/biz/ - Business & Finance

30$ or something so in like 2 months

No ERC token has been valued over 2$ ever

>>6894638

$15.50, so hopefully by the end of Q2 or Q1 if I'm lucky.

$225 or so :/

I need more more more

$20 for me, but more like $25 if you account for taxes.

>>6894710
Damn, your'e gonna make it. Yeah I see $30 by March

exactly $1000

>>6894747
ZRX

BTFO

>>6894638
Roughly £322

I would like to increase my stack to at least 10k LINK but I'll need some miraculous gains on other alts before I can get there.

>>6894749
February

>>6894752
It will still happen...just not sure about this year

$1263

>>6894747
Except ELIX, ZRX, and SUB

>>6894638
$10 or $3.5bn market cap

Around $30 for now. I plan on getting it down to around $20

At 0,46$

>>6894828
so next month? congrats anon

>>6894638
$108

>>6894798

So I just checked other replies... I'm a fucking linklet :(

anyone wanna donate? I only need 208 more LINK to have 1000

0x1d199d8aed7b84be615ced4cfee996d0018498fa

>>6894638
95$

>>6894747
EOS 13, OMG 17, WALTON 37, ICON 8, POPULOUS 50?
Are you stupid or just retarded?

100

I was looking at this when it was 0.17

$53

I own 22k so $45

180

>>6894795

You think the Bitcoin SuperConference will cause that big of a jump in price?

>>6894858
take out a mortgage buy out the sellbook and become a multimillionaire chad in a few months

62.5$

Fucking sad, i need more

20$

$900

I want to accumulate more, but I can't afford to put any more fiat in, and I don't trust myself trading.

>>6894878
i did too but i invested in other things and now using those profits on the future

>>6894878
Like passing on eth at $1

$200, but plan to make it 100$ next month.

>>6894638
$1828.
Am I going to make it?

So far, it looks like we are all gonna make it

>>6894972
Lul

$200

But when?

>>6894638
9009, 111 links

$5654

get paid on Friday though

putting whole paycheck on this

>>6895040
>the only thing shilled more than LINK on /biz/ were Antshares and Ethereum i wonder where they are now reddit normie

$7642, Done the math this morning lads. How long's my ship gonna take to come in? I'm thinking Q1 2019?

$50

I can afford to wait

i have

1 link

am i gonna make it?

ITT:
non-insiders indoctrinated by Chainlink shill and blindly believe that Chainlink will have a big moon

£7.35, or about $10, so hopefully by march

>>6895046
ouch.

>>6895074
>What is digibyte
>What is sia
>What is dogecoin back in 2014

>>6894793
Hey fellow bong

I need it to be £14 with my 75k stack

>>6894638
$1,000,000

Kys bagholders

>>6894638
a price of $6.666667 United States Dollars (USD) would make me a millionaire from Chainlink... how long will I have to wait? WHO TF knows

>>6895140
>>/biz/thread/S1101020#p1104644
>mfw the same fud was used for ethereum and this is how nonlinkers will be next month

>>6894638
$40 on the dot.

>>6895028
within the next 3 yrs, yes

Buy the handle.
Cup and handle forming right now.

>>6894747
RLC has been over 10 briefly, currently around 3

Timeline on $10,000 dollar link lads? I read that it's wrong to think about crypto as stocks. We need to think about crypto as Cows or Onions. Neither of those have a market cap, they are just tools for achieving our aims. Link could theoretically hit $100k with 6 months if everything went well, $500k if the starts aligned.

>>6895185
None of them come even close to CL in any aspect. At all.
Also, all three of those had extreme moon missions.
Also also, right now all three rank way higher in terms of market cap than Link, even after they crashed back into the ground.

Stop trying to fud, you're only making my penis harder.

$4 for me. Here's hoping it doesn't take too long, my faps will be so good once it does

Holding 222 so $4.5k

0x05a16e3c8639ad5f1fc30793861c27de38b8d82b

Thanks random stranger. I'll name my first born 'Anon' in memory of your donation.

https://vocaroo.com/i/s1otzmUxCdp5

>>6895411
>None of them come even close to CL in any aspect. At all.

Only obvious in retrospect. I was convinced digibyte was gonna set me free and be a technological revolution bigger than the internet and automobile combined last year.

>>6894793
>>6895213

ew brit bongs need to B T F O we speak in USD here or

S A T O S H I S

>don't be a brit-bong, not even once

About 16 dollars, but gotta round it up to 20 because taxes. Not gonna cash out much, only like 50k when it gets there though. I genuinely believe this is 100 EOY next year

$20

hoping to slowly trade my way up to 100K to make that $10...

25$ but im only selling half my stack at around $500 + and staking the rest.

500 dolaros

>>6895460
>digibyte
Its main claim to fame was being part of a whole parade of novelties at an event hosted by a single bank.

Compare that to Link, which was the ONLY external crypto invited and paid to develop a PoC for fucking SWIFT, and showcase it to a network of 11k banks.

Hindsight or not, let this sink in.

$370... I sure hope they are affordable still in March when I can throw some of my bonus at it. Worried I won’t make it tho.

There's a LINK TA over at >>6893250

>>6894893
This

>>6894638
please post the high resolution logo

$117
I need to get more, hoping I can get some more linkies after I have some fun next month

>>6895468
>ew brit bongs

>>6895632
no worries m8

Every time I see a link thread I'm more and more tempted to buy more link. What should I do? It's becoming an addiction.
I feel like pic related everyday, like something greater than me is attracting me to LINK. Are we all the chosen ones?

you people are fucking psychotic

the coin doesn't do anything. its going sideways.

>>6895280
Interesting read and good perspective.

Why the fuck you faggots believe that this shitcoin will ever reach more than 10 bucks, let alone 30$ this year?
Shill me hard faggots, and I don't want any "speculative" memes, I want you telling why this shitcoin that has been the laughingstock of /biz/ for so long has the potential to become something that will destroy any other shitcoin. And don't go "hurrd durrr DYOR and read the whitepaper" I have, and it fucking sucks.

>>6895781
DYOR and read the whitepaper

>>6895781
dyor
read the whitepaper

>>6895731
>coin
Your discrediting yourself by talking. Stop it

>>6895107
Thats 1000 dollar next year

>>6895280
>>>/biz/thread/S1101020#p1104644

wow, eerily similar to link threads today

>>6895781
it wont. market sell now.

>>6895800
>>6895807
Done faggots, now shill me hard.

As of today about $29

>>6895835
>tfw /biz/ used to be a good board

>>6895468
This.
t. also britbong but gbp:crypto what the actual fuck

>>6895862
we don't need you
fuck off

>>6895781
>"hurrd durrr DYOR and read the whitepaper" I have, and it fucking sucks.
Then there is no hope for you. This image is not a meme, it's real. If you don't understand chainlink it just proves that this a high-iq project, normies don't understand it. They will probably fomo after institutional investors.

$39

>>6895835
>it's not just the code itself which brings value to ethereum, but the community of developers and companies building on the network, the network of miners, and in the future, stakers, and the wider ethereum community as well as their technical expertise.
Link had a two man team plus rory
And a slack channel full of bag holders
Such alike

>>6895874
This. I bought 35k LINK at average of 20 cents each.

$10, UNironically 100k

>>6894638
Vitalik himself called this the most legit ERC20 token there is out there. Nothing can stop us, boys.

>>6895419
and my faps will be even better when I make more than you with a much smaller stack, and I stake my LINK for continued passive gains that will pay me for the rest of my life while you inevitably lose it all and get cucked.

>>6895862
If you read the whitepaper and don't understand links potential then don't buy. Simple as that.

The only reason you see so many link posts because it is fucking funny this coin has 275mil cap while something like tron has 4.6 bil,

Is it a good time to join or is this shit gonna dip more

>>6894638
Us linklets are going to get dumped on hard by all of you giants, aren't we?

>>6895994
is this true?

>>6896003
Link doesn't have proof of stake
Are Linkies actually this retarded?

>>6895994

sauce

>>6896086
Their dumps at low prices will generally coincide with awareness, so it will have little to no effect in all reality. Millions will be pouring in while millions are leaving. That's why you will be rewarded more and more the longer you hold, because a lot of these losers who sell early will see LINK continue to rise and FOMO back in.

>>6894747
>No ERC token has been valued over 2$ ever
so next month will br groundbreaking in more ways now

>>6895962
>>6895911
>>6896010
>T. Brainlets
Ok kids, keep playing with your shitcoin, you could've easily explained a single reason why do you think this shitcoin is going to 30$, but you went full pajeet, and how do I know you fucktards are a bunch of brainlets? I never even mentioned that link is going to failed, I asked why do you faggots believe this will moon to 30$, can't even read a post correctly, let alone a shitty whitepaper.

>>6896094
He tweeted something to the effect that the tech was impressive but not worth $32 million. This obviously was before the enormous altcoin run

>>6894747
What a blatant bullshit statement. I owned an ERC20 token that was valued over $6 in June.

>>6896003
Haha you got problems, no need to be mad cause poor. I didn't say I was selling at $4. Just seeing my blockfolio will be all I need

>>6896124
>Vitalik
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/71k0xe/vitaliks_chainlink_tweet_deleted/

Lads, wait a second, there have been another fork

>>6895781
I advise anyone skeptical about link to go and looking at the website. You don't even need to read the white paper. Do you think they'd be allowed to use all the logos on there without some kind of at least implicit permission? If you're not completely new you'll have looked at a lot of coin websites, & will immediately be able to tell that this is a serious project and probably one of the coins with the most serious potential out there. I keep reading more & more in the media about "smart contracts." The other day in a major UK newspaper there was an article about bitcoin price crash, & at the end after all the usual shit, the person interviewed was like "but blockchain technology itself is very promising and exciting, especially smart contracts which have the potential to revolutionise many industries" or something. When I read that I felt like selling all my other coins for link. The website / company is called smart contracts for Christ sake, not link.

>>6896238
Wait, he actually did? I was just making shit up.

>>6896107

>>6894906

I don't. I don't think we'll start to see a huge uptick until partnerships start being announced.

>>I don't think its unreasonable to think it'll surpass $1000 per ETH.
>if there was any chance of this much money being involved, some serious pros would be on the case, creating something superior.
in fact they probably already are.
ETH will NEVER hit anything like $1,000. $10 maybe.
kek

>>6896179
We're not spoonfeeding you faggot.
We don't care if you sell or if you don't buy.
We are not looking for short - term profits.
We're in for the long run.

Questions for LINK skeptics:
- how did they get cited in the world economic forum report in fucking 2015?
- how did they get the connection with SWIFT?

>>6896300
Again, let me clarify something, I'm not saying this project isn't legit or that it will fail, but can you explain how is link going to moon to 30$? These fucktards can't even mention a single reason.

>>6896238

i knew about this tweet, but that's not quite the same as calling it the most legit erc20 token. very encouraging nonetheless

$5.80

>>6896388
So you're basically telling me that you can't because you're a fuckin brainlet who just shits numbers to feel good about his investment? One fucking reason and i'll stfu

>>6896441
When do you intend to sell?

>>6896430
Do you honestly think we marines care enough about you to explain?

>>6894858
Nobody here built their fortune on handouts. Good job getting in on LINK, just continue to be smart and do research on the next good investments. Begging is annoying.

>>6896434
Disney partnership confirmed

>>6896497
Fuck off. We literally DO NOT want you on board. Please don't buy and fuck off you dumb nigger.

>>6896497

Decentralized oracles.

$37 End of March

>>6895312
Ditto

>>6896501
Not sure, we'll see how things go.

>>6895280
>>>/biz/thread/S1101020#p1104644


>All the IBM FUD in that thread.

If only they knew.

good time to buy?

>>6896369

Me neither. I could see a significant pump (3-5x) post conferences and Go testnet release, but we won't break $10 until partnerships are announced.

>>6896572
Ok, now explain me how's that a reason for this to moon to 30$

>>6896430
In 12-18 months anything is possible. This time last year eth was 8$. Do you really think that if people on biz said thrn it'll be 1000$ in a year, everyone wouldn't just say what you're saying?

>>6896621
Generally agree but then I see stuff like https://fynestuff.com/chainlink-story-analysis/

>>6896772

Lol are you fucking trolling that article is not good for chainlink grow a brain

>>6896692

No, you're annoying as fuck. Read this or shut the hell up.

https://www.capgemini.com/consulting-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2017/08/smart_contracts_paper_long_0.pdf

>>6896696

>>6896832

>read this article that doesn't mention chainlink

>>6896692

We don't have to explain shit to you you fucking peasant. If your IQ isn't high enough or your patience to research isn't strong enough you simply don't deserve this gem of a coin. fuck off.

>>6896852
the main fud from back then isn't really wrong. smart contracts and the ethereum and all the other platforms have yet to really prove their value, because a lot of people are still very skeptical. Just because bitcoin pulled alts into a wild speculative frenzy doesn't mean ether has any right to be 1k

>>6896696
Yes, anything is possible, this project failing is possible as well, putting your money on feelings isn't a wise choice, and using hindsight in crypto is borderline autistic, anon. Do you really believe things just go up indefinitely?

>>6896832
>Can't give a single reason
Thank you anon, I'll just keep posting sergey memes.

>>6896834

>>6896852
Kek

>>6894638

$6.50

>>6896162
brb dipping my hands in molten lead

>>6896981
Ok what coins are you holding? Tell us your portfolio & then we can see what's got the most potential

>>6894638
$1k

Will be buying more once I can dump my 800 ICX at 12-15$

>>6897059
I'm all in on BAT. Am I gonna make money?

>>6897059
Xlm, neo, poe and link.

>>6896185
It was around the same time that he said Ethereum was overpriced at $8.

Market economic isn't his thing. Technology is.

>>6895468
this
we do not speak of b*ng subhumans here

>>6897142
We may see a 90% retracemeant yet

>>6896871

you need to add smartcontract.com and sergey nazarov to your ctrl+f game big boy

>>6895781
Read the whitepaper and DYOR

$15, want over 100k though

Slightly below $200.

>>6894638
SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME MY PORTFOLIO AND DECISIONS ARE GREAT.
I'm gonna keep putting money on these at the same ratios. Only started last week.

>>6894638
i have 17500 link, so whatever that works out to - can someone help?

>>6897386
I don't see XLM getting higher than $2.5 but everything is solid.

>>6897410
are you serious?

>>6894638
Roughly 1.8 million
I have 0.565 LINK

>>6895900
tfw Link was shilled before the huge normie invasion, think of it as a parting gift from the old biz to the newfags

>>6894638

9 USD, give or take a few cent.

>>6897386
open XLM chart, switch to log scale, zoom out and draw meme lines. If I was a holder I would hold XLM and probably EOS

100$ and im a millionaire in usd from link alone
it would be very tempting to exit around the 25-30$ mark as that would make me a millionaire in my country and seeing that from 1$-20$ is a x20 jump but from 20$-100$ is only x5 i might just exit there

>>6897428
>5x
>not high enough

Kek

>>6897439
i suck with maths fuck you

its probably $50 or so anyway like the first anon

>>6897428
Thankyou. I have a good feeling about xlm but link is defs where I think we should be at mostly.

>>6897480
That all you need.

>>6897496
And I wholeheartedly accepted the gift at $0.17. Gonna double down next month. Cheers senpai.

>>6897410
I'll teach you, you have 17500 link.

So we need to get that to 1 link. If we halve it u get 8750 link. if u divide that by 875 u get 10 link.

One tenth of a million is 100k.

So if u had 10 link u would need link to hit 100k to get 1 million. but to get there u had to divide by 875 so u divide 100k by 875 and u get 114.285714286. so if u had 8750 LINK u would need it to hit approx $114. But u had the double, so if u halve $114 you would need it to hit $57.

so u need it to hit $57.

Or u can just take 1 million divided by your amount, which would also be $57.

>>6894930
>>6895545
50K family
>>6895280
Holy shit. /biz/ was SO much better before stormfucks. And this thread is very enlightening, thanks.

>>6896852

this illustrates the issue that i have with skepticism pretty well. a certain level of skepticism is healthy and necessary, but most people just use it to posture as though they're intellectually rigorous. they mistake their own baseless and emotionally driven incredulity for reasoned skepticism, too unwilling to venture deep into the realm of "maybe" for fear of looking foolish, not noticing that the risk of looking foolish cuts both ways.

>>6897386
sell your eth buy more link/req/rlc
id even say with that amount just buy low mcap scams like pfr

>>6897584
kek'd

>>6897559
ETH, NEO and possibly EOS have room to 10x over the course of the next year. LINK is going to at least 1000x. That is why the XLM gains don't seem too great to me.

>>6896871

Moron.

>>6897584

>>6897567
You need $57 anon. A million divided by your holdings.

>>6897108

>and link

Well played, asshole.

>>6894638
450$

>>6897602
stop talking like a faggot.

I have 2.7K XLM I could sell to round off my stack up to around 5K link, should I wait out for fair X and sell when the price of XLM goes higher or should I accumulate now?

>>6897386
not enough link senpai

>>6897496
Wasn't the ico in August or September? That's when the "normie" Invasion was already in full swing

>nobody accounts for taxes

If you cash out in less than a year, income tax is around 45%

>>6897616
"At least 1000x" is too optimistic man. I'd say 100x at the high end. And don't XLM's potential, we all saw what happened to Ripple even though it had an already high market cap.

>>6897794
in my opinion the real normie invasion didn't really hit full throttle until november/december when bitcoin broke 10k and news started covering btc like no tomorrow

>>6897812
Hi Germany

>>6897584

>But u had the double

>>6897729
Only holding 300, not really that impressive.

>>6895075
Yeah... no

More like q1 2021

>>6894638

$50,000

l-lol at those no linkers right?

>>6895994
>>6896094
>>6896124

>>6897866
No. USA: https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#rcHHa4aW4x

Cash out 1 mil, government takes $400k or more

You actually need to cash out 2 million to get 1 million remaining

>>6897833
>"At least 1000x" is too optimistic man
My understanding of it is that if LINK achieves adoption as an oracle in mission-critical systems, particularly for financial institutions, there is a danger that somebody could manipulate things for financial gain by providing false data through the oracle. The only way to ensure that this isn't a viable thing to do is to increase the financial incentives of those providing an oracle (and therefore staking LINK).

Essentially if this sees adoption the value of LINK has to be significant enough that a bad actor could make more by staking than they could through their misdeeds.

$35

Feelsgood

>>6894638
I have significant questions about how the nodes will actually fucking work.

Won't the node operators essentially count as a third party? How will node operaters be reimbursed?

>>6897979
What about for something like 10K or 100K?

>>6897860
This. I settled /biz/ in June, it was already full of shitposting, but it was fun. Then November and December happened and the normalfags and pajeets stormed us and turned this board into what it is now.

>>6895459
fuck off pajeet, fuck i wish we had flags so these goofy voiced shitters were easily filtered

>>6898016
A single node can't do shit. If it provides bad data, it'll get punished. That's all there is to it. It cannot threaten the whole network.

>>6895632
>blurry blue edges
>hi res

>>6898150
Right, but if somebody can make millions by owning multiple nodes and sending bad stock data through so that they can profit elsewhere, what will stop them if the price of LINK is low?

>>6898083
>>6898150

> it will get punished
This is exactly the kind of vague shit that makes me nervous. Make no mistake, I got a 45k bag, but the specifics of how the nodes will operate should be easy enough to communicate, and yet we've heard nothing.

Could be a problem.

>>6895468

>>6897953
this noah faggot belongs in an oven.

>>6897603
Hrmm I get a good feeling about this suggestion. I was looking at req before but ended up going xlm instead, but there's no reason I can't have both with link as my largest investment I guess. I was keeping some eth in the folio for what I felt was a low risk long term hold, but you definitely don't think it is worth keeping over being able to grab those others?

>>6897953

this isn't real

>>6898095
Less, because it is a different tax bracket. But for real "make it" levels government will tax you at the highest tax bracket

Alternatively, you have to hold it for more than 1 year for capital gains tax

>>6898209
I guess this is called a Sybil attack? From the whitepaper:
"Sybil attacks resulting in false data, mirroring, and collusion in general may be eliminated by the use of trusted hardware in our long-term strategy"
I have no idea how the math will work out. But a $1000 token would mean a trillion dollar market cap. In a few years maybe.

>>6898257
Chill out. The whole market is a bubble. Until Sergey announces the project is dead the price will go up. If you watch closely some coins went x100 in a couple years on nothing but promises. Does announcing announcements sound familiar? Does meaninglessly rearanging code on GitHub sound familiar? Do conferences and livestreams talking about how awesome it'll be when everything's finised, but presenting nothing atm sound familiar? *B*U*B*B*L*E*

>>6898503
does using crest 20min whitening strips to bleach your asshole sound familiar?

>>6896179
I'm phone posting. I'm not going to type what chainlink does because it would be a pain on a phone. But I will set you on the right path to figuring it out yourself if you are have trouble
>learn what the ethereum network is (hint: it's not a cryptocurrency)
>learn what a smart contract is
>now read about "the oracle problem"
>now finally read chainlink whitepaper

Good luck. We will await for you back in this thread.

>>6898418
Can anyone here explain how trusted hardware prevents sybil attacks? I'm guessing it means that contract writers will choose node with trusted hardware, meaning that the node operators will not be aware of what data is coming through their oracle and will thus not be able to tamper with said data. Before that I guess the only way to prevent someone from spinning up 1000 nodes is the cost associated with doing so. Also the node incentive fund will likely partially go toward establishing "corporate" type nodes so the network is resilient enough that smart contract writers can choose enough of those nodes to make a sybil attack via "public" nodes impossible. I've heard the sybil attack fud before and so far I think they've not really been very responsive, but then again they've been cagey about a lot of things before the main net is pushed out.

>>6898257
It'll be designed so that you'd have to actively distort and manipulate information to the smart contract in order for the punishment to take place.

>>6898629
I can't explain it. I'm a bit of a brainlet when it comes to coding and computers. All I understand is that LINK is clearly the most decentralized oracle option. They wouldn't work with SWIFT and Ari Juels, or get attention from heavy hitters like Klaus Schwab if they weren't worth their salt. I do come back to the whitepaper every couple weeks and try to understand a little more each time.

>>6894638
$10

>>6895254
>deluded

Guys breaking news buy now.

OK memes aside, how far up do you see the coin going? It's obviously worth something since people usually don't call it a scam, but it deff won't be the next bitcoin.

>>6898851
>people usually dont call it a scam
Jason is gonna rip you a new one with the shadowfork

>>6894638
I would need to invest in $147 dollars worth of LINK to have enough shares to be a millionaire.

Unfortunately I don't have that on me right now.

>>/biz/thread/S6331621#p6334503

>We have to operate on three timelines: immediate boom, secondary consolidation, long term growth.

>In my opinion, I hate giving price estimates, but LINK will spike to 60-70 USD, consolidate to 10 USD as the entire market consolidates, then grow to 150 USD as long term adoption grows and PSD2 and other open banking initiatives reach full potential.

>>6894858
kill thyself

>>6894858
I would need 919 shares so suck it up. The most I hope to make from this is at best $5000.

>>6899028
>shares

>>6899042
Link isn't a coin.

>>6894638
I only have 2.5k link but i get around 10 linkies every 2 days since i just mine and power is free, if you think about the future price i would reccommend every anon to start mining with ur rig, why not, free money.

>>6898851
Speculating is pointless since it depends on a hundred factors. But if it launches as planned and is used in only a fraction of its potential places of use, high. Very high. If it's adopted as the standard oracle for blockchain interaction, you'd laugh at the numbers I'd throw your way.

>>6899078
how much power does mining linkies cost?

>CL is 100$, start holding a year for capital gains
>year passes, CL dumps and never recovers

>>6899078
what is the difficulty set at?

>>6899123
You can't mine LINK. You mine other shit, and sell it to buy LINK.

>>6899080
throw them my way anyways anon, im interested af

i want to make it with my 2k linkies

>>6899078
>>6899123
You can't mine a token. You can volunteer to run a node, but you don't really want to go there with an average PC.

I'd be lucky if i can get 10k off this lol. only have 1k link.

>>6897386

Dude your portfolio is actually great for a beginner. Tune out people saying 'all in on X' and just keep accumulating slowly. I am a huge believer in LINK, but one black swan and shit *could* go wrong (Sergey dies). Keep a big chunk, at least 30-50% of your portfolio in Eth for now.

Also, I'm very fond of ZRX, look into it. If there's a big market crash consider picking some up. ETH/ZRX/LINK are my top 3 holds.

>>6899147
um, no sweetie, other anons have posted pics of their linkminers and shadowlinkminers before

>>6899159
Go to Hyperledgers website and have a look at their members. It's big business' version of Ethereum. They've had their dicks hard about utilizing smartcontracts ever since Ethereum became known, bu they haven't been able to securely do it, or have their smartcontracts interact with information outside of its respective blockchain. LINK will support Hyperledger from the very get-go.

The amount of use cases for LINK goes to infinity, but worth mentioning are derivatives. The global derivative market is estimated to be worth between $630 trillion and $1.2 quadrillion.

If derivatives make their way to the blockchain, which is logical to assume, and LINK handles only a fraction of the volume, you could expect to see LINK where Ethereum is now in terms of marketcap.

If it becomes the standard oracle? Bitcoins current marketcap would seem like a bad joke in comparison.

>>6899136
haha i mine other shit, and swap it for chainlink, its only 80 cent for 1 linkie right now.. i would be a fool not to do it.

>>6897979
This can't be true anons... it can't be true.. isn't that almost a 40% capital gains tax!? I thought it was 25% in the home of the burgers

>>6895731
>buy high sell low

>>6894638
$13 - 82k stinkies

>>6894869
Walton isn't on it's own blockchain?

>>6899129
>what is converting to a less volatile crypto like eth.
>must be burger, whose autistic government wants to tax every single crypto trade

$333 for me, so by the end of Q4 2018

>>6894638
i only own 200. pls help me make a noose

>>6899458
lol I own 71. I'm a wagecuck with other financial demands right now :/

>>6897410
>enough foresight to buy that much
>cant do basic maths

>>6899129
Is this how it works, or is it 1 year from when I bought link? I bought in november, so this December am I good for capital gains tax?

$2000

>>6897592
>/biz/ was SO much better before stormfucks
Kill yourself retarded fucking newfag

>>6894638
37 dolla hanny.

>>6899326
>hey guys price got too high so we made more chainlink tokens to keep them at 5 dollars a piece! enjoy!

>>6894638
$9.50

why is it gonna moon tonight tho i dont get it

>>6895731
Really, like how it did thst retarded thing after it plunged after sibos? The whole 0.17/0.33$??? Then it went full retard to .40/60 and now 1.30/0.60$ Ohhhhh gollyyyy geeeeee surelly there is more money leaving from this projectthan getting in guys!!!!!!! How do you feel that you will never in your life be able to buy this stuff for less than 50 cents in your life???

>>6899833
That*

I own 1500 so $667. Not gonna happen, but I think this coin can achieve $100 which I would be ecstatic with.

>>6894747
icx over $10 multiple times

>>6899888
tfw i know this feel

2k linkie here

>>6899326
Literally cannot tell if this derivatives marketcap is a meme or not anymore. Hardest thing about chainlink threads is separating the copypastas from actual discussion.

>This has gotten crazy out of hand, I apologize but we will no longer be selling PonziCoin on this site because this was a joke. I cannot terminate the contract but I will not be selling any coins that I own.

kek

>>6899756
w-would they really do this anon?

>>6897410

Wow. Even complete literal brainlets know that LINK is a good buy. Hot damn.

>>6899953
Yeah sure it’s a meme just like chainlink solving the oracle problem is a meme. They’re both gonna happen but also both memes

>>6899950
>>6899888
>only got 270.
I'm fucked

>>6899987
lol wrong thread

>>6894756
Are you American?

>>6899953

donald trump was a meme candidate

>>6899953
The derivative market being worth that much doesn't mean LINK will be worth that much. If LINK was utilized for derivatives, it means information for smartcontracts worth trillions would flow through the LINK oracles.

LINK nodes would get a tiny cut. But a tiny cut of that amount of money is still a fuckton. And as always, the cryptomarket will react by overly inflating the value of LINK, because everyone wants to operate a node.

>>6899991
>would Swift want to keep their product affordable
yes
>>6900133
The banana picture meme gets posted on /b/ every. fucking. day.
are you saying the banana picture meme is good?

>>6900156
Makes me so happy to think about running my future node

30 boners

$40 fuck I wish I bought more at $.20

>>6895724
No. The chosen ones are those that will hold through the crypto apocalypse. When governments try to crack down on all of the “speculation” and founders of projects begin to lose faith and abandon their communities. The chosen will see Link crash to $3.14 but continue to have faith because they know decentralization is the future and that Sergey won’t stop until his LINK stack is equal to that of McDonalds. The crazy thing is that none of us are chosen. We are merely deciples followers sheep (whatever you want to call yourself you dumb fucks) of Mr Nazarov. We’re just on his wild ride maaaaaan and there’s no getting off until he’s had a bite of every one of our Big Macs

>>6899756
its almost like you dont know what the blockchain even does go back to plebbit

>>6899998
unironically its the brainlets that make money cause they know how to hold and understand to buy when a project gets shilled for half a year

>>6900234
Can’t tell if this fud is fucking retarded or genius

>>6899999

>>6900261
>dont make fun of my big mac crowdfund or you have to leave

>>6899374
Maximum long term capital gains tax would be 20%. Short term max is 40%. It pays to hodl

>>6899415
Not yet, it's coming in Q1 or start of Q2 and then it will be a platform for child chains, 3 are already in developement.

>>6900234

i'm saying that the banana picture meme is successful

$1000 gonna accumulate more after the 26th

$1090

FUCK I NEED SO MUCH MORE

>>6894638

$18.25

Tho won't sell till much higher

wow went to gym..came back and my thread still going?

>>6897584
what the fuck this is why i suck at maths

>>6901192
Yes now gimme some LINKS

>>6901251
>do operations
>do opposite of operations

>>6896107

linkpool.io

>>6901192
do i kno you?

>>6895354
topkek

>>6894638
Stop Phishing for how much Link this board owns, and Anons stop feeding OP.

>>6900234
I originally wrote that post. Other anon summed it up with his response well. Reread the part about not necessarily the best logically.

Tie that in to the second to last sentence about it's a worthwhile investment on the contagiousness alone. But yeah LINK will change the world and will be 1k per.

>>6895691
Damn. Where can I get some of this exclusive Mickey Link?

>>6895724
It's a heavy burden we carry. The bearers of the LINK.

Potential for dreamers. See how much you need here to become a Linkillionaire.

>>6897773

xlm has done its thing, do it

>>6894638
FYI
>On Wednesday, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) revealed that it has filed a lawsuit against the creators of ChainLink Coin, an alleged cryptocurrency scam that took naive investors for $6 million.

>The case, filed on January 16 and unsealed today, charges Sergey Nazarov, a man going by the name “Rory”, and ChainLink, Inc. with commodity fraud and misappropriation of funds raised for a virtual currency known as ChainLink (LINK).
#TimesUp

>>6902304
300 bil isn't that far fetched for 3-5 years down the line desu

I have exactly 169.83000000 links.

will i ever make it?

>>6902304

Jesus is this accurate? If Bitcoin can grow like it did last year we will actually see $50 LINK by EOY.

BTC went 14bil to 250bil in 2017.

>>6902304
>>6902340
>>6902551
New one, for more delusion.

>>6902701

I think your math is bullshit desu

>>6902742
why?

too bad link is just an intermediary for businesses

no value in holding on yourself, especially when nodes are owned by large companies

not a currency, doesn't actually do anything on it's own, just connects other things

shit investment
enjoy ur bags

>>6902765
that's what ether was supposed to be tho

>>6902809
that's worse wtf CL is competing with ETH?

lmao GL

>>6902858
oh, you haven't even heard of our shadowfork problems yet

>>6902765
eth was supposed to a be meme coz normies derived the same logic as you. Look at eth now brainlet

>>6902304
>>6902701
Except the majority of link isn't in circulation, so the actual market cap is much lower.

>>6902885
so you think you're going to take down ETH?
eth is here to stay bud

>>6902938

It's really clear you have no idea what chainlink is by this post - I have to wonder how you can justify even entering a conversation about it let alone start a debate...

>>6903002
Chainlink isn't that complicated. It seems like linkies love to just wave everyone off as not understanding

you can't build siht on top of link, it's not it's own ecosystem, it's just an intermediary.

once large companies get involved they have no incentive to drive the price up, and your nodes become absolute shit compared to theirs

>>6899807
Because tonight's the night.

>>6895383
This is the thought process of retards who can only afford a few hundred LINK.

>>6900133

this fucking bear market is making me so anxious, currently only 20 percent in link, 20 percent vechain 10 icon 10 dragonchain and not selling those. will any of the other shittier coins i have please moon so i can sell for more linkiepoos :'(

hmmmm

>>6902935
this