/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57742829
Why?

>>57742829
Why?

What sucks about game tokens is that every single crypto game sucks major ass. Every game token is just made with moonboys in mind and shilling to moon boys and the actual gaming aspect is secondary. We need a crypto game that is AAA studio quality. Something that will be actual playable by normies like league, COD, fortnite, etc. When that day comes the crypto backing that games ecosystem will make multi millionares.

>>57742926
white paper says it can support Unreal engine and Unity games, so it potentially could be more than dogshit arcade games

When CEX?

>>57742926

Good thing this is crypto steam so eventually some dev will make a good game on it and shill the shit out of it.

>>57743054
this is what I was thinking, devs could list their game on both Steam and Aviator with minimal extra effort right? Big thing will be incentivizing them to do it, the team has connections to Coinbase but do they have any connections or history in the gaming industry?

>>57743070

They would need to use Unity or Unreal to compile the game to WebGL at first, but yeah.

I don't know about game connections, but they have a lot of indie devs involved via game jams and sponsorships.

>>57742987
>>57743054
Nothing of your delusions are gonna happen. enjoy the ride as long as it lasts, after this bullrun this shitcoin will be gone like all the other useless game tokens.
>but it can support
>someone will make something out of it
Avi devs won't give a shit about this token's future after they made enough out of it.

people remember being broke in elementary school and playing web games
kids now will just install Fortnite and Overwatch 2 for free
Poppy's Playtime got shit for NFTs, gamers hate AI art in their games, indie dev era is pretty much dead

you should pivot to the Skybridge tech talk

WHERE IS THAT FUCKING NINTENDO LETTER FAGGOT HAHAHAHAH

Nintendo will deal with you retards. I should have made it, I asked you to dump the price nicely and now this is what you get. Your price will go fucking nowhere unless I or Furukawa say so

>>57743649
Come and take it, faggot.

Explain like I'm a retard:
When AVI bridges to base, what exactly happens to the ERC-20 coins currently possessed? Will they be "wrapped AVI" with the avi on base being "real AVI" if I have a wallet full of ERC-20 AVI and dissappear from the internet for a year, when I come back will it still be there and be the same price as AVI on base?
I know this sounds stupid, just asking

>>57742926
The team can’t control the quality of the games being built. The most they can do is to attract AAA devs to build on their platform which is something they’re already trying to do and capitalize on. Web3 gaming, although shitty in its current state, is still a hot narrative with a lot of people grouping it along side AI for this run.

At the end of the day, this is about whether this will make me money or not. If the games are good, I’ll play along with it. If not, idgaf either way as long as this sends like any of the other gaming projects have done. The team seems more than competent enough to make that happen

>>57743675
There will be no wrapped tokens, whether avi or any of the other tokens you bridge. Nothing changes except that it’s now on the base chain. At least that’s how I understood it from the amas

When is the next leg up

>>57743157
web3 game projects perform surprisingly well in this market, and this is the best idea for a web3 gaming project ive seen yet.
i agree that the average gamer thinks web3 gaming shit is retarded, but clearly the audience for it DOES exist
thinking aviator arcade wont do well seems to be entirely rooted in the belief that web3 gaming, in general, wont do well- which is demonstrably false.
but i also agree that, at least for now, skybridge is the most exciting part since itll be incredibly useful for basechain and will be somewhat of a display of what the team is capable of pulling off

>>57743677
the team decides what gets on the arcade and what doesnt

>>57743776
From a ToS standpoint, yes, but they aren’t dictating who can build what. They themselves said that they don’t want to step in the way of game devs, and what determines whether a game is good or bad will be the gamers themselves plus the incentives, or lack thereof. This will encourage devs to build quality games.

>>57743837
fair, but if a game is obvious disgustingly loq quality they'd reject it

>>57743649

>>57743677
The model doesn't make sense. If a decent game is built which has link to tokenomics, why the hell would they link to your bags instead of doing their own token on a cheap transaction blockchain where they can extract the most value out of the token while also ensuring the token doesn't die because its out of their control and held by a bunch of random whales?

>>57743967
because then they'd have to pay their own hosting fees and do their own solidity coding instead of using an API and existing platform and codebase

>>57743967
its free, easy, and the platform will already be there.
would you rather upload your game to a popular game site for free, or self-host and advertise yourself and likely end up with less exposure anyways?

>>57743967
>why host on steam when you can host your own game service

i lol'd

>>57744009
this. nobody is going to want to pay for hosting, set up their own site, monitor their own security, protect their own assets and player assets, make their own social system and marketplace, make their own api, get an audit for their own code

it's a development platform

>>57744009
That said, if you're making micro games on itch there's not a whole lot stopping you or reason not to throw them on AVI and charge a few tokens.

>>57743999
The things you just listed are not worth abdicating your game's tokenomics backend to some third party token and their bagholders.

>>57744090
youhave no understanding of business, a game dev team is not going to setup a whole new token, website, marketing for one game, thigns like STEAM exist for a reason

>>57744042
Steam is a massively used platformed bankrolled by Valve, that's why.

>>57744118
ok, what about websites like miniclip, armorgames, itch.io?

Reminder report this scam to nintendo and steam for patent and copyright infringement