/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58365743
Sers is this boolish for Rubic?

>>58365743
im not fudding but can you explain how this will finally pump the token?

It begins.
Fucking finally

>>58365769
Only if they have a bridge to chains who aren't covered by The Transporter.

So why would someone use a different front end now? Why on board teams like Xswap to just drop this soon after?

>>58365743
X-swap has had this for months

I've heard we are getting TRANS tokens for this? Anyone can confirm?

So they delivered? They said Q1 and they fulfilled their promise. Where are all the haters now, huh?

>>58365743
ok but price
ok but price
no matter what you say i say but price
isn't that nice?
enjoy your beans and rice
because link will forever be
LOW PRICE

>>58365823
It's Q2 my math challenged friend

>>58365743
>-0.13%

>>58365809
If Xswap is faster, cheaper or more secure.
But I doubt any bridge will be more secure than Link's huge decentralized network of oracles.

https://app.transporter.io/

For the lazy ass bastards out here

>>58365774
not sure if this will pump the token but it's yet another instance of the token being needed.
Paying for TX on transporter with LINK gives you a discount, so frequent bridgers would benefit from buying the token.
Txs paid in other format are converted behind the scenes to LINK to pay the node operators, which drives demand for Link.

So if this thing is used LINK is needed. Hope this helps anon

>>58365923
ok mr. chainlink advocate
tell me why i should use this "transporter" when i could just gamble on doggie coins and make 100x?

>>58365931
thank you makes sense. I guess no one really knows but i wonder just how much use this will suck up among bridges and if this use will actually give any meaningful pump. seems bullish but im so demoralized at this point its hard to imagine it doing anything, i am glad they finally released something though.

>>58365743
SHORT BITCOIN RIGHT FUCKING NOW

>>58365743
does it require the token?

>DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE moaaaaar sthhhhecret tech


>0.1%

Bahahahhahahahahahahaha

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>58365970
using the token is suggested but not required

>>58365935
You can continue to do that, but you aren't prone to bridge hacks anymore when sending dogfart from eth to base, since you don't want your dogfart to be stolen

>>58365931
>>58365774
It actually should because fees are gonna be paid in Link.
Would be funny if he'd continue to dump with their fee money now, so they would not have to get any more BTC loans anymore kek

>>58365743
chainlink is irrelevant unhyped shit that everyone hates now. SupraOracles will fkn destroy chainlink, they will hype the normies and get buyers and do everything correct that the fat fuck Sergey failed to deliver on

>>58365978
>>58365970
Isn't the token being used for a fee?

Get in the van!

>>58365743
TRY AGAIN STINKIES

>>58365989
well technically yes BUT the amount of link is so small it is insignificant
and there's always the "VIP option" where you can use an actual good crypto like eth to pay for fees at a discount

>>58365923
do not click. link is not app.

This was announced in my cryptic dreams when i was walking the street and I noticed the O in the Jason Statham (aka The Transporter). The mememagic left 4 Chan because its devouring the world.

>can’t deploy
SkyBridge destroys this

>>58366015
Forgot pic i was in incognito

>>58366020
no one is going to use your furfag bridge when this exists, better to just take your licks and bail before everyone dumps it

>>58365743
Is this transporter actually built by Chainlink Labs, or was it some other team? Curious as to who's actually behind it.

>>58365994
still the very best Serg meme

>>58365774
I'm not shilling but you already know that it won't. TNN

>>58365967
100x lev

>>58366066
link twitter people saying it was built by CLL internally through some new group "the chainlink foundation" the trademark is official link. actually out of character for them to do something like this kek, to actually make a usable product that is live and not some test net underneath levels of permission etc.. super backend. Could it be that this is actually bullish?

>>58366061
Look at the eth tokens you can bridge with this to base, skybridge will be able to bridge ANY eth token or nft.

>>58365743
They keep “making” shit and announcements and my number still isnt going up, i feel like i may have made the wrong investment with this one

>>58366102
Interesting. I hadn't heard of the Chainlink Foundation before. I assume their purpose is to build products on top of the actual oracle services.

>>58366116
Skybridge devs are Pakistans finest

>>58366066
>>58366144
Checking myself twice. $1k EOY.

>>58366116
yeah and how long before they start adding support for more and more tokens? you think cl isnt going to extend this to as much as they possibly can? i think its time to face it, bub, your token is already starting to dump and it's only been 30 minutes

>>58366185
>manually having to add support
vs
>supporting EVERY token or nft out of the box

UI is sexy

also paying in LINK = lower fees. token sneeded

>>58366201
>ccip
>cross-chain interoperability protocol
>thinking that this isnt planned in their roadmap
tick tock, better get to selling, you arent going to see avi at this price ever again

also
>20+ minute bridging time
useless

Honest question - how is this different from existing bridges and why would anyone use this over a bridge they're used to using and like already?

No where does it say that its created by chainlink

"Powered by chainlink" /=/ created by chainlink

LMAOOOOO

>>58366066
Checked
Check this out:
Welcome to https://transporter.io, a website-hosted user interface (the “Interface”) made available by PAE Operations II Ltd. (the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us”). The Interface provides information and enables access to the Chainlink Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (“CCIP”), a cross-blockchain messaging protocol powered by decentralized oracle networks using the Chainlink software (the “Chainlink Network”). The Interface is in the “beta” stage of development. There can be no guarantee that any of the contemplated features of the Interface will be implemented as specified or at all or that the Interface will be available or fit for a particular purpose.

We need to dig on pae operations

>>58366222
>you arent going to see this price again
>a linkie of all people saying this

this is actually sick.
how low will crypto sink now? i'm not even joking. this objectively good thing is usually followed up by a dump

>>58366116
CCIP does allow for bridging of any erc-20 token across blockchains though. Users can transfer tokens from smart contracts or external owned accounts (EOAS) to different blockchains. The off-chain shit like the decentralized oracle networks (DON) and the active risk management will facilitate that shit too. For example, each token has its own token pool that acts as an abstraction layer over erc 20 tokens - enabling onramp and offramp token ralted operations. Like burning, locking, unlocking, MINTING on the DESINTATION chain.
Literally feed chat GPT anything I'm telling your right now and you'll see it's not larp. So yes, this will allow someone on ethereum mainnet to deploy a contract on the base chain.

>>58366274
just out of curiosity anon, what method are you looking for when you choose to end it all when you see that your own worthless coin will be able to be bridged on transporter?

>>58366286
50k btc is all but locked in of course

>>58366226
Maybe it is for your twelve dollars but adults with size can wait assured that it’s secure

>>58366230
bridges are prone to hacks and are highly centralized.
Link now provided a decentralized way, making fund transfer secure and reliable for anybody.
Institutions can now transfer billions across chains riskfree

Is there some kind of ccip explorer/scan?

>>58365989
It is
>>58366003
You have it backwards ding dong, users get a discount for paying directly with LINK. Paying for the TX in ETH makes it more expensive for the user.

Either way, LINK is used either directly by the user or indirectly, swapped for by the CCIP contract. Because, as always, Chainlink node operators paid in LINK.

>>58366374
Yes. CCIP.CHAIN.LINK

>>58366340
>Institutions can now transfer billions across chains riskfree
do institutions need or want to do this? what is the demand side of this look like, genuinely asking, not fudding

>>58366292
and yet, still...token not needed.

token sneeded

>>58365743
ICP already does this faster, more securely, and cheaper. it makes chainshit obsolete.

Just imagine somenthing like aave. Instead of having a different aave isolated on every blockchain, it will all be together thanks to CCIP and the user won't even have to know anything, you will be able to send it from bsc, base, avalanche, whatever, it will all be powered by the cutting edge backend CCIP

>>58366404
Want
Institutions goal is to earn more money.
If there's a money making opportunity on chain X, they would want to take advantage of it.
Especially since plenty of projects on different chains are already backed by institutions and major venture capital firms.

>>58365743
So this is the moment linkies were waiting for.

>>58366292
SkyBridge will be cheaper, quicker, just as safe, and actually out before ccip allows that

Finally, some shit is fucking happening

>>58366442
kek

Wow very impressive technology surely this pumped Chainlink straight into the top 10 oh wait

>>58365743
I thought CCIP did this? What is this new fucking wordsalad?

>>58366294
i'll answer: impaled by fox cock shaped dragon dildo

>>58365743
two words
DECENTRALIZED METALAYER

>>58366181

>>58366066
>>58366144

Checking twice for you. Nice double dubs.

>>58366622
nice dubs anon, link 1k EOY

>>58366665
>>58366666
You just missed quints by 1 so you cancelled out the dubs
Thanks anon we are all going to die poor now

>>58366570
Seconding this. What is the significance of transport.io when ccip.chain.link has been available for 6 months already?

>>58365931
Forcing reasons to "need" the token is the pinnacle of proof for token not needed. They could do this with any other asset but they wanted to mint a billion stink to dump and need to justify it. LINK is basically just a more advanced version of the Brave/BAT scheme. Ask yourself how many scam shitcoins used this model and where they're at now. The whole "we'll force people to pay for this service with our shitcoin and/or convert behind the scenes to pay people who don't care and gunna dump it"

>>58366690
this :}
tough break stinkies
but lord kek is never wrong

>>58366708
Based retards

>>58366799
Seconding this

>>58366799
So you don't know either. Gotcha.

>>58366708
Yes, the developer tools have been out for 6 months already. Now here's a product made by Chainlink for users, aka non developers. You can either build out contracts + a frontend to move USDC yourself using CCIP's documentation or you can use this generalized contract + frontend Chainlink provided for you.

>>58366837
It's a front end for CCIP that anyone can use, not just the big brains.

Post yfw bitcoin dumps sometime in the next week or the next month and chainkeks will claim that ith a conthpiracy to suppress the price of their premined shitcoin bags

>>58366882
>or we'll be on the up and you'll still selling cowdung soap for 20Rs

>>58366690
i am never going to financially recover from this

>>58365809
>>58365810
X-swap is kill. Brutal display of business acumen from Sergey, letting one of his own BUILD partners build an entire dex, just to make them obsolete in a single tweet.

Aviators stay in our own lane so, so I'm not sure why Linkies wanna start fudding us now. AVI SkyBridge will let you bridge/deploy ANY token/NFT instantly, and in bulk at a cheaper cost, than Link while also taking care of cross chain liquidity (transporter doesn't even let you deploy any token). It will allow your market maker to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities and continue to dump tokens on you whenever the price goes up a tiny bit (in addition to Sergei dumping on you, see pic attached). We are also a gaming platform too that's creating something like web3 steam/newgrounds as well. As my Aviator tokens continue to moon in the near future with test net and prod on the way, I will consider buying Link OTC just to spend my spare time dumping on you.

>>58366990
bridging is a tough problem. every bridge produces canonical bridge tokens. while your Skybridge can bridge any token, they will be skyTokens on the other side. unless there is liquidity for the skyToken on the bridged chain, it won't be usable for anything. this is the real problem that bridges need to solve, beyond just creating secure architecture for bridging to take place

As SirGay said, theres not going to be Bitcoin megacycles anymore. Its going to be bullruns based on link adoption and based on how total RWA markets become. How did finance even fucking work without blockchains/smart contracts? Thats the really absurd thing.

>>58367018

SkyBridge also functions as a liquidity pool. Also, by allowing teams to bridge any arbitrary token instantly and at a bulk cost, it makes it easy for them to create liquidity pools with their bridged tokens. They are gonna have easy instructions for all of this and are working with a lot of projects to make this as easy as possible.

>>58367080
dude stop, Aviator is going to be about as legit as Floki no one is buying the meme coins for their tech

>>58365779
Czech the price

>>58367133

> Linkies start fudding AVI
> pl-please stop defending AVI

Sorry Linkies, but I'm just so excited to have a project that isn't financed by dumping on holders. It's also nice knowing that even if the bridge doesn't work out (it will), it has an awesome steam-like gaming/RWA platform coming

https://blog.chain.link/transporter-launch/

Blog post.

>>58366990
The disadvantage you guys have is the lack of reputation for being secure. Chainlink has that advantage so it'll be nigh impossible to take users from Chainlink once they start using it.

>>58367182

We got a 10/10 audit by the best web3 auditing firm in the world (same one that audits Binance, 1inch) and also have a bug bounty

https://hacken.io/audits/aviator---skybridge/

>autistic furries cucked linkies

>PROGRAMMABLE TOKEN BRIDGE REFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION
who remembers?

>>58367205

You love to see it. Seriously AVI holders usually bunker down in our threads and don't even make fun of Linkies. I don't know why they wanna fud us now. After this thread I'll leave them alone again if they continue to stay in their own lane.

I just bought, so expect a dump.

>>58367200
Reading the blogpost,

> Comprehensive smart contract audits—Both the onchain and offchain code for CCIP and the Risk Management Network underwent 14 independent audits by five leading security firms before its mainnet launch, including two crowdsourced audits on Code4rena. Being subject to such a robust set of audits provides users with unmatched confidence in CCIP’s codebase.

And they have a 24/7 customer support

Cope Stinkys

>>58367200
>we

>>58365743
>26 minutes to transfer usdc from base to arbitrum
literally 4x worse than ACH vs Wire given that alternatives can do it in 1 minute

>>58367230

>>58367274

I'm not saying Link is less secure, I'm saying AVI is way cheaper market cap (e.g. way more room to grow), just as secure, have many great products on the way including a great gamefi project and a very unique bridge/liquidity/deployment solution, and the project isn't financed by dumping on holders. I already did a 30x this year and there is still so much room to grow with AVI at 40m mc (because our devs don't dump on us, unlike Linkies)

>>58367283

That's right we, because I hold AVI and actually make money because we're a low cap coin that isn't financed by Sergei selling 700k to Binance

>>58367253
>don't know why they wanna fud us now
unironically a great sign
we constantly get projects both new and old showing up to either try and make community alliances (i support this) or pick on us (insta-btfo)
i havent really seen anything else like it, but clearly avi has a presence

also agree with leaving them alone if they stay in their lane, or even accepting a linkie alliance. i know stixil likes link

>>58367329
>we
You did it again lad.

i love how link threads always end by some other shitcoin invading and shilling itself nonstop

>>58367371

> Sry Aviator fags, nothing personal, but CCIP for blockchains is out now.
> pl-please stop invading us we are the victim!!!!

>>58367304
>can do it in 1 minute
>need to got through an exchange on both ends if want interface with any chain
PS RWAs are all onchain. think ahead
cool man

>>58367371
i mean, they brought us up

You are not getting your entry

>>58367344

>also agree with leaving them alone if they stay in their lane, or even accepting a linkie alliance. i know stixil likes link

Yeah Stixil and the team actually like Link. I never held a strong opinion on them other than that it's funny that their own devs dump on them non-stop. If they stay in their own lane next time, I won't enter more of their threads and make fun of them

>>58367353
lol you also just typed we, therefore you lose

>>58367398

I'm not interested lmao Link has 17b MC fully diluted and your market makers + devs dump every time the token has any movement. My only goal here is to be as annoying as possible so you stay in your own lane next time instead of having your threads filled with AVI shilling.

>>58367509

>>58367559

That ship looks like where Linkies live since their devs shit on them 700k at a time.

>>58367559
white american devs
by all means, though, invite us back next time if you want to get mogged again

>>58367171
What's your favorite Aviator Arcade game?
>>58367391
What does a gaming token have to do with a real utility coin like LINK?

I thought he was making digital crop insurance. Wtf? Why has Sergey been wasting his time on THIS

>>58367596

Arcade is in alpha right now but we get a nice preview of some of the games. I'm excited for the Pudgy Penguins one, and any games indie devs create and then shill

>>58367618

Maybe he's too busy fudding AVI and dumping 700k

>>58367253
Because they see AVI as a competitor now.

>>58367387
that's why i chose base->arb as an example.

>>58367596
before the arcade is open, their first product will be the skybridge, which lets anyone instantly deploy any erc20/erc721 token onto basechain.
its entering public testnet within the next few days, and theyll gradually add more chains once its fully live

>>58367672

It's hilarious because they are a top 20 coin, so they have no room to grow from tokenomics alone, but are still so insecure over a 40m mc token. I guess I would be too because we're completely mogging them this cycle.

>>58365743
wowie zowie what a bullish thesis, transferring shit between dying casino shitchains. Linkies act like it is still 2017 and everyone is naively optimistic about tons of altcoins actually having a reason to exist and market fit.

>>58365743
>+0.34%
oh yay! we are going to make it guys!!! woo hoo!

>>58367735
facts, connectinf one scam to another rugpull lmffffffao

so did chainlink make transporter? why doesn't it explicitly say that anywhere?

>>58367753

Congrats Linkies!!! Say wagie!!!

>stinkfags have to boast about competing against a coin that isn’t even in the top 1,000 on cmc
LOL. And the product still is inferior

>>58367842

It's absolutely incredible. Aviator isn't even listed on exchanges yet and they have a better product. It's also way lower market cap so it will actually still do at least another 50x this cycle, unlike Link which may soon be surpassed by ICP

So does this mean that CCIP GA has been finally launched?? Don't see it being mentioned anywhere

anons, i know it was mentioned above but wasn't really made clear...

hasn't this functionality (able to be used by non devs) already been around since xswap? what exactly is the difference here?
not talking about official chainlink labs branding, but in functionality.

>>58367885

This masterpiece is why Sergie has been dumping on Linkies for years

>>58367018
you're stupid, the reason the bridge only supports networks on the OP stack is because you don't have to wrap them so there is no "SkyDogshit2.0" on the destination layer. You bridge Dogshit2.0 from eth to base and you get Dogshit2.0 on base.
the years of getting spoonfed scams have left nufags unable to do any independent research

>>58367885
Way farther back anon. How do you think people moved their stuff to Polygon or Avalanche? They used a bridge.

The difference is that Chainlink released a bridge of their own powered by CCIP for people to use. You can use Chainlink's bridge "transporter" or use some other bridge. However, note that we've had over a billion dollars worth of hacks. Do you want to risk using some other bridge or use Chainlink's transporter bridge?

>>58367323
Damn fuck me sideways its really coming together

>>58368079

Nice. More hype so that more baggies and Sergei can continue to dump

not sure why advocates are saying this is a big unveil
this was mentioned by in 2021...
this is jus the Programmable Token Bridge with a retail label
https://blog.chain.link/introducing-the-cross-chain-interoperability-protocol-ccip/

>>58368124
this :}
it's literally nothing stinkies
thats why the price is doing FUCK ALL

>>58367950
right

>>58367986
thanks anon, and what exactly is the difference with xswap?

we already can use a 'bridge' powered by ccip at xswap.

>>58367978
>the bridge only supports networks on the OP stack
then it's not a bridge, it's analogous to polkadot xcm or avalanche warp messaging.
>>58367080
the ability to make liquidity pools is not the problem, attracting and keeping liquidity is the problem. axelar and layerzero have been providing the same functionality as ccip and skybridge for years now. the real competition comes down to who gets the money and therefore the volume

>>58368173
that this was released today, what with it being announced that uniswap is facing an SEC lawsuit yesterday, is interesting

>>58366868
So CCIP was overengineered gobledegook which is basically unusuable for 99% of people, but somehow its going to make everyone use it and make us rich? In fact its so good they had to make a dumbed down version as well. Gotcha.

>>58368140
>and what exactly is the difference with xswap

xswap is the uncolored soap option at the car wash
trannysporter is the colorful soapy bubbles with a free vacuuming

xswap only supports usdc movements, transporter supports multiple tokens and will be adding more tokens and more chains. Look at the front page before entering the dapp, every square will be a supported blockchain

>>58365743
Do you realize there are dozens of bridge protocols out there that have never been hacked and take less than 20 minutes for a stablecoin transfer from arbitrum to polygon

My ethereum to base bridge takes 0 seconds and thanks to normiebase 0 fees.

>>58368192
thanks anon, what i figured too.

fwiw, xswap supports much more than just usdc, plenty of movements available via the swap function...

link has been trying to get some of the attention of the base meme world recently too.
and some say 'hiding strategy' .

provided people use transporter (i'm not that involved in crypto, just link, rose and btc for me) then i guess ccip has a use case before rwa's and banks etc onboard.

pay up

>>58368193
Thank you, yes, this is actually what I was trying to say.

>>58368213
chainlink will unironically hire sec experts to hack every other bridge, screencap this

>>58365810
Xswap is dogshit, 30 minutes wait and can't even bridge between Arbitrum and Base

>>58368385
Don't do it Ari! Have mercy!

>>58368385
they've been doing this for years, the seeds have been planted. spring is here.

>>58368290
the swap function is fine but it requires liquidity pools and slippage, its just a cross chain swap(which is nice desu)
but having free liquidity is like having free testosterone, you can do so much more with it if you dont have to have a million dollars worth of your token locked on Chain A and Chain B to transfer(think multichain, rip)

i fud regulary but yeah i guess this is a step in the right direction, just wish CCIP GA would come out already

>>58366749
>they wanted to mint a billion stink to dump and need to justify it
yeah. businesses get started because the founder wants to make some money. how do you make money in crypto? you sell tokens. why would anyone buy your particular token instead of any other? same as dropshipping: your marketing is better. you pick your target demographic and tell them exactly what they want to hear (while skirting securities law, of course)

>>58368213
name them

>>58368385
sure bro

>>58368570
sure
LayerZero - https://layerzero.network/
deBridge - https://debridge.finance/
Socket - https://socket.tech/
Connext - https://www.connext.network/
Synapse - https://www.synapseprotocol.com/
Across - https://across.to/
Axelar - https://axelar.network/ (more on interoperability than a bridge per se)
Stargate - https://stargate.finance/
Orbiter - https://www.orbiter.finance/
cBridge - https://cbridge.celer.network/
Hop - https://hop.exchange/
Symbiosis - https://symbiosis.finance/

>>58366442
>t.

>>58368213
>>58368730
do you not understand that sergey's got financial institutions lined up to use ccip who are so big and bad that one of their individual dicks is longer and veinier than every combined dick in this joke of an industry?

>>58368799
Noone is going to use a closed source proprietary protocol like CCIP. I know you don't understand how defi works but people care about truth over trust because there is no other way when dealing with code

>>58368799
Checked. They know the crypto market is about to get wiped of all the scams and bullshit (about 95% of crypto overall) and don’t wanna see their ponzi casino become something valuable.

>>58368891
>closed source
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/ccip

>>58368891
we will see gay boy

>>58368891
this
we simply do not trust sergey
t. high level investoor

>>58368730
>that list
lmao get fucked nigger
you lost

Oh no AVI chads, in 15 years when this comes out we are ruined

>>58368730
desperation

>>58368919
>Chainlink CCIP is in the “Early Access” stage of development, which means that Chainlink CCIP currently has functionality which is under development and may be changed in later versions. There is no guarantee any of the contemplated features of Chainlink CCIP or the Chainlink Network will be implemented as specified. Chainlink CCIP is a messaging protocol. Chainlink does not hold or transfer any assets. Please review the Chainlink Terms of Service which provides important information and disclosures. By using Chainlink CCIP, you expressly acknowledge and agree to accept these terms.
I guess having ever changing Terms of Service is truth over trust

>>58368983
>>58368995
Something as simple as Across or Axelar mog CCIP back to 2019. Hard to admit but yeah
https://github.com/across-protocol
https://docs.axelar.dev/dev/intro

>>58369004
you said it was closed source. it is not. you were wrong. you won't admit it. we're done here.

>>58369004
dude, what if they change the contract while im using it and like, steal all my stuff

>>58369034
they can't change the contract, all engineers are redoing the counter that goes up

This is now an AVI thread.

>>58365743
I finally bought this piece of shit

Thank God I didn't buy it sooner though!

>>58369033
The network of validators/node operators running CCIP and all Chainlink service is closed source just like the code that makes sure nodes in the network operate following the principles outlined in the whitepaper.

>>58369004
Cant help it if you are brown and never experienced what legal clarity is before.
Such things dont enter the world of street shitters obviously. Its all dealt going to gurpreets hut and beating him up if someone steals a village chicken

>>58369130
Code is law. Having to show off Terms of Service in the developers docs shows who is the brown one scared to be caught with his pants off.
You are supposed to tuck that stuff in the footer

>>58369032
cringe, reeks of third world

brownshits are truly the dredges of the world. only attempting to imitate, never creating anything new.

actually no, they did invent and perfected rugpulls and streetshitting

>>58369185
deBridge is a few months old and already has a clearly outlined roadmap on how staking and slashing will work on their validators network
https://docs.debridge.finance/the-core-protocol/slashing-and-delegated-staking
Chainlink can't even produce a document like this after 7 years

>>58369100
You sure that's a good idea when OGs have been blueballed for 7 years and are just waiting to dump on your ass at the first hint of any pump? From the staking rewards alone, they have enough to tank the price. Plus Sergey is never going to stop dumping into the pumps. My unsolicited advice is to accumulate AERO and dump after it reaches half billion marketcap. Don't mess with chainlink

>>58369209
wow, deBridge is amazing
really mogs chainlink, thats for true

>>58369185
Kek and absolute MOG from Chainlank

>>58369223
>supports more tokens
>support more chains
>supports Solana which is not an EVM chain
>very fast, 15 seconds top to bridge
It does mog CCIP yeah

>>58369248
>supports Solana which is not an EVM chain
It's not a chain at all

>>58369272
Yeah sure is not a chain but deBridge still handled hundred of millions in volume to/from Solana with no issue whatsoever

>>58369209
damn they have a ROADMAP?!?
thats focking CRAZY dood
brb im selling my ENTIRE stack and buying this rugpull right NOW

the absolute state of third world scammers

>>58369347
It's indeed nothing impressive but is still more concrete and detailed than anything Chainlink has revealed regarding its validator network

>>58368730
orbiter got hacked december 2023
not checking any of the other ones you mentioned, you already lost all credibility

>>58369385
Orbiter the protocol wasn't hacked. Orbiter the team was hacked. Like saying that Sirgay getting mugged on the NYC metro makes Chainlink not safe.
>not checking any of the other ones you mentioned
funny how a bad incident on one invalidates all the others protocols, you realize there is a team of different individuals working on each right? And no unlimited paid time off for a lot of them

>>58369385
>>58369347
this cope is sad

>>58369426
>asked to name bridges that have not been hacked
>names a bridge that has been hacked
>wants me to waste my time checking over him after his 2 minute google search of "crypto bridge"

>>58366749
This fud again huh?
Could you build a Chainlink clone and base it off a different currency/crypto? Yes. You could build a Chainlink clone that pays validators in Eth.... Or USDC for that matter.

The very clear reason you don't want to do this
1. You take on any inherent risks to those alternative currencies (eth changing issuance curve, USDC systemic failure, etc.) - anything bad that could happen to those alternatives could then negatively impact the security of the decentralized oracle network. It's pretty easy to see that it's in everyone's best interest to decouple chain agnostic oracle networks from native tokens or stablecoins.

2. TransferAndCall is needed which didn't exist on other ERC-20 tokens prior to LINK

this'll push us over eighteen dollars for sure
how exciting

>>58369501
the bridge itself wasn't hacked but go off i guess

>>58368213
Pray tell us more about these bridges anon. The list drafting is upon us, go out and make thine list! Share into this net of ether upon the pages of the four-chins. Make haste, sweet summer child, the assassins lurk unbeknownst to thou.

>>58365743
Wait, so is this general access?

>>58369644
partial list, there are other interoperability protocols
LayerZero - https://layerzero.network/
deBridge - https://debridge.finance/
Socket - https://socket.tech/
Connext - https://www.connext.network/
Synapse - https://www.synapseprotocol.com/
Across - https://across.to/
Axelar - https://axelar.network/ (more on interoperability than a bridge per se)
Stargate - https://stargate.finance/
cBridge - https://cbridge.celer.network/
Hop - https://hop.exchange/
Symbiosis - https://symbiosis.finance/

>>58365743
About time.

>>58369827
No.

Cool is it going to pump it back above $20? $1k eoy am i right?

>>58365743
>Sergey sells another 700k$
My Avi stays wavy. Can someone make a Sergey Homelander?

>>58369827
CCIP is still in beta and will be up to 2027 most likely

>>58365743
Chainlink confirmed $50

>>58369535
>2. TransferAndCall is needed which didn't exist on other ERC-20 tokens prior to LINK

Could you expand on this?

>>58370101
here's an expansion on that:
muh dick

>>58370169
K fine be that way. I'm just going to keep spamming biz with more cuckhold posts until someone can deliver to me the following demands:

Explain to me what is a smart contract.

How come when I sent my Link tokens to my Ltc wallet, the app said the transaction is proccessing? Its been like that for over a week. I thought CCIP was supposed to take care of everything on the backend?

Why does the team never stop dumping tokens? I was under the impression that Chainlink was the only project that is not a scam and yet here they are and their behavior is no different than the scammers.

>>58369177
no it isn't. I'm a freelance software developer and i have to send all my clients contracts like that so i done get liable if they fuck shit up by themselves later

>>58366882
>Chainlink fudder is also a brown thirdie fantasizing about white women fucking dogs
Kek. Can't make this shit up.

>>58370392
As a brown thirdie, can someone tell me if white women are actually worth it? Am I missing out?

>>58369847
if you want to rely on teams running ledgers around that's on you

>>58369563
Well it's better than under 18. Or is it?

>>58370481
Can only speak on white women in Europe, and I like them a lot. Hapas are even better though

>>58370481
The only white woman I know who has mothered two half jeet children to different fathers is unironically not. She is a nightmare psycho and they are both out of her league. One drives uber and the other makes gigabucks in IT.
Almost all high value whites stick to their own. Except Asians for for the nerds. You would be much better off finding a good woman of your own kind. I used to have yellow fever and it got cured when I realised we're spiritually different species.

>>58369535
>inherent risks to those alternative currencies
as opposed to >90% swings on link price? or is your argument really "but what if the entire economy fails, what then, huh?"

>>58365743
>221 thousand views on the tweet
>zero (ZERO) price action

>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude le FUDDDERZZZZ are brown ES—-ACKKKKKK


https://x.com/chainlink/status/1777777751937733070?s=46&t=pxB_5KMjs0qNm4ER3GIweA

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>58370511
Fuck sickos

>>58366507
>>58368783
I accept your concessions faggots.

>>58366144
The Chainlink Foundation was announced around the same time they started calling themselves Chainlink Labs I'm pretty sure. It's extremely vague and I don't think anyone knows who or what the fuck the "Chainlink Foundation" actually is and how it's tangibly different from Chainlink Labs. It's all part of the absurd juxtaposition of Chainlink projecting virtues about truth > trust while they often conduct themselves with vague ambiguities where no one really knows what the fuck is going on.

>>58369104
Mr dear Pajeet, the word you're looking for is actually "permissioned" over "closed source". Closed sourced semantically makes no sense when you're describing the nodes of a network.

>>58370088
Checked

>>58368570
i just realizefd it was chainlink who has been behind all the hacks. and using it to fund chainlink

>Let's just check the pri-ACKKKK

>>58370918
Fuck off Jeremy you weak cunt

>>58370849
Would

I looked at their website, when doing cross-chain transaction where do you specify the receiving wallet address?

Any luck identifying Transporter activity in the CCIP Explorer?

>>58372319
Shes literally perfect

>>58366015
>>58366039
weird. i was thinking about the transporter movie today when i read about the announcement. and here they are making his name linkpilled. very strange coincidence. memes leaking into reality like when that plane crashed into bane irl (reference: https://bane.fandom.com/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525 )

>>58365743
me like

>>58370481
Sorry they are reserved for blvck bvll BBC only

>>58370511
the lower the better

>zero mention of LPL in /LPL/
we are SOO early BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS POOLS CLOSED LPL FUCKING SEETHE

https://twitter.com/0xCygaar/status/1778522791073214685

Is there anything stopping someone launching a gasless cross-chain dex with CCIP + EIP-3074 eliminating the need to ever hold gas tokens? Pic related.

>>58371547
Yea no fucking shit

Why can't I swap my eth for btc? Some bridge.

>>58372319
100% sure she is a prostitute, and I have a video of her.

>>58372936

>>58372319
perfect waifu

>>58372809
How would you do that without LPL?
Check the LPL github fren the LPL team thought of that already :-)

>>58373384
This is the best part of the Chainlink project. The LPL chuddie kiddos already did like what 90-94% of the heavy lifting so no outside development required. Damn it feels good to be an LPL chuddie kiddo

>>58373406
>Early access Build project tokens
>SEC approved revenue sharing
>AI generated limited edition Jonny Bollocks NFTs
>Exclusive access to Live Stream chuddie kiddo Dev sessions
Yep I'd say those Chuddie Kiddo Brits have everything covered fren rest easy and enjoy :-)
>Checks LPL github
>Damn it feels good to be an LPL chuddie kiddo
Well said fren this is a great catch phrase to spam very meme worthy

>>58373442
>>Early access Build project tokens
>>SEC approved revenue sharing
>>AI generated limited edition Jonny Bollocks NFTs
>>Exclusive access to Live Stream chuddie kiddo Dev sessions
I think I need to sit down

we're gonna wagmi bros

>>58365962
if you're demoralized over watching number go up or down you have the temperament of a teenage girl

>>58373384
Why would LPL be needed for this? Be specific instead of being a shill.

>Multibillion dollar project fudding fox token
God damnit I didn't know I could get even more bullish on aviator but now I am ERECT

>>58373566
Could you give me a reason why LPL wouldn't be needed for this... be specific there's no need to be a fuddie... we are all learning here.

>>58373642
LPL is needed fren check the github

>>58365743
Just wait until Chainlink DECO releases

>>58373642
I don't get this meme I assumed you actually meant SDL :( , I haven't been on biz much lately.

>>58365743
but chainlink itself is nothing but a bridge

>>58374286
>>58373771
>>58373642
>>58373566
>>58373497
>>58373442
>>58373406
>>58373384
CHECKED BASED AND LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED ANON

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

BUY LPL THE ONLY OFFICIAL WAY TO STEAK YOUR LINKIES

WHICH NODES WILL YOU STAKE WITH WITHOUT LPL LOL???

HOW WILL YOU BRIBE NODES TO STEAK YOUR LINK WITHOUT LPL???

NOW THE POOLS CLOSED AND ALL THE BASED KIDDOS ARE CHUDDIE

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED LPL

HUH?

LPL

HUH???

LINK token not needed stinkies bridges are needed now more than ever look at your 3 bridgeable tokens and stare and wonder why do you even try anymore be careful what token you choose this bullrun..it might be the last one gl linkies kisses

>>58369960
>>58370057
How isn't it general access?
Anyone can send shit cross-chain with this.

>>58374794
You are an idiot. Not everyone can build apps with CCIP yet. If you are whitelisted, you can use CCIP with your app.

6 years of my life and the price can't pump 2 percent on this announcement

>>58375063
why would you want to build apps with CCIP? That would be like using a house to build a car

>>58375069
Just buy some Aviator. It's going to go up... a lot. It's Base season, and avi is about to bridge itself to Base. Fucking cheap compared to Link too

>>58375069
Did you think a million people with a billion dollars liquid were waiting in the wings for a CCIP front end announcement?

>>58365743
Supra has done this since with the HyperNova.

>>58375063
Yes you can build apps with CCIP.

https://docs.chain.link/ccip/

It's getting access to mainnet that you have to contact Chainlink directly. Dude, integrations aren't a done in a day type of thing, it takes months to integrate and test and audit.

>>58375702
You can integrate something like LayerZero on your own without having to contact anyone lmao. Only you linky weirdos think that having a permissioned web3 service is normal

>>58375174
Yes

>>58371189
permissioned is essentially closed source and goes against the way actual web3 is supposed to work

>>58370495
What's the difference with Chainlink exactly. Their validators network is permissioned and noone knows what's going on in the background exactly. Is slashing live yet?

>>58375765
Never said it wasn't permissioned. I am addressing the point here:

>>58375063
>Not everyone can build apps with CCIP yet.

This is incorrect.

>>58375847
It is formally correct as you can get blacklisted on Chainlink Labs sole discretion, so yeah not everyone can build on CCIP

>>58375906
LPL SOLVES THIS DUMB NEWFAG LMAO IMAGINE NOT KNOWING THIS

>>58376061
>a staking service external to Chainlink solves Chainlink validators network being permissioned.

>>58376102
ANON WHICH NODES WILL YOU STEAK WITH???

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS LPL POOLS FUCKING CLOSED

>>58365931
>Paying for TX on transporter with LINK gives you a discount
in other words the price going up makes the fees more expensive until the point where the "discount" is higher than the average payment

the only way this system works is if chainlink price stays low be that with minting LUNA style or simply lack of interest because bridges are a dead narrative and chainlink is offering too little too late

TLDR: TOKEN NOT NEEDED

>>58375063
>Not everyone can build apps with CCIP yet
Anyone has been able to do this since last summer.

>>58376267
>he price going up makes the fees more expensive
lmao no it doesn't
Fees are calibrated according to fiat value.

>>58376267
>18 decimals
>bought in USD equivalent link
just wanted to add that you're wrong, carry on

>>58376102
>a single anon is destroying the entire FOMO narrative shills are trying to create
>not a single guacamole is able to stand toe to toe to him
and the thread predictably dies
the ABSOLUTE STATE of stink marines in 2017+7

>>58365743
Jeez we are going to be so rich, Just waiting for the hacks of all the other shit to begin. Imagine using anything else than Chainlink. lol ....No.

Chainlink
Oracles
Power
Everything

>>58376102
>>58377247
>Actually falling for ironic LPL chuddie kiddo posting
POOLS FUCKING CLOSED BASED CHUDDIE KIDDO

SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT LPL LIKE WE TOLD YOU

>>58365923
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MY LINKIEEESSSSSSSS

>>58365743
stop wasting time with chainlink, if we all use BRC20 tokens the world would be a better place.