[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 10 KB, 240x250, 1511289844371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8414502 No.8414502 [Reply] [Original]

>the markets crashing!
>LINK 1000$ eoy
>I'm too ugly for women to like me
>americucks are awake

can you fags at least try to be original? it's the same boring threads every single day

>> No.8414520

You're asking too much from recluse NEETs who hate everything beyond their norms

>> No.8414528

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just

look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can

easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an

established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is

basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by

cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA

>> No.8414536

>>8414502

No coiner detected gtfo

>> No.8414555 [DELETED] 

>>8414502
>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You) (You)
>>8414464 (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life

>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You) (You)
>>8414464 (You) (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>8414474
LINK aims to do>>8414509 (You)
>>8414500
>>8414488
>>8414474
>>8414464
>>8414456 (You)
HAHA
>Node operators
>cryptographically fact

>> No.8414568 [DELETED] 

>>8414536
>>8414502
Can you imagine the average no-coiner? Especially the ones on r/buttcoin. I just think that it doesn't make sense that they consider a ~70% drop from ATH to be the losses of everyone in crypto because it's retarded to assume that everyone bought that high. Opportunity cost, yes, but then you can only imagine that these guys started fudding bitcoin and crypto in general some years ago, looking back at the post history of the average no-coiner. Much sadder is when you see that some of them post on r/investing or r/entrepreneur, probably spending a lot of time there, trying so hard to come up with ways to make money when he could've just bought in. Even the ones who only started being salty at the start of last year, their opportunity costs are still what, some crazy amount still. I think I read somewhere that they applauded some dude who made a manifesto of sorts and sent it to SEC, lambasting the Winklevoss twins' attempt at making an ETF. Bitcoin at that time was below $1k. I think it's more sensible to make fun of the idiots who bought into crypto when it goes below the point where you started being a salty no-coiner. Because making fun of bitcoin back when it was $1k, and after going down from $19k ATH to its current price, well, it just seems retarded because the ones who you started with in this game of crypto are still way ahead. It may very well go down to that point, but don't count your chickens and all. Like being down some 1000 points in a basketball game and cheering like a maniac when there's only a 300 points deficit. You're still losing, hard at that.

>> No.8414588
File: 15 KB, 221x250, 1510755382527.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8414588

>>8414555
>>8414528
this thread isn't even about LINK you stupid niggers
>>8414536
I guarantee I have more $ in crypto than you

jesus are you ALL newfags?

>> No.8414605
File: 14 KB, 478x523, 590A89F6-0A8A-4F45-97A5-1650741AA0FD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8414605

>>8414588

>> No.8414607

>>8414588

larp more loser

>> No.8414615

>>8414568
yeah I have more satoshis than you insecure faggot. sorry, I was just addressing that this place is a dump now, mainly because of people like you

>> No.8414631 [DELETED] 

>>8414615
>>8414433
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh

>> No.8414676
File: 32 KB, 406x395, C2EE8E63-88B1-4C0B-AE6B-C9D96F72A31D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8414676

>>8414631
Good work anon
Maybe he gets it now

>> No.8414690 [DELETED] 

>>8414676
>>8414631 (You)
Good work anon
Maybe he gets it now
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

>>8414568 (You)
yeah I have more satoshis than you insecure faggot. sorry, I was just addressing that this place is a dump now, mainly because of people like you
>>8414528
this thread isn't even about LINK you stupid niggers
>>8414536
I guarantee I have more $ in crypto than you

jesus are you ALL newfags?

>> No.8414710 [DELETED] 

>>8414568
>>>8414536
>>>8414502 (OP)
>Can you imagine the average
>>8414568
>Can you imagine
>>8414568
>n. I just think that it doesn't make sense
>>8414588
>414555
>>>8414528
>this thread isn't even about LINK you stupid niggers
>>>8414536
>I guarantee I have more $ in crypto than you
>jesus are you ALL newfags?>>8414615
>>>8414568
>yeah I have

>> No.8414739

>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO.)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)