/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58180148
>Community raises the money
>It's a secret guys

>>58180182
It was made clear before the raise that the name couldn't be revealed until the raise was done and the technical integration completed. Pretty standard stuff - but fine, miss the boat.

>rumours say kucoin or kraken
Stop spreading the rumours then.

>>58180748
If I put rumors in all caps would you feel better about it?

>>58180148
Shill me this koin anon. Why this?

>>58180915
Also sui/make it stack?

>>58180148
Get back here OP you fucking faggot

>>58180148
Gotta do a better job at shilling this esp if you’re from the Koinos kucksquad. What exchange can I buy this? Rather gamble on this than meme tokens that have rugs every few minutes . More legit blockchains can hit low billion caps over time much better than everyone believing meme tokens get you rich. I gotta see more low MC blockchain shill threads

>>58181186
It’s on MEXC looks like. Checked out their GitHub and it looks legit.

>>58181207
Do you know any other exchanges that have it listed? Not confident with MEXC

>>58181100
Haha sorry mate. Okay here's the spoon feed:

>Team behind steemit (before it became shit)
>No gas fees. Not low; none.
>WASM support (means they can support any language for development not just shitty solidity)
>Governance on chain (never going to be a hardfork like BTC)

Sui/Make it - I've been in it pre launch when it was a PoW mined ERC20 and I am not selling until its a billion mcap. Do with that what you will.

>>58181702
MEXC isn't ideal but meh, it has an 8/10 trust score on Coingecko. I've bought and withdrawn there before with no issues - just maybe wouldn't keep a hot wallet there. Could wait for the new exchange listing; but will likely pump a lot before then - especially when they market the listing.

>>58180148
>next Kaspa
Next jewish shit coin that fizzles out instead of mooning whiel every other crypto is?

>>58185027
If Koinos hit Kaspa's mcap it'd be a nearly an 80x return. Point stands. Low cap L1 plays are a way better bet than 99.99% of the shit on this board.

>>58184003
MEXC doesnt work in the US when I try it. Have you tried the other two sites that come up, Coinstore or chainge? Not getting much good results. You right about low cap L1, look at kaspa being almost 4 bill MC and even dead Algorand at 2.7 bill MC. The money to be made is in the upcoming low cap L1 stuff. This is the biz we need

>>58186402
fukin nothing works in the jewnited states
youre all cucked over there

>>58186402
Have you tried changing your DNS?

>>58186402
Gotta use a VPN for MEXC (if in the US) and chainge has shit liquidity. That's why the CEX raise happened. I think you can withdraw from MEXC without KYC even in the US (but don't quote me on that). Either that or wait a few weeks for the alternative but more than likely be a worse entry.

>>58180148
>3 year old project
>2 shit listings.

Should tell you enough.

>>58180148
>Koinos

How does it compare to Kaspa?

How do I mine Koinos, and how much Koinos is in circulattion relative to max supply?

How much nodes does the network have?

>>58182838
>No gas fees
So another nano? Lol lmao

>>58189864
The all time high was like 4 months ago and slowly building up listings and tech is a given for an actually community owned project. Most of the motherfuckers on this board would rather take long shots on a 2-month old dog coin than an actually experienced team that has been diligently working on something innovative for years.

I will be 500 Koinos today as a sui stack because the Icon is similiar to Link

>>58180148

All new coins are the next one... and all scks
Play GRAVITY is something new...

>>58191312

Based

>>58191211
Sure? Except nano provides no incentive to secure the network beyond it being in the "interest" of businesses and apps to run nodes and participate in consensus. Koinos has no fees and actual financial rewards for participation in consensus through a unique Proof of Burn mechanism (supported by 2% annual inflation). Also that is just one USP of the project. Its got like 12 USPs that each easily could have justified spinning up a new chain on their own.

>>58192106
Sounds like a whole lot of cope for another chain that will be spammed to death

>>58193462
Nope, its spam resistant. You need to hold KOIN to be attributed network resources and it has a mana system (your ability to send transactions will deplete but recharges over time). The real trick is that you can delegate your mana to accounts that don't hold KOIN. So if you're a big app, you don't have to get your users to buy tokens to leverage your use case. Trust me bro, it ain't cope.

>>58193546
>Nope, its spam resistant.
That's what nano claims too. Doesn't stop it from being spammed.

>>58193597
I don't think you're really listening to what I'm saying, but I suppose it is easier to just say "but nano...".

Koinos prevents spam more effectively than Nano. While Nano uses a small PoW for spam resistance, attackers can overcome it without significant investment; Koinos's proof-of-burn mechanism disincentivizes spam by requiring attackers to irreversibly spend resources (burn tokens) to conduct attacks, making spam far less economically feasible. Additionally, the Mana system allows for dynamic pricing of network resources without actual fees, further complicating spam attacks by adding an opportunity cost. These mechanisms offer a multi-layered defence against spam that adapts to network conditions.

>>58180148
kaspa? since that project went to shit I had read absolutely nothing about them. Fortunately I realized I was going to lose all my money and managed to get out in time. I recovered what I lost doing daytrade based on truflation and right now I am concentrating on my XRP.

>>58195528
XRP will probably get you some healthy gains this run. But I'd at the very least get a sui of KOIN.