[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 89 KB, 745x481, mobius.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6114048 No.6114048 [Reply] [Original]

RIP CHAINLINK

>> No.6114101

>>6114048
In the multi trillion dollar Oracle industry, there is room for two. I'll be investing in Mobius BECAUSE I invest in LINK.

>> No.6114228

>>6114048

yep, much better than LINK. I am already in

>> No.6114262

>>6114228
give me 1 reason why it's better than LINK

>> No.6114405

>>6114262
It's better

>> No.6114520
File: 234 KB, 1084x811, 100%better.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6114520

>>6114262
Team

>> No.6114584

Thanks, where can i buy?

>> No.6114616

>>6114520
3 pajeets at the top.

ill pass

>> No.6114637

>>6114584
you cant, you can buy credits in their dapp store??

>> No.6114700

>>6114048
>stanford grads
>CEO is from ycomb
I'm unironically in

>> No.6114719

>>6114520
Pajeet's LINK

>> No.6114760

>>6114637
I might be wrong but I think that's just their way of getting around the US investing regulations

>> No.6114852

im a 60k link whale, and i sold half my stack to get into mobius

>> No.6114856

L-linkies... is this t-true?

100$ LINK w-when.?

>> No.6114886

>>6114520
lol...

>> No.6114916

>>6114852
show us the sell order, faggot

>> No.6114948

>>6114048
Ya well...you might have a team and great advisors...but do you have an office over a nail salon or iphone repair shop? Checkmate faggot.

>> No.6114956

>>6114520
pajeets and chinks wew lad

>> No.6115114

Still waiting for an explanation why this is supposed to be better than Chainlink.

>> No.6115115
File: 2 KB, 724x34, Screenshot_4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6115115

>>6114916

>> No.6115165

>>6115114
It has a real team

>> No.6115207

>>6115115
fair enough

>>6115165
"real team" yeah, ok.

>> No.6115210

>>6115165
Yup, still waiting for a single reason why this is supposed to be better than CL.

>> No.6115235

>>6114700
>>6114520

this you /pol retards

>> No.6115317

>>6115210

better team and they have a roadmap

>> No.6115351

>>6115317
I repeat, still haven't seen a single reason why this is supposed to be better than CL.

>> No.6115373

PROS
ycombinator
cool name
stellar tech under the hood

CONS
>>6114520 circles are not round, bad web design
pajeets
link has a better logo

>> No.6115432

You cant even particpate they sold out

>> No.6115477

>>6115317
>muh roadmap

we'll see which coin does better. my bet is still on LINK

>> No.6115605

>>6115373
>stellar tech under the hood
Explain.

>> No.6115613

LINK is blockchain agnostic, a huge advantage over the 'competitors' who are limited to a proprietary blockchain. The use case is completely different, don't be dumb.
bo.jpg

Of all their weaknesses, Mobius has their biggest problem with their team members. Blockchain technology is such a specific software sector that you simply can’t find and hire blockchain engineers that will be willing to work with your project and also be competent enough – you need to have them on your team from the outset. The scope of Mobius also means that this project is likely one of the tougher applications of blockchain, and it puts even more stress on the team to deliver a top notch product.

Secondly, the scope of Mobius feels like it’s far too big. Are they primarily focusing on their DApp Store, their oracles, or their Smart Markets? In a world of specificity and niche solutions to complicated problems, Mobius attempts to be a generalized solution that tries to solve everything at once. This has historically not been possible, or has taken an extremely long time to get any groundwork done – as examples, you can take a look at projects such as ARK and MAIDSafe. Their roadmap also feels like it has unrealistic expectations – they intend to release almost all parts of their project goals within the first 6 months of 2018. For a team of this makeup, it almost feels impossible that they will reach their goal.

Finally, the token sale economics aren’t ones that I am very impressed with. They are raising 40 million dollars which is already more than Chainlink has raised with their own project while lacking many of the advantages that Chainlink enjoys. Comparisons between these two projects will be clearly made, and Chainlink simply wins out on almost all of these.

>> No.6115654

unironically mobius is doomed because they don't have memes like chainlink does

>> No.6115720
File: 140 KB, 1000x800, photo_2017-12-22_01-46-44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6115720

LINK is blockchain agnostic, a huge advantage over the 'competitors' who are limited to a proprietary blockchain. The use case is completely different, don't be dumb.

Of all their weaknesses, Mobius has their biggest problem with their team members. Blockchain technology is such a specific software sector that you simply can’t find and hire blockchain engineers that will be willing to work with your project and also be competent enough – you need to have them on your team from the outset. The scope of Mobius also means that this project is likely one of the tougher applications of blockchain, and it puts even more stress on the team to deliver a top notch product.

Secondly, the scope of Mobius feels like it’s far too big. Are they primarily focusing on their DApp Store, their oracles, or their Smart Markets? In a world of specificity and niche solutions to complicated problems, Mobius attempts to be a generalized solution that tries to solve everything at once. This has historically not been possible, or has taken an extremely long time to get any groundwork done – as examples, you can take a look at projects such as ARK and MAIDSafe. Their roadmap also feels like it has unrealistic expectations – they intend to release almost all parts of their project goals within the first 6 months of 2018. For a team of this makeup, it almost feels impossible that they will reach their goal.

Finally, the token sale economics aren’t ones that I am very impressed with. They are raising 40 million dollars which is already more than Chainlink has raised with their own project while lacking many of the advantages that Chainlink enjoys. Comparisons between these two projects will be clearly made, and Chainlink simply wins out on almost all of these.

>> No.6115755
File: 15 KB, 318x405, 1480966634970.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6115755

>>6114520
Wait, you're being serious?

>> No.6115864

>>6115605
They're using stellar as their platform. LINK is using ETH

>> No.6115895

>>6115864
that's not a good thing

>> No.6115898

It's on the stellar blockchain on listing on some decentralized stellar exchange... so don't expect binance or any real exchange anytime soon

>> No.6115957
File: 12 KB, 217x217, heston smile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6115957

>>6115317
>better team and they have a roadmap

just lol....i think i'll stick with the one that is partnered with SWIFT, and several blockchain projects, and is almost ready to release their mainnet.

>> No.6116013
File: 893 KB, 492x342, retard alert.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6116013

>>6115864
>LINK is using ETH

>> No.6116215

>>6115720
I agree.
Not even hating on that project because it's good to see others notocing the need of transfering data onto the blockchain but let's be honest, when someone tries to do everything they end up not doing shit at the edn of the day

>> No.6116387
File: 404 KB, 342x342, 1515364931864.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6116387

I can't wait till it comes out, whats its tracker going to be?

>> No.6116506
File: 614 KB, 781x609, Screenshot_20180104-234921.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6116506

Retards dressed as lamb

>> No.6116839

why is mobius decentralized?

>> No.6116916

>>6116215
Reading through their white paper; among other things they want to be a dapp store.

>> No.6117115

>>6114520
3 pajeets
1 terrorist
2 chinks
3 white guys one which looks autistic or part chink (probably both)

looks like a winning combination

>> No.6117155

too many things at once. More bullish on niche project like XMR and LINK