the inevitable bomb drop in their ama. it isnt worth missing out anons

>>9154859
Inb4 bad news and big dump like after Medium article.

He's in, are you?

>>9154495
9 am wallet guy here anon what’s up.
I keep the stats at an excel sheet at my wagecuck and I’ll have an update tomorrow morning.
Nothing changed anon and nothing will change for a while, this is the definition of a long term hold as stupid as that sounds

>>9154859
You haven't been around JNT very long if you think there is going to be a news drop in the AMA. You are even more naive if you think it is going to be positive.

You should really hope it is just a boring AMA where they answer some community questions and don't reveal ANYTHING

>>9155464
In person these guys are very persuasive. I don't know if you watched boxminings interview with Talal but he made Jibrel sound absolutely amazing. He is the king shill. Unfortunately though even if the AMA is bullish itll probably dump because of the sell the news meme.

>>9155608
They are already selling.

>>9155690
Big if true

>>9155608
Talal is a proper shill but I don't see anything good coming of this AMA. They are going to reveal jDev and probably push some things back. Which will likely result in a dump.

Article on Quorum, mentions Jibrel.

"America’s largest bank; JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) tested a $150 million certificate of deposit (CD) transaction on its Quorum blockchain solution."

"The Quorum test is very similar to the Jibrel Network (JNT)"

https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/22912651-daniel-jennings/5151780-jpm-morgan-chase-testing-blockchain-transactions-telegram-200-million-users

>>9155889
That doesn't sound good.

>>9155952
In what way? At least it shows there's a demand for the services JNT provides. This is an Arabic project, they aren't going to capture every bank worldwide.

>>9155952
No one can save you from your low iq friend

>>9155889
sounds bullish, jpmorgan acknowledging jibrel's concept means adoption is highly likely

>>9156149
>Quorum uses debt instruments

Oh wow, so jBonds aren't a meme then? Who would have guessed

>>9156172
>crypto depository receipts

AMA soon.

>>9156227
>AMA confirmed for end of May

>>9156227
love me a good binary event.

>>9156227
Real question is wtf is kakaotalk

>>9156280
an asian chat app if im not completely wrong

>>9156255

2019

>>9156280
Korean Telegram.

>>9156022
please sir, save me from myself! and TELL ME WHAT TO THINK

>>9156280
kakaotalk is the wechat of s.korea

>>9156301
>Since Star League foundation

>>9156322
We need a spy on the inside

>>9156309
Stfu faggot. I found the article. I would have dumped and fudded you niggers if it was bad

>>9156227
So delayed AMA confirmed.

>>9156727
there was never a firm date for the AMA. the nig who admins the telegram, who isn't affiliated with the team, said the AMA will be released "towards late April." as far as I know, no one from the actual team said that the AMA would be released in April.

>>9156901
too late for that now lmao, too many people believe its a deadline

>>9156901
And the excuses are already starting. Best damage control ever.

>>9156985
>>9157156
Yup, just 100k, totally unacceptable.

>>9156727
No real reason to interpret it like that but yeah I wouldn't be surprised either way.

>>9154495
I like this coin but it's going to dump in a few days since they're going to be late on the AMA. The community is not amused.

>>9157432
I would say that interpretation is pretty reasonable.I doubt it will come out in the next 24 to 48 hours.

>>9154495
sold my JNT for WAN

feel comfy - fuck this jnt scam

>>9157460
Yeah actually reading it again he doesn't seem to suggest it's iminent. Then again how long can it take to edit it if it's already recorded.

>>9157156
Video will be out tomorrow you nigger. Also, your carebare FUD is absolutely disgusting and easy to see through.

>>9157470
Trump Pepe = opinion disregarded.

>>9157569
I think you are going to be sorely disappointed tomorrow.

>>9157661
Nah, I have inside connections to the team. I also called the contents of the laste medium post on here in a thread. (75%/25% jBonds split).

The AMA is being edited right now, and hopefully out tomorrow. I have actual info because I take the time to get involved in the projects I am invested in. You should try it some time.

>>9157721
>I'm an insider trust me guys
Okay so big boy. Bring up the post you made in the previous thread about the medium article and tell us what will be in the AMA.

>>9156227
hahahaha just like the sheik announcement. "yeah we did it but we're aren't gonna announce it yet".

>>9157551
I'm very tempted to screecap this

>>9157759
This. Desperated JNT hodlers

>>9158409
I kinda feel like a black woman in hindsight right now. Sure this coin will probably moon one day and it's a good project. But it's going to keep on dumping for the next couple of days. It will probably go back to 0.0005.

>>9157721
>>9157759
I remember that post well (if it is the same guy) basically predicted the whole medium post a few hours before it came out. Mind telling us some more anon? How do you think the AMA will be received?

>>9158463
Who cares about long term moon missions, basically anything outperformed JNT right now.

>Ont
>EOS
>Omg

The list is long, but keep on holding JNT boyos.

>>9158496
Genuinely not selling until 2019 minimum unless some really shitty news comes out. Makes all this shit much less stressful.

>>9158496
I sold. I'll buy in for cheaper.

>>9158496
And EOS? Kek. Shit coin.

>>9158536
Why would buy so early if you don't expect any significant return in the short term, which is completly realistic because they are still at the beginning of their pilot

>>9158620
Clever anon.

>>9158628
Yeah shitcoin that have me x2,5 return over 2 weeks. Really shitty

>>9158691
You should sell that EOS now though. It's just going to bleed for a while. Sell it and set a low buy order for JNT.

>>9158691
Holding may not be the quickest way to make gains but it's proven to be the safest over and over. Besides, with a project of this scale you never know when they'll drop amazing news to BTFO swing traders.

>>9158766
People aren't swinging. The volume is too low. People are just getting annoyed and selling. You should get out now while it's still a good price.

>>9158766
They aren't dropping any amazing news for the next month or two at least. They are waiting on everything being ready for use first.

It won't be interesting until Q3.

>>9159030
That's the main problem really. JNT is still in its infancy while other projects are mooning left and right. This lady rally was brought on by nothing but ETH mooning. People are going to sell to look for faster gains.

>>9159097
Yeah. There is never going to be a sustained pump without it being on Binance.

>>9159030
They are going to be buying up a shitload of jnt for the alphas which will raise the price.This is happening anytime now in q2.We got rid of the sub 10k total porfolio 4chan moonboys who dumped during the huge marketwide crash.The majority of jnt is locked away by large holders who know where this is heading.

>>9159133
We're not going to be listed on Binance. That's been confirmed. I dont think getting listed on Binance is the solution to all of JNTs problems though.

>>9159372
How on earth has that been confirmed. Can't stand people that don't know what they're talking about stating things with such certainty.

>>9159613
Talal stated on the telegram that a Binance listing would cause too much volatility.

>>9159627
brainlet.jpg

>>9159613
>>9159372
Yes and no. They said they still have applications but that Binance and other listings would cause too much volatility.

What this means is they have no plans to actually be listed until everything is done. They both plan on being listed and know it will cause too much volatility without JNT sinks. They won't be listing anywhere else until a lot more stuff is done which is around Q3 anyway.

>>9159627
It was Yazan and Talal later clarified that he was misunderstood, you illiterate nigger. Literally then confirmed exchange applications are proceeding.

>>9159990
Kinda sounds like Binance doesn't want JNT.

>>9160013
5/10 concern troll, (You) can do better than that.

>>9160072
K. Still 99% sure that Binance isn't listing JNT. Another exchange maybe. Not Binance.

>>9160238

the only reason I havent sold is I feel like they still have a strong chance of getting listed there given that CZ does zero conferences, but spoke at theirs. Given I only invested 10 eth and the marketcap is so low, im going to hang tight for a few more months.

>>9160238
9 posts in this thread, all with the most unsubtle jibrel fud ive ever seen.People are not selling buddy, we got rid of the weak hands 3-4 weeks ago.Either buy now or buy for more later.

>>9160269
I swear you guys are something else. This has way more going for it than a (very probable) Binance listing. Sometimes I wonder if I'm only one who read the last medium post more than once.

>>9159994

that was bullshit corporate double speak. They say something truthful, community reacts negatively, and then another person comes in to claim a misunderstanding.

If it was just a misunderstanding, then why the FUCK did their medium article explicitly tell people to not trade jnt because it would cause a failure of the project. This was after talals bullshit excuse.

It sounds an awful lot like what Yazan was saying, then reconfirmed in their horrifying medium update.

>>9160337
They said do not trade jnt because of speculation. It's standard information for many start-up. Ripple has it for example.

>>9160337
Maybe you should look into other projects. Your intellect is unironically too low for JNT.

>>9160337
Lmao man it was not horrifying in any way whatsoever. Either you're mailiciously acting this dense or you're a genuine brainlet.

>>9154495
holding 195k JNT hope I /make it/ within a year.

>>9161620
if you don't make it i'm completely fucked so there's that

>>9161620
Best of luck fellow. You might or might not.

>>9160331
I hear you anon. I thought the last article was incredibly bullish, but biz isn't even talking about it...it's like the details didn't register and everyone is still confused about whether or not JNT is a simple gas token.

>>9158480
Yeah man, that's me. This time idk what will be in the AMA desu, Talal didn't say a lot. But he said the video will be out tomorrow, bar some crazy fuckup during editing happens.

>>9161960

how is it bullish? Instead of 100% on-chain proof of solvency, now it will be some unknown split of on chain and off chain. And not only that but YET AGAIN they asked people not trade aka speculate on JNT because the volatility has detrimental impacts to what they are trying to achieve.

These assholes raised millions without running simulations (or they did and are thieves) and now want to decrease volatility by increasing token utility. Bad news talal, no matter what utility you give this shit coin if btc crashes 75% its taking jnt down with it.

They will put barely anything in jbonds vs jcash meaning onchain solvency will be minimal and this coin will be just another LAtoken.

>>9162039
Are you being serious right now, or are you someone who likes to fud the projects they're in?

>>9162039
and here we go again with this faggot. the dedication you've shown to fudding this project over the last 3 months is autistic to a degree i'd never thought possible prior to experiencing it firsthand

>>9162187

too bad im not that guy. I was an early investor post ico, that bailed once that medium article did a 180 and the team kept talking out of both sides of their mouth. Instead of just insulting me, tell me where I am wrong in my analysis of the fact that no longer is everything on-chain solvent and the team keeps belaboring increasing utility to decrease volatility as the only means of making things on-chain actually work, which in crypto will NEVER happen because its all tied to the price of btc regardless of utility.

You wont, the team cant, and they should have ran their shit simulations before raising money. How did they not know a 75% correction would make them insolvent? This is crypto. And who the FUCK would bond $2 to tokenize $1 as the team suggests might be needed to increase the buffer to prevent insolvency.

>>9162212
you're definitely the same person

>>9162212
you're making snap judgments based on what you've gathered, which isn't all of the information out there.

i want you to bite the bullet and tell us all that you unironically believe that YOU ALONE are the only one recognizing these common sense "issues" and that the people designing and leading this project simply never thought of any of this.

also please bite the bullet and tell us all that one of the wealthiest groups in the MENA region is willfully agreeing to bond $2 to tokenize $1 BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM IT AT ALL AND WILL IN FACT LOSE MONEY.

you need to think less strictly linearly (autistic) and learn to think peripherally and make inferences (not autistic).

>>9160269
>Only reason I haven't sold
>>9162212
>I sold after the medium article

Which is it exactly? Because you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.

>>9162288
kek'd and checked, fudfag just got massively btfo