/biz/ - Business & Finance

nigga that's the old logo

>>6967104
niga are you fully comprehending what I just said
ma hniihha this is FUTURE

>>6967052

glad im not the only one that sees this future

I still think this is a somewhat risky investment because of the way how the storage works. Could it get regulated? If not and the manage to pull this off, then this might be a goldmine.

>>6967052
This coin is my longest hold since I sold off XRB the other day. Fully believe

>>6967230
>regulated?
>on tangle?
why do you think Bruno is fully anon lol this is literally deepweb 3.0

>>6967140
nigga i'm all-in but use the new logo for shilling

>>6967230
Bruno has plans for Daaps also
>the guy is probably Kim DotCom or similar type evil genius

>>6967052
even though I don't like them, ads are a very important thing and the only way for smaller companies to get some attention. With something like PRL you would get forced to mine if you want or not. Also Im sure someone would develop a blocker against it.

>>6967357
nah I dont like new designed shit
>keep it old school

>>6967104
>>6967052

I like the old logo even though I thought it was very gay at first.

The re-branding is a little more effective but, could have definitely been better not gonna lie.

>>6967399
the old logo looks like ass. new logo is normie friendly

>>6967387
the ball is in webhoster court here
>as end user you'll be able to opt out from running "PRL cookie" and probably only getting limited content or something what paywalls do now

>>6967335
unironically, have fun being poor

>>6967509
Yeah, there is nothing stopping a company to do the same business model with any other bigger crypto. Might be the first mainstream adopter of it, but I’m pretty sure there is something similar already for BTC, but hasn’t been legitimized yet.

>>6967052
Do you think we will not block that ? Wtf is wrong with you ? Are you trying to tell me that the faggots behind PRL are going to force me to mine their shitcoin on my limited battery smartphone ?

>>6967728
>we will not block that
who "we" ?
>eat shit, you faggot currently using web content for free and not taxed on anything
>PRL is fair way of monetizing your content online as content holder

>>6967728
I mean, porn and streaming sites could use this effectively.

>>6967338
Because he's some nineteen year old kid who took a udemy course to learn how to program?

>>6967509
>>6967627
Come on. This can't be the best FUD you guys have?

>>6968294
not even fud.
you are literally invested in something going nowhere

The problem is the project is literally malware.

>>6968531
Ads on some sites use way more of my cpu than this would. And this would make it look so much cleaner, and probably load a lot smoother too. It's so much better than ads with potential malware in them. Go ahead, use some of my cpu for a better browsing experience, I have tons of things using my cpu. Why are some people against this?

>>6969156
Im not against it. I would block it, granted. But idc otherwise. But it's still malware. Building a miner into a site or making someone mine is malware hence the opposition and it never taking off. Also the problem arrises of so what? who buys PRL? investors. But not forever. So what happens when my site makes $10,000 in PRL in a month. Who is willing to buy it? its only use is to be sold for USD so it would bottom out at zero.

>>6967052
Thanks for the thread. Just heard about this yesterday gonna put some money in today. Will probably sell off my iota.

>>6969237
that's some thick mental diarrhea you have there

>>6969582
not an argument.

>>6969624
sorry but it's like arguing with schizophrenic about color of the sky
>you are free to believe what you want

>>6968432
>>6969237
Look, I'm not claiming this is a Top 10 coin but there is definitely room for growth. They have an actual monetization plan that will work. The utility of token will be better defined later on when they implement the dapp layer after the network has matured. The marketcap is only at 80million yet you guys are acting like it's somehow overvalued for what it aims to achieve, which seems rather puzzling considering some of the shitcoins in the top 100 at the moment.

>>6969696
Nice get

>>6970198

>>6969696
Also not an argument.
What fundamental reason should I buy PRL past investment?
Why should lage companies invest in malware.
>>6969772
I bought the crash but Ill sell before there is even a full product desu.

>>6970381
back to drawing board you go son

>>6968081

What 'type' of porographers are going to end up using this though.

'anonymously upload vidoes to websites', its literally fully anonymous it doesnt take a genius to work out how it will be used.

However, if 'that' market caught onto PRL you would still make money off it.

How strong are your morals?

>>6970828
please... just... stop

>>6969237
it's not malware if they're upfront about it.
ads are malware for your fragile brain anon, much worse
plus some people aren't absolute sociopath and are ok with supporting creators if it doesn't cost them

real problem is jinn

https://cryptolve.com/oyster-pearl-solution-advertisements/
OYSTER PEARL TO THE MOON

update just dropped !!!
>>6971228

>>6969696
checked

rsi is fucked

>>6971418
> N I C E

>>6972217
also new Microsoft dev got hired


>we need more media coverage before marketing takes place
don't skip reddit normies and general shilling

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7t8jun/oyster_prl_testnet_a_update/

>>6972349
> E V E N B E T T E R