/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58267010
I feel the same. There's some games that are still somewhat relevant like chunbi village but most of them died already. Some devs are trying to make the p2e games relevant again (some are actually good like ether orb) with playstyles that focus more on the game than in the tokens but its safe to say it will never be the same again.
On that note does anybody remember that one game that was like factorio on the moon? i used to be super hyped about it but i cant remember the name and i want to know what became of that shit, it was moon something i swear it was erased from my mind

>>58267010
yeah those were the good times

>>58267010
i made some friends playing pvu that i probably never be able to see again....

>>58267010
Axie infinity was the only game worth playing and ever since Pixels came on Ronin, axie kinda seems in the background. It's like they don't even try to catch up with the hype with Pixels. And idk what's the case with them too. And Axie hasn't done sh*t in the last months, except for part evo, which led to nothing so far. For the first time in 3 years I'm considering to leave the network. It's lust...stuck. They have to blow up with something real big to make people stay and play. And I'm talking about axie as a game, not the Network. I just hope their big ego doesn't drag them to the bottom along with the token.

>>58267401
None of these games where ever fun to begin with, people just played them bcs they wanted to make money dont delude yourself

>>58267083
>Kino orb mentioned
im already thinking of going full blaze

>>58267408
hey i enjoyed them... for a time

>>58267083
trantorian? you mean that one right?

>>58267408
>biz was actually pro nftgaming four years ago
>now they wouldnt be caught defending them
>most of them probably still play them in the hopes of making a bit of money back
hypocrites

also dont forget illuvium

>>58267010
Sorry pal that time has passed, best i can do is offer you a derivative of doge on SOL kek

yes, I too miss the early days of boundless enthusiasm and experimentation. sadly we've discovered that crypto games simply do not work. p2e is critically vulnerable to bots. filtering bots is extremely difficult and makes gameplay validation centralized, which defeats the web3 aspect of the game.

>>58267010
forget about gamefi, todays shit is making your own coinz, you now can and as quick as it can be, 1intro makes this possible and other do to but fail bluntly

>>58267010
NFT era is gone anon, now is the era of memecoins, L1s and Oracles. One project that service them all is Supra. Use this info as you want

Nearly all of them were massive failures and any "crypto gaming" project seems like a straight up scam where you have a shitty game with crypto barely attached to it, but I don't see a future where gaming and crypto won't converge at least to some degree.

All the gaming skins, microtransactions, points, rewards, it just seems so incredibly obvious that blockchain will get involved in some way at some point. Even just on a basic degen gambling level, there are asians dropping near six figures on whatever rare gaming weapon skins just to flex on others basically the same as NFT traders, all very similar elements and activities.
I have no clue though when or where will any of this happen, certainly not with retarded shitty blockchain games.

>>58267010
getting raped is the best you'll get out here

>>58268775
>All the gaming skins, microtransactions, points, rewards, it just seems so incredibly obvious that blockchain will get involved in some way at some point.
The question is why. The game developer is the sole issuer of skins, points, and rewards. The developer is also the sole manager of the server that prevents people from cheating to get points and rewards they shouldn't have. It's way easier to keep things internal to that system, instead of using a blockchain, and there is way less margin for error. The narrative about "ownership" is silly because at any time the developer can dilute you or print new and better assets, and in fact they should, to balance the game or make it more interesting. Trying to force web3 into games really just makes them worse and harder to work with, for no benefit

>>58268840
Yes I fully agree, not to mention that basically no one gives a shit about decentralization or if their weapon skin is "in their own private wallet", they just want to open their in-game inventory and see it there simple as.

But still I believe it will seem incredibly obvious in the future that blockchain will get involved with gaming in some way. How I don't have a clue, x125 leverage trading CSGO skins who knows, gaming companies certainly won't implement shit until it's fully regulated and if it can allow them to make even more money that's for sure.

>>58268999
Crypto will have a place when transacting on a game platform, just like every other retailer and point of sale operation will plug into blockchains for payment. What has no future is the gating of gameplay mechanics through the blockchain, which has been the focus of every "blockchain game" for the past few years despite extremely strong objective evidence that it does not work financially or mechanically. Unfortunately the grift is still alive and well. There is an active proposal on Arbitrum asking for hundreds of millions of dollars to fund "web3 gaming". It wouldn't be used to fuel shitty game economies, by the way, no it's even worse - you have trash companies that are completely in the hole financially begging Arbitrum DAO for money that will be funneled straight into their own pockets for "development", despite having already failed to make any working games after many years and millions of dollars wasted