/biz/ - Business & Finance

Anything that's constantly shilled on /biz/: SHIT
Stuff with good volume/mc/hc and good work being done where nobody replies if ever posted on /biz/: Probably good

>>8983358
Chainlink has a god tier logo

>>8983358
dragonchain logo is actually pretty nice.

>>8983358

No clue what that blue dimaond one is but Dragonchain has a sexy logo. Bitshares is shit.

Weird, I think all of the green ones in your pic are pretty shit.

I think 0x and AMB have pretty nice looking logos.

>>8983358
how about post the real one? waves will be a tsunamii soon

the icx logo is basically goatse

>>8983358

>>8984223
hey man, I just came up with a great alternative logo for McDonalds
it's minimalist AND geometric,
I think you'll love it

and it'll definitely become recognizable worldwide without the words under it
r-right?

omisego isn't bad when you know it's derived from the game go. can see why some one else would think it's whack tho

>>8984351
ah k

>>8984364
>derived from the game go
oh shit, yeah I didn't notice that

still not ideal cus it needs to resonate with regular people
(I'm learning GO, and even I didn't realize what it was trying to do)

>>8984351
oh wait

>>8984537
No it doesn't. It's a payment processor and will work on the back end. If OMG does well regular people won't even know it exists.

>>8984532
>>8984551
nice try,
except... nobody separates the amazon 'smile' from the 'A'

even if they did, it's infinitely more recognizable than a blue square...

( see >>8984177 )


>>8984571
you're forgetting that a lot of the people investing (aka, funding the projects)
are everyday people online, shilling their crypto of choice,
hoping to get people to invest

and if the project team is too cheap to hire a logo designer good enough to create a memorable logo
what other areas did they take shortcuts on?

I think AMB is gonna moon about this Friday 6PM Berlin time. Watch that candle grow greeeeeeen

>>8984794
https://blog.wavesplatform.com/more-about-the-waves-rebrand-862276272482

>>8984842
aaaaaaand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pjMueirxGU

God knows what they paid Pentagram for this first year student tier shit.

>>8984842
>>8984867
read and watched it

basically:
>we chose a blank square so we can put other generic symbols on it
didn't have to be a generic square though, could have been a more interesting shape
like EOS or Augur

what do you think is more likely?
that in the last 100 years,
nobody was clever enough to combine 1 basic shape with 1 basic color

...

or that this project just chose a shitty designer,
left it too soon until the rebranding date and had to just run with it


nothing against the project,
in fact I'll probably invest
but you haven't convinced me that a blue square will become recognisable

>>8984905
It’s not even original

>>8985020
I have to admit you got some points there .. their logo lacks something uniquely recognizable .. I like their client tho

>>8984905
The arrow bypasses the H and moves to the right, symbolizing how America will ignore Hillary's campaign for a more right leaning candidate.

>>8985020

I quite like the Wave rebrand, huge improvement on their previous.

I like Ripple, Lisk and golems branding and logos.
I like Ark and decred's branding, but not the logo.

NEM logo is pretty neat, but they really struggle with the brand identity. Improvements have been made, but it's not quite there yet.
BAT's warming on me.
Ardor is quite nice.

Chainlink, Populous and Stellar are absolute garbage tier trash.

>>8984214
My reasoning for the 'good' logos:

Bitshares - Represents the shares of a company, while capturing the first letter of the project.

(though this is the weakest of the 3)


Aeternity - interesting visual representation of eternity, as well as the unique spelling of the project name

EOS - Simple, yet striking and memorable. Looks great in 2D, or 3D / animated

>>8985235
the reason I never bought antshares was because of the fucking logo...
the reason I bought bitbean last year was precisely because of the logo...

acid is a hell of a drug

Larrimer shills. Bitshares and eos could have a logo so aesthetic it induces spontaneous orgasm I still wouldn’t buy those pieces of shit

Nothing wrong with drgn

>best
Unironically this. Tired of triangles and pyramids and colorful shit you thought were designs for candy wrapper.

The site they've had since the ICO sucks dick though, they need a better "web "designer" asap.

>most generic / boring
Nano's anal beads. Along with its boring generic name.

>worst
Monero.

>>8985756
and yes it's just a tz ligature, dont care

AMB much?

>>8983358
chainlink has the best logo

>>8985805
this is actually disgusting

>>8983358
I agree that Dragonchain's logo sucks. It looks like something from a free mobile game.

>>8985805
Amb has one of the coolest logos, I bought at one point based on that only lol.

>>8985805
It has a cool dystopian feel to it. We're watching you.

antshares rebrand into neo gave me a fresh perspective..
a nice way for seemingly shitcoins to stay under the radar for a while.
tons of pretty decent projects will boom if they decide to rebrand....
fucking sucks waiting for them to do it though

>>8985043
that's just an NES controller

Too many of them are trying to do the same thing.
Factom, Civic, Vertcoin and Upfiring are pretty sick. Dragonchain is actually good OP. The new Lisk is pretty slick but I like the old one better, it has a cheesyness to it that makes it feel like geeky tech ala Linux penguin

Pic related is the best project with the worst marketing/logo. They said rebrand in Q2 though

Also I like Ethereum because its basically Zendikar

>>8983358
oh boy aeternity, that will hit so great with mainnet release <3
> rare coin on biz

OMG is God tier