/biz/ - Business & Finance

stinky linkies have been my best performing asset by far

>>57045950
you hold LINK too you retard

>>57046017
it's true

isnt a utility token capped inherently because you need a smaller amount of them to do what you need them to do

meanwhile other tokens are designed to just be produced forever

>>57045950
i made a poor financial decision investing in this token

>>57046034
>isnt a utility token capped inherently because you need a smaller amount of them to do what you need them to do
Is that why it went from 15 cents to 15 dollars you absolute fucking retard?

>>57046780
no but it is why i dogged your mom sped

>>57045983
>Dec 20, 2023 w/ $100,000 invested on Dec 20, 2020
LINK: $109,332.79
ETH: $333,676.26
BTC: $224,295.18
SOL: $4,980,219
BNB: $755,829
AVAX: $1,435,254
MATIC: $4,105,262
DOGE: $2,368,421
TRX: $333,333
ADA: $368,750

Then you are a retard

i made a poor financial decision investing in this token

>>57045950
I bought this token at 0.70€

>>57045950
I am very close to selling my stack of LINK and just buying SOL or INJ. Seriously, this is getting ridiculous.

>>57045950
>>57047031
so how's your sex life?

made a poor financial decision investing in this token
>got back into crypto in September
>listened to linkbaggies and got a 5k stack of shitlink
>got a 2x, cool
>now stuck at 14 for 2 months
>avax has gone from 17 to 48 in that time
>sol has gone from 25 to 90 in that time
Suffering. The worst part is that this useless coin is only able to pump when bitcoin does. But it never catches up to the % that btc pumps. Last time btc was 44k link was 17, now it’s 44 and 14…

As someone who bought at 5 and holds at 15 thousand dollars, I'm sitting pretty. Same with avax.

LPL insider here... official. won't dox myself frens but let me give you a warning...

you dont own enough LPL.

you have less than two more weeks remaining. god speed anons and may the best chuddie kiddo win.

good god I am excited for you crazy kiddos

LPL

pools closed

Daily reminder that DTCC and Euroclear process dollar values literally in the quadrillion and Chainlink will soon be at the heart of that. Paid fud should therefore come as no surprise. Understand what you're holding and why these assholes don't want you holding it.

>>57048470
so... which nodes will the dtcc and euroclear use to process quadrillion dollar amounts anon...?

that moment of realization when the no lpl pooler begins to figure it all out - connect the pieces in his mind - but aww shucks it was all for nothing anon coz tge pool is closed and you simply do not own enough LPL

good god i am excited for you crazy kiddos

pools closed.

few.

holy fuck I am APING into LPL someone sell me their stack RIITE NAOOOO

>>57048462
>>57048490
I own a large stack of both Link and LPL, I'm also very, very gay.
Any gay Linkies??

I made a poor financial decision investing in this token
Worst performing piece of shit that will make me miss out on two fucking bullruns
Close to selling my stack and aping into AVAX since it actually pumps

>>57048470
And the market cap of those clearing houses is tiny

>>57048470
>>57050208
I'll add that it is never explained how or why chainlink would see any piece of that revenue, it's always been vaguely advertised as "oh imagine if we captured JUST [some asspulled percentage] of this activity, just imagine what this would mean". Sorry, what exactly are you expecting, a percentage of every trade? That's not how any of this shit works. There's also no clear reason to use staking to "secure" any of this

>>57047031
so your saying I didn’t lose money, sweet

>>57050208
>>57050260
Chainlink isn't about replacing clearing houses, it's about becoming part of the infrastructure clearing houses, banks, etc. use.

What you're asking is basically "how will cars capture a piece of transportation companies' revenue?".
Transportation companies will continue to exist, they'll just use cars instead of horses.

>>57050477
I'm not asking for yet another analogy or vague metaphor, I'm asking how you sincerely envision Chainlink actually monetizing their "holy grail product" and how this would feed into staking

>>57050493
If you don't know how Chainlink will monetize usage by DTCC, you don't know how Chainlink will monetize any usage.

>>57045950
debating selling 50 link either Friday or next week. Feel like treating myself tbqh

>>57050514
I don't think Chainlink Labs themselves know how they will monetize usage

>>57050535
The only way CLL itself monetizes usage, is by running nodes themselves.

>>57050559
right, they don't have a plan and they don't know where this is going, they just dump tokens

>>57047031
Hi Uncle.

>>57050578
>Chainlink labs should extract value from network use
You mean like the EVM mafia?
Retard.

>>57050628
I am specifically responding to this marketing copy here >>57048470

>>57050643
And I’m specifically responding to your bullshit about Chainlink labs needing to extract value from usage.

>>57050578
How would CLL monetize the network for themselves, anon?

>>57050660
>I'm specifically imagining a grievance that never existed in this dialogue
okay

>>57050667
I don't know, and as I said, I don't think they do either

>>57050678
You said Chainlink not monetizing usage means they don’t have a plan outside of dumping tokens.

>>57050708
They definitely know. You can't monetize a decentralized protocol, outside of becoming a participant (node).

>>57050711
nodes HAVE TO sell tokens to pay gas costs, this is a simple fact. if, as that anon asserted, CLabs is running nodes, then it follows they must dump tokens. and if they have no plan or understanding of how to make the network profitable, then dumping tokens is all they can do

>>57050730
>nodes have to sell tokens
>that means the network is not profitable

Tell me Link is your first crypto without telling me Link is your first crypto

>>57050730
How can you know so little, yet seem so confident?
Teach me your ways.

>>57050493
>another analogy or vague metaphor

congrats on waking up. Better late than never. These are the only tool they have at this point. The advocates (fishy and clg) have verbatim admitted at current, there is no function for returning value back to the token.

>>57050994
>there is no function for returning value back to the token
How does Bitcoin do this again? I forgot.

>>57045950
i made a poor financial decision investing in this token
pretty easy, if you think I'll squirm then you have no clue how deep our despair has been for the last few years and how it has made us immune to feelings

>>57050979
>>57051010
sup Zach, you passive aggressive feminine faggot

>>57045950
i made a poor financial decision investing in this token because i didn't buy enough of it

>>57051075
Is it your fantasy to argue with this Zach guy?

>>57051144
>fantasy
it's an unfortunate reality
>this Zach guy
kek, good one Zachary

>>57050535
>>57050708
How does the Ethereum Enterprise Alliance monetize usage? Right, they don't. They have been coasting off of their ETH allocation to fund core devs and R&D, just like Chainlink Labs. Why is it bad when Chainlink does it?

>>57045950
Glad I dumped LINK for the upcoming oracles like DIA and SUPRA.

>>57048383
What's stopping you from selling it for Floki RAIL and BONK?

>>57047073
You need a passive income to get your ass back gayman

>>57051684
I might be a stinky but I am not a total retard.

>>57051730
I slurp OGBX and earn passive income from staking, exclusive NFTs, community rewards, and exciting in-game advantages. Get on board anon.

>>57047031
>$100,000 invested on Dec 20
But I invested in September 2017. Can you provide number from that date?

>>57050260
>it is never explained how or why chainlink would see any piece of that revenue
Have you tried reading the whitepaper?

>>57047031
now do that number from jan 2019

>>57047031
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>57051010
dude for the 10,000th time, just because you make an altcoin, it isn't going to become bitcoin or be treated anything like bitcoin from an investment standpoint. Do you seriously not understand that?

>>57045950
How can we all be so wrong about this project? It felt so right a few years ago but now it’s so over

>>57053714
just buy LPL and relax kiddo

>>57051230
Both are shit investments now. Go figure that.

>>57045950
this piece of shit has ruined me, cant even sell

>>57055835
>Chainloik bad because ETH bad
It's still the # 2 crypto in this space. Not the argument you would like it to be.

Just droppin this here lol
https://crypto.news/analyst-predicts-shocking-gains-for-chainlink-in-2024/