/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8948075
Qubic will change de world xD

>>8948174
I'm curious as to what the actual release of Q will be, but if it's what I think it is, it could be very interesting.

>>8948075
will it finally be a working wallet?

or maybe a working system that doesn't lock up or loose tokens all the time?


that would be nice.

>>8948219
The wallet works just fine anon. Has been for a very long time. It just wasn't made for idiots.
Don't worry the next wallet will be idiot proof.

I think you meant to say lose ;). And I don't believe they ever lost any.

https://www.iota.org/the-foundation/team

Who has a better team in crypto?

>>8948075
iota isn't decentralized
iota is a theory they can't seem to make work
many other IOT coins
partnerships are overblown
i've done a lot of research on this coin. its trash

>>8948509
show me that research

>>8948509
Outdated FUD anon.
It's partly decentralized, and WHEN the coordinator is removed it will not only be faster due to more users, it'll be completely decentralized.
IOTA works fine, actually it works VERY WELL.
Other IOT coins that have how many partnerships? Oh none. Ok.
Their partnerships are not overblown at all.
Roger Bosch VC buy tokens, VW buying in.
Taipei city testing it for smart city.
Doesn't sound overblown to me anon.

>>8948571
the Devs cocks will get overblown when the make us all dirty rich

>>8948626
You know I really fucking hope so. I don't have a lot of faith in the crypto space besides IOTA XLM and XMR, but the majority of holdings are in IOTA due to the high probability of it making me filthy fucking rich

>>8948571
The only gripe I got with IOTA atm is the confirmation rate. It should be damn near 100% before we can say that IOTA works "very well" in capital letters.
https://tanglemonitor.com/ 27% recently...
You can chose to resend the transaction, but that's really tedious, and it makes the act of making a transaction feel like a lottery.

>>8948075
sorry anon you already missed the pump last summer nobody cares about this worthless memecoin anymore. maybe they should rebrand it as lazercoin or something to attract a new round of gullible retards.

>>8948694
Fair enough, honestly I kind of agree.
https://blog.iota.org/confirmation-rates-in-the-tangle-186ef02878bb

From my understanding the new trinity wallet will do a lot of this automatically though.

>>8948708
keep buying your stinky linkys little guy
memecoin lmao

>>8948075
>devs don't understand crypto and introduce bugs that let people steal funds
>devs get caught lying about fake partnerships
>devs threaten to sue anyone who calls them out
Really makes you think.

>>8948772
There has never been a bug that let users steal funds from other users.
They never got caught lying about fake partnerships.
That is a legitimate move in any business.

Nice try though.

>>8948772
>believes all of the FUD he reads on shitty crypto "news" sites
sure makes me think

>>8948772
>>8948789

>>8948694
I'm curious anon, how much have you tried to use the network?
like have you really had issues with confirmations?
I personally haven't, just wondering.

>>8948571
You can't be partly decentralized, you realize that right?

IOTA is a meme coin

>>8948893
>20 post thread
>10 posts by this ID

>>8948893
you got the latest wallet? I'll send you some dust so you can see for yourself if you want. Sometimes it works really well, but too often you have to reattach the transaction. According to tangle monitor confirmation rate is 27% and you usually wait for 10min before you resend the transaction, as your transaction needs some depth in the tangle before it's even considered by any node that the transaction is legitimate.

>>8948789
>>8948805
>>8948820
>There has never been a bug that let users steal funds from other users.
https://medium.com/@neha/cryptographic-vulnerabilities-in-iota-9a6a9ddc4367
>They never got caught lying about fake partnerships.
https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2017/12/12/iota-partnership-microsoft-marketplace
>That is a legitimate move in any business.
https://www.newsbtc.com/2018/02/26/ethereum-founder-iota/

Lol, nice coin you've got there.

>>8948924
Because an OP that wants to have a discussion is a problem? Ok.

>>8948957
Yeah, it's all good you don't need to send me anything. Was more just wondering if you actually had issues yourself.
Thanks though.

>>8948960
As soon as all the legit FUD surrounding this Theranos 2.0 of a token is brought up you don't want to discuss it anymore. Also, you have been here keeping this shitty thread alive for 2 hours. 1) you are getting paid to do this 2) how heavy are your bags faggot?
>inb4 I bought my bags at 25 cents newfag! 1 trillion market cap or 0 baby! XD

>>8948914
Is Bitcoin decentralized? Or does consist of a small number of mining pools?
IOTA will first distribute more coordinator nodes to spread the power and later once the network is large enough turn them to make for true decentralization.

>>8949046
Neither actually. Just wanted to see what biz actually thought about IOTA. It was pretty much what I anticipated.
Where was there "legit FUD" again?

>>8948960
Why do you bother talking about IOTA on /biz/ out of all places, here are only three kind of people, pajeet scammers, gullible idiots falling for pajeet scammers, and people posting wojaks while laughing and the idiots.

If IOTA Foundation keeps its shit together, it will make blockchain obsolete, do you think they will just give up their golden goose without trying to fud IOTA to death? Just dont bother, accumulate more if you trust it. Everyone that cares about the technology behind crypto invest some time reading about who is best suited for it, and they will find their way themself to IOTA. Fuck the rest, let them fomo.

>>8949071
see >>8948959
>>8948509
>>8948694

Also some FUD of my own about the significance of their "partnerships"

>>8949149
exactly my thoughts

Bosch, VW, Fujitsu, Deutsche Telekom and many more. Yeah, IOTA will be huge.

>>8949164
see >>8948789

>>8949149
You're right anon. And they will FOMO eventually