/biz/ - Business & Finance

https://streamable.com/zc17k

Fat if true

ChainLink is a scam

>>8826982
This.

Can't believe anyone is actually invested in this scam

>>8826873
Can we just make this the general?

Btw, most excited about the github activity.

>>8826994

dis. sell me your bags

>>8826982
there wont be a need when APIs can cryptographically sign their own data

>>8827057

Why don't APIs do this right now

>>8826873
>almost q2
>still trying to shill a shitcoin

>>8827077
They do, chainlink is just trying to take the credit and scam people while jumping on the crypto hype
You will see

>>8827057
Don't tell them retard

>>8826873
I have 100k
Will I win at life or kms?

>>8827171
If you actually had 100k you'd be set. Even when this "only" hits $10 you'll be a literal millionaire.

>>8827171
>no debt
>about to finish math degree
>about to get my commission as a 2LT in the Army
>about to publish research
>tfw have 77k linkies and I'm only 20
>just found a qt3.14 gf

there's nothing comfier than my life rn

>>8827223
$10 ... is ... is that possible anon?

I AM WEALTHY
I AM FINANCIALLY FREE

EVERY LINK TOKEN IN MY POSSESION IS WORTH 1,200 USD
EVERY LINK TOKEN IN MY POSSESION IS WORTG 1,200 USD
EVERY LINK TOKEN IN MU POSSESION IS WORTH 1,200 USD

I AM WEALTHY
I AM FINANCIALLY FREE

>>8827096

shill me some non shitcoins then please

>>8826909
>https://streamable.com/zc17k

Erection Material

$0.8 EOY screen cap this

>>8826982
ur mom is a scam

>>8827264
Envious bro. I'm very close to asking a recruiter if I can get a commission with my 5 year old degree. The military sounds neet as all hell. What branch did you go into? What career path?

>>8827057
>he thinks not knowing if the data came from the API provider is the problem of decentralized data feeds for a smart contract

as if this wasn't dumb enough

>he thinks data from APIs isn't signed right now

>>8826909
I love this. Totally deluded.

Theres no way life can play out this easily. It just doesn't seem real..

I have fucking 70k LINK at 22, have enough from crypto to keep it at this level and travel for the next 2 years while it takes off. All my friends think I'm fucking insane?

>>8826873
all of them. LINK is doing big fucking this q2-q3. screen cap this. if only you guys knew.

>>8827100
>scam
LOL. presenting your product's POC at fucking SIBOS 2017 is a scam right? AHAHAHAHA

>20yo
>64k link
>live in russia

>>8827453
they wont think you're insane when you pull out of the lot with your Bugatti soon.

>>8827077
they are?
https://blockoneiq.thomsonreuters.com/

When unfakeable cryptography makes a complex and expensive system based on voting what is true obsolete.

>>8827409
Well I haven't commissioned yet, but my top choices are cyber, engineer and infantry. It's a good life, man. Hard but good

>>8827264
I'm going to give you some solid advice man. I'm a 1LT wrapping up my XO time, head to the Career Course in another 6 months.

DITCH THE BITCH and do not under any circumstance get married (EVER) or tell her about the crypto. I've had way to many of my male buddies destroyed.

Keep yourself debt free. Props on that btw.

>>8827409
I though the same thing, ROTC commissioning source. And let me tell you, unless your Infantry or in ARSOF (SF not Civil Affairs or PSYOPs). It's feminized, fucking lame, full of paperwork and affirmative action hires, and isn't getting better.

>>8827505
Read this and stfu about BlockOneIQ
>>8818523

>>8827544
Noted, and I feel the same way. I'm just keeping her around right now so I can have something to poke on and some arm candy at our military ball next month. She'll be great for that.

What branch are you? Also how many /biz/ bros are in the military. wtf man

>>8827171

Anon.

Let's be clear.

Every single coin is going up in the next bull run. Even trash shit like DOGE and TRX.

If LINK is a meme you'll get rich. If LINK isn't a meme you'll get even richer.

>>8827278
You bought 100k. Why are you in here pretending like you haven’t seen the memes?

>>8827366
XVG
Vechain
XLM
FUN

>>8826909
fucking amazing

>>8827610
You know de wei!

I went Chemical Corp. Love the science and the history, and not gonna lie my boy Gordon Freeman from Half-Life said it was a good time. Plus the jobs when I bounce are promising. And there's more than you might think. It's funny but once we realized how anti-male and bureaucraticly incompetent the Army is, we all started search for another way to make it. Myself and most of the guys in my commissioning class caught the BTC, ETH, and NEO waves.

>>8827057
>cryptographically signing data means the data is usable on the blockchain
HUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

35k link will I make it

>>8827926
also centralized oracles = 2points of failure, data source + oracle
decentralized oracles = 1 point of failure, data source only

>muh private blakchein
>hurr no tokens much professional durrr

you know the fudders are desperate when they're shilling something they can't even benfit from just to reassure themselves they are right being dirty no-linkers

>>8828011

>>8828011
if the centralized oracle is the datasource, oralce and notary all in one (like blockone) it still is one point of failure. The servers either work or don't.

With decentralized oracles it is 2 the datasource itself and the few nodes retriving the data at the same time and voting what is true.

>>8828011
Right. as long as you have a temper proof middleware makes the end to end data sources a lot more secure is what sergey said.

>>8827453
Literally same except 24yrs old 35k link some other boring shit. I really am having a hard time convincing myself I'll make it. Thing is I really do believe in link and it seems that if link is successful we'd actually have something that is worth serious value. It would definitely make ETH more valueable/usable. It's just really hard to imagine right now feel like I'm tricking myself because I'm so convinced.

>>8828197
i said the same about eth. i said the same about Antshares, just trust the tech man. its gonna happen.

they are speaking about datawallet u moron

>>8828096
Chainlink is not responsible for data sources, 2 or more interested parties either trust eachother or they don't, the missing link is an always-reliable mailman (chainlink) to transport that data safely, on time.
Centrlized oracles can fail not only from their own fault but also from the outside bad actors. Being an API provider and an oracle all in one doesn't change the fact that it's still a 2 step process, they need to have/store the data(1) and transport it(2)

If it was that simple smart contracts alrady would be widely used
another thing is no centrlized oracle will offer insurance for high-value smart contracts
>we are good and safe but won't guarantee anything, sorry sir!

>>8828119
yea, they think Sergey is a brainlet who started this project out of boredom or something.
Now everyone says it
>won't work
>won't be needed
etc, but eoy or next year those same people will be here riding all the buzzwords hype like API economy, smart contracts, decentralized oracles etc

Those are the people who only buy shit once everyone and their mothers already know about it

>>8828251

>>8827453
How do you fuckers have more LINK than me all of a sudden?
In other threads people be having 500-9k LINKies.
I was feeling good with my 36k.

>>8828286
some people are consolidating their portfolios in this bear market, realizing some shitcoins might actually die in this market. LINK is promising enough to be a solid part of everyones portfolio imo.

>>8828286
because i hustled every day in highschool... put 6k in the market last june and then got into some really good icos (+antshares)

I know chainlink is the answer it just cant be this easy

>>8828286
>come out to the street, we'll get together, have a few shits.

>>8827479
Thats what this cunt has spent the 32 million on, he bought his way into all these festival confrences and is preparing for the biggest cypto scam of all time!

>>8828286
Well, less than 2000 wallets have more than 15k link, about half of those wallets are from 4chan.

When I think "it just seems too easy", I remember that, that just 2000 people will become millionaires because of it, and the world won't even blink at this amount of people.

>>8828359
you cant buy a seat next to Tom Gonser at SXSW you fucking idiot

>>8828265
If I consolidated a bunch of your failures into one image, you'd look like a pretty massive failure of a human being too. Not that I give a shit about Oraclize whatever the fuck it is, just pointing out the obvious bias and self-affirmation here.

>>8828378
id say 5k wallets have more than 15k, i have 50k link but i keep it on binance im sure many others do too, and you also have to account for people that spread out their LINKs throughout several ethereum addresses

>>8828378
>>8828329
Yeah this shit is pretty surreal.
Guess we'll never know until it actually happens.

>>8828251
>, they need to have/store the data(1) and transport it(2)
yeah that awesome plan falls about when you realize that it is not a 2 step solution, since the transport part is the same as a LINK node asking the data source for the data. So if the datasource can not communicate or transport the data then the link nodes can not retrieve it. These steps also always come in the LINK model.

>If it was that simple smart contracts alrady would be widely used
blockone is still in beta and oraclize is too small (also a third party and not a one in all solution like blockone). Not sure where the MS oracle is now.
We still do not know if smart contracts will ever experience mainstream adoption and albeit technically feaisible rn there is no hype to do so at the moment. Also Ehter is not able to scale for the requirements of smart contracts so it is no surprise that no one is using them.

>>8828379
everyone has a price
toms was 32 million
fucking retard

>>8828426

Cryptocurrency is dead. No one wants blockchain tokens.

>>8828408
You're missing the point of that image entirely.
ALL of those issues in that image are non-existent with LINK. Entirely non-existent. That's the point, not to just "smear the competition" like a brat.
You dumbass

Sergey truly is the next Vitalik. Can't you people see that? The difference between us LINKstas and you noLINK foo's is that you jus' don't got the VISION. We do.

>>8828010
Yes

>>8828408
nice salt you got there

>>8828425
but like I said CL is not about solving the data source problem, also in many cases there will be multiple sources for 1 type of data.
Another thing is that some smart contracts will be more complex than just send x from A to B, meaning it will involve more than 2 parties and they would rather use an independent solution than be forced to trust one of the sides of the deal (by trust I mean trust that it's tamperproof to outside parties not that one bank will decide to fuck over another)

You can believe that every API provider will be an oracle as well, but that's like saying that grocery stores will start producing the food they sell), and even then there is still the need for a smart oracle with a consensus mechanism that can feed data to a complex smart contract

>>8828531
No, you're missing the point of my comment. I know what the image means. My point is that it's disingenuous to sum up all of the negatives/problems/failures into one image and pretend like it paints an unbiased picture of the topic at hand. LINK is not without fault, and I'm sure there's more than one or two images that shit all over LINK as well. The point is to do your own research beyond looking at some dumb image that only focuses on the shortcomings of a project.

chainlink is a sexy coin

>>8828583
I’d say maybe 3% of Link holders here see any vision. 97% have bought because of biz hype and therefore make new threads hourly trying to confirm whether or not they’ve made a dumb decision by finding whoever has the best response. Smart investing.

>>8828646
>my comment
Go back to plebbit please

>>8828660
Nah, if you don't understand and believe in LINK the FUD would have made you sold. It was some intense FUD desu.

>>8828646
>My point is that it's disingenuous to sum up all of the negatives/problems/failures into one image and pretend like it paints an unbiased picture of the topic at hand.
You're wrong. Literally the only thing Oraclize is being used for is e-gambling. Precisely because of the issues presented in the image.
Pointing out shortcomings in an easy to digest format is not disingenuous. That's something a loser would say.

>LINK is not without fault, and I'm sure there's more than one or two images that shit all over LINK as well.
There aren't.

>>8827531

12A here. Keep in mind EN is either super high speed Sapper guys, or extremely autistic actual civil engineers with zero social skills at all.

>>8828629
>You can believe that every API provider will be an oracle as well, but that's like saying that grocery stores will start producing the food they sell)

Good metaphor because probably data providers will find it economically advantageous to supply an oracle node with their API, and that would be analogous to a grocery store offering their store brand product. Of course there are products from all sorts of suppliers in the store in addition, just as many third party nodes would attach to the API. Data providers trying to monopolize their own API could be a problem though, as there's nothing stopping the provider from closing down their API to third party use

Chainlink 100k EOY Kek willing!

>>8828675
Your inferiority complex is showing.

>>8828709
Literally the only thing LINK is being used for is memes and shilling.

>>8828836
LINK is not released yet, retard.
Just stop posting. It's clear you're getting super emotional here.

nah salesforce's ceo isnt talking about chainlink meme,

look Datawallet, he fucking invested to it.
yes you heard it right. Marc Benioff, salesforce's ceo, has invested to Datawallet.

and rn it has only 11m marketcap

>>8828629
>but like I said CL is not about solving the data source problem,
I agree with your. In my example it was just advantageous that datasource, notary and node are all in one due to less points of failure.

>be multiple sources for 1 type of data

this is 100% feasible with centralized oracles. The smart contract can average, accumulate all the (lets say 3 answers) it got from 3 centralized oracles and decide what to do with it.

>Another thing is that some smart contracts >will be more complex than just send x from A >to B, meaning it will involve more than 2 >parties and they would rather use an >independent solution than be forced to trust >one of the sides of the deal (by trust I mean >trust that it's tamperproof to outside parties >not that one bank will decide to fuck over >another)

Both parties have to decide in advance what kind of data sources are acceptable(if they are all in one solution) or have to decide the data source+notary (if the datasource can not sign its data). In the CL model you also have to decide which nodes are acceptable (and thereby you also chose the acceptable datasource). Literally the same except centralization is more secure (cryptography vs voting) and cheaper.

It is the same as centralized visa vs decentralized bitcoin. Or centralized cdn vs torrent. Centralied is better unless you have to avoid it at all cost.

>You can believe that every API provider will >be an oracle as well, but that's like saying that >grocery stores will start producing the food >they sell),

I do not think that every source will also be an oracle but how much "diverse" data do you need. I mean all fincancial data will be covered by few weather data and sports data+political data by others. The meme of
CL will use IOT/gps/supply chain is bs and we all know it. Bank accounts (swift) are centralized anyways.

>>8826909
I want to believe so badly

>>8828880
I don't give a fuck about Oraclize or LINK, I'm just trying to help you retards not get tunnel visioned into losing your entire savings. Carry on with your echo-chamber LINK shills.

>>8828913
The only thing you're trying to help is your own crumbling ego. I'll say it again: stop posting.

>>8828913
same. Oracles are awesome and prob the next big thing but hard to capitalize on them unless you invent some contrived mechanism for the sole reason that data sources can not sign their data somehow ever.

>>8828934
My ego on an anonymous board on the internet. You're a fragile person if you think ego plays a role here. Sorry if I've upset the delicate balance in your chamber of shilling, I'll stop posting so you can get back to feeling good about your over-investing in a speculative asset that could crash overnight.

>>8828759
>nothing stopping the provider from closing down their API to third party use
PSD2

>>8828993
You're starting to sound super mad now. Just had to get the last post in, didn't you?
Shoo shoo, child

Reminder that we will make it, there's a FUCKTON of millionaires in America, we'd be just another drop in the bucket

https://dqydj.com/how-many-millionaires-decamillionaires-america/

>>8829035
Projection is a hell of a drug. And yes, I have to get the last post in. How else will I get my chuckles on this board if it's not laughing at deluded linkies.

>>8828897
>Bank accounts (swift) are centralized anyways.

y-yea y-youre right senpai, sergey presented at SIBOS for two years then decided to put it all on hold while he developed a meme oracle network that SWIFT and every other corporation was in no way interested in and is completely useless and now continues to lie about it rather than just working on the product SWIFT was actually interested in. What a a s-silly g-guy am I-i right g-guys. *giggles neverously and tugs on fringe*

*tickles your tummy and gently strokes your penis*

you're such a smart boyo, come here and give daddy a ball rub

>>8829035
shut the fuck up you sound like such a fucking faggot, this other guy would destroy you irl.

>>8828836
>inferiority complex
I have a superiority complex you fucking fag

>>8829130
That would be too easy. I think you actually have an inferiority complex, so you LARP online pretending to have a superiority complex because it's easier than coming to terms with your feelings of inferiority and impotence. But hey, what do I know. Things will get better anon.

>>8829221
>7 posts by this ID
>every single one stinks more and more of self satisfied smugness as they go
Go sniff your own farts elsewhere
>>>/r/eddit

>>8826982
What the fuck did you just fucking say about ChainLink, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my crypto economics class, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret pump and dumps on BitBean, and I have over 300% confirmed gains. I am trained in gorilla fudding and I’m the top Link bagholder on etherscan. You are nothing to ChainLink but just another shitcoin. I will wipe your tokens the fuck out with losses the likes of which has never been seen before in these markets, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit about Linkies over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of Pajeets and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, no-linker. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your wallet. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can hack your private keys in over seven hundred ways. Not only am I extensively trained in memetics, but I have access to the entire hashpower of the blockchain and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little street shitter. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn brainlet. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

>>8829221
>is not souprirty complix
>is infeeryorty cumplekz
>am power

>>8828897
>this is 100% feasible with centralized oracles. The smart contract can average, accumulate all the (lets say 3 answers) it got from 3 centralized oracles and decide what to do with it.
yea, searching and paying 3 different oracles, and even if this process would get automated in the future in what direction is it going ironically? it would be some quasi decentralized oracle, so maybe decentralized oracles are not that bad at the end of the day?

>Both parties have to decide in advance what kind of data sources are acceptable(if they are all in one solution) or have to decide the data source+notary (if the datasource can not sign its data). In the CL model you also have to decide which nodes are acceptable (and thereby you also chose the acceptable datasource). Literally the same except centralization is more secure (cryptography vs voting) and cheaper.

for me it's obvious which option would be better, also CL will allow to automatically choose the best available nodes obviously, but you're entitled to your opinion of course

>The meme of CL will use IOT/gps/supply chain is bs and we all know it.

No I don't know it, but I actually do think that all the supply chain meme coins will die when there is an agnostic solution available

>but how much "diverse" data do you need.
apparently a lot, unless you think the CL team are brainlets wasting their time working at nights/weekends

>>8829221
you really want to "help us to save our" money" it seems

guys should i take a loss and dump my bags and buy more link or wait for the next bull run?

>>8829422
3 months ago buddy

>>8829035
>>8829096
>>8829105
you're all fags

link shills are next level pajeetery

>>8829448
so just wait it out for the next bull run?

I figure if i wait bull run happens or mainet comes out i lose. I dump my bags now take a loss and maybe profit if link works the way it is supposed to

>>8828286
You haven't been accumulating anon?

bought 5k link at 1.10 after AB post, however the optimism i gone, the conferences were for nought.There was no partnerships

SOON

>>8827171
youve already won. i fucking hate you faggots

>>8828329
The thing is it CAN be just that easy. I started when ETH was at a decent price, moved over most of that intoned ANS. Both were shilled here (albeit not as strongly) and there was fud for both, but they still turned out as great projects and went to prices most people wouldn’t have guessed. Now I believe the cosmos put us in the position to have money from those in order to go balls deep on the next big thing and we’re doing it with ChainLink. I unironically hold 104k at only around 40 percent of my portfolio. But I believe in the project and I know we’re gonna make it. God speed

>>8829578
I also bought LINK at $1 and I want to shoot myself every day

>>8828660
100% false. If you are not capable of seeing the vision and a world that is dominated by smart contracts you're not going to put 20k into it and sleep well. That would be fucking dumb, r-right?

>>8828224
NEO is a piece of shit though

>>8828993
sounds like a boomer

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-61

SEC are dropping hammers left and right. If we file enough complaints for Chainlink they will get investigated.
Do your duty, Anonymous. Save /biz/.

>>8826873

Do I buy into LINK now or wait longer?

>>8827295
>subtle misspellings to illustrate the veracity of typing out this comment by hand
nice

>>8830302
Mate do you want to be hunted down by a thousand autistic lunatics?

>>8828993
I pray you own link. if you are unironic and not a shitposter then you are likely to an hero in a big way once singularity happens.

>>8830321
Kys tripfag

>>8830321
kys tripfag

>>8828425
>We still do not know if smart contracts will ever experience mainstream adoption
Oh, WE know. You might not, but we do.

1000$ EOY

holy fuck this thread is so comfy. i love how all these news doesn't even move the price. The few, the proud, the LINK marines

>>8827264
who gives a shit about your army rank, its your linkmarine rank that matters

>3. Sergey/Chainlink is active online. Sergey is very philosophical. He is a deep thinker. He's been >thinking deeply about his new hires. @chainlink now follows accounts.
Unironically this is the most important facet of the project. This guy, making all these connections happen.

>>8830932

11k Linklet checking in - goal is 15k. Please kek don't let it moon too hard, i need to accumulate

>>8828646
>and I'm sure there's more than one or two images that shit all over LINK as well.
the weird thing is, there isnt. it's like there really isnt anything wrong with the LINK project.

>>8830321
kys tripfag

>>8831104
I am at 11k too anon. Do we have enough to make it? I feel like everyone has 100k plus.

>>8831104
>>8831285
>tfw only enough for 1k
I won't make it but I might be able to get enough to be in the running for the next moon meme

>>8828410
Friendly reminder that during the singularity you might not be able to withdraw your linkies from exchanges that use IOUs (e.g. binance)...shit will be chaotic, chinks in the binance offices might be foaming at the mouth to get their hands on the cold storage once the hot wallet is drained

>>8831347
why are you saying that?

>>8831285
my god I hope so. Been seeing "20k to make it" thrown around. Don't know if we have enough time to build our stacks that high though.

>>8831455
1k is enough to make it. 350B market cap is nothing.

Is there still time to accumulate lads? I just want another 1k.

>>8831315
Link is unironically the last moonshot

>>8831285
Yes, EVERYONE has 100k Chainlink tokens except you.

>>8826873
Those hiring criteria are backwards and why link will fail.

>>8829468
just hold and accumulate, accumulate and hold. dont overthink this

>>8831630
If they were actually hiring people I might agree with you.

>>8832081
well he did hire one of ethereum's core devs didnt he?

>>8832052
im a broke dick. I cant afford to sink more money

>>8832102
Not as a longterm employee, as far as I know.

>>8832117
>
me too, so we just hold now.

>>8832137
They dont have to, Rory said that they are hiring devs for specific tasks, when there is no need for them to keep them around for more than necessary.

>>8832137
I suppose. He was contracted to do a job and he did it. I guess there's no point to hiring a dev full-time if you don't need him.

>>8832162
Try reading the thread. I was responding to the FUD that Link would fail because they're "hiring" people that share their "values", not people with strong skills.

>>8831315
You'll make it.

Guys are we all going to be rich? This all seems too good to be true.

What if the LARPers and shillers were just PnD'ers profiting off of our autistic LINK obsession? What if oracles really aren't as important of a component of the future as other meme buzzwords, like interoperability and DEX's or whatever? Am I an idiot for being all in? I have so many worries

5k checking in getting to 10k+

>>8832213
- LINK has a proper, active github
- sergay attends real, technical conferences
- the project has a roadmap that the team are sticking to and hitting their targets
- actual partnerships confirmed; other "non-confirmed" partnrships we all know are real

now compare that to another shitcoin, and there's your answer

If Link does well, I'll be rich. However, I haven't over-invested and I'll be totally fine if I lose everything I've invested in crypto. What's wrong with those of you that this isn't true for?

>>8832213
The dude that committed to their github today is one of the core Ethereum devs, was hired by Sergey and seemed happy to promote them.

>>8832213
If you feel this way you need to research more. And no, /biz/ is not research.

>>8832282
and i shoudl add that the team are super -professional - they actually fud their project to keep their partners happy. LINK is the real deal...

>>8832282
>actual partnerships
i haven't seen anything confirmed

>>8832284
This, chainlink is 70% of my cryptofolio, ive got money in the bank and bonuses coming. I also have a 401k unlike you dumb neets.

Be a well rounded investor please. It will save you so much frustration. Read secrets of the millionaire mind by harv eker

>>8832381
Pink id, do i all in? wat say u kek

>>8832282
who /oldfag/ here and remembers when LINKs github was private and all we had was this old repo with 6 months of inactivity
now we have one of the most active repos in all of crypto. damn. how time changes.

>>8832465
>>tfw 6 months is enough to qualify as an oldfag

>>8832734
>tfw 6 months is enough to qualify as an oldfag
it kind of is in crypto; i remember someone complaining that a report released 5 days previously was "old news"

Sergey helped create bitcoin

we have the documents

>>8829027
yeah lmao, it's required by law

what a fag eh

>>8826873
3. Sergey is very philosophical.

Thought precedes reality.

>>8832381
I beg to differ...I threw 30k of all my money in a penny stock that mooned 20x. Got out with around 500k.

Spent 200k of it on bullshit like cars and a downpayment on a house.

I now have almost 300k of it in EOS, NEO, LINK, AND REQ

>>8832381
>chainlink is 70% of my cryptofolio
>Be a well rounded investor please
haha, oh

>>8830321
kys tripfag

>>8826873

The absolute shittiest meme scamcoin. KYS faggots.

>>8828010
im so gay for not buying more than 5k

I am so scared to buy more.

>>8828660
>>8828699
>>8829578
>>8829957
>>8830068
5k link here. bought at 3 different prices 50 cents and under. lowest 18 cents.

Fuck boys im just gonna keep it until it makes me half a million or crashes and burns.

Im thinking that we should all throw out our wardrobes and wear the same outfit as sergey every day. It would be so funny if it becomes a trend and 1 million people dress exactly like sergey by EOY

>>8830321
Buy it now. get 5k and hold until armageddon

>>8831039
He voted Trump but dont let that get out

>>8832213
Bra just read the whitepaper, the first part is easy and presents how useful and how needed a decentralized oracle would be.

>>8828629
Yes the API provider can provide oracles. I'll even take it a step further and say cryptocurrencies like ETH can have integrated oracles too. So why don't they all do it and laugh at middleware like the chainlink network?

Cost.

Companies like Google can afford oracles but for most companies it is cost effective to just buy the service from a third party. This is what Sergey understood. He knew this was a niche market with terrible or no competition and jumped in.

>>8836084
actually, integrated oracles or other extensions to the protocol layer is explicitly against the ethereum design philosophy. go read it.

>>8836197
anon i am 100% fucking sure he doesn't even know what that is. i am willing to bet my shitty 5k LINK he doesnt know eth design principles

>>8836197
My point still stands. ETH is just one crypto in a sea of them that I chose because it's one everyone is familiar with. Most of them have not bothered with integrated oracles due to cost or other priorities.

>>8832282
look at Vechain fag, its doing better than link

>>8832284
I'm an inveterate gambler. I need more than I can afford to lose staked on LINK otherwise I can't do it! Hence why I'm all in baby. Let's ride this fucking moonshot!

>>8836197
It's not an integrated oracle though so you are kind of dumb but trying to be smart, sorry about that lad

>>8832282
>>8832465
it really looks like this might actually happen

All-in, Just hit 3k lads, I’m so happy. 7k to go and then im *done*

Had a lot of personal financial setbacks this last year but it looks like it’s all over now, and I can finally start accumulating proper.

See you on the moon boys

btw, salesforce's Ceo has invested to Datawallet project

Insider here, you have until June to accumulate. Buy at any price-point below 30,000 SATS

>>8837374
Hell ya m8, same goal as you (10k). I’m almost halfway there and was at your spot not two weeks ago, I believe in you!!

>>8837379
hei vitun homo painu vittuun!

salesforce's ceo has invested to Datawallet, also it has

>fucking tiny only 11m marketcap

>40 mln soldout in ico 1 day, then token dropped -80% below ico because only on shit exchanges and bear market

why the fuck you wouldnt accumulate this hidden gem

>>8837447
Salesforce +chainlink was just a meme. Oh no

>>8837399
i have the same goal. i came up with this goal just a minute ago. i realised that its very cheap to get 10k linkies and it might be 10m one day so why the fuck not. i have 2.5k now. i might be even more adhd later and set up a new goal to get 20k.

>>8837469
i know, that Marc Benioff would just laugh at deluded linkies and would never invest cent to their shit or use their product

instead of chainlink garbage he is actually on Datawallet and will pump it to moon soon

>>8837488
i know that nobody gives a fuck about your discord shill group and your shitty wallet

>>8837506
u deluded link fanboy, do you realize that you guys are speculating about shitcoin "chainlink"&salesforce partnership instead of investing to token that has actually Salesforce's ceo backing it

>>8837519
im not i dont give a shit about salesforce. go back to your street

>>8837519
they don't speculate about partnership, but about the potential usecase. Datawallet and chainlink complement each other well as chainlink needs diverse API marketplace to be successful. It doesn't need partnerships other than maybe nodes running by some reputable organisations.

>>8837447
I'll buy some of this shit when I get paid. Hit me with a price prediction EOY

>>8837580
Please don't, it's Garbage, inb4 that other fag discord shill says "stay poor"

>>8837519
Holy shit, most obvious pajeet ever

>>8837399
I love the solidarity and comradeship amongst the linkies.
My brothers, we will all make it.
I love you all

>8836947

BIM fag was not larping but it's long hold for linklets

>>8837651
>>8836947

>>8837487
>>8837637
Love you all LINK marines. Full time college kid with two part time jobs here trying to get to 10k. Send me your blessings LINK marines, I know I’ll get to 10k.

>>8837519
u saying wat u son of basterd bich?

>>8837752
well, salesforce's Ceo has invested to Datawallet.
not chainlink, biatch

>>8837713
I hope you succeed man! the real world is scary

>>8837770