/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8721020
Kek

>>8721020
Based Skelly
nice OP, was about to make this thread

>crypto drama

Literal reddit tier faggotry - kindly get fucked

It's funny that the CAP theorem (basic computer science) implies that the ETH network cannot scale and stay consistent.
Would you call someone who knows this but doesn't inform investors a scammer?

Alpha as fuck

vitaliks belief that Craig isn't satoshi is as useful as Andresen's belief he is

>>8721079
>whines about reddit
>uses reddit spacing
You are the cancer killing /biz/

>>8721020
crypto boys never got picked for sports. CSW naturally sits high on social hierarchies and he reminds money-skeletons of their disappointed fathers. Vitty is acting out the way his mother never would let him.

>>8721091
Lol this is ancient fud. Go back to bitcointalk

>>8721099
>My belief that Joseph Smith didn't translate magic gold tablets is as useful as somebody who believes he did.

You should join a cult.

>>8721106
It's not fud, simply the truth. Eth can't handle 1 cryptokitties app. That's a fact.
And proposed solutions are still pie in the sky (pro-tip: eth can't scale, period).

>>8721092

Don't even joke about that. There's nothing alpha about Vitalik at all. I cringe everytime he speaks, and I admire the guy a lot.

There's only room for one Russian Alpha in the this space

>trusting an autistic pedo, made ETH but was in BTC before that
vs
>guy who doesn't care about shit and has many many degrees, made BTC and claims he's satoshi ONCE

try harder plz

>>8721117
they're both arguments from authority

atm there is no definitive proof craig is satoshi either way

there is some evidence in andresen's testimony for and against in the obscure way craig has gone about it

like how buterin be so sure that he's calling the cunt out with no evidence to the contrary

>>8721117
>CSW breaks open the Tulip Trust
>Before the BTC can confirm enroute to the exchange they are alreay worthless
>BCH flips
>BTC renamed to BCC...bitcoin-core by the first confirmation
>Everyone remember's Vit's tantrums
>ETC flips ETH
>ETH doesn't even get a new name

>>8721020
Vitalik is right though, this guy parades around as someone he's not and everyone is jumping hoops for the guy.

>>8721091
There's no consistency in decentralized crypto by design. This has nothing to do with scaling, don't use terms you don't understand.

in b4 sergey eats them both

>>8721105
>projecting your homoerotic fantasies and mommy issues onto other people
this is your average CSW nuthugger, everyone.

https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/981069924255739904
he sperged out

>>8721105
No it's the classic Linus-style anger for stupidity below his tolerance threshold. It's not a post that can be ignored, he literally had to sit there and listen to Craig's BS for several minutes.

>>8721157
Well I am Satoshi, prove me wrong.
You can't. That's why claiming you are should be proved.

>>8721157
No, dingus. Vitalik's argument is based on Information Theory, not authority.

Wright can prove he's Satoshi by sending a clear signal (signing from Satoshi's address), but instead chose a noisy, unverifiable method (showing his followers magic tablets). According to Information Theory, using a noisy method like that is indicative of deceit.

>>8721143
>Sergey nazarov
>S.N.
>Stoshi Nakamoto
>S.N.

>>8721163
>CSW wakes up with a Morning Wood

>>8721233
Solely the mere idea of Satoshi being alive and having it's private keys will cause panic.
Funny thing is he really is Satoshi and he's going to flip BCH over BTC anytime now.

>>8721262
Oh, I see. So he doesn't want people to know he's Satoshi because that would cause a panic. So instead he claims he's Satoshi because that makes sense in your retarded world.

>>8721233
Information Theory? What a fucking nerd.
How about this... what could CSW gain from blasting a signed message across the net? Nothing.

Not yet at least.

>>8721140
Nah, you’re fudding and you know it

>>8721233
how autistic are you to believe signal theory applies to this situation, its like modelling your grocery shopping with a nash equilibrium.

the logic of the situation is craig has not definitively proved he's satoshi (which signing the satoshis keys would not do) and there is nothing to say isn't

he's certainly a likely candidate and it's immediately obvious why he would want to maintain plausible deniability in the claim because satoshi will be the richest man alive this century

>>8721274
Yes, he doesn't want people to know he's Satoshi, that's why he backedits his blog posts from 2008 to mention cryptocurrency. Totally doesn't want to be seen as Satoshi.

>>8721274
There's a difference between moving 1,000,000 BTC and just claiming you have the keys to trustees (like Gavin). You're already in ad hominem arguments. The world is not as simple as you think. Think bigger.

>>8721238
On 18 August 2008, the domain name bitcoin.org was registered.[11] Later that year on 31 October, a link to a paper authored by Satoshi Nakamoto titled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System[12] was posted to a cryptography mailing list.[11] This paper detailed methods of using a peer-to-peer network to generate what was described as "a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust".[13][14][15] On 3 January 2009, the bitcoin network came into existence with Satoshi Nakamoto mining the genesis block of bitcoin (block number 0), which had a reward of 50 bitcoins.[13][16] Embedded in the coinbase of this block was the text:

The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.[17]

This note has been interpreted as both a timestamp of the genesis date and a derisive comment on the instability caused by fractional-reserve banking.[18]:18

The first open source bitcoin client was released on 9 January 2009.[19][20]

>>8721278
Shut the fuck up you nitwit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA what andresen thinks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU what vitalik thinks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0ttVAPKgTA listen to the 10th minute

>>8721285
Look at this image.

This is not the behavior of someone who "doesn't want to be seen as Satoshi"

>>8721278
Craig, please go back to your diploma mill.

>>8721283
If you were paying attention, I brought it up because somebody said Vitalik's argument was based on authority, which it is not. It's based on theory.

>>8721289
(1) he doesn't have to move anything; he could just sign a message from an address saying he's Wright: (2) ad hominem is when you attack a person INSTEAD of addressing his or her argument. If you address the argument, then attack the person, it doesn't qualify as ad hominem, dingus.

>>8721212
Fucking classic
Money skeleton spergout, bringing pink wojaks to your ETH portfolio.

at the end of the day he has a right to speak because of nChain

I believe there's a very good chance he is satoshi but I don't even know if it's possible to prove someone is satoshi or that it was one person

and there is not a single argument for keeping the blocksize at 1mb today and only economically retarded arguments for rbf

>>8721199
Checked and confirmed: Sergey will eat Vitalik and Craig sometime before the singularity.

>>8721345
>your retarded world
whatever man
to sign a message within the first block keys is equal to saying 1,000,000 are alive and therefore adding them to the circulating supply
and then BTC drops like a rock
he's satoshi and he's fighting every argument one after another

THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/981132424875728896

>>8721382
>I don't even know if it's possible to prove someone is satoshi

Sign with Satoshi's private key.

>>8721396
D'okay. Still waiting for that series of blog posts.

>>8721285
This image alone says enough about what the situation here is.

>>8721238
>The Chain
>Stevie Nicks
>S.N.
>Satoshi Nakamoto
>Sergey Nazarov

>>8721430
rotfl, absolutely pathetic
he's butthurt so bad

>>8721430
lol really?

>>8721430

>>8721430
fukken saved

>>8721212
>17. Roger finishes speech, one person claps. Roger says, "you can clap". ~25% (?) of the room claps.

>>8721442
all that does is prove that person has satoshis keys you brainlet

>>8721442
Signing a transaction only proves that the individual at one point in time had access to the private keys. The fact wright doesn't even have access to them kinda makes me think his involvement in the project was limited.. No way is he Satoshi.

He needs to provide sufficient hints be able to gather the community around him, but not enough to destroy the market with the threat of selling those masses of bitcoins amongst other things as well as putting his whole family in danger due to being immensely wealthy and ripe for a kidnapping.

>>8721103
>reddit spacing

>he doesn't even know what reddit spacing is
>calls out people for "reddit spacing"

You ledditors are easy to spot

>>8721542
he also explicitly stated that one of the initial contributors to bitcoin software stopped doing anything with the code because even while known under a pseudonym, he received death threats from core supporters later on.

>>8721285
I have a bottle of wine (a bottle of well aged Penfolds Cabernet Sauvignon (1995 vintage)

>i have a mixed vegetable lassangne with a rich capisum sauce and nutmeg bechmel

>>8721506
You should include Vitalik's tweets about Craig's presentation

>>8721506
So what the fuck can BCH do?

>>8721584
craig believes everything can be done on bch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW1maA09ECo&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJHGWgmZdkQlZA28fuGfNmA/videos

It at least proves Wright has access to Satoshi's keys, you chuckle fuck.

>>8721298
>Sergey D. Nazarov

Holy shit

>>8721649
>Suregay

>>8721506
But who would have Satoshi's key if not Satoshi?

And it would be more evidence for his own claim. Also, the only thing we can be sure is that anyone who DOESNT have Satoshi's key (which it seems very likely Craig doesnt), is not Satoshi.

>>8721345
Vitalik knows who Satoshi is you spunkbubble. Nick Szabo aka Satoshi Nakamoto helped him with the ETH whitepaper.

Why do you think the ETH denominations are called szabo, Finney and Wei named after the 3 people who wrote the bitcoin one, Hal Finney, wei dai and Satoshi/szabo

Numbnuts

>>8721145
>claims he's satoshi ONCE
Nice try faggot he claims this almost every day

so does vb know who satoshi is?

>>8721258
>CSW wakes up with a Morning Wood
Up his ass you mean

>>8721680
He claimed once, WE claim it every day.
We are all satoshi.

I am Satoshi. I will move my coin in two hours to prove it.

t. Satoshi

>>8721298
The domain has been held by several people and Sergey was not the first. Keep trying shillboy.

>>8721690
Yeah see here:
>>8721675

>>8721675
The fuck are you talking about? I also believe Szabo is Satoshi. I just agree with Vitalik that Wright is a fraud.

Smart contracts, priof or work, ... Those are all conceptd from the 90s. Markle trees (including block chains) are from the 70. Git also chains hashes. What Satoshi added was proof of work for concensus (and let's be honest, that idea doesn't even scale)

>>8721703
Uhh no, my dad is satoshi.

>>8721669
>But who would have Satoshi's key if not Satoshi?
it could be your mom, NSA, other contributors, a kidnapper, vitalik, sergey. Signing a satoshi key today does not mean you had it in 2009

>>8721715
Replies to the wrong person probably. There’s too much retardation in this thread at this point I’m just randomly stabbing my phone screen with anger

>>8721719
Back to work, son.

>>8721739
you mean wife's son

>>8721729
God you're fucking stupid. IF CRAIG SIGNS WITH "I'M CRAIG" IT AT LEAST SHOWS HE HAS THE KEYS!!!. HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU NOT GETTING THIS??!!1

>>8721729
Even so, as I said in my previous post,
>it would be more evidence for his own claim

Also, Vitalik already BTFO him long ago, only bcashers retards believe that guy is Satoshi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

the biggest chad in crypto

>>8721775
>>8721775
no shit I never disagreed with that. Signing the keys doesn't prove he's satoshi you autist, that's what we're arguing about

>>8721781
vitaliks signal theory idea is useless because it assumes craig wants to prove he has the keys. it's not hard to imagine why craig would want plausible deniability

>>8721020
Even vitalik cant believe he had the balls to say that. Look how fast he put on a smile and sat the fuck down lol. Funny what billions of dollars can do to a person. Btw im team vitalik all the way. Fuck that fake satoshi

>>8721903
>craig publishes a fake proof which is blasted

>why would he want to prove the claim he continually makes???

the utter state of your cognitive dissonance

>>8721020
>omg someone called him a fraud
Wow, wtf I hate large blocks now

>>8721951
I agree with you, I don't have a dog in this fight
I don't believe craig is satoshi, andresen's testimony definitely makes him a top contender for me

he hasn't been proven a fraud either though, why can't people understand the logic

>>8721976
I love these photos of Vitalik doing awkward poses while thinking about something abstract.
Vitalik is sigma as fuck. Not alpha but genuinely doesn't give a fuck and can be assertive when needed.

>>8721976
>someone
>maker of the second biggest evolution in crypto world, allowing for ICOs.

you fucking cuck GTFO biz shill

>>8722032
it's called being a child

>>8722024
>he hasn't been proven a fraud either though, why can't people understand the logic

it's literally impossible to prove he isn't satoshi without having someone else prove that they are
it's like trying to disprove the existence of god,
Not sure why your expecting anyone to do it or why you think anything that can't be disproven should be given the benefit of the doubt.

>>8721079
>thinks crpyto drama is faggotry
>hangs out on /biz/

>>8721298
>Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks

In this video (we've all seen):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nmLU284fIk

You can see Sergey gets pissed when he talks about companies stealing resources from tribal people. I understand a lot of players in the crypto space feel that way, but there's something about Sergey that seems freakishly similar to Satoshi. They both have detectable anger and cynicism about how the world works, and how people are treated. It's not just the sentiment, its expression is also uncanny.

I want to believe

>>8722024
>he hasn't been proven a fraud either though

>no one has proven unicorns are fake

You are asking for a proof that can't be made.

>>8722061
>>8722110

i think andresens testimony is enough to concede its not unlikely he is satoshi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU [Embed]

>>8722061
>it's literally impossible to prove he isn't satoshi without having someone else prove that they are

Actually not true, it's impossible either way, even if someone came out and said "Im satoshi, here are the private keys, e-mails, video recording of it, etc", you could still say that he stole private keys, forged the e-mails, etc., it's literally impossible to prove that someone isn't satoshi with 100% certainty, if you want to get technical.

>>8722119
Why should we trust that guys word? As vitalik said, if he chose this path of shaky proof, it's because he couldn't prove it the good way.

I realise now that you are trolling me or a literal brainlet, probably both.

>>8722119
>it's not unlikely
mate are you trying to be confusing
gavin was most likely tricked with a fake proof, probably similar to the one craig put as a blogpost.
The fact that he can't prove it publicly when it would be very easy to, and has to attempt to gain validity by (probably) spoofing it privately with people is why he is probably a fraud

>62 tweets
Wtf

>>8722102
You Link faggots are like the retarded cousin our mom makes us hang out with. Like go to another thread.

>>8722151
>>8722162
fuck me you people are so retarded

I literally believe this: Craig is definitely someone who could be satoshi, along with szabo, finney

even if craig signed a satoshi key I would not believe he is definitely satoshi.


you shouldn't trust gavin for no reason but you also can't assume he's wrong/lying for no reason.
>if he chose this path of shaky proof, it's because he couldn't prove it the good way.
there are more than one motivation for doing what he did so it's not proof he couldn't prove it >the good way

>>8722053
t. embryo brain

>>8722254
>I literally believe this: Craig is definitely someone who could be satoshi

But why? There have been lots of signals and studies that show that Nick Szabo and maybe Hal Finney is/are Satoshi, but close to none backing Craig's case, except his OWN claim, and everything that derived from it.

>>8722254
Fuck me you people are so retard
I literally believe unicorns could be real; everyone that says they aren't could be lying and I wohld not believe they are definitely telling the true

That one guy that sighted a unicorn, Gavin, you can't assume he's wrong/lying for no reason!!!!

REEEEEEEEEEEE

>>8721283
Haha. I like that you needed some big words to make your post sound smart but you only know formulas that have been in films

>>8722284
his context fits (online gambling, academia, autist)
andresen believes he's satoshi because he claims to have seen craig sign a satoshi key and says he fits the personality of the person he was dealing with in 2009

I don't know how you could disagree with: Craig is definitely someone who could be satoshi

>>8722332
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/911621111531663361

>>8721099

Wow, brainlet logic at work

>>8721430
>https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/981132424875728896
I refuse to believe this is real this is too incredible

>>8722332

Fits the personality? Andresen may mad have a few email exchanges with Satoshi but there are hundreds of posts and other emails from Satoshi, all public viewable. His "personality" is no secret. And it's _completely_ different from Craigs.

Andresen is a naive retard.

>>8722324
>>8722352
you're starting to sound like shills, maybe he is satoshi?

>>8722377
if you believe it's trivial that the person satoshi handed the btc github to says someone is satoshi then we should just agree to disagree

>>8722249
LINK $1000 EOY

So when Vitalik coming out as Satoshi? I mean we all know he is the guy at this point. There is nothing to hide anymore.

>>8722403
Huh? I'm just laughing at how dumb you are.
Your point was that what, vitalik is an autist?
Ok great point well observed.
clap clap clap.

>>8722504
>>8722418

>>8721020
>>8721212
I'm never buying eth again cause of this retard. I think he's butthurt the price cratered and that's why he's having a meltdown. All that "muh price doesn't matter just the tech, waaah lambo memes" shit was just virtue signaling. He's the archtypical communist cock sucker.

>>8721020
Followed by 60 tweeds saying "Core are retards, Roger is right".
I mean I agree with Vitalik on almost everything in the post chain

>>8721020
PUNISHED SATOSHI
A HERO DENIED HIS COIN

>>8721382

Do you really believe nChain didn't vet Craig before they hired him? How do you think they vetted him? He obviously showed a few higher-ups undeniable proof he's satoshi.

Hell I believe Craig is personally funding Nchain all by himself.

>>8721099
https://youtu.be/2qLI3VIHuKU

He's stated his reasons before

>>8722332
Aussies have never invented anything. His personality is completely off from the one on Bitcointalk forums and his posting times do not correspond to someone living anywhere in Australia during the day time. He can at least sign using Satoshi's key to make us take him seriously but he can't because he doesn't have it. Satoshi was probably Finney & Szabo. If anyone half way credible goes along with Craig's narrative it's either because they are naive or they know who Satoshi is and it's not Craig.

>>8723510
This. Aussies only do one thing, and that's shit up a conversation. Craiggles is a irl shitpost.

Craig is Satoshi and NO ONE has been able to prove otherwise so SHUT THE FUCK UP.

>>8723623
I am Saotshi.

Noone has been able to prove otherwise. So you must accept that I am Satoshi.

retard

>>8723634

The difference is that Craig has proved that he is Satoshi and you haven't.

>>8723510
>Aussies have never invented anything
Uhhh... what? We invented a fuckload more than you ameritards did. Grow a brain before you attempt to make an argument next time dumb cunt

>>8723648
he has not

>>8721285
It's all about this -- that's the smoking gun for his scammitude right there.

Oh also, here is his bad excuse why he edited the blog post:

https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6xkn24/bcc_bch_are_bitcoin_they_follow_the_whitepaper/dmjcyou/?context=3

>That was to throw Wired.

This is despite the fact that Wired was only interested in him in late 2015 and it turns out he had already modified his blog post in May 2015.

2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

>>8721145
only ivory tower academic faggots measure intelligence based on number of degrees
>what is specialization

>>8723648
>has proved that he is Satoshi
LOOL. Absolute state of cryptards.

>>8721430
kek

craig is getting ready to break the twig called vitalik and he knows it, more drama leading up to the takeover

>>8721839
the hero we deserve

nChain stands for Nakamoto so I think they know whats going on with Craig

debunk this

>>8721430
>https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/981132424875728896
Is that the best he could come up with? Holy butthurt guy.

>>8723648
When has he ever proved he is Satoshi?

>people still defending fake satoshi
The absolute fucking state of /biz/

>>8724198
>>8724138

See

>>8724239
>dude just trust gavin andresen
That is an appeal to authority you drooling retard.

The entire point of crypto is we don't have to to trust in central authorities for verification of such things.

Bcashies don't even understand this fundamental idea about crypto, top kek.

Just reading through Vitalik's thread now.
He fucking ROASTED Craig, way more than I expected.
Absolute bloodbath.

>>8723866
>Islam means "peace," therefore it is a religion of peace.

>>8721285
this nutter sounds like a narcissist. insufferable twat

I thought vitalik sounded desperate, weak attempt to throw down a cheap shot

>>8724338
Agreed, doesn't sound anything like Satoshi.

Joseph Poon is doing god's work

https://twitter.com/IamNomad/status/981152648094277632

>>8721020
There's no reasonable explanation why Btrash is over $1.

Dismissing something as a fallacy is also a fallacy fallacy fyi. Also appeal to authority doesn't really relate to something evidence based like this. It's like dismissing a witness testimony from someone who witnessed their friend being killed.

>>8724444
>>8724281

>>8723709
I don't know how anyone can ignore this.

>>8724444
Look retard. Even if if I thought Gavin Andresen was acting in good faith, how do I know that CSW didn't trick him?

You expect me to just take his word for it over some shady back-room key signing? No, that is not how crypto works my friend.

>>8724444
The utter state of (You)
Just go all in on bcash already and stop trying to delude others

>>8724478
Nobody's expecting you to do anything. It's just pointless for you to dismiss that evidence like that.

>>8724479
Because Cashies don't really have any response.

They claim he doesn't want to be Satoshi but all the signs point to a desperate man who wants to convince people he's Satoshi for whatever sad reason.

>>8724491
>>8724491
>some guy saying he saw CSW sign the genesis block so it must be true
It's not evidence retard, it's hearsay. I am going to dismiss it every time.

>>8724512
Nobody cares because all you've done now is insult people and stated your grand opinion.

>>8721143
>hello female jew

>>8724535
My friend is Satoshi. You have to take me seriously now or else.

>>8724535
I care, you stinky buttfucker.

>>8724555
You are anonymous and have no authority. You have no relation to him. Stop strawmaning.

>>8724444

>>8724573
Nobody in crypto has any authority retard, that's the point.

You are literally citing centralized authority as evidence in defense of someone frauding and pretending to be someone who abhorred centralized authority. Die you fucking faggot.

>>8724593
>in crypto
You've just doubled down on your straw man tactics. This is about people, not crypto. Ironic as you dismiss everything using fallacy fallacy, like a perpetual loop.

>>8724624
He is claiming to have control over the genesis coins, so it is about crypto

Him claiming to be Satoshi with no proof is about as valid as me claiming I'm Satoshi.

Die

>>8724624
nice slide. I've already forgot that this thread is about Vitalik BTFO Bcash hero Craig Wright

>>8724643
No it isn't, because you are anonymous and have no authority. You're acting like you'd have the same authority as someone's wife to call their husband a wife beater. Foolish.

>>8724668
>muh authority
You don't understand crypto.

>>8724649
Ironic, guess you love appeals to authority from based Vitalik but not from Gavin Andresen?

>>8724681
I'm genuinely curious, do you froth at the mouth when thinking about how judges use witness testimonies? Those damn fallacious bastards, I'll kill them all!

>>8724684
This again. Vitalik made an actual argument, dunce.

>>8724712
I'm curious, do you often believe anyone who claims to have control of a cryptographic asset without cryptographic proof?

>>8724756
Like? in OP he just called him a fraud for making mistakes or something inaudible

>>8724767
Tripling down on your strawman tactics now.

>>8724789
>implying he's not a fraud
Are you braindead or trolling?

>>8724802
>t-troll!
Doesn't matter either way if I really make you think

Vitalik and his skelly crew lmao

>>8724789
So you believe people who claim to have control of a cryptographic asset without cryptographic proof.

This isn't a strawman, this is genuinely what you believe. You believe that CSW has control over a cryptographic asset in absence of cryptographic proof.

>>8724941
That's a great point friend, but it's unrelated to any of the points actually made before. You are dismissing Gavin's testimony just because fallacy.

>>8724982
>You are dismissing Gavin's testimony just because fallacy.
I have no reason to trust Gavin's testimony. Why should I?

>>8721283
>claims he's Satoshi
>wants plausibile deniability to being Satoshi
Craig supporters are amazing.

lmfao based alien skell

>>8725003
Because he has strong relations to Satoshi objectively, and therefore has authority. Why should you trust a wife's testimony on knowing where her husband is, over a random on the street? Authority is useful.

>>8725063
>therefore has authority.
Appeal to authority. Thanks for playing.

>>8722377
>Andresen is a naive retard.
He's not and Craig isn't Satoshi. There's three realistic theories as to why he'd go along with it anyways.
1.He does it because he thinks it will help bitcoin cash.
2.He does it because he likes the fact that it essentially makes Craig a fall guy for the real Satoshi.

>>8725080
There are a million examples on why dismissing something as a fallacy is wrong, its rude for you to just avoid my question like that.
>Why should you trust a wife's testimony on knowing where her husband is, over a random on the street?
How does that not make it obvious that appeals to authority are sometimes useful?

>>8725115
Why should I trust arbitrary human authority over public key cryptography?

>>8725127
You avoided the question yet again.INobody said anything about trusting testimonies "over" (nice strawman again) pgp

Better quality video
https://twitter.com/IamNomad/status/981151257564938240

>>8725152
I have no reason to trust Gavin Andresen. Why should I? I have no idea what his personal motivations are; I've never met the guy. But you assert I should just take his word for it. Why?

>there are people that care more about who Satoshi is than implementing his vision into the world
the absolute state

>>8721230
He proved it by signing a message with Satoshi’s private keys. People who doubt it are morons, this guy really is Satoshi

>>8721020
>Cash is going to scale and do everything ETH does
>Vitalik realizes this and gets defensive

Really made me think

you're not gonna see a public proof involving moving of early coins or signing of blocks (revealing the holder of the satoshi key publicly) Either would be a violation of the legal trust terms.

>>8725181
your fire control is cringeworthy

>>8725191
Those keys were faked.

Kek also "why is x allowed to speak". Reminder that Ethereum intends to censor users and Cash doesn't.

>>8721020
still a pedo booster

>>8721020
Has this faggot ever presented actual proof that he is satoshi? Why does anyone believe him just because he says he is?

>>8725271
>spend years building a globally used system from scratch
>put in the same category as a random fraudster
might as well let elvis impersonators speak at the conference too

Who the fuck is vitalik to decide who speaks at a conference. Craig has been chosen to take the position as head spokesperson of bitcoin as it takes over, deal with it or make exit plans

>>8725657
>Has this faggot ever presented actual proof that he is satoshi?
No.

>Why does anyone believe him just because he says he is?
Nobody really does.

>>8725697
>might as well let elvis impersonators speak

Yeah that's what I said.

>>8721020
Vitalik makes a pyramid scheme that pumps out more pyramid schemes that gets hacked every other day. That contributes to proof of weak minded nigger spam on this board. Creates a charity to get our of paying some taxes giving money to Ebola niggers. Attacks some idiot because he is the lowest hanging fruit to virtue signal. Guys a hero in the eyes of leddit.

>>8725961
you couldn't fit more memes in a post if you tried

congrats on being cancer

>>8726067
Thanks leddit. Up voted

>>8721212

>>8726086
kys

>>8726336
If I was your money then this would probably indeed be the case. You honestly can't actually be this stupid as to see what is going on here with these retards or crypto in general.

>>8726283
>pizza should be legal
Well then the jews will be pumping eth this summer I see

>>8726283
L E L nice edit fag

>>8726353
nobody cares what some faggot meme-spouter thinks

i didnt read your post

Aahahaah samson btfo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajaK1iXPkg0

>>8726415
>nobody cares

Responds, bit ironic. eh

>>8721143
Am I gay if I like Sergey's eyes?
I really like them a lot.

>there are people who think Craig Wright isn't a fraud
>there are STILL people who doubt money skelly
I'm so happy there are people out there who are so easily exploited by their stupidity. You're really making my life easier, thanks!

>>8726441
didnt read faggot

>>8721719
thats funny because *stands up from the crowd* I am satoshi

>>8726570
Agreed. Vitalik is an autistich commie pedo but at least he has done things. Craig wright has done nothing except pretend to be someone famous.

they're both equally dumb tho

>>8721020
>https://twitter.com/yuzushioh/status/981103761702641664/video/1

Longer video. Different angle
https://twitter.com/IamNomad/status/981151257564938240

>>8724138
You know that he didn't actually do that, don't you? Gavin made an assumption that what he was being shown was real and didn't actually check.

FakeSatoshi Wright promised BBC journalist Rory Cellan-Jones that he would provide indisputable proof by actually moving a small amount of some early coins (by sending £5 GBP to Jones).

That never happened and Wright eventually backed down on his claim, at which time he made the statement that he would never appear for public media again. He's since pretty much constantly been spouting complete nonsense.

>>8726283
>8. Child Pornography should be legal.
Anyone who's been around long enough know he believes this anyway.

>>8726283
fake and gay

>>8721143
jew nose

Think about it /biz/tards.

If a man who claims to be the inventor of a groundbreaking, world changing invention that allows undeniable and easily verifiable proof of ownership of digital assets cannot simple proof that he actually invented it, would you believe him?

Take your time.

>>8727940

this

>>8721649
>Sergey D. Nazarov
Smart contracts were talked about long before Bitcoin came about. The phrase "smart contracts" was coined by computer scientist Nick Szabo in 1996

>>8721390
And Nick Szabo thought of smart contracts before Sergey's balls dropped. Nick Szabo. NS. Nakamoto Satoshi.

Kleiman. Finney. Tatsuaki Okamoto. David Chaum. Gavin Andresen.

Instead of arguing over who satoshi is, support ETH, support BCH. Support the rise of crypto altogether.

>>8728298
You seem to have mistakenly spelled BTC wrong.

>>8726368
>>8728008
I can't tell if you guys are serious or just unironically not funny.

going to be fun watching all these fake and illegal icos and coins go back to zero

Smackdown by Vitalek....

Oh... where are my degrees..... it burns, it burns...


Sorry Bevis...Uh oh sorry i meant Vitalik

https://youtu.be/QiK34QicusI

>>8729998
>"I will never ever be on the camera ever again for any TV station or any media, ever." - Craig Wright to BBC News (May 2, 2016)

>>8721143
It's so funny, Sergey looks like a lost puppy.

>literally who getting btfo by money skelly

I like bcash but kind of wish it flopped so this retard wouldn't have a platform. Looks like being rich is not enough, he has to lie for fame