/biz/ - Business & Finance

bump

>>8115282
Do you know there are better programs than ms paint?

>>8115465
like... paint.net?

it's just a collage, don't really need fancy edditing
you're free to do it if you want though

>>8115465
What this guy said, but then again mspaint has a certain aproachability and charm. Also you're the one doing this and we're not, so good shit there. Thanks.

The design you've got going on is great. has a similar effect to the stream of headlines they typically show in documentaries or disaster movies to introduce the subject. Makes me want to buy more.

https://youtu.be/4hR4rDbJPM4

>>8115523
thanks man
still trying to remember that thing

>>8115579

Sure it wasn't something to do with Hyperledger?

>>8115873
YES!
that was it thanks

>>8115873
>>8115909
but that doc was deleted apparently, got a copy?

>>8115873
>>8115927
there was also a collage made with the info from here: https://pastebin.com/n8cpQq0z

do anyone has that? could add it

>>8115488
Ye, paint.net
Layers themselves make it 100 times better

>tesla dev
>docusign
>swift
>Bletchley Cryptlets
>Rexford Ventures
>IBM reveiw on oracle
>SONY AXA
>REQ
>Nick Szabo Retweet
>PSD2 Regulation
>and a lot more
Did i researched enough biz?

I also have this one from an anonymous MS overlord

>>8116311
Origami is working off of link, there's another i forgot though

>>8116318
here

>>8116336
kek so ill be billionaire in 2023 i somehow doubt that

>>8116311
I'm looking for confirmed, non-speculative research
thanks though

>tesla dev
him working on chainlink dosent mean a collab with TESLA
>docusign
we'll see at the conference I guess
>swift
it's kinda in there, subtly
>Bletchley Cryptlets
ehm, what? don't remember this one
>Rexford Ventures
I'm guessing these are investors in SC?
>IBM reveiw on oracle
that one got deleted :( got any pic?
>SONY AXA
they did test it but they didnt announce anything official
>REQ
that's official, guess I really should add it
>Nick Szabo Retweet
justa retweet, trying not to add retweets or twitter praising
>PSD2 Regulation
this is nice info but not exactly wait I'm aiming at, just BASIC and OFFICIAL announcements
>and a lot more
yup

>>8116336
that's more in depth analysis, just looking for basic research. thanks though

>>8116336
i typically ignore linkies but this swayed me, putting $250 usd in rn.

>>8116411
anyone else think that when sergey answered the question of whether or not node operators would be paid in link and his response was "initially" or "for right now" (i forget how it was worded) was hinting at partnering with req nad their whole automatic payments in whatever you want to be paid in type deal? like yeah youll be paid in link but x is paying in usd type deal. not sure if im articulating the thought in my head correctly but thats what no sleep will do to you

People don't understand the ZeppelinOs one.

Consider adding this image in so they understand zeppelinos is a pretty big deal and is working with many teams whose tokens they may already hold.


https://screenshots.firefox.com/bQDS0sNiNAyczje6/zeppelinos.org

>>8116473
The LINK tokens are used to transmit data. Whether you are paid in LINK or not you will need to have some for the network to function.

>>8116473
yes, I know what you're saying

he said something along the lines of "currently we're working as stated in the whitepaper" and then said something like "at the moment, yes" when asked if node operators would only get paid in LINK

>>8116493
I don't want to spoonfeed too much, this is like the gate to the info to DYOR, not the research itself

>>8116502
not what i was getting at but thanks

>>8116513
thats it. I think the req partnership would do wonders for the whole payment situation. this is like a pie in the sky type thing but imagine youre a node operator and want payment in monero or whatever but the person on the otherside only has fiat (like a bank) then itll just go through req. this would make adoption way easier for businesses since then they wouldnt have to set up any sort of system to purchase crypto to use link nodes

>>8116619
agree, ironically REQ would use chainlink to know the price of USD/BTC/XMR/LINK etc
talk about feedback...

added a little hint to the req thing, I believe everyone know about it but adding it there cuz it's official and that's the point of this

>>8115282
Request is trash. Sergey doesnt give a fuck bout them

>>8116336
Can barely read it you fuckhead learn to add a stroke or dropshadow and take a better color for contrast.

You should also add that Confido is going to use Chainlink as an oracle provider

>>8116683
it looks better like this

>>8116741
read the OP

In two videos Airswap people have said they're talking to chainlink, and in the second one it definitely sounded like something was happening. Airswap is quite a serious project. No text to go in this image though unfortunately.

>>8116739
Tis is not my creation

However I used to make LINK memes
Here's one for example
https://youtu.be/YyeNEiM09ao

>>8116761
ooh, I was not aware of that!

wouldn't amaze me that any of those projects would want to work with chainlink, it's the only way to access key API in a decentralized trustless way

>>8116741
This. Don't forget Confido, OP.

>>8116741
>>8116795
>I didn't add origami for the same reason I didn't add confido up in there.

>>8116619
damn then the price will never truly moon if node operators aren’t paid in link smhtbh

>>8117086
they need the LINK for the reputation system anyway
and the fact that I can pay with whatever and then it's automatically converted to LINK and given to the nod eoperator is GREAT
I think that's in part where Zeppelin_OS fits in (and as some anon said, REQ)

>>8117129
>I think that's in part where Zeppelin_OS fits in (and as some anon said, REQ)
This is not at all what zeppelin is

>>8117144
AFAIK oyu can trade things on the zeppelin platform using only the ZEP token that is then traded for whatever you want to trade
since they use chainlink they wont ask people to pay a fee with LINK but the node operators will get the LINK anyway for their service... (unless they set the price to 0 which makes no sense)

you'll be bale to create any kind of contract without worrying about the different fees or tokens needed for it

>>8116411
https://www.torque.vc/portfolio/

>>8117239
thanks for the info m8 but that just means they invested in chainlink, not that they plan to work with them
that would be a bit more advances research, not sure I should add it

this aims to be entry level

[confirmed ]investors is a more advanced level

and then there's the real deep shit and speculation (connecting dots, un-confirmed investors and contributors)

>>8117239
>>8117320
you can add it to your own version though, open source research kek

>>8115282

>>8117409
>>8117320
>and then there's the real deep shit and speculation (connecting dots, un-confirmed investors and contributors)

>>8117409
This is false tho

The domain was created then, but sergey only bought the domain much later

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117226
are you thinking of kyber?

>>8117486
Prove it faggot

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117486
Prove it faggot

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8115282
>Zuckerberg announced Facebook would be implementing blockchain technology on site
>Facebook's chief tech engineer is an advisor for Chainlink.

>>8116411
Director of engineering for facebook is on board, have a look in the team section of the SC website. Not many people mention this but it is a huge deal.

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8118086

>Facebook's chief tech engineer is an advisor for Chainlink.

The CTO of FB is Mike Schroepfer you dull fuck

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Schroepfer

He is not an advisor to ChainLink. Jesus christ you autist scammers.

The advisor to CL is a simply VP-Engineer (middle management) at FB

>>8118145
yeah I was wondering if I should add the advisors too in the end...

added those two as they're the most well known IMO

>>8118255
https://www.linkedin.com/in/chengevan

>>8118255

Why did you go through the trouble retard

>>8118428
hes retarded......

>>8117486
prove it faggot

found a screencap of the IBM mail
too bad I couldn't find the headline of that mail :/

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8116795
wait that was a thing?

>>8118993
yeah Confido are using link as their oracle provider

>>8116795
>>8118993
Confido claimed Chainlink to be their Oracle provider because it would draw in /biz/ like a magnet, seeing as many on /biz/ love getting into ICO's early, and love Chainlink. Fish in a barrel. Im just glad Sergey never once acknowledged or endorsed them.

>>8119088
just like many scams use ETH, many scams will use LINK. it's like saying the internet is bad because of nigerian prince emails.

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8119088
Confido went 30x. Got 32eth for my 2eth investment. Joost is and will always be /ourguy/

>>8117486
faggot it prove

>>8117486
prove it faggot

>>8117486
Faggot if proof

I was the one guy who told biz bout CFD. Ironically I failed to send my eth in time and both missed this glorious x30 and dodged a bullet

>>8119197
die reddit

>>8119222
nice trips fag

>>8119197
die reddit

>>8119197
die reddit

>>8119242
>>8119258
>>8119268
*autism intensifies*

>>8119146
The most hilarious thing about confido is that AFTER it was confirmed a scam you STILL could've made like a x60 of it.

>>8117486
You can not prove that as you have no idea who had that domain before Sergey purchased it - it was in a business name. Sergey could have been involved in that business.

>>8119289
No way
It had small dead cat bounces at tiny volumes but nothing close to x2 even

>>8116336
>blog chains

Wtf

>>8119197
i can tell that you are of ashkenazi decent

>>8119333
Trips of truth don't lie

>>8119331
He meant blag chains obvi

>>8119088
ah so oragami network

>>8119197
die reddit

>>8119392
blank chains

>>8116741
>>8116795
>>8119041
>>8119401
did you read the OP?

>>8119598
yes. does it mean im forbidden from saying oragami network or confido? let me tell you how youre a liberal

>>8119682
no, it just means you're making a fool out of yourself

>>8119721
oh ok. so when did confido say they were using chainlink?

>>8119331

Subtle, subtle, subtle Steemit shill.

thanks, just got brainwashed into buying LINK, see you in 3 years. look for this pic.

>>8119750
when they came out... what's the point of this question?

>>8119946
you're welcome I guess, keep on digging for more info, so the FUD dosen't get to you m8

>>8119957
how did they say they were going to use chainlink? it sounds a lot like oragami network

>>8119986
that's exactly my point

did you thought I was shilling origami? that shit sounds like confido 2.0. hence why I didn't add it to the collage

>>8120019
why are you talking about confido and oragami? did you even read the op?

>>8115282
Awesome work here - 4chan should pin this to the top of the board and keep it posted. Pretty much everybody is here because of CL and this is valuable info.

>>8120045
lmao, there's a difference between suggesting I add them to the collage when I specificallyy said I wouldn't (which makes you sounds dumb or with reading probelms) and me answering your questions...
why do I even bother? If you don't want to buy LINK just don't do it man, we don't need your lunch money
and sorry for the ad hominem there

>>8120092
thanks man! I appreciate it

>>8120110
hey man if you want to talk about confido or oragami network we can but op specifically banned it.

>>8115282
Link marine here, could someone give me a realistic eoq2 eoy estimate for req? how far along in their development are they?

Comfy desu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTg3OdmtA9s

>>8120151
alright let's talk about it
I believe it's a scam because the tech isn't ready for it to work like that, maybe in a decade it will be possible
btw I'm OP, my id changed, guess my IP changed

wanna add anything besides "you forgot confido!!1!"?

>>8115282
OP ban this guy already...he just wants to talk about confido and oragami network

>>8120227

>>8119946
hold fast anon. do not sell the FUD

Alright think it's all in there

wasen't sure If I should add a collage of that last info but I decided to just add the name of the articles and the links

>>8120599
you forgot confido and oragami network

>>8120599
this is the collage I mentioned

>>8120599
I like this version more

>>8120678
These redditors don't deserve your hard work, but thanks nonetheless.

>>8115282
no one cares about LINK!!!

>>8120686
thanks for the compliment, wasen't really that much hard work anyway

>>8120338
newfag

>>8120338
OP ban this guy already! Ban that Bitch!

>>8117486
prove it fagget